Advertisement

Neuroradiology

, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 385–391 | Cite as

Clinical outcome after endovascular coil embolization in elderly patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage

  • M. Johansson
  • O. Norbäck
  • G. Gál
  • K. G. Cesarini
  • M. Tovi
  • S. Solander
  • C. F. Contant
  • E. Ronne-Engström
  • P. EnbladEmail author
Interventional Neuroradiology

Abstract

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is not an unusual disease in an elderly population. The clinical outcome has improved over time. It has been suggested that elderly SAH patients would benefit from endovascular aneurysm treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate technical results and clinical outcome in a series of elderly SAH-patients treated with endovascular coil embolization. Sixty-two patients (≥ 65 years) presenting with aneurysmal SAH underwent early endovascular coil embolization at Uppsala University Hospital between September 1996 and December 2000. In all 62 cases included in the study, endovascular coil embolization was considered the first line of treatment. Admission variables, specific information on technical success, degree of occlusion and procedural complications, and outcome figures were recorded. Clinical grade on admission was Hunt and Hess (H&H) I–II in 39%, H&H III in 27% and H&H IV–V in 34% of the patients. The proportion of posterior circulation aneurysms was 24%. Coil embolization was successfully completed in 94%. The degree of occlusion of the treated aneurysm was complete occlusion in 56%, neck remnant in 21%, residual filling in 11%, other remnant in 5% and not treated in 6%. The rate of procedural complications was 11%. Outcome after 6 months was favorable in 41%, severe disability in 36% and poor in 22%. Favorable outcome was achieved in 57% of the H&H I–II patients, 47% of the H&H III patients and 17% of the H&H IV–V patients. Endovascular aneurysm treatment can be performed in elderly patients with SAH with a high level of technical success, acceptable aneurysm occlusion results, an acceptable rate of procedural complications and fair outcome results.

Keywords

Subarachnoid hemorrhage Aged Intracranial aneurysm Therapeutic embolization Glasgow Outcome Scale 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Lennart Persson, Head of the Department of Clinical Neurosciences, for his groundbreaking work and for supporting the establishment of interventional neuroradiology in Uppsala. This study was supported by The Swedish Research Council (2002/ A0799).

References

  1. 1.
    Johansson M, Cesarini KG, Contant CF, Persson L, Enblad P (2001) Changes in intervention and outcome in elderly patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 32:2845–2949PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Dion J, Duckwiler G (1991) Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. 2. Preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg 75:8–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ausman JI (1997) The future of neurovascular surgery. I. Intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol 48:98–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Molyneux A, Kerr R (1999) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 91:352–353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rowe JG, Molyneux AJ, Byrne JV, Renowden S, Aziz TZ (1996) Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a minimally invasive approach with advantages for elderly patients. Age Ageing 25:372–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Birchall D, Khangure M, McAuliffe W, Apsimon H, Knuckey N (2001) Endovascular management of acute subarachnoid haemorrhage in the elderly. Br J Neurosurg 15:35–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sedat J, Dib M, Lonjon M, Litrico S, Von Langsdorf D, Fontaine D, Paquis P (2002) Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in patients aged 65 years and older: follow-up of 52 patients after 1 year. Stroke 33:2620–2625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Molyneux A (2002) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2,143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:1267–1274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Persson L, Enblad P (1999) Neurointensive care of aneurysmal SAH. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 72:73–80Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Byrne JV, Molyneux AJ, Brennan RP, Renowden SA (1995) Embolisation of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 59:616–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hunt W, Hess R (1968) Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 28:14–20Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fisher C, Kistler J, Davis J (1980) Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 6:1–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moret J, Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, Rey A (1997) The “remodelling technique” in the treatment of wide neck intracranial aneurysms. Angiographic results and clinical follow-up in 56 cases. Intervent Neuroradiol 3:21–35Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jennett B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet i:480–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, van der Graaf Y, van Rooij WJ, Algra A (1999) Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: a systematic review. Stroke 30:470–476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vanninen R, Koivisto T, Saari T, Hernesniemi J, Vapalahti M (1999) Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: acute endovascular treatment with electrolytically detachable coils—a prospective randomized study. Radiology 211:325–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Friedman JA, Nichols DA, Meyer FB, Pichelmann MA, McIver JI, Toussaint LG, 3rd, Axley PL, Brown RD, Jr. (2003) Guglielmi detachable coil treatment of ruptured saccular cerebral aneurysms: retrospective review of a 10-year single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:526–533PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baltsavias GS, Byrne JV, Halsey J, Coley SC, Sohn MJ, Molyneux AJ (2000) Effects of timing of coil embolization after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage on procedural morbidity and outcomes. Neurosurgery 47:1320–1329; discussion 1329–1331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Casasco AE, Aymard A, Gobin P, Houdart E, Rogopoulos A, George B, Hodes J, Cophignon J, Merland J-J (1993) Selective endovascular treatment of 71 intracranial aneurysms with platinum coils. J Neurosurg 79:3–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kassell N, Torner J, Haley EJ, Jane J, Adams H, Kongable G (1990) The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery. 1. Overall management results. J Neurosurg 73:18–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Debrun GM, Aletich VA, Kehrli P, Misra M, Ausman JI, Charbel F (1998) Selection of cerebral aneurysms for treatment using Guglielmi detachable coils: the preliminary University of Illinois at Chicago experience. Neurosurgery 43:1281–1295; discussion 1296–1287Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raftopoulos C, Mathurin P, Boscherini D, Billa RF, Van Boven M, Hantson P (2000) Prospective analysis of aneurysm treatment in a series of 103 consecutive patients when endovascular embolization is considered the first option. J Neurosurg 93:175–182Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Johansson
    • 1
  • O. Norbäck
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. Gál
    • 3
  • K. G. Cesarini
    • 1
  • M. Tovi
    • 3
  • S. Solander
    • 3
    • 5
  • C. F. Contant
    • 4
  • E. Ronne-Engström
    • 1
  • P. Enblad
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Neuroscience, Section of NeurosurgeryUppsala University HospitalUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyÖrebro University HospitalÖrebroSweden
  3. 3.Department of NeuroradiologyUppsala University HospitalUppsalaSweden
  4. 4.Department of NeurosurgeryBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  5. 5.Department of RadiologyUniversity of North Carolina School of MedicineChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations