Advertisement

Neuroradiology

, 50:863 | Cite as

Brain imaging with a flat detector C-arm

Technique and clinical interest of XperCT
  • M. Söderman
  • D. Babic
  • S. Holmin
  • T. Andersson
Interventional Neuroradiology

Abstract

Introduction

We present the first clinical results from brain tissue imaging with a novel functionality in the angiography room, the XperCT.

Methods

XperCT is a flat detector C-arm volume acquisition functionality integrated with the angiography equipment. We assessed brain images from 42 patients examined with computed tomography (CT) and XperCT.

Results

In all patients, XperCT had significantly more beam hardening and reconstruction artifacts than CT, in particular in the posterior fossa. Contrast resolution was better on CT images. Hemorrhage, edema, and ventricular size could be assessed with XperCT in all patients, but CT was superior also in this aspect. In four of the last 12 cases, after the latest software upgrade, it was possible to differentiate between supra-tentorial grey and white substance on XperCT images.

Conclusion

CT was superior to XperCT regarding brain soft tissue imaging. However, XperCT could in some cases discriminate between grey and white substance. XperCT is a useful new functionality in interventional neuroradiology. In the clinical setting, it improves patient safety by allowing almost instant access to CT-like brain imaging in the angiography room. It can be life saving in situations where complications during an interventional procedure prompt for immediate action.

Keywords

Computed tomography Interventional neuroradiology Angiography Cone-beam CT 

Notes

Conflict of interest statement

Michael Söderman, Staffan Holmin, and Tommy Andersson are employees of Karolinska University Hospital. The hospital has a research agreement with Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands. Drazenko Babic is an employee of Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands. These affiliations have not influenced the acquisition or interpretation of data.

References

  1. 1.
    Grass M, Koppe R, Klotz E et al (1999) Three-dimensional reconstruction of high contrast objects using C-arm image intensifier projection data. Comput Med Imaging Graph 23(6):311–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW (1984) Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am A 1:612–619Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benndorf G, Strother CM, Claus B et al (2005) Angiographic CT in cerebrovascular stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26(7):1813–1818PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heran NS, Song JK, Namba K, Smith W, Niimi Y, Berenstein A (2006) The utility of DynaCT in neuroendovascular procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(2):330–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doelken M, Struffert T, Richter G et al (2008) Flat-panel detector volumetric CT for visualization of subarachnoid hemorrhage and ventricles: preliminary results compared to conventional CT. Neuroradiology. DOI  10.1007/s00234-008-0372-z
  6. 6.
    Akpek S, Brunner T, Benndorf G, Strother C (2005) Three-dimensional imaging and cone beam volume CT in C-arm angiography with flat panel detector. Diagn Interv Radiol 11(1):10–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    White PM, Gilmour JN, Weir NW, Innes B, Sellar RJ (2007) AngioCT in the management of neurointerventional patients: a prospective, consecutive series with associated dosimetry and resolution data. Neuroradiology 50(4):321–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y (2007) Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 17(11):2767–2779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Obenauer S, Dullin C, Alves F, Missbach-Guentner J, Grabbe E, Heuser M (2007) Flat-panel-detector-based volumetric CT: performance evaluation of imaging for skeletal structures of small animals in comparison to multislice CT. Clin Imaging 31(1):18–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahnken AH, Grasruck M, Schmidt B, Gunther RW, Wildberger JE (2008) Flat panel computed tomography for non-invasive flow measurement: initial results in in-vitro studies. Eur Radiol 18(4):747–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hirota S, Nakao N, Yamamoto S et al (2006) Cone-beam CT with flat-panel-detector digital angiography system: early experience in abdominal interventional procedures. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 29(6):1034–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kakeda S, Korogi Y, Hatakeyama Y et al (2008) The usefulness of three-dimensional angiography with a flat panel detector of direct conversion type in a transcatheter arterial chemoembolization procedure for hepatocellular carcinoma: initial experience. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 31(2):281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kakeda S, Korogi Y, Ohnari N et al (2007) Usefulness of cone-beam volume CT with flat panel detectors in conjunction with catheter angiography for transcatheter arterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18(12):1508–1516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Virmani S, Ryu RK, Sato KT et al (2007) Effect of C-arm angiographic CT on transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of liver tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18(10):1305–1309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Honey OB, Scarfe WC, Hilgers MJ et al (2007) Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132(4):429–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Engelhorn T, Rennert J, Richter G, Struffert T, Ganslandt O, Doerfler A (2007) Myelography using flat panel volumetric computed tomography: a comparative study in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 32(18):E523–E527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buhk JH, Elolf E, Jacob D, Rustenbeck HH, Mohr A, Knauth M (2008) A comparison of angiographic CT and multisection CT in lumbar myelographic imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(3):442–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Söderman
    • 1
  • D. Babic
    • 2
  • S. Holmin
    • 1
  • T. Andersson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeuroradiologyKarolinska HospitalStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Philips Medical SystemsBestThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations