Advertisement

The Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 247, Issue 3, pp 289–290 | Cite as

Reply to Response to ‘What Do Aquaporin Knockout Studies Tell Us about Fluid Transport in Epithelia?’ Maclaren OJ, Sneyd J, Crampin EJ (2013) J Membr Biol 246:297–305

  • Oliver J. MaclarenEmail author
  • James Sneyd
  • Edmund J. Crampin
Letter to the Editor

Keywords

Mathematical Model Human Physiology Water Transport Water Flux Water Permeability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Hill AE, Shachar-Hill Y (2013) Response to “What do aquaporin knockout studies tell us about fluid transport in epithelia?” Maclaren OJ, Sneyd J, Crampin EJ (2013) The Journal of Membrane Biology 246:297–305. J Membr Biol 246(9):665–667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Maclaren OJ, Sneyd J, Crampin EJ (2012) Efficiency of primary saliva secretion: an analysis of parameter dependence in dynamic single-cell and acinus models, with application to aquaporin knockout studies. J Membr Biol 245:29–50PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Maclaren OJ, Sneyd J, Crampin EJ (2013) What do aquaporin knockout studies tell us about fluid transport in epithelia? J Membr Biol 246:297–305PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver J. Maclaren
    • 1
    Email author
  • James Sneyd
    • 2
  • Edmund J. Crampin
    • 3
  1. 1.Mathematical InstituteUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.Melbourne School of EngineeringThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations