The Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 236, Issue 1, pp 15–26 | Cite as

Analysis of Plasma Membrane Integrity by Fluorescent Detection of Tl+ Uptake

  • Angela M. Bowman
  • Olena M. Nesin
  • Olga N. Pakhomova
  • Andrei G. Pakhomov
Article

Abstract

The exclusion of polar dyes by healthy cells is widely employed as a simple and reliable test for cell membrane integrity. However, commonly used dyes (propidium, Yo-Pro-1, trypan blue) cannot detect membrane defects which are smaller than the dye molecule itself, such as nanopores that form by exposure to ultrashort electric pulses (USEPs). Instead, here we demonstrate that opening of nanopores can be efficiently detected and studied by fluorescent measurement of Tl+ uptake. Various mammalian cells (CHO, GH3, NG108), loaded with a Tl+-sensitive fluorophore FluxOR™ and subjected to USEPs in a Tl+-containing bath buffer, displayed an immediate (within <100 ms), dose-dependent surge of fluorescence. In all tested cell lines, the threshold for membrane permeabilization to Tl+ by 600-ns USEP was at 1–2 kV/cm, and the rate of Tl+ uptake increased linearly with increasing the electric field. The lack of concurrent entry of larger dye molecules suggested that the size of nanopores is less than 1–1.5 nm. Tested ion channel inhibitors as well as removal of the extracellular Ca2+ did not block the USEP effect. Addition of a Tl+-containing buffer within less than 10 min after USEP also caused a fluorescence surge, which confirms the minutes-long lifetime of nanopores. Overall, the technique of fluorescent detection of Tl+ uptake proved highly effective, noninvasive and sensitive for visualization and analysis of membrane defects which are too small for conventional dye uptake detection methods.

Keywords

Electroporation Nanosecond electric pulses Nanopores Thallium Cell membrane Dye uptake Membrane integrity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by R01CA125482 from the National Cancer Institute.

References

  1. Beebe SJ, Fox PM, Rec LJ, Willis EL, Schoenbach KH (2003a) Nanosecond, high-intensity pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in human cells. FASEB J 17:1493–1495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Beebe SJ, White J, Blackmore PF, Deng Y, Somers K, Schoenbach KH (2003b) Diverse effects of nanosecond pulsed electric fields on cells and tissues. DNA Cell Biol 22:785–796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Creighton TE (1993) Proteins: structures and molecular properties. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Czarnecki A, Dufy-Barbe L, Huet S, Odessa M-F, Bresson-Bepoldin L (2003) Potassium channel expression level is dependent on the proliferation state in the GH3 pituitary cell line. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 284:1054–1064Google Scholar
  5. DeCoursey TE, Chandy KG, Gupta S, Cahalan MD (1985) Voltage-dependent ion channels in T-lymphocytes. J Neuroimmunol 10:71–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Djuzenova CS, Zimmermann U, Frank H, Sukhorukov VL, Richter E, Fuhr G (1996) Effect of medium conductivity and composition on the uptake of propidium iodide into electropermeabilized myeloma cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1284:143–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gamper N, Stockand JD, Shapiro MS (2005) The use of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells in the study of ion channels. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 51:177–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Glaser RW, Leikin SL, Chernomordik LV, Pastushenko VF, Sokirko AI (1988) Reversible electrical breakdown of lipid bilayers: formation and evolution of pores. Biochim Biophys Acta 940:275–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Golzio M, Teissie J, Rols MP (2002) Direct visualization at the single-cell level of electrically mediated gene delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:1292–1297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gowrishankar TR, Weaver JC (2006) Electrical behavior and pore accumulation in a multicellular model for conventional and supra-electroporation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 349:643–653CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hille B (2001) Ionic channels of excitable membranes. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu Q, Viswanadham S, Joshi RP, Schoenbach KH, Beebe SJ, Blackmore PF (2005) Simulations of transient membrane behavior in cells subjected to a high-intensity, ultra-short electric pulse. Phys Rev E 71:031914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ibey BL, Xiao S, Schoenbach KH, Murphy MR, Pakhomov AG (2009) Plasma membrane permeabilization by 60- and 600-ns electric pulses is determined by the absorbed dose. Bioelectromagnetics 30:92–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Idone V, Tam C, Andrews NW (2008a) Two-way traffic on the road to plasma membrane repair. Trends Cell Biol 18:552–559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Idone V, Tam C, Goss JW, Toomre D, Pypaert M, Andrews NW (2008b) Repair of injured plasma membrane by rapid Ca2+-dependent endocytosis. J Cell Biol 180:905–914CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kotnik T, Miklavcic D (2006) Theoretical evaluation of voltage inducement on internal membranes of biological cells exposed to electric fields. Biophys J 90:480–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Neumann E, Sowers AE, Jordan CA (1989) Electroporation and electrofusion in cell biology. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Niswender CM, Johnson KA, Luo Q, Ayala JE, Kim C, Conn PJ, Weaver CD (2008) A novel assay of Gi/o-linked G protein-coupled receptor coupling to potassium channels provides new insights into the pharmacology of the group III metabotropic glutamate receptors. Mol Pharmacol 73:1213–1224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pakhomov AG, Pakhomova ON (2010) Nanopores: a distinct transmembrane passageway in electroporated cells. In: Pakhomov AG, Miklavcic D, Markov MS (eds) Advanced electroporation techniques in biology in medicine. CRC Press, pp 178–194Google Scholar
  20. Pakhomov AG, Phinney A, Ashmore J, Walker KJK, Kono S, Schoenbach KS, Murphy MR (2004) Characterization of the cytotoxic effect of high-intensity, 10-ns duration electrical pulses. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 32:1579–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pakhomov AG, Kolb JF, White JA, Joshi RP, Xiao S, Schoenbach KH (2007a) Long-lasting plasma membrane permeabilization in mammalian cells by nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF). Bioelectromagnetics 28:655–663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pakhomov AG, Shevin R, White JA, Kolb JF, Pakhomova ON, Joshi RP, Schoenbach KH (2007b) Membrane permeabilization and cell damage by ultrashort electric field shocks. Arch Biochem Biophys 465:109–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pakhomov AG, Bowman AM, Ibey BL, Andre FM, Pakhomova ON, Schoenbach KH (2009) Lipid nanopores can form a stable, ion channel-like conduction pathway in cell membrane. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 385:181–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Saulis G (1999) Kinetics of pore disappearance in a cell after electroporation. Biomed Sci Instrum 35:409–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Saulis G, Venslauskas MS, Naktinis J (1991) Kinetics of pore resealing in cell membranes after electroporation. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 26:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scarlett SS, White JA, Blackmore PF, Schoenbach KH, Kolb JF (2009) Regulation of intracellular calcium concentration by nanosecond pulsed electric fields. Biochim Biophys Acta 1788:1168–1175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schoenbach KH, Beebe SJ, Buescher ES (2001) Intracellular effect of ultrashort electrical pulses. Bioelectromagnetics 22:440–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schoenbach KH, Katsuki S, Stark RH, Buesher ES, Beebe SJ (2002) Bioelectrics—new applications for pulsed power technology. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 30:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schoenbach KS, Hargrave B, Joshi RP, Kolb J, Osgood C, Nuccitelli R, Pakhomov AG, Swanson J, Stacey M, White JA, Xiao S, Zhang J (2007) Bioelectric effects of nanosecond pulses. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 14:1088–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith KC, Weaver JC (2008) Active mechanisms are needed to describe cell responses to submicrosecond, megavolt-per-meter pulses: cell models for ultrashort pulses. Biophys J 95:1547–1563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Stojilkovic SS, Zemkova H, Goor FV (2005) Biophysical basis of pituitary cell type-specific Ca2+ signaling–secretion coupling. Trends Endocrinol Metab 16:152–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Teissie J, Golzio M, Rols MP (2005) Mechanisms of cell membrane electropermeabilization: a minireview of our present (lack of?) knowledge. Biochim Biophys Acta 1724:270–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tekle E, Astumian RD, Chock PB (1994) Selective and asymmetric molecular transport across electroporated cell membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:11512–11516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tekle E, Oubrahim H, Dzekunov SM, Kolb JF, Schoenbach KH, Chock PB (2005) Selective field effects on intracellular vacuoles and vesicle membranes with nanosecond electric pulses. Biophys J 89:274–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Titus SA, Beacham D, Shahane SA, Southall N, Xia M, Huang R, Hooten E, Zhao Y, Shou L, Austin CP, Zheng W (2009) A new homogeneous high-throughput screening assay for profiling compound activity on the human ether-a-go-go-related gene channel. Anal Biochem 394:30–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Vernier PT, Sun Y, Marcu L, Salem S, Craft CM, Gundersen MA (2003) Calcium bursts induced by nanosecond electric pulses. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 310:286–295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Vernier PT, Sun Y, Marcu L, Craft CM, Gundersen MA (2004) Nanoelectropulse-induced phosphatidylserine translocation. Biophys J 86:4040–4048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Vernier PT, Sun Y, Gundersen MA (2006) Nanoelectropulse-driven membrane perturbation and small molecule permeabilization. BMC Cell Biol 7:37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Volkov AG, Paula S, Deamer DW (1997) Two mechanisms of permeation of small neutral molecules and hydrated ions across phospholipid bilayers. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 42:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weaver JC (2000) Electroporation of cells and tissues. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 28:24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weaver CD, Harden D, Dworetzky SI, Robertson B, Knox RJ (2004) A thallium-sensitive, fluorescence-based assay for detecting and characterizing potassium channel modulators in mammalian cells. J Biomol Screen 9:671–677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu SN, Chen BS, Wu YH, Peng H, Chen LT (2009) The mechanism of the actions of oxaliplatin on ion currents and action potentials in differentiated NG108-15 neuronal cells. Neurotoxicology 30:677–685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zimmermann U, Friedrich U, Mussauer H, Gessner P, Hämel K, Sukhorukov V (2000) Electromanipulation of mammalian cells: fundamentals and application. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 28:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela M. Bowman
    • 1
  • Olena M. Nesin
    • 1
  • Olga N. Pakhomova
    • 1
  • Andrei G. Pakhomov
    • 1
  1. 1.Frank Reidy Research Center for BioelectricsOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations