The Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 236, Issue 1, pp 3–13 | Cite as

Induced Transmembrane Voltage and Its Correlation with Electroporation-Mediated Molecular Transport

  • Tadej Kotnik
  • Gorazd Pucihar
  • Damijan Miklavčič
Article

Abstract

Exposure of a cell to an electric field results in inducement of a voltage across its membrane (induced transmembrane voltage, ΔΨm) and, for sufficiently strong fields, in a transient increase of membrane permeability (electroporation). We review the analytical, numerical and experimental methods for determination of ΔΨm and a method for monitoring of transmembrane transport. We then combine these methods to investigate the correlation between ΔΨm and molecular transport through an electroporated membrane for isolated cells of regular and irregular shapes, for cells in dense suspensions as well as for cells in monolayer clusters. Our experiments on isolated cells of both regular and irregular shapes confirm the theoretical prediction that the highest absolute values of ΔΨm are found in the membrane regions facing the electrodes and that electroporation-mediated transport is confined to these same regions. For cells in clusters, the location of transport regions implies that, at the field strengths sufficient for electroporation, the cells behave as electrically insulated (i.e., as individual) cells. In contrast, with substantially weaker, nonelectroporating fields, potentiometric measurements show that the cells in these same clusters behave as electrically interconnected cells (i.e., as one large cell). These results suggest that sufficiently high electric fields affect the intercellular pathways and thus alter the electric behavior of the cells with respect to their normal physiological state.

Keywords

Induced transmembrane voltage Electroporation Transmembrane transport Isolated cell Cell suspension Cell cluster Di-8-ANEPPS Propidium iodide 

References

  1. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J et al (2008) Molecular biology of the cell, 5th edn. Garland Science, New York, pp 669–671Google Scholar
  2. Bernhard J, Pauly H (1973) Generation of potential differences across membranes of ellipsoidal cells in an alternating electrical field. Biophysik 10:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bukauskas FF, Elfgang C, Willecke K et al (1995) Biophysical properties of gap junction channels formed by mouse connexin40 in induced pairs of transfected human HeLa cells. Biophys J 68:2289–2298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng DKL, Tung L, Sobie EA (1999) Nonuniform responses of transmembrane potential during electric field stimulation of single cardiac cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 277:H351–H362Google Scholar
  5. El-Fouly MH, Trosko JE, Chang CC (1987) Scrape-loading and dye transfer: a rapid and simple technique to study gap junctional intercellular communication. Exp Cell Res 168:422–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Escoffre JM, Portet T, Wasungu L et al (2009) What is (still not) known of the mechanism by which electroporation mediates gene transfer and expression in cells and tissues. Mol Biotechnol 41:286–295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fluhler E, Burnham VG, Loew LM (1985) Spectra, membrane binding, and potentiometric responses of new charge shift probes. Biochemistry 24:5749–5755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gabriel B, Teissié J (1997) Direct observation in the millisecond time range of fluorescent molecule asymmetrical interaction with the electropermeabilized cell membrane. Biophys J 73:2630–2637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gabriel B, Teissié J (1999) Time courses of mammalian cell electropermeabilization observed by millisecond imaging of membrane property changes during the pulse. Biophys J 76:2158–2165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gimsa J, Wachner D (2001) Analytical description of the transmembrane voltage induced on arbitrarily oriented ellipsoidal and cylindrical cells. Biophys J 81:1888–1896CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gross D, Loew LM, Webb W (1986) Optical imaging of cell membrane potential changes induced by applied electric fields. Biophys J 50:339–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Grosse C, Schwan HP (1992) Cellular membrane potentials induced by alternating fields. Biophys J 63:1632–1642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris AL, Spray DC, Bennett MVL (1981) Kinetic properties of a voltage-dependent junctional conductance. J Gen Physiol 77:95–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hassan N, Chatterjee I, Publicover NG et al (2002) Mapping membrane-potential perturbations of chromaffin cells exposed to electric fields. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 30:1516–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He H, Chang DC, Lee YK (2007) Using a micro electroporation chip to determine the optimal physical parameters in the uptake of biomolecules in HeLa cells. Bioelectrochemistry 70:363–368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Heida T, Wagenaar JBM, Rutten WLC, Marani E (2002) Investigating membrane breakdown of neuronal cells exposed to nonuniform electric fields by finite-element modeling and experiments. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49:1195–1203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hibino M, Shigemori M, Itoh H et al (1991) Membrane conductance of an electroporated cell analyzed by submicrosecond imaging of transmembrane potential. Biophys J 59:209–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hibino M, Itoh H, Kinosita K Jr (1993) Time courses of cell electroporation as revealed by submicrosecond imaging of transmembrane potential. Biophys J 64:1789–1800CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu Q, Joshi RP (2009) Transmembrane voltage analyses in spheroidal cells in response to an intense ultrashort electrical pulse. Phys Rev E 79:11901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kennedy SM, Ji Z, Hedstrom JC et al (2008) Quantification of electroporative uptake kinetics and electric field heterogeneity effects in cells. Biophys J 94:5018–5027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kotnik T, Miklavčič D (2000a) Analytical description of transmembrane voltage induced by electric fields on spheroidal cells. Biophys J 79:670–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kotnik T, Miklavčič D (2000b) Second-order model of membrane electric field induced by alternating external electric fields. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 47:1074–1081CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kotnik T, Miklavčič D (2006) Theoretical evaluation of voltage inducement on internal membranes of biological cells exposed to electric fields. Biophys J 90:480–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kotnik T, Bobanović F, Miklavčič D (1997) Sensitivity of transmembrane voltage induced by applied electric fields—a theoretical analysis. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 43:285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kotnik T, Miklavčič D, Slivnik T (1998) Time course of transmembrane voltage induced by time-varying electric fields—a method for theoretical analysis and its application. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 45:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lodish H, Berk A, Kaiser CA et al (2008) Molecular cell biology, 6th edn. WH Freeman, New York, pp 458–460Google Scholar
  27. Loew LM (1992) Voltage sensitive dyes: measurement of membrane potentials induced by DC and AC electric fields. Bioelectromagn Suppl 1:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lojewska Z, Franks DL, Ehrenberg B et al (1989) Analysis of the effect of medium and membrane conductance on the amplitude and kinetics of membrane potentials induced by externally applied electric fields. Biophys J 56:121–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Maswiwat K, Wachner D, Gimsa J (2008) Effects of cell orientation and electric field frequency on the transmembrane potential induced in ellipsoidal cells. Bioelectrochemistry 74:130–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Miklavčič D, Šemrov D, Mekid H et al (2000) A validated model of in vivo electric field distribution in tissues for electrochemotherapy and for DNA electrotransfer for gene therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1523:73–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Neumann E, Rosenheck K (1972) Permeability changes induced by electric impulses in vesicular membranes. J Membr Biol 10:279–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pauly H, Schwan HP (1959) Über die Impedanz einer Suspension von kugelformigen Teilchen mit einer Schale. Z Naturforsch B 14:125–131Google Scholar
  33. Pavlin M, Pavšelj N, Miklavčič D (2002) Dependence of induced transmembrane potential on cell density, arrangement, and cell position inside a cell system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49:605–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pucihar G, Kotnik T, Valič B et al (2006) Numerical determination of transmembrane voltage induced on irregularly shaped cells. Ann Biomed Eng 34:642–652CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pucihar G, Kotnik T, Teissié J et al (2007) Electroporation of dense cell suspensions. Eur Biophys J 36:173–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Pucihar G, Kotnik T, Miklavčič D et al (2008) Kinetics of transmembrane transport of small molecules into electropermeabilized cells. Biophys J 95:2837–2848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pucihar G, Miklavčič D, Kotnik T (2009a) A time-dependent numerical model of transmembrane voltage inducement and electroporation of irregularly shaped cells. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56:1491–1501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pucihar G, Kotnik T, Miklavčič D (2009b) Measuring the induced membrane voltage with di-8-ANEPPS. J Vis Exp 33:1659Google Scholar
  39. Qu Y, Dahl G (2002) Function of the voltage gate of gap junction channels: selective exclusion of molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:697–702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Susil R, Šemrov D, Miklavčič D (1998) Electric field induced transmembrane potential depends on cell density and organization. Electro Magnetobiol 17:391–399Google Scholar
  41. Teissié J, Rols MP (1993) An experimental evaluation of the critical potential difference inducing cell membrane electropermeabilization. Biophys J 65:409–413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Teissié J, Golzio M, Rols MP (2005) Mechanisms of cell membrane electropermeabilization: a minireview of our present (lack of?) knowledge. Biochim Biophys Acta 1724:270–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tekle E, Astumian RD, Chock PB (1994) Selective and asymmetric molecular-transport across electroporated cell-membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:11512–11516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Teruel MN, Meyer T (1997) Electroporation-induced formation of individual calcium entry sites in the cell body and processes of adherent cells. Biophys J 73:1785–1796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Towhidi L, Kotnik T, Pucihar G et al (2008) Variability of the minimal transmembrane voltage resulting in detectable membrane electroporation. Electromagn Biol Med 27:372–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tsong TY (1991) Electroporation of cell membranes. Biophys J 60:297–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Valič B, Golzio M, Pavlin M et al (2003) Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment. Eur Biophys J 32:519–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Valiunas V, Bukauskas FF, Weingart R (1997) Conductances and selective permeability of connexin43 gap junction channels examined in neonatal rat heart cells. Circul Res 80:708–719Google Scholar
  49. Weaver JC (2003) Electroporation of biological membranes from multicellular to nano scales. IEEE Trans Diel El Insul 10:754–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yeager M, Harris AL (2007) Gap junction channel structure in the early 21st century: facts and fantasies. Curr Opin Cell Biol 19:521–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Ying W, Henriquez CS (2007) Hybrid finite element method for describing the electrical response of biological cells to applied fields. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54:611–620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tadej Kotnik
    • 1
  • Gorazd Pucihar
    • 1
  • Damijan Miklavčič
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations