The Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 245, Issue 10, pp 611–616

Enhanced Killing Effect of Nanosecond Pulse Electric Fields on PANC1 and Jurkat Cell Lines in the Presence of Tween 80

  • Gaurav Basu
  • Bhargava Subhash Kalluri
  • Ahmet Can Sabuncu
  • Christopher J. Osgood
  • Michael W. Stacey
Article

Abstract

We investigated the effects of nanosecond pulse electric fields (nsPEFs) on Jurkat and PANC1 cells, which are human carcinoma cell lines, in the presence of Tween 80 (T80) at a concentration of 0.18 % and demonstarted an enhanced killing effect. We used two biological assays to determine cell viability after exposing cells to nsPEFs in the presence of T80 and observed a significant increase in the killing effect of nsPEFs. We did not see a toxic effect of T80 when cells were exposed to surfactant alone. However, we saw a synergistic effect when cells exposed to T80 were combined with the nsPEFs. Increasing the time of exposure for up to 8 h in T80 led to a significant decrease in cell viability when nsPEFs were applied to cells compared to control cells. We also observed cell type–specific swelling in the presence of T80. We suggest that T80 acts as an adjuvant in facilitating the effects of nsPEFs on the cell membrane; however, the limitations of the viability assays were addressed. We conclude that T80 may increase the fragility of the cell membrane, which makes it more susceptible to nsPEF-mediated killing.

Keywords

Nanosecond pulse electric field Tween 80 PANC1 cell Jurkat cell 

References

  1. André FM, Rassokhin MA, Bowman AM et al (2010) Gadolinium blocks membrane permeabilization induced by nanosecond electric pulses and reduces cell death. Bioelectrochemistry 79:95–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basrur V, Chitnis M, Menon R (1983) Differential agglutination of P388 Adriamycin-sensitive and P388 Adriamycin-resistant leukemia cells. Oncology 40:202–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beebe S, White J, Blackmore P et al (2003a) Diverse effects of nanosecond pulsed electric fields on cells and tissues. DNA Cell Biol 22:785–796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beebe SJ, Fox PM, Rec LJ et al (2003b) Nanosecond, high-intensity pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in human cells. FASEB J 17:1493–1495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowman A, Nesin O, Pakhomova O et al (2010) Analysis of plasma membrane integrity by fluorescent detection of Tl+ uptake. J Membr Biol 236:15–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen X, James Swanson R, Kolb J et al (2009) Histopathology of normal skin and melanomas after nanosecond pulsed electric field treatment. Melanoma Res 19:361–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chitnis M, Menon R, Gude R (1984) Effect of Tween 80 on Adriamycin cytotoxicity in murine P388 leukemia. Tumori 70:313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Coors E, Seybold H, Merk H et al (2005) Polysorbate 80 in medical products and nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 95:593–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones M (1999) Surfactants in membrane solubilisation. Int J Pharm 177:137–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kandušer M, Šentjurc M, Miklavcic D (2006) Cell membrane fluidity related to electroporation and resealing. Eur Biophys J 35(3):196–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kolb J, Kono S, Schoenbach K (2006) Nanosecond pulsed electric field generators for the study of subcellular effects. Bioelectromagnetics 27:172–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nuccitelli R, Pliquett U, Chen X et al (2006) Nanosecond pulsed electric fields cause melanomas to self-destruct. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 343:351–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pakhomov A, Kolb J, White J et al (2007) Long-lasting plasma membrane permeabilization in mammalian cells by nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF). Bioelectromagnetics 28:655–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parris C, Masters J, Walker M et al (1987) Intravesical chemotherapy: combination with Tween 80 increases cytotoxicity in vitro. Urol Res 15:17–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Peskin A, Winterbourn C (2000) A microtiter plate assay for superoxide dismutase using a water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-1). Clin Chim Acta 293:157–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Riehm H, Biedler J (1972) Potentiation of drug effect by Tween 80 in Chinese hamster cells resistant to actinomycin D and daunomycin. Cancer Res 32:1195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sabuncu A, Kalluri B, Qian S et al (2010) Dispersion state and toxicity of mwCNTs in cell culture medium with different T80 concentrations. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 78:36–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schwan H, Chiabrera C, Nicolini C (1985) Interactions between electromagnetic fields and cells. Plenum Press, New York, pp 173–191Google Scholar
  19. Sehested M, Jensen P, Skovsgaard T et al (1989) Inhibition of vincristine binding to plasma membrane vesicles from daunorubicin-resistant Ehrlich ascites cells by multidrug resistance modulators. Br J Cancer 60:809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stacey M, Fox P, Buescher S, Kolb J (2011) Nanosecond pulsed electric field induced cytoskeleton, nuclear membrane and telomere damage adversely impact cell survival. Bioelectrochemistry 82:131–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tennant J (1964) Evaluation of the trypan blue technique for determination of cell viability. Transplantation 2:685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tsujino I, Yamazaki T, Masutani M et al (1999) Effect of Tween-80 on cell killing by etoposide in human lung adenocarcinoma cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 43:29–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vernier P, Sun Y, Marcu L et al (2003) Calcium bursts induced by nanosecond electric pulses. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 310:286–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wallace PG, Huang M, Linnane AW (1968) The biogenesis of mitochondria: II. The influence of medium composition on the cytology of anaerobically grown Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 37:207–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yaoqin Y, Huchuan Y, Huihong T et al (1996) The enhancement of Tween-80 on the antitumor effect of the hyperthermia 41 °C in tumor-bearing mice. Chin J Cancer Res 8:168–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zheng Z, Obbard J (2002) Evaluation of an elevated non-ionic surfactant critical micelle concentration in a soil/aqueous system. Water Res 36:2667–2672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gaurav Basu
    • 1
  • Bhargava Subhash Kalluri
    • 1
  • Ahmet Can Sabuncu
    • 1
  • Christopher J. Osgood
    • 1
  • Michael W. Stacey
    • 1
  1. 1.Frank Reidy Research Center for BioelectricsOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations