, Volume 49, Issue 9, pp 753–759 | Cite as

Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures

  • A. A. DawkinsEmail author
  • A. L. Evans
  • J. Wattam
  • C. A. J. Romanowski
  • D. J. A. Connolly
  • T. J. Hodgson
  • S. C. Coley
Interventional Neuroradiology



Cerebral angiography is an invasive procedure associated with a small, but definite risk of neurological morbidity. In this study we sought to establish the nature and rate of complications at our institution among a large prospective cohort of consecutive patients. Also, the data were analysed in an attempt to identify risk factors for complications associated with catheter angiography.


Data were prospectively collected for a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral angiography between January 2001 and May 2006. A total of 2,924 diagnostic cerebral angiography procedures were performed during this period. The following data were recorded for each procedure: date of procedure, patient age and sex, clinical indication, referring specialty, referral status (routine/emergency), operator, angiographic findings, and the nature of any clinical complication or asymptomatic adverse event (arterial dissection).


Clinical complications occurred in 23 (0.79%) of the angiographic procedures: 12 (0.41%) significant puncture-site haematomas, 10 (0.34%) transient neurological events, and 1 nonfatal reaction to contrast agent. There were no permanent neurological complications. Asymptomatic technical complications occurred in 13 (0.44%) of the angiographic procedures: 3 groin dissections and 10 dissections of the cervical vessels. No patient with a neck dissection suffered an immediate or delayed stroke. Emergency procedures (P = 0.0004) and angiography procedures performed for intracerebral haemorrhage (P = 0.02) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (P = 0.04) were associated with an increased risk of complications.


Neurological complications following cerebral angiography are rare (0.34%), but must be minimized by careful case selection and the prudent use of alternative noninvasive angiographic techniques, particularly in the acute setting. The low complication rate in this series was largely due to the favourable case mix.


Cerebral angiography Neurologic complications Arteriography Neuroangiography 


Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, terBrugge K et al (2003) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 227:522–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Earnest F, Forbes G, Sandok BA et al (1984) Complications of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol 142:247–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grzyska U, Freitag J, Zeumer H (1990) Selective cerebral intraarterial DSA: complication rate and control of risk factors. Neuroradiology 32:296–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ et al (1987) Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke 18:997–1004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA et al (1994) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:1401–1407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnston DC, Chapman KM, Goldstein LB (2001) Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practice. Neurology 57:2012–2014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waugh JR, Sacharias N (1992) Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 182:243–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olivecrona H (1977) Complications of cerebral angiography. Neuroradiology 14:175–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leffers AM, Wagner A (2000) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: a retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors. Acta Radiol 41:204–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eisenberg RL, Bank WO, Hedgcock MW (1980) Neurological complications of angiography in patients with critical stenosis of the carotid artery. Neurology 30:892–895PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mani RL, Eisenberg RL, McDonald EJ Jr et al (1978) Complications of catheter arteriography: analysis of 5,000 procedures. I. Criteria and incidence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 131:861–865PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Komiyama M, Yamanaka K, Nishikawa M et al (1998) Prospective analysis of complications of catheter cerebral angiography in the digital subtraction and magnetic resonance era. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 38:534–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Warnock NG, Gandhi MR, Bergvall U et al (1993) Complication rates of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in patients investigated for cerebral vascular disease. Br J Radiol 66:855–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takahashi M, Kawanami H (1972) Complications of catheter angiography: an analysis of 500 examinations. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 19:248–258Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kachel R, Jahn U, Schiffmann R et al (1991) Complications in cerebral angiography. A study of 6698 cerebral angiographies. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 95:97–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chuah KC, Stuckey SL, Berman IG (2004) Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography: detection with diffusion-weighted imaging. Australas Radiol 48:133–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Burger R et al (1999) Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet 354:1577–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mani RL, Eisenberg RL (1978) Complications of catheter arteriography: analysis of 5,000 procedures. II. Relation of complication rates to clinical and arteriographic diagnoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 131:867–869PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Dion JE (1999) Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arterio-venous malformation: A meta-analysis. Stroke 30:317–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Sellar RJ (1990) Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 21:209–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Antonovic R, Rosch J, Dotter C (1976) The value of systemic arterial heparinisation in transfemoral angiography: a prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 127:223–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shannon P, Billbao JM, Marotta T et al (2006) Inadvertent foreign body embolization in diagnostic and therapeutic cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:278–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wilcox J, Wilson AJ, Evill CA et al (1987) A comparison of blood-brain barrier disruption by intracarotid iohexol and iodixanol in the rabbit. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 8:769–772PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kato K, Tomura N, Sakuma I, Watarai J (2003) Ischemic lesions related to cerebral angiography: evaluation by diffusion weighted MR imaging. Neuroradiology 45:39–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Bartsch AJ et al (2004) Heparin and air filters reduce embolic events caused by intra-arterial cerebral angiography: a prospective, randomized trial. Circulation 110:2210–2215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Dawkins
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. L. Evans
    • 1
  • J. Wattam
    • 1
  • C. A. J. Romanowski
    • 1
  • D. J. A. Connolly
    • 1
  • T. J. Hodgson
    • 1
  • S. C. Coley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyRoyal Hallamshire HospitalSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations