, 50:869 | Cite as

Endovascular and surgical treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas

  • Robert H. AndresEmail author
  • Alain Barth
  • Raphael Guzman
  • Luca Remonda
  • Marwan El-Koussy
  • Rolf W. Seiler
  • Hans R. Widmer
  • Gerhard Schroth
Interventional Neuroradiology



The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) that were treated with surgery, catheter embolization, or surgery after incomplete embolization.


The study included 21 consecutive patients with SDAVFs of the thoracic, lumbar, or sacral spine who were treated in our institution from 1994 to 2007. Thirteen patients were treated with catheter embolization alone. Four patients underwent hemilaminectomy and intradural interruption of the fistula. Four patients were treated by endovascular techniques followed by surgery. The clinical outcome was assessed using the modified Aminoff–Logue scale (ALS) for myelopathy and the modified Rankin scale (MRS) for general quality of life. Patient age ranged from 44 to 77 years (mean 64.7 years).


Surgical as well as endovascular treatment resulted in a significant improvement in ALS (−62.5% and −31.4%, respectively, p < 0.05) and a tendency toward improved MRS (−50% and −32%, respectively) scores. Patients that underwent surgery after endovascular treatment due to incomplete occlusion of the fistula showed only a tendency for improvement in the ALS score (−16.7%), whereas the MRS score was not affected.


We conclude that both endovascular and surgical treatment of SDAVFs resulted in a good and lasting clinical outcome in the majority of cases. In specific situations, when a secondary neurosurgical approach was required after endovascular treatment to achieve complete occlusion of the SDAVF, the clinical outcome was rather poor. The best first line treatment modality for each individual patient should be determined by an interdisciplinary team.


Dural arteriovenous fistula Spine Treatment Surgery Embolization 


Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Kendall B (1986) Spinal angiography with iohexol. Neuroradiology 28:72–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hurst RW, Kenyon LC, Lavi E, Raps EC, Marcotte P (1995) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: the pathology of venous hypertensive myelopathy. Neurology 45:1309–1313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jellema K, Canta LR, Tijssen CC, van Rooij WJ, Koudstaal PJ, van Gijn J (2003) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical features in 80 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:1438–1440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kohno M, Takahashi H, Ide K, Ishijima B, Yamada K, Nemoto S (1996) A cervical dural arteriovenous fistula in a patient presenting with radiculopathy. Case report. J Neurosurg 84:119–123Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koch C, Gottschalk S, Giese A (2004) Dural arteriovenous fistula of the lumbar spine presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 100:385–391PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hassler W, Thron A, Grote EH (1989) Hemodynamics of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. An intraoperative study. J Neurosurg 70:360–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koenig E, Thron A, Schrader V, Dichgans J (1989) Spinal arteriovenous malformations and fistulae: clinical, neuroradiological and neurophysiological findings. J Neurol 236:260–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koch C (2006) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula. Curr Opin Neurol 19:69–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gilbertson JR, Miller GM, Goldman MS, Marsh WR (1995) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: MR and myelographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 16:2049–2057PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Partington MD, Rufenacht DA, Marsh WR, Piepgras DG (1992) Cranial and sacral dural arteriovenous fistulas as a cause of myelopathy. J Neurosurg 76:615–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosenblum B, Oldfield EH, Doppman JL, Di Chiro G (1987) Spinal arteriovenous malformations: a comparison of dural arteriovenous fistulas and intradural AVM's in 81 patients. J Neurosurg 67:795–802PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jellema K, Tijssen CC, Fijnheer R, de Groot PG, Koudstaal PJ, van Gijn J (2004) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas are not associated with prothrombotic factors. Stroke 35:2069–2071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rizvi T, Garg A, Mishra NK, Gaikwad SB, Gupta V (2006) Metachronous double spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 4:503–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krings T, Lasjaunias PL, Hans FJ, Mull M, Nijenhuis RJ, Alvarez H, Backes WH, Reinges MH, Rodesch G, Gilsbach JM, Thron AK (2007) Imaging in spinal vascular disease. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 17:57–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sibon I, Menegon P, Tafer N, Dousset V (2006) Diffusion MRI in spinal dural arterio-venous fistula: a case report. Spinal Cord 44:315–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Binkert CA, Kollias SS, Valavanis A (1999) Spinal cord vascular disease: characterization with fast three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:1785–1793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Farb RI, Kim JK, Willinsky RA, Montanera WJ, terBrugge K, Derbyshire JA, Van Dijk JM, Wright GA (2002) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula localization with a technique of first-pass gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: initial experience. Radiology 222:843–850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Dijk JM, TerBrugge KG, Willinsky RA, Farb RI, Wallace MC (2002) Multidisciplinary management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical presentation and long-term follow-up in 49 patients. Stroke 33:1578–1583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zampakis P, Santosh C, Taylor W, Teasdale E (2006) The role of non-invasive computed tomography in patients with suspected dural fistulas with spinal drainage. Neurosurgery 58:686–694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oldfield EH, Di Chiro G, Quindlen EA, Rieth KG, Doppman JL (1983) Successful treatment of a group of spinal cord arteriovenous malformations by interruption of dural fistula. J Neurosurg 59:1019–1030PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nichols DA, Rufenacht DA, Jack CR Jr, Forbes GS (1992) Embolization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula with polyvinyl alcohol particles: experience in 14 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 13:933–940PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steinmetz MP, Chow MM, Krishnaney AA, Andrews-Hinders D, Benzel EC, Masaryk TJ, Mayberg MR, Rasmussen PA (2004) Outcome after the treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: a contemporary single-institution series and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 55:77–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sherif C, Gruber A, Bavinzski G, Standhardt H, Widhalm G, Gibson D, Richling B, Knosp E (2008) Long-term outcome of a multidisciplinary concept of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae treatment. Neuroradiology 50:67–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guzman R, Dubach-Schwizer S, Heini P, Lovblad KO, Kalbermatten D, Schroth G, Remonda L (2005) Preoperative transarterial embolization of vertebral metastases. Eur Spine J 14:263–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Song JK, Gobin YP, Duckwiler GR, Murayama Y, Frazee JG, Martin NA, Vinuela F (2001) N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate embolization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:40–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aminoff MJ, Logue V (1974) The prognosis of patients with spinal vascular malformations. Brain 97:211–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vanswieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJA, Vangijn J (1988) Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 19:604–607Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morimoto T, Yoshida S, Basugi N (1992) Dural arteriovenous malformation in the cervical spine presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage: case report. Neurosurgery 31:118–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Atkinson JLD, Miller GM, Krauss WE, Marsh WR, Piepgras DG, Atkinson PP, Brown RD Jr, Lane JI (2001) Clinical and radiographic features of dural arteriovenous fistula, a treatable cause of myelopathy. Mayo Clin Proc 76:1120–1130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thron A (2001) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Radiologe 41:955–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Aminoff MJ, Barnard RO, Logue V (1974) The pathophysiology of spinal vascular malformations. J Neurol Sci 23:255–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oldfield E (1998) Spinal vascular malformations. In: Swash M (eds) Outcomes in neurological and neurosurgical disorders. Cambridge Univ. Press, Boston, p 134–155Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bradac GB, Daniele D, Riva A, Bracchi M, Stura G, Riccio A, Pagni CA (1994) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: an underestimated cause of myelopathy. Eur Neurol 34:87–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jellema K, Tijssen CC, Sluzewski M, van Asbeck FW, Koudstaal PJ, van Gijn J (2006) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas—an underdiagnosed disease. A review of patients admitted to the spinal unit of a rehabilitation center. J Neurol 253:159–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McCutcheon IE, Doppman JL, Oldfield EH (1996) Microvascular anatomy of dural arteriovenous abnormalities of the spine: a microangiographic study. J Neurosurg 84:215–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huffmann BC, Gilsbach JM, Thron A (1995) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: a plea for neurosurgical treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 135:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Symon L, Kuyama H, Kendall B (1984) Dural arteriovenous malformations of the spine. Clinical features and surgical results in 55 cases. J Neurosurg 60:238–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Afshar JK, Doppman JL, Oldfield EH (1995) Surgical interruption of intradural draining vein as curative treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 82:196–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Watson JC, Oldfield EH (1999) The surgical management of spinal dural vascular malformations. Neurosurg Clin N Am 10:73–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ushikoshi S, Hida K, Kikuchi Y, Miyasaka K, Iwasaki T, Abe H (1999) Functional prognosis after treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 39:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Niimi Y, Berenstein A, Setton A, Neophytides A (1997) Embolization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: results and follow-up. Neurosurgery 40:675–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Song JK, Vinuela F, Gobin YP, Duckwiler GR, Murayama Y, Kureshi I, Frazee JG, Martin NA (2001) Surgical and endovascular treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: long-term disability assessment and prognostic factors. J Neurosurg 94:199–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Guillevin R, Vallee JN, Cormier E, Lo D, Dormont D, Chiras J (2005) N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate embolization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: CT evaluation, technical features, and outcome prognosis in 26 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:929–935PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Westphal M, Koch C (1999) Management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae using an interdisciplinary neuroradiological/neurosurgical approach: experience with 47 cases. Neurosurgery 45:451–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schick U, Hassler W (2003) Treatment and outcome of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Eur Spine J 12:350–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nagata S, Morioka T, Natori Y, Matsukado K, Sasaki T, Yamada T (2006) Factors that affect the surgical outcomes of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Surg Neurol 65:563–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Deen HG Jr, Nelson KD, Gonzales GR (1994) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula causing progressive myelopathy: clinical and imaging considerations. Mayo Clin Proc 69:83–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jellema K, Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Tijssen CC, Beute GN (2005) Embolization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: importance of occlusion of the draining vein. J Neurosurg Spine 2:580–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cognard C, Miaux Y, Pierot L, Weill A, Martin N, Chiras J (1996) The role of CT in evaluation of the effectiveness of embolisation of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae with N-butyl cyanoacrylate. Neuroradiology 38:603–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Britz GW, Lazar D, Eskridge J, Winn HR (2004) Accurate intraoperative localization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae with embolization coil: technical note. Neurosurgery 55:252–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jellema K, Tijssen CC, van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Koudstaal PJ, Algra A, van Gijn J (2004) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: long-term follow-up of 44 treated patients. Neurology 62:1839–1841PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert H. Andres
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
    Email author
  • Alain Barth
    • 1
    • 3
  • Raphael Guzman
    • 1
    • 4
  • Luca Remonda
    • 2
  • Marwan El-Koussy
    • 2
  • Rolf W. Seiler
    • 1
  • Hans R. Widmer
    • 1
  • Gerhard Schroth
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of Berne, InselspitalBerneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional NeuroradiologyUniversity of Berne, InselspitalBerneSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
  4. 4.Department of NeurosurgeryStanford University Medical CenterStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations