, 50:909 | Cite as

Materials and techniques for coiling of cerebral aneurysms: how much scientific evidence do we have?

  • W. KurreEmail author
  • J. Berkefeld
Invited Review



Since coils were approved for aneurysm treatment, materials and techniques developed rapidly. It still remains an open question whether one material or method is superior. This article reviews the literature on various coil types and treatment approaches assessing the scientific evidence of its use.

Materials and methods

Studies on aneurysm treatment with Guglielmi detachable platinum coils, bioactive coils, hydrogel coated coils, and complex designs as well as balloon- and stent-assisted techniques were retrieved by a PubMed database search from 1990 until May 2008. Data were analyzed in terms of aneurysm occlusion, permanent morbidity and mortality, recanalization, and retreatment. We also assessed the level of evidence of the published studies.


Only the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial provides level I evidence proving the superiority of endovascular over surgical therapy in ruptured aneurysms. Randomized trials comparing bioactive or hydrogel coated devices with bare coils are ongoing. Other studies were based on registries or case series mainly conducted without control groups. Morbidity, mortality, and initial occlusion rates appear similar for all devices. No clear evidence exists for the superiority of bioactive- or hydrocoils regarding long-term stability. It remains ambiguous whether morbidity and mortality rises with the use of balloons and stents. There is no evidence that routine use of balloons improves treatment durability. Mid-term results of stent-assisted coiling of complex aneurysms appear favorable.


There is a lack of studies with a high level of evidence comparing different coiling materials and techniques. Case series and registries were not able to prove the superiority of any device or method.


Endovascular aneurysm therapy Aneurysm coiling Scientific evidence 



  1. 1.
    Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, Dion J, Lylyk P, Berenstein A, Strother C, Graves V, Halbach V Nichols D et al (1992) Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms by electrothrombosis using electrically detachable coils. J Neurosurg 77(4):515–524PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bob Phillips, Chris Ball, Dave Sackett, Doug Badenoch, Sharon Straus, Brian Haynes, Martin Dawes (2001) Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence 1025
  3. 3.
    International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group (2002) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:1267–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yu LM, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Sandercock P (2005) International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366:809–817PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, Summers PE, Kerr RSC, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Rischmiller J, Byrne JV (2007) Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT). Stroke 38:1538–1544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJE, van der Graaf Y, van Rooij WJJ, Algra A (1999) Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by emolization with coil: a systematic review. Stroke 30(2):470–476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, Rey A, Moret J (1998) Intracranial berry aneurysms: angiographic and clinical results after endovascular treatment. Radiology 206:499–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Debrun GM, Aletich VA, Kehrli P, Misra M, Ausmann JI, Charbel F (1998) Selection of cerebral aneurysms for treatment using guglielmi detachable coils: the preliminary University of Illinois at Chicago experience. Neurosurgery 43(6):1281–1295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ng P, Khangure MS, Phatouros CC, Bynevelt M, ApSimon H, McAuliffe W (2002) Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with guglielmi detachable coils analysis of midterm angiographic and clinical outcomes. Stroke 33(1):210–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, Gobin YP, Jahan R, Frazee J, Martin N, Vinuela F (2003) Guglielmi Detachable Coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years’ experience. J Neurosurg 98:959–966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gallas S, Pasco A, Cottier JP, Gabrillargues J, Drouineau, Cognard C, Herbreteau D (2005) A multicenter study of 705 ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with guglielmi detachable coils. Am J Neuroradiol 26:1723–1731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bonafé A, Picot MC, Jean B, Bourbotte G, Seris C, Margarot M, Khoury K, Coubes P, Segnarbieux F (2005) Acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with GDC coils. Results from a single center over a period of 5 years. Neurochirurgia 51(3–4):155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bradac GB, Bergui M, Stura G, Fontanella M, Daniele D, Gozzoli L, Berardino M, Ducati A (2007) Periprocedural morbidity and mortality by endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms with GDC: a retrospective 12-year experience of a single center. Neurosurg Rev 30:117–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Byrne JV, Sohn MJ, Molyneux AJ (1999) Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. J Neurosurg 90:656–663PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cognard C, Weill A, Spelle L, Piotin M, Castaings L, Rey A, Moret J (1999) Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 212:348–356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thornton J, Debrun GM, Aletich VA, Bashir Q, Charbel FT, Ausman J (2002) Follow-up angiography of intracranical aneurysms treated with endovascular placement of guglielmi detachable coils. Neurosurgery 50(2):239–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, Georganos SA, Juravsky L, Lambert A, Lamoureux J, Chagnon M, Roy D (2003) Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 34(12):1398–1403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li MH, Gao BL, Fang C, Gu BX, Cheng YS, Wang W, Scotti G (2006) Angiographic Follow-Up of Cerebral Aneurysms treated with guglielmi detachable coils: an analysis of 162 cases with 173 aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 27:1107–1112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lanterna LA, Tredici G, Dimitrov BD, Biroli F (2004) Treatment of unrupted cerebral aneurysms by embolization with guglielmi detachable coils: case-fatality, morbidity, and effectiveness in preventing bleeding—a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurgery 55:767–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murayama Y, Vinuela F, Duckwiler GR, Gobin YP, Guglielmi G (1999) Embolization of incidental cerebral aneurysms by using the Guglielmi detachable coil system. J Neurosurg 90:207–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gonzalez N, Murayama Y, Nien YL, Martin N, Frazee J, Duckwiler G, Jahan R, Gobin YP, Vinuela F (2004) Treatment of unrupted aneurysms with gdcs: clinical experience with 247 aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 25:577–583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Standhardt H, Boecher-Schwarz H, Gruber A, Benesch T, Knosp E, Bavinzski G (2008) Endovascular treatment of unrupted intracranial aneurysms with guglielmi detachable coils—short- and long-term results of a single-centre series. Stroke 39:899–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gallas S, Drouineau J, Gabrillargues J, Pasco A, Cognard C, Pierot L, Herbreteau D (2008) Feasibility, Procedural morbidity and mortality, and long-term follow-up of endovascular treatment of 321 unrupted aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 29:63–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chang HS (2006) Simulation of the natural history of cerebral aneurysms based on data from the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. J Neurosurg 104:188–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Trial on Endovascular Aneurysm Management, International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN 62758344
  26. 26.
    Murayama Y, Tateshima S, Gonzalez NR, Vinuela F (2003) Matrix and bioabsorbable polymeric coils accelerate healing of intracranial aneurysms: long-term experimental study. Stroke 34(8):2031–2037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Matrix Newsletter 2/2004 Boston ScientificGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ (2005) Questionable interpretation of results of ACTIVE study on matrix coils by Boston Scientific. Am J Neuroradiol 26:1882–1883PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moret J, Vinuela F (2005) Reply to the letter by Sluzewki and van Rooij. Am J Neuroradiol 26(9):2163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ (2005) Reply to letter regarding interpretation of results of ACTIVE study. Am J Neuroradiol 26:2436–2437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rossitti S (2007) Endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms using bioactive coils: a single-center study. Acta Radiologica 48(5):565–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Deng J, Zhao Z, Gao G (2007) Periprocedural complications associated with endovascular embolisation of intracranial ruptured aneurysms with matrix coils. Singapore Med J 48(5):429–433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mitra D, Herwadkar A, Soh C, Gholkar A (2007) Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with matrix detachable coils: a single-center experience. Am J Neuroradiol 28:362–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rivet DJ, Moran CJ, Mazumdar A, Pilgram TK, Derdeyn CP, Cross DT (2007) Single-institution experience with matrix coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with same-center outcomes with the use of platinum coils. Am J Neuroradiol 28:1736–1742PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pierot L, Bonafé A, Bracard S, Leclerc X (2006) Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with matrix detachble coils: immediate posttreatment results from a prospective multicenter registry. Am J Neuroradiol 27:1693–1699PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pierot L, Leclerc X, Bonafé A, Bracard S (2008) Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with matrix detachable coils: midterm anatomic follow-up from a prospective multicenter registry. Am J Neuroradiol 29(1):57–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Katsaridis V, Papagiannaki C, Violaris C (2006) Guglielmi detachable coils versus matrix coils: a comparison of the immediate posttreatment results of the embolization of 364 cerebral aneurysms in 307 patients: a single-center, single-surgeon experience. Am J Neuroradiol 27(9):1841–1848PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Niimi Y, Song J, Madrid M, Berenstein A (2006) Endosaccular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using matrix coils—early experience and midterm follow-up. Stroke 37:1028–1032PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wong GKC, Yu SCH, Poon WS (2007) Aneurysm-embolization—clinical and angiographic outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with Matrix detachable coils in Chinese patients. Surg Neurol 67:122–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Murayama Y, Vinuela F, Ishii A, Nien YL, Yuki I, Duckwiler G, Jahan R (2006) Initial clinical experience with matrix detachable coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 105(2):192–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Linfante I, Akkawi NM, Perlow A, Andreone V, Wakhloo AK (2005) Polyglycolide/polylactide-coated platinum coils for patients with ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms—a single-center experience. Stroke 36:1948–1953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Taschner CA, Leclerc X, Rachdi H, Barros AM, Pruvo JP (2005) Matrix detachable coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms—analysis of early angiographic and clinical outcomes. Stroke 36:2176–2180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kang HS, Han MH, Kwon BJ, Kwon OK, Kim SH, Choi SH, Chang KH (2005) Short-term outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with polyglycolic acid/lactide copolymer-coated coils compared to historical controls treated with bare platinum coils: a single-center experience. Am J Neuroradiol 26:1921–1928PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG (2006) Durability of aneurysm embolization with matrix detachable coils. Neurosurgery 58(1):51–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    MAPS Trial: Matrix and Platinum Science— Identifier NCT00396981
  46. 46.
    Veznedaroblu E, Koebbe CJ, Siddiqui A, Rosenwasser RH (2008) Initial experience with bioactive cerecyte detachable coils: impact on reducing recurrence rates. Neurosurgery 62(4):799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Geyik S, Yavuz K, Ergun O, Koc O, Cekirge S, Saatci I (2008) Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with bioactive cerecyte coils: effects on treatment stability. Neuroradiology (in press) doi: 10.1007/s00234-008-0399-1
  48. 48.
    Butteriss D, Gholkar A, Mitra D, Birchall D, Jayakrishnan V (2008) Single-center experience of cerecyte coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: initial experience and early follow-up results. Am J Neuroradiol 29(1):53–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bendszus M, Bartsch AJ, Solymosi L (2007) Endovascular occlusion of aneurysms using a new bioactive coil—a matched pair analysis with bare platinum coils. Stroke 38:2855–2857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cerecyte Coil Trial
  51. 51.
    van Rooij WJ, de Gast AN, Sluzewski M (2008) Results of 101 aneurysms treated with polyglycolic/polilactic acid microfilament nexus coils compared with historical controls treated with standard coils. Am J Neuroradiol 29(5):991–996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    White PM, Lewis SC, Nahser H, Sellar RJ, Goddard T, Gholkar A (2008) Hydrocoil endovascular aneurysm occlusion and packing study (helps trial): procedural safety and operator-assessed efficacy results. Am J Neuroradiol 29(2):217–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kang HS, Han MH, Lee TH, Shin YS, Roh HG, Kwon OK, Kwon BJ, Kim SY, Kim SH, Byun HS (2007) Embolization of intracranial aneurysms with hydrogel-coated coils: result of a korean multicenter trial. Neurosurgery 61(1):51–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Deshaies EM, Adamo MA, Boulos AS (2007) A prospective single-center analysis of the safety and efficacy of the HydroCoil embolization system for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 106:226–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Berenstein A, Song JK, Niimi Y, Namba K, Heran NS, Brisman JL, Nahoum MC, Madrid M, Langer DJ, Kupersmith MJ (2006) Treatment of cerebral aneurysms with hydrogel-coated platinum coils (hydrocoil): early single-center experience. Am J Neuroradiol 27(9):1834–1840PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stracke CP, Krings T, Möller-Hartmann W, Mahdavi A, Klug N (2007) Severe inflammatory reaction of the optic system after endovascular treatment of a supraophthalmic aneurysm with bioactive coils. Am J Neuroradiol 28:1401–1402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Marden FA, Putman CM (2007) Aneurysm—perianeurysm edema with second-generation bioactive coils. Surgical Neurology 69(6):627–632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    White JB, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF (2008) But did you use hydrocoil? perianeurysmal edema and hydrocephalus with bare platinum coils. Am J Neuroradiol 29(2):299–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Cloft HJ (2006) HydroCoil for endovascular aneurysm occlusion (heal) study: periprocedural results. Am J Neuroradiol 27:289–292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Cloft HJ (2007) HydroCoil for endovascular aneurysm occlusion (heal) study: 3–6 month angiographic follow-up results. Am J Neuroradiol 28(2):152–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Geyik S, Yavuz K, Cekirge S, Saatci I (2007) Endovascular treatment of basilar and ICA termination aneurysms: effects of the use of HydroCoils on treatment stability in a subgroup of patients prone to a higher recurrence rate. Neuroradiology 49:1015–1021PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gaba RC, Ansari SA, Roy SS, Marden FA, Viana MAG, Malisch TW (2006) Embolization of intracranial aneurysms with hydrogel-coated coils versus inert platinum coils—effects on packing density, coil length and quantity, procedure performance, cost, length of hospital stay, and durability of therapy. Stroke 37(6):1443–1450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Fanning NF, Berentei Z, Brennan PR, Thornton J (2007) HydroCoil as an adjuvant to bare platinum coil treatment of 100 cerebral aneurysms. Neuroradiology 49:139–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hirsch JA, Bendok BR, Paulsen RD, Cognard C, Campos J, Cronqvist M (2007) Midterm clinical experience with a complex-shaped detachable platinum coil system for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: trufill dcs orbit detachable coil system registry interim results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:1487–1494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wakhloo AK, Gounis MJ, Sandhu JS, Akkawi N, Schenck AE, Linfante I (2007) Comlpex-shaped platinum coils for brain aneurysms: higher packing density, improved biomechanical stability, and midterm angiographic outcome. Am J Neuroradiol 28:1395–1400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ (2007) Packing performance of helical Guglielmi Detachable Coil (GDC) 18 in intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with helical GDC 10 coils and complex trufill/orbit coils. Am J Neuroradiol 28:1384–1387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Slob MJ, van Rooij WJ Sluzewski M (2005) Influence of coil thickness on packing, re-opening and retreatment of intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study between two types of coils. Neurol Res 27(1):116–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Taschner CA, Leclerc X, Gauvrit JY, Kerkeni A, El-Mahdy M, Lejeune JP, Pruvo JP (2007) Saftey of endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with a new, complex shaped Guglielmi detachable coil. Neuroradiology 49:761–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M (2007) Packing Performance of GDC 360° Coils in intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with complex orbit coils and helical GDC 10 coils. Am J Neuroradiol 28:368–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Piotin M, Spelle L, Mounayer C, Salles-Rezende MT, Giansante-Abud D, Vanzin-Santos R, Moret J (2007) Intracranial aneurysms: treatment with bare platinum coils—aneurysm packing, complex coils, and angiographic recurrence. Radiology 243(2):500–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Moret J, Pierot L, Boulin A, Castaings L (1994) Remodeling“of the aterial wall of the parent vessel in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology 36(S1):S83Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Moret J, Cognard C, Weill A, Castaigs L, Rey A (1997) Reconstruction technique in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. long term angiographic and clinical results. Apropos of 56 cases. J Neuroradiol 24:30–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Layton KF, Cloft HJ, Gray LA, Lewis DA, Kallmes DF (2007) Balloon-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation of local thrombus formation and symptomatic thromboembolic complications. Am J Neuroradiol 28:1172–1175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Soeda A, Sakai N, Sakai H, Iihara K, Yamada N, Imakita S, Nagata I (2003) Thromboembolic events associated with guglielmi detachable coil embolization of asymptomatic cerebral aneurysms: evaluation of 66 consecutive cases with use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 24:127–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Albayram S, Selcuk H, Kara B, Bozdag E, Uzma O, Kocer N, Islak C (2004) Thromboembolic events associated with balloon-assisted coil embolization: evaluation with diffusion-weighted mr imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 25:1768–1777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Beute GN, Nijssen PC (2006) Procedural complications of coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: incidence and risk factors in a consecutive series of 681 patients. Am J Neuroradiol 27:1498–501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Beuts GN, Nijssen PC (2006) Balloon-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: incidence, complications, and angiography results. J Neurosurg 105(3):396–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ross IB, Dhillon GS (2006) Balloon assistance as a routine adjunct to the endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Surgical Neurology 66:593–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Cekirge S, Saatci I (2005) Advanced reconstructive endovascular techniques for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Neurol Res 27(S1):S108–S115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lubicz B, Leclerc X, Gauvrit JY, Lejeune JP, Pruvo JP (2004) HyperForm remodeling-balloon for endovascular treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 25:1381–1383PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Henkes H, Fischer S, Weber W, Miloslavski E, Felber S, Brew S, Kuehne D (2004) Endovascular coil occlusion of 1811 intracranial aneurysms: early angiographic and clinical results. Neurosurgery 54(2):268–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Nelson PK, Levy DI (2001) Balloon-assisted coil embolization of wide-neckes aneurysms of the internal carotid artery: medium-term angiographic and clinical follow-up in 22 Patients. Am J Neuroradiol 22:19–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Cottier JP, Pasco A, Gallas S, Gabrillargues J, Cognard C, Drouineau J, Brunereau L, Herbreteau D (2001) Utility of balloon-assisted gugliemi detachable coiling in the treatment of 49 cerebral aneurysms: a retrospective multicenter study. Am J Neuroradiol 22:334–351Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Aletich VA, Debrun GM, Misra M, Charbel F, Ausman JI (2000) The remodeling technique of balloon-assisted guglielmi detachable coil placement in wide-necked aneurysms: experience at the University of Illinois at Chicago. J Neurosurg 93(3):388–396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Malek AM, Halbach VV, Phatouros CC, Lempert TE, Meyers PM, Dowd CF, Higashida RT (2000) Balloon-assist technique for endovascular coil embolization of geometrically difficult intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg 46(6):1397–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Lefkowitz MA, Gobin YP, Akiba Y, Duckwiler GR, Murayama Y, Guglielmi G, Martin NA, Vinuela F (1999) Balloon-assisted Guglielmi detachable coiling of wide-necked aneurysms: part ii—clinical results. Neurosurgery 45(3):531–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Lubicz B, Lefranc F, Bruneau M, Balériaux D, de Witte O (2008) Balloon-assisted coiling fo intracranial aneurysms is not associated with a higher complication rate. Neuroradiology (in press) doi: 10.1007/s00234-008-397-3
  88. 88.
    Lee JY, Kim DJ, Suh SH, Lee SK, Kim J, Kim DI (2005) Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms. Neuroradiology 47:680–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Han P, McDougall CG (2004) Preliminary experience using the neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 54(1):6–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Lylyk P, Ferrario A, Pabón B, Miranda C, Doroszuk G (2005) Buenos Aires experience with the neuroform self-expanding stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 102:235–241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Biondi A, Janardhan V, Katz JM, Salvaggio K, Riina H, Gobin PY (2007) Neuroform stent-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: strategies in stent deployment and midterm follow-up. Neurosurgery 61(3):460–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Katsaridis V, Papagiannaki C, Violaris C (2006) Embolization of acutely ruptured and unruptured wide-necked cerebral aneurysms using the neuroform2 stent without pretreatment with antiplatelets: a single center experience. Am J Neuroradiol 27:1123–1128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Akpek S, Arat A, Morsi H, Klucznick RP, Strother CM, Mawad ME (2005) Self-expandable stent-assisted coiling of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience. Am J Neuroradiol 26:1223–1231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Benitez RP, Silva MT, Klem J, Veznedaroglu E, Rosenwasser RH (2004) Endovascular occlusion of wide-necked aneurysms with a new intracranial microstent (neuroform) and detachable coils. Neurosurgery 54(6):1359–1368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Wanke I, Doerfler A, Goericke S, Gizewski ER, Sandalcioglu E, Moemken S, Stolke D, Forsting M (2005) Treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with a self-expanding stent: mid-term results. Zentralbl Neurochir 66:163–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Deshmukh VR, McDougall CG (2005) Usefulness of the neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: results at initial (3–6-Mo) follow-up. Neurosurgery 56(6):1191–1202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Woo H, Rasmussen PA, Masaryk TJ, McDougall CG (2006) Neuroform in-stent stenosis: incidence, natural history, and treatment strategies. Neurosurgery 59(1):34–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Pumar JM, Blanco M, Vázques F, Castineira JA, Guimaraens L, Garcia-Allut A (2005) Preliminary experience with Leo self-expanding stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 26:2573–2577PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Lubicz B, Leclerc X, Lvivier M, Brotchi J, Pruvo JP, Lejeune JP, Balériaux D (2006) Retractable self-expandable stent for endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: preliminary experience. Neurosurgery 58(3):451–457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Kis B, Weber W, Berlit P, Kühne D (2006) Elective treatment of saccular and broad-necked intracranial aneurysms using a closed-cell nitinol stent (LEO). Neurosurgery 58(3):443–450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Higashida RT, van Halbach V, Dowd CF, Juravsky L, Meagher S (2005) Initial clinical experience with a new self-expanding nitinol stent for the treatment of intracranial cerebral aneurysms: the cordis enterprise stent. Am J Neuroradiol 26:1751–1756PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Weber W, Bendszus M, Kis B, Boulanger T, Solymosi L, Kühne D (2007) A new self-expanding nitinol stent (Enterprise) for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: initial clinical and angiographic results in 31 aneurysms. Neuroradiology 49:555–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Peluso JPP, van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Beute GN (2008) A new self-expandable nitinol stent for the treatment of wide-neck aneurysms: initial clinical experience. Am J Neuroradiol 20(7):1405–1408Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Lubicz B, Francoise O, Levivier M, Brotch J, Baleriaux D (2008) Preliminary experience with the enterprise stent for endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: potential advantages and limiting characteristics. Neurosurgery 62(5):1063–1069Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Liebig T, Henkes H, Reinartz J, Milolavski E, Kühne D (2006) A novel self-expanding fully retrievable intracranial stent (SOLO): experience in nine procedures of stent-assisted aneurysm coil occlusion. Neuroradiology 48:471–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Yavuz K, Geyik S, Pamuk AG, Koc O, Saatci I, Cekirge HS (2007) Immediate and midterm follow-up results of using an electrodetachable, fully retrievable SOLO stent system in the endovascular coil occlusion of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 107:49–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    TOMCAT (“Tabelle zur Optimierung und Monitoring der zerebralen Aneurysmatherapie”):
  108. 108.
    Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–72PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeuroradiologyUniversity of FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations