, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 285–292 | Cite as

Diffusion tensor imaging of the cortico-ponto-cerebellar pathway in patients with adult-onset ataxic neurodegenerative disease

  • Kaeko Kitamura
  • Keiko Nakayama
  • Satoru Kosaka
  • Eiji Yamada
  • Hiroyuki Shimada
  • Takami Miki
  • Yuichi Inoue
Diagnostic Neuroradiology



We sought to determine whether diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) can detect in vivo axonal damage in the corticopontocerebellar pathway of patients with adult-onset ataxic neurodegenerative disease.


Conventional MRI and DTI were performed on 18 patients with adult-onset ataxic neurodegenerative disease and 28 age-matched control subjects. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and the mean diffusivity (MD) were measured in the ventral, central, and dorsal pons, middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) and internal capsule to evaluate corticopontocerebellar projection. Changes in FA and MD values were compared between patients and controls. Clinical disability was assessed according to the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). The relationship between DTI measurements and ICARS was studied. Follow-up MRI was performed in five patients approximately 1 year later.


FA values were significantly lower in the ventral and central portions of the pons, MCP, and internal capsules than in these areas in control subjects (P < 0.05) with the lower FA values correlating with poorer ICARS (r > −0.57, P < 0.05). MD values were elevated in these areas, but the differences were smaller than for the FA values. No relationship was observed between the MD and ICARS. In the five patients who underwent the follow-up study, there were significant decreases between the initial study and the follow-up DTI study for FA in the MCP and internal capsule (P < 0.05).


DTI can demonstrate a degenerated corticopontocerebellar pathway in patients, and FA values can be correlated with ataxia severity. DTI may be a clinically useful tool as a quantitative surrogate marker for monitoring disease progression.


Diffusion tensor imaging Cortico-ponto-cerebellar pathway Neurodegenerative disease Ataxia Fractional anisotropy 


Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Graham DI, Lantos P (eds) (2002) Greenfield’s neuropathology, 7th edn. Arnold, London, pp 343–346, 359–372Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iwabuchi K, Tsuchiya K, Uchihara T, Yagishita S (1999) Autosomal dominant spinocerebellar degenerations. Clinical, pathological, and genetic correlations. Rev Neurol (Paris) 155(4):255–270Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nabatame H, Fukuyama H, Akiguchi I, Kameyama M, Nishimura K, Nakano Y (1988) Spinocerebellar degeneration: qualitative and quantitative MR analysis of atrophy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12:298–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klockgether T, Schroth G, Diener H-C, Dichgans J (1990) Idiopathic cerebellar ataxia of late onset: natural history and MRI morphology. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 53:297–305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gallucci M, Splendiani A, Bozzao A et al (1990) MR imaging of degenerative disorders of brain stem and cerebellum. Magn Reson Imaging 8:117–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ormerod IE, Harding AE, Miller DH et al (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging in degenerative ataxic disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57:51–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nicoletti G, Fera F, Condino F et al (2006) MR imaging of middle cerebellar peduncle width: differentiation of multiple system atrophy from Parkinson disease. Radiology 239:825–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Savoiard M, Strada L, Girotti F et al (1990) Olivopontocerebellar atrophy: MR diagnosis and relationship to multisystem atrophy. Radiology 174:693–696Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bürk K, Bühring U, Schulz JB, Zühlke C, Hellenbroich Y, Dichgans J (2005) Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of sporadic cerebellar ataxia. Arch Neurol 62:981–985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mascalchi M, Cosottini M, Lolli F et al (2002) Proton MR spectroscopy of the cerebellum and pons in patients with degenerative ataxia. Radiology 223:371–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tedeschi G, Bertolino A, Massaquoi SG et al (1996) Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in patients with cerebellar degeneration. Ann Neurol 39:71–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nave RD, Foresti S, Tessa C et al (2004) ADC mapping of neurodegeneration in the brainstem and cerebellum of patients with progressive ataxias. Neuroimage 22:698–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guerrini L, Lolli F, Ginestroni A et al (2004) Brainstem neurodegeneration correlates with clinical dysfunction in SCA1 but not in SCA2. A quantitative volumetric, diffusion and proton spectroscopy MR study. Brain 127:1785–1795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adachi M, Hosoya T, Yamaguchi K, Kawakami T, Kato T (2000) Diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI of the transverse pontine fibers in spinocerebellar degeneration. Neuroradiology 42:803–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nicoletti G, Lodi R, Condino F et al (2006) Apparent diffusion coefficient measures of middle cerebellar peduncle differentiate the Parkinson variant of MSA from Parkinson’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain 129:2679–2687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee SK, Mori S, Kim DJ et al (2003) Diffusion tensor MRI and fiber tractography of cerebellar atrophy in phenytoin users. Epilepsia 44:1536–1540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shiga K, Yamada K, Yoshikawa K, Mizuno T, Nishimura T, Nakagawa M (2005) Local tissue anisotropy decreases in cerebellopetal fibers and pyramidal tract in multiple system atrophy. J Neurol 252:589–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yoon B, Kim SJ, Lee SK, Kim BS, Chung SR, Kim YI (2006) Early pathological changes in the cerebellum of patients with pure cerebellar syndrome demonstrated by diffusion-tensor imaging. Eur Neurol 56:166–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blain CRV, Barker GJ, Jarosz JM et al (2006) Measuring brain stem and cerebellar damage in parkinsonian syndromes using diffusion tensor MRI. Neurology 67:2199–2205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Henkelman R, Stanisz G, Kim J et al (1994) Anisotropy of NMR properties of tissues. Magn Reson Med 32:592–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C (1996) Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 111:209–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pierpaoli C, Basser PJ (1996) Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy. Magn Reson Med 36:893–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Beaulieu C, Allen PS (1994) Determinants of anisotropic water diffusion in nerves. Magn Reson Med 31:394–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shimony JS, McKinstry RC, Akbudak E et al (1994) Quantitative diffusion-tensor anisotropy brain MR imaging: normative human data and anatomic analysis. Radiology 212:770–784Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim J, Lee SK, Lee JD, Kim YW, Kim DI (2005) Decreased fractional anisotropy of middle cerebellar peduncle in crossed cerebellar diaschisis: diffusion-tensor imaging-positron-emission tomography correlation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2224–2228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Trouillas P, Takayanagi T, Hallett M et al (1997) International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome. J Neurol Sci 145:205–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Storey E, Tuck K, Hester R et al (2004) Inter-rater reliability of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). Mov Disord 19:190–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yagishita A (1999) MRI of spinocerebellar degeneration (in Japanese). J Clin Radiol 44:1295–1303Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    le Bihan D (2006) Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI: functional and molecular imaging of stroke and dementia – updates in diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring. In: Nishimura T, Sorensen AG (eds) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Functional and Molecular Imaging of Stroke and Dementia, Kyoto, Japan, 14 and 15 October 2005. International Congress Series, vol. 1290 (Radiology), pp 1–24. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Papp MI, Lantos PL (1994) The distribution of oligodendroglial inclusions in multiple system atrophy and its relevance to clinical symptomatology. Brain 117:235–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Watanabe H, Saito Y, Terao S et al (2002) Progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. An analysis of 230 Japanese patients. Brain 125:1075–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ellis CM, Simmons A, Jones DK et al (1999) Diffusion tensor MRI assesses corticospinal tract damage in ALS. Neurology 53:1051–1058PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sach M, Winkler G, Glauche V et al (2003) Diffusion tensor MRI of early upper motor neuron involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 127:340–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Graham JM, Papadakis N, Evans J et al (2004) Diffusion tensor imaging for the assessment of upper motor neuron integrity in ALS. Neurology 63:2111–2119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Toosy AT, Werring DJ, Orrell RW et al (2003) Diffusion tensor imaging detects corticospinal tract involvement at multiple levels in amytrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:1250–1257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaeko Kitamura
    • 1
  • Keiko Nakayama
    • 1
  • Satoru Kosaka
    • 2
  • Eiji Yamada
    • 1
  • Hiroyuki Shimada
    • 2
  • Takami Miki
    • 2
  • Yuichi Inoue
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations