Advertisement

Neuroradiology

, Volume 45, Issue 12, pp 900–904 | Cite as

Venous variations in the region of the third ventricle: the role of MR venography

  • N. Çagatay ÇimşitEmail author
  • Uğur Türe
  • Gazanfer Ekinci
  • M. Necmettin Pamir
  • Canan Erzen
Diagnostic Neuroradiography

Abstract

In this study, we examined the anatomical variations of the subependymal veins in the region of the foramen of Monro and the third ventricle by MR time of flight (TOF) venography. Fifty healthy subjects, ten patients with third-ventricle tumors, and four patients with lateral-ventricle tumors were included in the study. The courses of the anterior septal vein (ASV), thalamostriate vein (TSV), and internal cerebral vein (ICV) were studied. The proximity of the venous angle, the false venous angle, and the ASV–ICV junction to the posterior margin of the foramen of Monro was measured. In 69 (53.9%) sides, the ASV–ICV junction was located at the venous angle and at the posterior margin of the foramen of Monro. In 59 (46.1%) sides, the ASV–ICV junction was located beyond the foramen of Monro. Our study shows the high incidence of posteriorly located ASV–ICV junctions, which can be crucial in the planning of a better surgical approach. We strongly recommend that MR venography, which is a short radiological examination, be used before one operates on third-ventricle and lateral-ventricle tumors.

Keywords

Foramen of Monro MR venography Subependymal veins Transcallosal approach Ventricle Tumor 

References

  1. 1.
    Türe U, Yasargil MG, Al-Mefty O (1997) The transcallosal-transforaminal approach to the third ventricle with regard to the venous variations in this region. J Neurosurg 87:706–715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mattle HP, Wentz KU, Edelman RR, et al. (1991) Cerebral venography with MR. Radiology 178:453–458Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sze G, Simmons B, Krol G, et al. (1988) Dural sinus thrombosis: verification with spin-echo technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 9:679–686PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vogl TJ, Bergman C, Villringer A, et al. (1994) Dural sinus thrombosis: value of venous MR angiography for diagnosis and follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:1191–1198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark CR, Geffen GM (1989) Corpus callosum surgery and recent memory. A review. Brain 112:165–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geffen G, Walsh A, Simpson D, et al. (1980) Comparison of the effects of transcortical and transcallosal removal of intraventricular tumors. Brain 103:773–788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shucart WA, Stein BM (1978) Transcallosal approach to the anterior ventricular system. Neurosurgery 3:339–343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Türe U, Hiçdönmez T, Elmacı I, Peker S (2001) Solid-calcified colloid cyst of the third ventricle. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 103:51–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woiciechowsky C, Vogel S, Lehmann R, et al. (1995) Transcallosal removal of lesions affecting the third ventricle: an anatomic and clinical study. Neurosurgery 36:117–123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yamamoto I, Sato H, Sato M (1996) Obliteration and its consequences for the deep venous system in surgical approaches to the third ventricle. In: Hakuba A (ed) Surgery of the intracranial venous system, embryology, anatomy, pathophysiology, neuroradiology, diagnosis, treatment. Springer, Tokyo, pp 321–329Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yaşargil MG (1996) Microneurosurgery, vol IVB. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 29–68, 205–223, 313–338Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yaşargil MG, Türe U, Roth P (1998) Combined approaches. In: Apuzzo MLJ (ed) Surgery of the third ventricle, edn 2. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 541–552Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Banna M, Young JR (1970) Normal anatomical variation and asymmetry of the Galenic venous system. Br J Radiol 43:126–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johanson C (1954) The central veins and deep dural sinuses of the brain; an anatomical and angiographic study. Acta Radiol Suppl 107:1–184Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krayenbuhl HA, Yasargil MG (1968) Cerebral angiography, edn 2. Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lang J (1985) Surgical anatomy of the hypothalamus. Acta Neurochir 75:5–22Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mokrohisky JF, Paul RE, Lin PM, et al. (1956) The diagnostic importance of normal variants in deep cerebral phlebography. With special emphasis on the true and false “venous angles of the brain” and evaluation of venous angle measurement. Radiology 67:34–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ono M, Rhoton Al Jr, Peace D, et al. (1984) Microsurgical anatomy of the deep venous system of the brain. Neurosurgery 15:621–657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Probst FP (1970) Position of the “venous angle” in the median sagittal plane. A new topometric method (1970) Acta Radiol (Diagn) 10:271–288Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ring BA (1959) Variations in the striate and other cerebral veins affecting measurements of the “venous angle”. Acta Radiol 52:433–447Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stein RL, Rosenbaum AE (1974) Deep supratentorial veins. Section I. Normal deep cerebral venous system. In: Newton TH, Potts DG (eds) Radiology of the skull and brain. Angiography. Vol 2. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 1903–1998Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wolf BS, Huang YP (1964) The subependymal veins of the lateral ventricles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 91:406–426Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zimmer AE, Annes GP (1966) The septal vein. An indicator of space occupying lesions in the anterior cranial fossa. Radiology 87:813–823PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Çagatay Çimşit
    • 1
    Email author
  • Uğur Türe
    • 2
  • Gazanfer Ekinci
    • 1
  • M. Necmettin Pamir
    • 2
  • Canan Erzen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, School of MedicineMarmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Neurosurgery, School of MedicineMarmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations