The Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 236, Issue 1, pp 87–95 | Cite as

Use of Collagen Gel as a Three-Dimensional In Vitro Model to Study Electropermeabilization and Gene Electrotransfer

  • Saša Haberl
  • Mojca Pavlin


Gene electrotransfer is a promising nonviral method that enables transfer of plasmid DNA into cells with electric pulses. Although many in vitro and in vivo studies have been performed, the question of the implied gene electrotransfer mechanisms is largely open. The main obstacle toward efficient gene electrotransfer in vivo is relatively poor mobility of DNA in tissues. Since cells are mechanically coupled to their extracellular environment and act differently compared to standard in vitro conditions, we developed a three-dimensional (3-D) in vitro model of CHO cells embedded in collagen gel as an ex vivo model of tissue to study electropermeabilization and different parameters of gene electrotransfer. For this purpose, we first used propidium iodide to detect electropermeabilization of CHO cells embedded in collagen gel. Then, we analyzed the influence of different concentrations of plasmid DNA and pulse duration on gene electrotransfer efficiency. Our results revealed that even if cells in collagen gel can be efficiently electropermeabilized, gene expression is significantly lower. Gene electrotransfer efficiency in our 3-D in vitro model had similar dependence on concentration of plasmid DNA and pulse duration comparable to in vivo studies, where longer (millisecond) pulses were shown to be more optimal compared to shorter (microsecond) pulses. The presented results demonstrate that our 3-D in vitro model resembles the in vivo situation more closely than conventional 2-D cell cultures and, thus, provides an environment closer to in vivo conditions to study mechanisms of gene electrotransfer.


3-D in vitro model Collagen gel Gene electrotransfer GFP Electropermeabilization Propidium iodide CHO cell 


  1. Aihara H, Miyazaki J (1998) Gene transfer into muscle by electroporation in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 16:867–870CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andre F, Gehl J, Sersa G et al (2008) Efficiency of high and low voltage pulse combinations for gene electrotransfer in muscle, liver, tumor and skin. Hum Gene Ther 19:1261–1271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreason GL, Evans GA (1989) Optimization of electroporation for transfection of mammalian cell lines. Anal Biochem 180:269–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barralet JE, Wang L, Lawson M et al (2005) Comparison of bone marrow cell growth on 2D and 3D alginate hydrogels. J Mater Sci Mater Med 16:515–519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein P, Dong M, Corbeil D et al (2009) Pellet culture elicits superior chondrogenic redifferentiation than alginate-based systems. Biotechnol Prog 25:1146–1152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bettan M, Ivanov MA, Mir LM et al (2000) Efficient DNA electrotransfer into tumors. Bioelectrochemistry 52:83–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bureau MF, Gehl J, Deleuze V et al (2000) Importance of association between permeabilization and electrophoretic forces for intramuscular DNA electrotransfer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1474:353–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrne CM, Thompson JF (2006) Role of electrochemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic melanoma and other metastatic and primary skin tumors. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 6:671–678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Canatella PJ, Black MM, Bonnichsen DM et al (2004) Tissue electroporation: quantification and analysis of heterogeneous transport in multicellular environments. Biophys J 86:3260–3268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cemazar M, Sersa G, Wilson J et al (2002) Effective gene transfer to solid tumors using different nonviral gene delivery techniques: electroporation, liposomes, and integrin-targeted vector. Cancer Gene Ther 9:399–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cemazar M, Golzio M, Sersa G et al (2006) Electrically-assisted nucleic acids delivery to tissues in vivo: where do we stand? Curr Pharm Des 12:3817–3825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chevallay B, Herbage D (2000) Collagen-based biomaterials as 3D scaffold for cell cultures: applications for tissue engineering and gene therapy. Med Biol Eng Comput 38:211–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cotten M, Wagner E (1993) Non-viral approaches to gene therapy. Curr Opin Biotechnol 4:705–710CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR et al (2001) Taking cell–matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 294:1708–1712CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Curiel DT, Agarwal S, Wagner E et al (1991) Adenovirus enhancement of transferring-polylysine-mediated gene delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:8850–8854CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Drury L (1996) Transformation of bacteria by electroporation. Methods Mol Biol 58:249–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ganeva V, Galutzov B, Teissie J (1995) Electric field mediated loading of macromolecules in intact yeast cells is critically controlled at the wall level. Biochim Biophys Acta 1240:229–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gehl J, Mir LM (1999) Determination of optimal parameters for in vivo gene transfer by electroporation, using a rapid in vivo test for cell permeabilization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 261:377–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Le Deist F, Carlier F et al (2002) Sustained correction of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency by ex vivo gene therapy. N Engl J Med 346:1185–1193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Harkin DG, Hay ED (1996) Effects of electroporation on the tubulin cytoskeleton and directed migration of corneal fibroblasts cultured within collagen matrices. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 35:345–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Heller R, Jaroszeski M, Atkin A et al (1996) In vivo gene electroinjection and expression in rat liver. FEBS Lett 389:225–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hindie M, Vayssade M, Dufresne M et al (2006) Interactions of B16F10 melanoma cells aggregated on a cellulose substrate. J Cell Biochem 99:96–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanduser M, Miklavcic D, Pavlin M (2009) Mechanisms involved in gene electrotransfer using high- and low-voltage pulses—an in vitro study. Bioelectrochemistry 74:265–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kikuchi A, Aoki Y, Sugaya S et al (1999) Development of novel cationic liposomes for efficient gene transfer into peritoneal disseminated tumor. Hum Gene Ther 10:947–955CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim JB, Stein R, O’Hare MJ (2004) Three-dimensional in vitro tissue culture models of breast cancer—a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 85:281–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee GY, Kenny PA, Lee EH et al (2007) Three-dimensional culture models of normal and malignant breast epithelial cells. Nat Methods 4:359–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall E (1999) Gene therapy death prompts review of adenovirus vector. Science 286:2244–2245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Miklavcic D, Beravs K, Semrov D et al (1998) The importance of electric field distribution for effective in vivo electroporation of tissues. Biophys J 74:2152–2158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mir LM, Belehradek M, Domenge C et al (1991) Electrochemotherapy, a new antitumor treatment: first clinical trial. C R Acad Sci III 313:613–618PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mir LM, Glass LF, Sersa G et al (1998) Effective treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous malignant tumors by electrochemotherapy. Br J Cancer 77:2336–2342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mir LM, Bureau MF, Gehl J et al (1999) High-efficiency gene transfer into skeletal muscle mediated by electric pulses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:4262–4267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Muller KJ, Sukhorukov VL, Zimmermann U (2001) Reversible electropermeabilization of mammalian cells by high-intensity, ultra-short pulses of submicrosecond duration. J Membr Biol 184:161–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Neumann E, Rosenheck K (1972) Permeability changes induced by electric impulses in vesicular membranes. J Membr Biol 10:279–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y et al (1982) Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J 7:841–845Google Scholar
  35. Nishi T, Yoshizato K, Yamashiro S et al (1996) High-efficiency in vivo gene transfer using intraarterial plasmid DNA injection following in vivo electroporation. Cancer Res 56:1050–1055PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ong SY, Dai H, Leong KW (2006) Inducing hepatic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in pellet culture. Biomaterials 27:4087–4097CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pavlin M, Flisar K, Kandušer M (2010) The role of electrophoresis in gene electrotransfer. J Membr Biol. doi: 10.1007/s00232-010-9276-z
  38. Potter H (1988) Electroporation in biology: methods, applications, and instrumentation. Anal Biochem 174:361–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rols MP, Teissie J (1998) Electropermeabilization of mammalian cells to macromolecules: control by pulse duration. Biophys J 75:1415–1423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rols MP, Delteil C, Golzio M et al (1998) In vivo electrically mediated protein and gene transfer in murine melanoma. Nat Biotechnol 16:168–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Satkauskas S, Bureau MF, Puc M et al (2002) Mechanisms of in vivo DNA electrotransfer: respective contributions of cell electropermeabilization and DNA electrophoresis. Mol Ther 5:133–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Satkauskas S, Andre F, Bureau MF et al (2005) Electrophoretic component of electric pulses determines the efficacy of in vivo DNA electrotransfer. Hum Gene Ther 16:1194–1201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sersa G (2006) The state-of-the-art of electrochemotherapy before the ESOPE study: advantages and clinical uses. Eur J Cancer Suppl 4:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sersa G, Stabuc B, Cemazar M et al (2000) Electrochemotherapy with cisplatin: clinical experience in malignant melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 6:863–867PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Simoes S, Slepushkin V, Gaspar R et al (1998) Gene delivery by negatively charged ternary complexes of DNA, cationic liposomes and transferrin or fusogenic peptides. Gene Ther 5:955–964CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Simon JR (1993) Transformation of intact yeast cells by electroporation. Methods Enzymol 217:478–483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Somiari S, Glasspool-Malone J, Drabick JJ et al (2000) Theory and in vivo application of electroporative gene delivery. Mol Ther 2:178–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sukhorukov VL, Reuss R, Zimmermann D et al (2005) Surviving high-intensity field pulses: strategies for improving robustness and performance of electrotransfection and electrofusion. J Membr Biol 206:187–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Terzaghi WB, Cashmore AR (1997) Plant cell transfection by electroporation. Methods Mol Biol 62:453–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tevz G, Pavlin D, Kamensek U et al (2008) Gene electrotransfer into murine skeletal muscle: a systematic analysis of parameters for long-term gene expression. Technol Cancer Res Treat 7:91–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Titomirov A, Sukarev S, Kistanova E (1991) In vivo electroporation and stable transformation of skin cells of newborn mice by plasmid DNA. Biochim Biophys Acta 1088:131–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ušaj M, Trontelj K, Miklavčič D, Kandušer M (2010) Cell–cell electrofusion: optimization of electric field amplitude and hypotonic treatment for mouse melanoma (B16-F1) and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. J Membr Biol. doi: 10.1007/s00232-010-9272-3
  53. Vienken J, Zimmermann U (1985) An improved electrofusion technique for production of mouse hybridoma cells. FEBS Lett 182:278–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wagner E, Plank C, Zatloukal K et al (1992) Influenza virus hemagglutinin HA-2N-terminal fusogenic peptides augment gene transfer by transferring-polylysine-DNA complexes: toward a synthetic virus-like gene-transfer vehicle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:7934–7938CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wasungu L, Escoffre JM, Valette A et al (2009) A 3D in vitro spheroid model as a way to study the mechanisms of electroporation. Int J Pharm 379:278–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Wolf H, Rols MP, Boldt E et al (1994) Control by pulse parameters of electric field-mediated gene transfer in mammalian cells. Biophys J 66:524–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zaharoff DA, Yuan F (2004) Effects of pulse strength and pulse duration on in vitro DNA electromobility. Bioelectrochemistry 62:37–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Zaharoff DA, Barr RC, Li CY et al (2002) Electromobility of plasmid DNA in tumor tissues during electric field-mediated gene delivery. Gene Ther 9:1286–1290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations