, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 331–340 | Cite as

Low-pressure balloon angioplasty with adjuvant pharmacological therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by intracranial arterial occlusions

  • Raul G. NogueiraEmail author
  • Lee H. Schwamm
  • Ferdinando S. Buonanno
  • Walter J. Koroshetz
  • Albert J. Yoo
  • James D. Rabinov
  • Johnny C. Pryor
  • Joshua A. Hirsch
Interventional Neuroradiology



The use of coronary balloons in the cerebral vasculature is limited due to their poor trackability and increased risk of vessel injury. We report our experience using more compliant elastomer balloons for thrombus resistant to intraarterial (IA) pharmacological and mechanical thrombolysis in acute stroke.


We retrospectively analyzed 12 consecutive patients with an occluded intracranial artery treated with angioplasty using a low-pressure elastomer balloon. Angiograms were graded according to the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) and Qureshi grading systems. Outcomes were categorized as independent (modified Rankin scale, mRS, score ≤2), dependent (mRS score 3–5), or dead (mRS score 6).


Included in the study were 12 patients (mean age 66±17 years, range 31–88 years; mean baseline National Institutes of Health stroke scale score 17±3, range 12–23). The occlusion sites were: internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus (five patients, including two concomitant cervical ICA occlusions), M1 segment (two patients), and basilar artery (two patients). Pharmacological treatment included intravenous (IV) t-PA only (two patients), IA urokinase only (nine patients), both IV t-PA and IA urokinase (one patient), and IV and/or IA eptifibatide (eight patients). Mean time to treatment was 5.9±3.9 h (anterior circulation) and 11.0±7.2 h (posterior circulation). Overall recanalization rate (TICI grade 2/3) was 91.6%. Procedure-related morbidity occurred in one patient (distal posterior inferior cerebellar artery embolus). There were no symptomatic hemorrhages. Outcomes at 90 days were independent (five patients), dependent (three patients) and dead (four patients, all due to progression of stroke with withdrawal of care).


Angioplasty of acutely occluded intracranial arteries with low-pressure elastomer balloons results in high recanalization rates with an acceptable degree of safety. Prior use of thrombolytics may increase the chances of recanalization, and glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors may be helpful in preventing reocclusion and in increasing patency rates.


Balloon angioplasty Stroke Eptifibatide 


Conflict of interest statement

R.G. Nogueira is a consultant for Concentric Medical, ev3, and Coaxia; L.H. Schwamm is a consultant for Coaxia; and J.C. Pryor is a consultant for ev3. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Marks MP, Wojak JC, Al-Ali F et al (2006) Angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: clinical outcome. Stroke 37:1016–1020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwamm LH, Rosenthal ES, Swap CJ et al (2005) Hypoattenuation on CT angiographic source images predicts risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and outcome after intra-arterial reperfusion therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1798–1803PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schaefer PW, Roccatagliata L, Ledezma C et al (2006) First-pass quantitative CT perfusion identifies thresholds for salvageable penumbra in acute stroke patients treated with intra-arterial therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:20–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group (1995) Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 333:1581–1587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H et al (2003) Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 34:e109–e137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qureshi AI (2002) New grading system for angiographic evaluation of arterial occlusions and recanalization response to intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Neurosurgery 50:1405–1414; discussion 1415–1415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L et al (1999) Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in acute cerebral thromboembolism. JAMA 282:2003–2011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    The NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group (1997) Intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous t-PA therapy for ischemic stroke. Stroke 28:2109–2118Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berger C, Fiorelli M, Steiner T et al (2001) Hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic brain tissue: asymptomatic or symptomatic? Stroke 32:1330–1335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hunter GJ, Silvennoinen HM, Hamberg LM et al (2003) Whole-brain CT perfusion measurement of perfused cerebral blood volume in acute ischemic stroke: probability curve for regional infarction. Radiology 227:725–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hacke W, Albers G, Al-Rawi Y et al (2005) The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke 36:66–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Molina CA, Alvarez-Sabin J, Montaner J et al (2002) Thrombolysis-related hemorrhagic infarction: a marker of early reperfusion, reduced infarct size, and improved outcome in patients with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 33:1551–1556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith WS, Sung G, Starkman S et al (2005) Safety and efficacy of mechanical embolectomy in acute ischemic stroke: results of the MERCI trial. Stroke 36:1432–1438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith WS (2006) Safety of mechanical thrombectomy and intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke. Results of the multi Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) trial, part I. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1177–1182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lisboa RC, Jovanovic BD, Alberts MJ (2002) Analysis of the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy in ischemic stroke. Stroke 33:2866–2871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ueda T, Sakaki S, Nochide I et al (1998) Angioplasty after intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute occlusion of intracranial arteries. Stroke 29:2568–2574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ringer AJ, Qureshi AI, Fessler RD et al (2001) Angioplasty of intracranial occlusion resistant to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Neurosurgery 48:1282–1288; discussion 1288–1290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakano S, Iseda T, Yoneyama T et al (2002) Direct percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for acute middle cerebral artery trunk occlusion: an alternative option to intra-arterial thrombolysis. Stroke 33:2872–2876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramee SR, Subramanian R, Felberg RA et al (2004) Catheter-based treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke 35:e109–e111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Noser EA, Shaltoni HM, Hall CE et al (2005) Aggressive mechanical clot disruption: a safe adjunct to thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke? Stroke 36:292–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abou-Chebl A, Bajzer CT, Krieger DW et al (2005) Multimodal therapy for the treatment of severe ischemic stroke combining GPIIb/IIIa antagonists and angioplasty after failure of thrombolysis. Stroke 36:2286–2288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mangiafico S, Cellerini M, Nencini P et al (2005) Intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (tirofiban) followed by intra-arterial urokinase and mechanical thrombolysis in stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2595–2601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lum C, Stys PK, Hogan MJ et al (2006) Acute anterior circulation stroke: recanalization using clot angioplasty. Can J Neurol Sci 33:217–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levy EI, Ecker RD, Horowitz MB et al (2006) Stent-assisted intracranial recanalization for acute stroke: early results. Neurosurgery 58:458–463; discussion 458–463PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raul G. Nogueira
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Lee H. Schwamm
    • 3
  • Ferdinando S. Buonanno
    • 3
  • Walter J. Koroshetz
    • 3
  • Albert J. Yoo
    • 1
    • 2
  • James D. Rabinov
    • 1
    • 2
  • Johnny C. Pryor
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joshua A. Hirsch
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Endovascular Neurosurgery/Interventional Neuroradiology SectionMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Neurosurgery, Endovascular Neurosurgery/Interventional Neuroradiology SectionMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Neurology, Neurocritical Care and Vascular Neurology SectionMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  4. 4.Massachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations