Clinical outcome after endovascular coil embolization in elderly patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage
- 182 Downloads
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is not an unusual disease in an elderly population. The clinical outcome has improved over time. It has been suggested that elderly SAH patients would benefit from endovascular aneurysm treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate technical results and clinical outcome in a series of elderly SAH-patients treated with endovascular coil embolization. Sixty-two patients (≥ 65 years) presenting with aneurysmal SAH underwent early endovascular coil embolization at Uppsala University Hospital between September 1996 and December 2000. In all 62 cases included in the study, endovascular coil embolization was considered the first line of treatment. Admission variables, specific information on technical success, degree of occlusion and procedural complications, and outcome figures were recorded. Clinical grade on admission was Hunt and Hess (H&H) I–II in 39%, H&H III in 27% and H&H IV–V in 34% of the patients. The proportion of posterior circulation aneurysms was 24%. Coil embolization was successfully completed in 94%. The degree of occlusion of the treated aneurysm was complete occlusion in 56%, neck remnant in 21%, residual filling in 11%, other remnant in 5% and not treated in 6%. The rate of procedural complications was 11%. Outcome after 6 months was favorable in 41%, severe disability in 36% and poor in 22%. Favorable outcome was achieved in 57% of the H&H I–II patients, 47% of the H&H III patients and 17% of the H&H IV–V patients. Endovascular aneurysm treatment can be performed in elderly patients with SAH with a high level of technical success, acceptable aneurysm occlusion results, an acceptable rate of procedural complications and fair outcome results.
KeywordsSubarachnoid hemorrhage Aged Intracranial aneurysm Therapeutic embolization Glasgow Outcome Scale
We thank Prof. Lennart Persson, Head of the Department of Clinical Neurosciences, for his groundbreaking work and for supporting the establishment of interventional neuroradiology in Uppsala. This study was supported by The Swedish Research Council (2002/ A0799).
- 9.Persson L, Enblad P (1999) Neurointensive care of aneurysmal SAH. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 72:73–80Google Scholar
- 11.Hunt W, Hess R (1968) Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 28:14–20Google Scholar
- 13.Moret J, Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, Rey A (1997) The “remodelling technique” in the treatment of wide neck intracranial aneurysms. Angiographic results and clinical follow-up in 56 cases. Intervent Neuroradiol 3:21–35Google Scholar
- 17.Friedman JA, Nichols DA, Meyer FB, Pichelmann MA, McIver JI, Toussaint LG, 3rd, Axley PL, Brown RD, Jr. (2003) Guglielmi detachable coil treatment of ruptured saccular cerebral aneurysms: retrospective review of a 10-year single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:526–533PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Debrun GM, Aletich VA, Kehrli P, Misra M, Ausman JI, Charbel F (1998) Selection of cerebral aneurysms for treatment using Guglielmi detachable coils: the preliminary University of Illinois at Chicago experience. Neurosurgery 43:1281–1295; discussion 1296–1287Google Scholar
- 22.Raftopoulos C, Mathurin P, Boscherini D, Billa RF, Van Boven M, Hantson P (2000) Prospective analysis of aneurysm treatment in a series of 103 consecutive patients when endovascular embolization is considered the first option. J Neurosurg 93:175–182Google Scholar