Semigroup Forum

, Volume 85, Issue 3, pp 513–524 | Cite as

Automorphisms of partition order-decreasing transformation monoids

Open Access


Let T n be the full transformation semigroup on a finite set X n ={1,2,…,n}. Let ρ be an equivalence relation on X n and ⪯ be a total order on the partition set X n /ρ. We describe all automorphisms of the partition order-decreasing transformation monoid:
$$T(\rho,\preceq)=\bigl\{\alpha\in T_{n}: (x\alpha)\rho\preceq x\rho, \forall x\in X_{n}\bigr\} $$
that generalizes the results of Schreier (Fundam. Math., 28:261–264, 1936) and Šutov (Izv. Vysš. Učebn. Zaved., Mat., 3:177–184, 1961).


Transformation semigroup Partition order-decreasing Automorphism group 

1 Introduction

For the standard definitions on semigroups and transformation semigroups we refer the reader to the books [3, 4, 5].

Let X n ={1,2,…,n}. A submonoid M of the semigroup T n of full transformations on X n is intransitive if there exist x,y in X n such that \((x)\varphi\not= y\) for any φM. A submonoid M of T n said to be half-transitive provided that it is intransitive, and for every ordered pair (x,y)∈X n ×X n there is some φM such that either =y or =x. In [10] we showed that, for every half-transitive submonoid M of T n , there exist a non-universal equivalence relation ρ on X n and a total order ⪯ on the partition set X n /ρ such that M lies inside a half-transitive submonoid T(ρ,⪯) of T n defined by
$$T(\rho,\preceq)=\bigl\{\alpha\in T_{n}: (x\alpha)\rho\preceq x\rho, \forall x\in X_{n}\bigr\}. $$
Here we consider the monoid T(ρ,⪯) for arbitrary equivalence relation ρ on X n . In particular, if ρ is universal then T(ρ,⪯)=T n ; T(ρ,⪯) is the order-decreasing finite full transformation monoid if ρ is the identity relation [9]. If X n /ρ={{1},X n −{1}} and {1}≺X n −{1} then T(ρ,⪯) is isomorphic to PT n−1, the semigroup of partial transformations of X n −{1}.

Note that automorphisms of T n and PT n−1 were described by Schreier and Šutov in [6] and [8] respectively. In present paper, we will describe automorphisms of the monoid T(ρ,⪯). Thus our result generalizes the results of Schreier [6] and Šutov [8].

For the topics of automorphisms of transformation semigroups we refer the reader to the references of [1] and [3]. We point out that T(ρ,⪯) is not the centralizer of any idempotent in T n [1] and, in general, T(ρ,⪯) does not contain all constant transformations of X n . Our method is different from any one of the references of [1] and [7]. Here we use a basis fact that an automorphism φ of a monoid S maps units of S to its units, and idempotents of S to its idempotents.

To achieve our aims, the organization of the paper is as follows: In Sect. 2 we investigate the units and the idempotents of T(ρ,⪯), and describe the generators of T(ρ,⪯). In Sect. 3 we describe the Green’s -relations \(\mathcal{L}^{*}\) and \(\mathcal{R}^{*}\) on T(ρ,⪯). As a consequence, T(ρ,⪯) is shown to be abundant. Finally, in Sect. 4, we use the results of the previous sections to determine all automorphisms of the monoid T(ρ,⪯).

Throughout the paper, we use the following notations: let |A| denote the cardinality of a set A. 1 A denote the identity function from A to itself. For a function α:AB, denote the image of α by \(\operatorname{im} \alpha\). \(|\operatorname{im} \alpha|\) is said to be the rank of α, and we can write
$$\alpha= \left ( \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} A_{1} & \ldots& A_{k}\\ a_{1} & \ldots& a_{k} \end{array} \right ), $$
where \(\operatorname{im} \alpha=\{a_{1},\dots,a_{k}\}\), a i α −1=A i (i=1,…,k) and \(\{A_{1}, \dots,A_{k}\}=A/\operatorname{ker} \alpha\), where \(\operatorname{ker} \alpha\) is the kernel of α (the equivalence relation {(x,y)∈A×A:=}). Denote the restriction of α to C by α| C for CA and (C)α denotes the image set of C under α.
Let E n−1 denote the set of idempotents in T n of rank n−1. Every element e of E n−1 has the form
$$e = {b\choose a} $$
for some a,bX n ,ab, which maps b to a and x to itself for any xX n −{b} [4].

For the remainder of the paper, ρ will denote an equivalence relation on X n and ⪯ will denote a total order on the partition set X n /ρ.

2 Units, idempotents and generators

In this section we describe the units and the idempotents of T(ρ,⪯), and determine the generators of T(ρ,⪯).

We define
$$U_{\rho}=\bigl\{\alpha\in T_{n}: (x\rho)\alpha= x\rho, x\in X_{n}\bigr\}. $$
Clearly, U ρ T(ρ,⪯). Let S n be the symmetric group on X n . The following lemma gives the description of the group of units of T(ρ,⪯).

Lemma 2.1

Let αT n . Then the following statements are equivalent:
  1. (1)

    α is a unit of T(ρ,⪯).

  2. (2)

    αS n T(ρ,⪯).

  3. (3)

    αU ρ .



Obviously (1)⇒(2).

(2)⇒(3). Suppose that αS n T(ρ,⪯). Then α −1S n T(ρ,⪯). Given any xX n . Take any y, we have
$$y\rho=\bigl(y\alpha\alpha^{-1}\bigr)\rho\preceq(y\alpha)\rho\preceq y \rho=x\rho, $$
and so . Thus ()α. To prove that ⊆()α consider z. Then we have
$$x\rho=z\rho=\bigl[\bigl(z\alpha^{-1}\bigr)\alpha\bigr]\rho\preceq \bigl(z\alpha^{-1}\bigr)\rho\preceq z\rho $$
and so −1 and z=( −1)α. It follows that ()α= and hence αU ρ .

(3)⇒(1). By the definition of U ρ , we have that αT(ρ,⪯) and the restriction α| is a bijection from the ρ-class onto itself, and so αS n and α −1T(ρ,⪯). Thus α is a unit of T(ρ,⪯). □

Next we have

Lemma 2.2

Let αT(ρ,⪯). Then α is an idempotent if and only if for all \(t \in \operatorname{im} \alpha\), =t and =min{:x −1}.


First recall that αT n is an idempotent if and only if, for all \(t \in \operatorname{im} \alpha\), t −1. Hence αT(ρ,⪯) is an idempotent if and only if, for all \(t\in \operatorname{im} \alpha\),
$$t\alpha= t \quad\mbox{and}\quad t\rho= \min \bigl\{x\rho: x \in t \alpha^{-1}\bigr\} $$
since t −1 and x −1 implies that t== and =()ρ. □

Corollary 2.3

Let a,bX n and ab. Then if and only if \({b\choose a}\in T(\rho,\preceq)\).

From Corollary 2.3 we introduce the following idempotent subset of T(ρ,⪯) with rank n−1 (that is often used in the paper):
$$E^{w}_{\rho}=\left\{{b\choose a}\in E_{n-1}: a\rho\preceq b \rho\right\}. $$
Then we have

Lemma 2.4

Let α be an element of T(ρ,⪯)−U ρ . Then α is a product of elements in \(E^{w}_{\rho}\cup U_{\rho}\).


Let s(α) be the cardinality of the set {xX n :x}. We will show that α can be written as a product of elements in \(E^{w}_{\rho}\cup U_{\rho}\) by using induction on s(α).

Clearly, if s(α)=1 then \(\alpha\in E^{w}_{\rho}\). We now assume that s(α)>1 and let
$$\alpha= \left ( \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} A_{1} & A_{2} & \ldots& A_{k}\\ a_{1} & a_{2} & \ldots& a_{k} \end{array} \right )\in T(\rho, \preceq)-U_{\rho}. $$
Then, for every i, a i ρ⪯min{:xA i } from the definition of T(ρ,⪯). Choose b i A i such that b i ρ=min{:xA i } for every i. Without loss of generality we may assume that
$$a_{1}=b_{1}, \dots, a_{i}=b_{i}, \quad\quad a_{i+1} \ne b_{i+1},\dots, a_{k}\ne b_{k}. $$
$$\beta= \left ( \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} A_{1} & \ldots & A_{k}\\ b_{1} & \ldots& b_{k} \end{array} \right ) \quad\mbox{and}\quad \gamma= \left ( \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} b_{1} & \ldots& b_{i} & b_{i+1} & \ldots & b_{k} & Y\\ b_{1} & \ldots& b_{i} & a_{i+1} & \ldots & a_{k} & y \end{array} \right ), $$
where Y=X n −{b 1,…,b k }, yY and =min{:zY}. Then βT(ρ,⪯)−U ρ and γT(ρ,⪯). Moreover, γU ρ if and only if k=n−1.

Note that s(α)=ni>nk=s(β) and s(γ)=s(α)−1. Thus both β and γ are products of elements in \(E^{w}_{\rho }\cup U_{\rho}\) by inductive supposition. It follows that α=βγ is a product of elements in \(E^{w}_{\rho}\cup U_{\rho}\). This completes the proof. □

From Lemma 2.4 we immediately deduce

Proposition 2.5

Let U ρ and \(E^{w}_{\rho}\) be defined above. Then \(E^{w}_{\rho}\cup U_{\rho}\) is a generating set of T(ρ,⪯).

Similar to the proof as Lemma 2.4 we also have

Lemma 2.6

Let α be an idempotent of T(ρ,⪯)−U ρ . Then α is a product of elements in \(E^{w}_{\rho}\).

3 Green’s -relations \(\mathcal{L}^{*}\) and \(\mathcal{R}^{*}\)

We recall some of the basis facts about Green’s *-relations \(\mathcal{L}^{*}\) and \(\mathcal{R}^{*}\). The relations \(\mathcal{L}^{*}(\mathcal{R}^{*})\) is defined on a semigroup S by the rule \(a{\mathcal{L}^{*}}b(a{\mathcal{R}^{*}}b)\) if and only if the elements a,b of S are related by the Green’s relation \({\mathcal{L}}(\mathcal{R})\) in some oversemigroup of S [2]. The following lemma, from [2], provides us an alternative description for \(\mathcal{L}^{*}(\mathcal{R}^{*})\).

Lemma 3.1

Let S be a semigroup and let a,b be in S. The following conditions are equivalent:
  1. (1)


  2. (2)

    for all s,tS 1, as=at(sa=ta) if and only if bs=bt(sb=tb).


For αT n , \(\operatorname{ker} \alpha=\{(x,y)\in X_{n}\times X_{n}: x\alpha=y\alpha\}\). Then we have

Proposition 3.2

Let α,β be elements of T(ρ,⪯). Then
  1. (1)

    \((\alpha, \beta) \in{\mathcal{L}^{*}}\) if and only if \(\operatorname{im} \alpha= \operatorname{im} \beta\);

  2. (2)

    \((\alpha, \beta) \in{\mathcal{R}^{*}}\) if and only if \(\operatorname{ker} \alpha= \operatorname{ker} \beta\).



(1) Certainly if \(\operatorname{im} \alpha = \operatorname{im} \beta\) then \((\alpha, \beta) \in{\mathcal{L}}(T_{n})\) [5] and so \((\alpha, \beta) \in{\mathcal{L}}^{*} \).

Conversely, suppose that \((\alpha, \beta) \in{\mathcal{L}}^{*} \). Then
$$\alpha\gamma= \alpha\delta \quad\mbox{if and only if}\quad \beta\gamma= \beta \delta \quad \bigl(\mbox{for all } \gamma, \delta\in T(\rho,\preceq)\bigr). $$
Let X n /ρ={Y 1Y 2≺⋯≺Y t }. If Y 1={x}, for some xX n , then, certainly =x=; Otherwise, choose yY 1 and yx, then \({x\choose y} \in T(\rho, \preceq)\). Hence
$$x\not\in \operatorname{im} \alpha\Leftrightarrow\alpha\cdot{x\choose y} = \alpha \cdot1_{X_{n}} \Leftrightarrow\beta\cdot{x\choose y} = \beta\cdot 1_{X_{n}}\Leftrightarrow x\not\in \operatorname{im} \beta. $$
We therefore conclude that \(\operatorname{im} \alpha= \operatorname{im} \beta\).

(2) Again if \(\operatorname{ker} \alpha= \operatorname{ker} \beta\) then \((\alpha, \beta) \in{\mathcal{R}}(T_{n})\) [5] and so \((\alpha, \beta) \in{\mathcal{R}}^{*} \).

Conversely, if \((\alpha,\beta) \in {\mathcal{R}}^{*}\) then
$$\gamma\alpha= \delta\alpha\Leftrightarrow\gamma\beta= \delta\beta \quad\bigl( \mbox{for all } \gamma, \delta\in T(\rho, \preceq)\bigr). $$
For x,yX n with xy, we may assume that . Then \({x\choose y} \in T(\rho, \preceq)\). Hence
$$x \alpha= y\alpha\Leftrightarrow{x\choose y}\cdot\alpha= 1_{X_{n}}\cdot \alpha \Leftrightarrow{x\choose y}\cdot\beta= 1_{X_{n}}\cdot\beta \Leftrightarrow x\beta= y\beta. $$
We therefore conclude that \(\operatorname{ker} \alpha= \operatorname{ker} \beta\). □

A semigroup S in which each \({\mathcal{L}}^{*}\)-class and each \({\mathcal{R}}^{*}\)-class contains an idempotent is called abundant [2]. We have

Corollary 3.3

For any equivalence relation ρ on X n and a total orderon the partition set X n /ρ, the semigroup T(ρ,⪯) is abundant.


For a typical \({\mathcal{R}}^{*}\)-class \(R^{*}_{\alpha}\) of T(ρ,⪯) with \(X_{n}/\operatorname{ker} \alpha= \{ A_{1}, A_{2}, \ldots, A_{k}\}\). Choose b i A i such that b i ρ=min{x i ρ:x i A i } for every i∈{1,…,k}. Then we have that
$$\beta= \left ( \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} A_{1} & \ldots& A_{k}\\ b_{1} & \ldots& b_{k} \end{array} \right ) $$
is an idempotent of T(ρ,⪯) by Lemma 2.2. and αR β by Proposition 3.2.
Next, consider that a typical \({\mathcal{L}}^{*}\)-class \(L^{*}_{\alpha}\) of T(ρ,⪯) with \(\operatorname{im} \alpha= \{ a_{1},\ldots, a_{k}\}\), where 1≤kn. We will use induction on k to show that \(L^{*}_{\alpha}\) contains an idempotent of T(ρ,⪯). If k=1 then, clearly α is an idempotent. Suppose now that the conclusion holds for k−1. Consider that
$$\alpha= \left ( \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} A_{1} & \ldots& A_{k-1} & A_{k}\\ a_{1} & \ldots& a_{k-1} & a_{k} \end{array} \right ) \in T(\rho, \preceq). $$
Without loss of generality, we may assume that
$$a_{1}\rho\preceq \cdots\preceq a_{k-1}\rho\preceq a_{k}\rho. $$
Then \({a_{k}\choose a_{k-1}}\in T(\rho,\preceq)\) by Corollary 2.3, and so
$$\beta= \left ( \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} A_{1} & \ldots& A_{k-2} & A_{k-1}\cup A_{k}\\ a_{1} & \ldots& a_{k-2} & a_{k-1} \end{array} \right ) = \alpha{a_{k}\choose a_{k-1}}\in T(\rho,\preceq). $$
By induction supposition, there exists an idempotent εT(ρ,⪯) such that \(\beta{\mathcal{L}}^{*} \varepsilon\). Hence, by Lemma 2.2, we can let
$$\varepsilon= \left ( \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} B_{1} & \ldots& B_{k-2} & B_{k-1}\\ a_{1} & \ldots& a_{k-2} & a_{k-1} \end{array} \right ) $$
with a i B i ,i=1,…,k−1 and a i ρ=min{x i ρ:x i B i } for every i∈{1…,k−1}. Since a k X n =B 1∪⋯∪B k−1, there exist a unique B j such that a k B j . Note that a k a j , so a j B j ∖{a k }. It follows, by Lemma 2.2, that
$$\varepsilon^{*} = \left ( \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} B_{1} & \ldots& B_{j-1} & B_{j}\backslash\{a_{k}\} & B_{j+1} & \ldots & B_{k-1} & a_{k}\\ a_{1} & \ldots& a_{j-1} & a_{j} & a_{j+1} & \ldots& a_{k-1} & a_{k} \end{array} \right ) $$
is an idempotent in T(ρ,⪯), so that \(\alpha{\mathcal{L}}^{*}\varepsilon^{*}\) as required. □

4 Automorphisms of T(ρ,⪯)

After the preliminaries of the previous two sections, to determine every automorphism of T(ρ,⪯), we need the following lemmas.

Lemma 4.1

Let \({b_{1}\choose a_{1}}, {b_{2}\choose a_{2}} \in E_{n-1}\). Then \({b_{1}\choose a_{1}}{b_{2}\choose a_{2}} ={b_{1}\choose a_{1}}\) if and only if b 1=b 2.


Assume that b 1=b 2. Then, from a 1b 1 we have
$$b_{1}{b_{1}\choose a_{1}} {b_{1}\choose a_{2}}=a_{1}{b_{1}\choose a_{2}}=a_{1}=b_{1}{b_{1} \choose a_{1}}, $$
and for every xX n ∖{b 1},
$$x{b_{1}\choose a_{1}} {b_{1}\choose a_{2}}=x{b_{1}\choose a_{2}}= x = x{b_{1}\choose a_{1}} $$
and so \({b_{1}\choose a_{1}}{b_{1}\choose a_{2}} ={b_{1}\choose a_{1}}\).
Assume now that b 1b 2. Then
$$b_{2}{b_{1}\choose a_{1}} {b_{2} \choose a_{2}} = b_{2}{b_{2}\choose a_{2}} = a_{2} \neq b_{2} =b_{2}{b_{1} \choose a_{1}}, $$
and so \({b_{1}\choose a_{1}}{b_{2}\choose a_{2}} \neq{b_{1}\choose a_{1}}\). □

Similar argument as in Lemma 4.1, we have

Lemma 4.2

Let \({x\choose y}, {y\choose w} \in E_{n-1}\). Then \({y\choose w}{x\choose y}\) is an idempotent if and only if x=w.

Lemma 4.3

Let \({b_{1}\choose a_{1}}, {b_{2}\choose a_{2}} \in T(\rho,\preceq)\) and b 1 ρb 2 ρ. We have
  1. (1)

    If b 1=b 2 then \({b_{1}\choose a_{1}}{\mathcal{L}}^{*} {b_{2}\choose a_{2}}\).

  2. (2)

    If b 1b 2 then there exists δT(ρ,⪯) such that \({b_{1}\choose a_{1}}{\mathcal{R}}^{*}\delta{\mathcal{L}}^{*}{b_{2}\choose a_{2}}\).



Since \(\operatorname{im} {b_{1}\choose a_{1}} = X_{n}\backslash\{b_{1}\} = \operatorname{im} {b_{1}\choose a_{2}}\), so (1) holds by Lemma 3.1.

For (2), note that \({b_{2}\choose b_{1}} \in T(\rho,\preceq)\) by Corollary 2.3, since b 1 ρb 2 ρ. It follows that \(\delta= {b_{1}\choose a_{1}}{b_{2}\choose b_{1}} \in T(\rho,\preceq)\) with \(\operatorname{ker} \delta= \operatorname{ker} {b_{1}\choose a_{1}}\) and \(\operatorname{im} \delta= \operatorname{im} {b_{2}\choose b_{1}}= \operatorname{im} {b_{2}\choose a_{2}}\). Hence, by Proposition 3.2, we have \({b_{1}\choose a_{1}}{\mathcal{R}}^{*}\delta{\mathcal{L}}^{*}{b_{2}\choose a_{2}}\). □

Let \(\operatorname{Aut} T(\rho,\preceq)\) be the automorphism group of T(ρ,⪯). Then we have

Lemma 4.4

Let \(\varphi\in \operatorname{Aut} T(\rho,\preceq)\). Then \((E^{w}_{\rho})\varphi= E^{w}_{\rho}\).


First, we claim that
$$\bigl(E^{w}_{\rho}\bigr)\varphi\cap E^{w}_{\rho} \ne\emptyset. $$
Assume that it is not such case. Note that (ε i )φ is idempotent for every \(\varepsilon_{i} \in E^{w}_{\rho}\), and so we certainly have \(|\operatorname{im} (\varepsilon_{i})\varphi |\leq n-2\). Next, given an element \(\varepsilon\in E^{w}_{\rho}\) then there exists an idempotent \(\omega\in T(\rho,\preceq)-\{1_{X_{n}}\}\) such that (ω)φ=ε. Thus, by Lemma 2.6, there exist elements ε 1,ε 2,…,ε k of \(E^{w}_{\rho}\) such that ω=ε 1 ε 2ε k . Hence we have
$$\varepsilon=(\varepsilon_{1} \varepsilon_{2} \cdots \varepsilon_{k})\varphi=(\varepsilon_{1})\varphi ( \varepsilon_{2})\varphi\cdots(\varepsilon_{k})\varphi. $$
It follows that \(n-1 = |\operatorname{im} \varepsilon| \leq|\operatorname{im} (\varepsilon_{k})\varphi| \leq n-2\) (since \((\varepsilon_{k})\varphi\not\in E^{w}_{\rho}\)), a contradiction.

We have shown that \((E^{w}_{\rho})\varphi\cap E^{w}_{\rho}\neq \emptyset\). Next, let \(\varepsilon_{0}= {b_{0}\choose a_{0}} = \bigl({b_{1}\choose a_{1}}\bigr)\varphi\in(E^{w}_{\rho})\varphi\cap E^{w}_{\rho}\). For any \(\varepsilon={b\choose a}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\), we distinguish two cases as follows.

Case 1: b=b 1. In this case, by (1) of Lemma 4.3 we have \(\varepsilon{\mathcal{L}}^{*} {b_{1}\choose a_{1}}\). Further, by Lemma 3.1, we immediately deduce \((\varepsilon)\varphi{\mathcal{L}}^{*}\varepsilon_{0}\). Hence, by (1) of Proposition 3.2, \(|\operatorname{im}(\varepsilon)\varphi| = n-1\) and so \((\varepsilon)\varphi\in E^{w}_{\rho}\).

Case 2: bb 1; b 1 ρ(Similar argument for b 1 ρ). By (2) of Lemma 4.3, there exists δT(ρ,⪯) such that \(\varepsilon{\mathcal{R}}^{*} \delta {\mathcal{L}}^{*} {b_{1}\choose a_{1}}\). Hence, by Lemma 3.1 we have \((\varepsilon)\varphi{\mathcal{R}}^{*}(\delta)\varphi{\mathcal{L}}^{*} \varepsilon_{0}\). That is, \(\operatorname{ker} (\varepsilon)\varphi= \operatorname{ker} (\delta)\varphi\) and \(\operatorname{im} (\delta)\varphi= \operatorname{im} \varepsilon_{0}\). It follows that
$$\big|\operatorname{im} (\varepsilon)\varphi\big| = \big|X_{n}/ \operatorname{ker} (\varepsilon)\varphi\big| = \big|X_{n}/ \operatorname{ker} (\delta) \varphi\big| = \big|\operatorname{im} (\delta) \varphi\big| = |\operatorname{im} \varepsilon_{0} | = n-1, $$
and so \((\varepsilon)\varphi \in E^{w}_{\rho}\).
By Case 1 and Case 2 above, we have shown that \((E^{w}_{\rho})\varphi\subseteq E^{w}_{\rho}\). By using the foregoing argument for the automorphism φ −1, we have \((E^{w}_{\rho})\varphi^{-1}\subseteq E^{w}_{\rho}\). It follows that
$$E^{w}_{\rho}=\bigl(E^{w}_{\rho}\bigr) \varphi^{-1}\varphi\subseteq\bigl(E^{w}_{\rho }\bigr) \varphi\subseteq E^{w}_{\rho}, $$
and so \((E^{w}_{\rho})\varphi= E^{w}_{\rho}\). □

Lemma 4.5

Let \(\varphi\in \operatorname{Aut} T(\rho,\preceq)\). Then there exists μ φ U ρ such that \(\big({x\choose y}\big)\varphi= {x\mu_{\varphi} \choose y\mu_{\varphi}}\) for every \({x\choose y}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\).


Let X n /ρ={Y 1Y 2≺⋯≺Y t }. We distinguish two cases: |Y 1|=1 or |Y 1|≥2.

Case 1: |Y 1|=1. Let Y 1={1}. For any xX n ∖{1}, clearly \({x\choose1}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\) and by Lemma 4.4 we can let \(\bigl({x\choose1}\bigr)\varphi={x'\choose1_{x}'} \in E^{w}_{\rho}\). We will prove that \(1=1_{x}'\). Indeed, if \(1 \neq 1_{x}'\) then \({1_{x}'\choose1}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\), and by Lemma 4.4 we can let \(\bigl({z\choose t}\bigr)\varphi={1_{x}'\choose1}\), where \({z\choose t}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\). Since zt and Y 1, we have z≠1 and so
$${z\choose t} {x\choose1}= \left \{ \begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} {x\choose1}, & t=1,x=z\\[6pt] {z\choose t}, & t\neq1,x=z\\[6pt] \left ( \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} \{z,x,1\} & k & \dots\\ 1 & k & \dots \end{array} \right ), & t=1,x\neq z \\[12pt] \left ( \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} \{z,t\} & \{x, 1\}& k &\dots\\ t & 1 & k & \dots \end{array} \right ), & t\neq1,x\neq z \end{array} \right . $$
is an idempotent, but \({1_{x}'\choose 1}{x'\choose1_{x}'}\) is not idempotent by Lemma 4.2, a contradiction. Thus \(1=1_{x}'\) and we have proved that
$$\left({x\choose1}\right)\varphi={x'\choose1} \quad\mbox{for any } x\in X_{n}\backslash\{1\}. $$
Now we define a mapping μ φ :X n X n by 1μ φ =1 and φ =x′ (defined the above), x≠1. Obviously, μ φ is a bijection.
Next, we will prove that \(\bigl({x\choose y}\bigr)\varphi={x\mu_{\varphi}\choose y\mu_{\varphi}}\) for any \({x\choose y}\in E^{w}_{\rho}, x\neq1, y\neq1\). By Lemma 4.4 we can suppose that \(\bigl({x\choose y}\bigr)\varphi={x^{*}\choose y^{*}}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\). Since
$${x\mu_{\varphi}\choose1}=\left({x\choose1}\right)\varphi=\left({x\choose1} {x\choose y}\right) \varphi ={x\mu_{\varphi}\choose1} {x^{*}\choose y^{*}}, $$
we immediately deduce that x = φ by Lemma 4.1. Moreover,from \(\bigl({y\choose1}{x\choose y}\bigr)\varphi={y\mu_{\varphi}\choose 1}{x\mu_{\varphi}\choose y^{*}}\) we see that if φ y then \({y\mu_{\varphi}\choose 1}{x\mu_{\varphi}\choose y^{*}}\) is an idempotent, and so \({y\choose1}{x\choose y}\) is idempotent (since φ is an automorphism). But this is impossible since \({y\choose1}{x\choose y}\) is not an idempotent. Hence φ =y . It follows that if then ( φ )ρ⪯( φ )ρ, and so μ φ U ρ .
Case 2: |Y 1|≥2. In this case, for any xX n , there exists yX n ∖{x} such that , and so \({x\choose y}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\). By Lemma 4.4 we can let
$$\left({x\choose y}\right)\varphi= {x'\choose y'}\in E^{w}_{\rho} \quad\mbox{and}\quad \left({x\choose z}\right)\varphi= {x'_{z}\choose z'}\in E^{w}_{\rho}. $$
Note that
$${x'\choose y'} = \left({x\choose y}\right)\varphi=\left[\left({x \choose y} {x\choose z}\right)\right]\varphi ={x'\choose y'} {x'_{z}\choose z'}, $$
and so \(x' = x'_{z}\) by Lemma 4.1. Hence, φ induces a map μ φ from X n to itself, defined by
$$\left({x\choose y}\right)\varphi= {x\mu_{\varphi}\choose y'},\quad \hbox{for every } {x\choose y}\in E^{w}_{\rho}. $$
Obviously, μ φ is surjective.

Fact 1

μ φ is injective.

Indeed, assume that t=x 1 μ φ =x 2 μ φ , for x 1,x 2X n . Since |Y 1|≥2, there exist y 1,y 2X n such that \({x_{1}\choose y_{1}},{x_{2}\choose y_{2}} \in E^{w}_{\rho}\). By Lemma 4.4 we let \(\bigl({x_{1}\choose y_{1}}\bigr)\varphi= {t\choose y_{1}'}\) and \(\bigl({x_{2}\choose y_{2}}\bigr)\varphi= {t\choose y_{2}'}\). Then
$$\left({x_{1}\choose y_{1}} {x_{2}\choose y_{2}}\right)\varphi={t\choose y_{1}'} {t\choose y_{2}'} ={t\choose y_{1}'} =\left({x_{1}\choose y_{1}}\right)\varphi. $$
As φ is a bijection it follows that \({x_{1}\choose y_{1}}{x_{2}\choose y_{2}}={x_{1}\choose y_{1}}\), and so x 1=x 2 from Lemma 4.1.

Fact 2

If x 1 ρx 2 ρ. Then (x 1 μ φ )ρ⪯(x 2 μ φ )ρ.

In fact, assume that (x 1 μ φ )ρ≻(x 2 μ φ )ρ. Then \({x_{2}\choose x_{1}}, {x_{1}\mu_{\varphi}\choose x_{2}\mu_{\varphi}} \in E^{w}_{\rho}\). By Lemma 4.4 we can let
$$\left({x_{2}\choose x_{1}}\right)\varphi= {x_{2} \mu_{\varphi}\choose x_{1}'}, \quad\quad\left({x_{1}\choose z}\right)\varphi={x_{1}\mu_{\varphi}\choose x_{2} \mu_{\varphi}}. $$
Note that \({x_{1}\mu_{\varphi}\choose x_{2}\mu_{\varphi}}{x_{2}\mu_{\varphi}\choose x_{1}'}\) is an idempotent. Hence \({x_{1}\choose z}{x_{2}\choose x_{1}}\) is also an idempotent, and so z=x 2 by Lemma 4.2. Further,
$${x_{1}\mu_{\varphi}\choose x_{2}\mu_{\varphi}}=\left({x_{1} \choose x_{2}}\right)\varphi= \left({x_{2}\choose x_{1}} {x_{1}\choose x_{2}}\right)\varphi={x_{2} \mu_{\varphi}\choose x_{1}'} {x_{1} \mu_{\varphi} \choose x_{2}\mu_{\varphi}} $$
is an idempotent. Hence, \(x_{1}' = x_{1}\mu_{\varphi}\) by Lemma 4.2. Since now both \({x_{2}\mu_{\varphi}\choose x_{1}\mu_{\varphi}}\) and \({x_{1}\mu_{\varphi}\choose x_{2}\mu_{\varphi}}\) belong to \(E^{w}_{\rho}\), we have (x 1 μ φ )ρ=(x 2 μ φ )ρ, which contradicts the assumption.

Fact 3

Let \(\bigl({x\choose y}\bigr)\varphi= {x\mu_{\varphi}\choose y'}\) for \({x\choose y}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\). Then y′= φ .

Since \({x\choose y}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\),we have , and so \({x\mu_{\varphi}\choose y\mu_{\varphi}}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\) by Facts 2 and 1. By Lemma 4.4 we can let
$$\left({x\choose z}\right)\varphi= {x\mu_{\varphi}\choose y\mu_{\varphi}} \quad{\mbox{for some}} z\in X_{n}\backslash\{x\}. $$
It is sufficient to show that y=z. Assume now that yz. Then or since ⪯ is a totally order.
For the former, by Facts 2 and 1 we have \({z\mu_{\varphi}\choose y\mu_{\varphi}}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\) and by Lemma 4.4 we can let \({z\mu_{\varphi}\choose y\mu_{\varphi}}=\bigl({z\choose t}\bigr)\varphi\), for some tX n . Note that \({z\mu_{\varphi}\choose y\mu_{\varphi}}{x\mu_{\varphi}\choose y\mu_{\varphi}}\) is idempotent. Then \({z\choose t}{x\choose z}\) is also idempotent, and so t=x by Lemma 4.2. Hence
$${z\mu_{\varphi}\choose y\mu_{\varphi}}=\left({z\choose x}\right)\varphi= \left({x \choose z} {z\choose x}\right)\varphi={x\mu_{\varphi}\choose y\mu_{\varphi}} {z\mu_{\varphi}\choose y\mu_{\varphi}}. $$
It follows that φ = φ and so x=z, which contradicts xz.
For the latter,then \({y\choose z}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\) and by Lemma 4.4 we can let \(\bigl({y\choose z}\bigr)\varphi= {y\mu_{\varphi}\choose z'}\) for some z′∈X n . Note that \({y\choose z}{x\choose z}\) is idempotent. We have that \({y\mu_{\varphi}\choose z'}{x\mu_{\varphi}\choose y\mu_{\varphi}}\) is also idempotent, and so z′= φ by Lemma 4.2. Hence, from
$$\left({x\choose z} {y\choose z}\right)\varphi={x\mu_{\varphi}\choose y \mu_{\varphi}} {y\mu_{\varphi}\choose x\mu_{\varphi}}={y \mu_{\varphi}\choose x\mu_{\varphi}}=\left({y\choose z}\right)\varphi $$
and φ is a bijection, we have that \({x\choose z}{y\choose z}={y\choose z}\) and so x=y, a contradiction.

We have proved Fact 3, and from Fact 2 we see that μ φ U ρ , and so the proof of Lemma 4.5 is now completes.  □

Lemma 4.6

For any \({x\choose y}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\) and for any μU ρ we have that
$$\mu^{-1}{x\choose y}\mu={x\mu\choose y\mu}. $$


For every zX n we have
$$z\mu^{-1}{x\choose y}\mu=\left \{ \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c} y\mu, & z\mu^{-1}=x\\ z, & z\mu^{-1}\neq x \end{array} \right .=\left \{ \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c} y\mu, & z=x\mu\\ z, & z \neq x\mu \end{array} \right .=z{x\mu\choose y \mu}, $$
and so \(\mu^{-1}{x\choose y}\mu={x\mu\choose y\mu}\). □

We now can state and prove the main result of the paper as follows:

Theorem 4.7

Let S n the symmetric group of X n and U ρ ={μS n :()μ=,xX n }. Then U ρ is the unit group of T(ρ,⪯) and, for any \(\varphi\in \operatorname{Aut} T(\rho,\preceq)\), there exists μU ρ such that (α)φ=μ −1 αμ for all αT(ρ,⪯).

Conversely, let μU ρ . Then μ −1 αμT(ρ,⪯) for any αT(ρ,⪯), and the map φ:T(ρ,⪯)→T(ρ,⪯) defined by (α)φ=μ −1 αμ,αT(ρ,⪯) is an automorphism.


Let \(\varphi\in \operatorname{Aut} T(\rho,\preceq)\). Then, first by Lemmas 4.5 and 4.6, there exists μU ρ such that
$$\left({x\choose y}\right)\varphi={x\mu\choose y\mu}=\mu^{-1}{x\choose y}\mu, \quad \hbox{for any } {x\choose y}\in E^{w}_{\rho}. $$
Secondly, we will prove that (α)φ=μ −1 αμ for all αU ρ . For αU ρ , we must have (α)φU ρ , and by Lemma 4.6, for any \({x\choose y}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\), we have Hence, xαμ=(α)φ and yαμ=(α)φ. It follows that (α)φ=μ −1 αμ.

Finally, for any \(\alpha\in T(\rho,\preceq)-E^{w}_{\rho}-U_{\rho}\), we have that α is a product of elements in \(E^{w}_{\rho}\cup U_{\rho }\) by Proposition 2.5. It follows that (α)φ=μ −1 αμ as required.

The converse part is obvious. □


The μ is unique in Theorem 4.7. Indeed, let μ 1,μ 2 be elements of U ρ such that \(\mu_{1}^{-1}\alpha\mu_{1}=\mu_{2}^{-1}\alpha\mu_{2}\) for all αT(ρ,⪯). Now, given any xX n , we can choose an element yX n such that \({x\choose y}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\) or \({y\choose x}\in E^{w}_{\rho}\). For the former (Similarly for the latter), we have
$${x\mu_{1}\choose y\mu_{1}}=\mu_{1}^{-1}{x \choose y}\mu_{1}=\mu_{2}^{-1}{x\choose y} \mu_{2}={x\mu_{2}\choose y\mu_{2}}. $$
Hence 1= 2, and so μ 1=μ 2.
The map \(\varPsi: \operatorname{Aut} T(\rho,\preceq)\rightarrow U_{\rho}\) defined by
$$(\varphi)\varPsi=\mu_{\varphi},\!\quad \varphi\in \operatorname{Aut} T(\rho,\preceq),\!\quad \mu_{\varphi}\in U_{\rho} \!\quad \hbox{with } (\alpha)\varphi= \mu_{\varphi}^{-1}\alpha\mu_{\varphi}, \!\quad\forall\alpha \in T(\rho,\preceq) $$
is an isomorphism. We have

Corollary 4.8

\(\operatorname{Aut} T(\rho,\preceq) \cong U_{\rho}\).

Let PT n be the semigroup of partial transformations on X n . Let \(S_{n}^{-}=\{\alpha\in T_{n}: x\alpha\leq x, \forall x\in X_{n}\}\) [9]. Then, by Corollary 4.8, we have

Corollary 4.9

\(\operatorname{Aut} T_{n}\cong S_{n}\); \(\operatorname{Aut} \mathit{PT}_{n} \cong S_{n}\) and \(\operatorname{Aut} S_{n}^{-} \cong\{1_{X_{n}}\}\).


Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.


  1. 1.
    Araújo, J., Konieczny, J.: Automorphism groups of centralizers of idempotents. J. Algebra 269, 227–239 (2003) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fountain, J.B.: Abundant semigroups. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 44(33), 103–129 (1982) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ganyushkin, O., Mazorchuk, V.: Classical Finite Transformation Semigroups: an Introduction. Algebra and Application, vol. 9 (2009) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Higgins, P.: Techniques of Semigroup Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992) MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Howie, J.M.: Fundamentals of Semigroup Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995) MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schreier, J.: Über Abbildungen einer Abstrakten Menge auf ihre Teilmengen. Fundam. Math. 28, 261–264 (1936) MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sullivan, R.P.: Automorphisms of transformation semigroups. J. Aust. Math. Soc. 20, 77–84 (1975) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Šutov, È.G.: Homomorphisms of the semigroup of all partial transformations. Izv. Vysš. Učebn. Zaved., Mat. 3, 177–184 (1961) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Umar, A.: On the semigroups of order-decreasing finite full transformations. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A, Math. 120, 129–142 (1992) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xiuliang, Y., Haobo, Y.: Maximal half-transitive submonoids of full transformation semigroups. Adv. Math. 40(5), 580–586 (2011) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Qiangjiang CollegeHangzhou Normal UniversityHangzhou CityP.R. China
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsHangzhou Normal UniversityHangzhou CityP.R. China

Personalised recommendations