Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 219, Issue 1–3, pp 9–17 | Cite as

Some Oculodentodigital Dysplasia-Associated Cx43 Mutations Cause Increased Hemichannel Activity in Addition to Deficient Gap Junction Channels

  • Radoslaw Dobrowolski
  • Annette Sommershof
  • Klaus Willecke


Oculodentodigital dysplasia (ODDD) is a dominantly inherited human disorder associated with different symptoms like craniofacial anomalies, syndactyly and heart dysfunction. ODDD is caused by mutations in the GJA1 gene encoding the gap junction protein connexin43 (Cx43). Here, we have characterized four Cx43 mutations (I31M, G138R, G143S and H194P) after stable expression in HeLa cells. In patients, the I31M and G138R mutations showed all phenotypic characteristics of ODDD, whereas G143S did not result in facial abnormalities and H194P mutated patients exhibited no syndactylies. In transfected HeLa cells, these mutations led to lack of the P2 phosphorylation state of the Cx43 protein, complete inhibition of gap junctional coupling measured by neurobiotin transfer and increased hemichannel activity. In addition, altered trafficking and delayed degradation were found in these mutants by immunofluorescence and pulse-chase analyses. In G138R and G143S mutants, the increased hemichannel activity correlated with an increased half-time of the Cx43 protein. However, the I31M mutated protein showed no extended half-time. Thus, the increased hemichannel activity may be directly caused by an altered conformation of the mutated channel forming protein. We hypothesize that increased hemichannel activity may aggravate the phenotypic abnormalities in ODDD patients who are deficient in Cx43 gap junction channels.


Gap junction Connexin Cx43 Hemichannel Oculodentodigital dysplasia 



This work was supported by a grant of the German Research Association through SFB 645, project B2 (to K. W.). We thank Dr. Elmar Endl (Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Bonn) for advice on the use of the FACS instrument.


  1. Attal J, Theron MC, Houdebine LM (1999) The optimal use of IRES (internal ribosome entry site) in expression vectors. Genet Anal 15:161–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao X, Chen Y, Reuss L, Altenberg GA (2004) Functional expression in Xenopus oocytes of gap-junctional hemichannels formed by a cysteine-less connexin 43. J Biol Chem 279:9689–9692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao X, Lee SC, Reuss L, Altenberg GA (2007) Change in permeant size selectivity by phosphorylation of connexin 43 gap-junctional hemichannels by PKC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:4919–4924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett MVL, Verselis VK (1992) Biophysics of gap junctions. Semin Cell Biol 3:29–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruzzone S, Guida L, Zocchi E, Franco L, De Flora A (2001) Connexin 43 hemichannels mediate Ca2+-regulated transmembrane NAD+ fluxes in intact cells. FASEB J 15:10–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahl G, Werner R, Levine E, Rabadan-Diehl C (1992) Mutational analysis of gap junction formation. Biophys J 62:172–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Vuyst E, Decrock E, De Bock M, Yamasaki H, Naus CC, Evans WH, Leybaert L (2007) Connexin hemichannels and gap junction channels are differentially influenced by lipopolysaccharide and basic fibroblast growth factor. Mol Biol Cell 18:34–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duffy HS, Sorgen PL, Girvin ME, O’Donnell P, Coombs W, Taffet SM, Delmar M, Spray DC (2002) pH-dependent intramolecular binding and structure involving Cx43 cytoplasmic domains. J Biol Chem 277:36706–36714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans WH, De Vuyst E, Leybaert L (2006) The gap junction cellular internet: connexin hemichannels enter the signalling limelight. Biochem J 397:1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fleishman SJ, Unger VM, Yeager M, Ben-Tal N (2004) A Calpha model for the transmembrane alpha helices of gap junction intercellular channels. Mol Cell 15:879–888PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foote CI, Zhou L, Zhu X, Nicholson BJ (1998) The pattern of disulfide linkages in the extracellular loop regions of connexin 32 suggests a model for the docking interface of gap junctions. J Cell Biol 140:1187–1197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerido DA, Derosa AM, Richard G, White TW (2007) Aberrant hemichannel properties of Cx26 mutations causing skin disease and deafness. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 293:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanemann CO, Bergmann C, Senderek J, Zerres K, Sperfeld AD (2003) Transient, recurrent, white matter lesions in X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease with novel connexin 32 mutation. Arch Neurol 60:605–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hertlein B, Butterweck A, Haubrich S, Willecke K, Traub O (1998) Phosphorylated carboxy terminal serine residues stabilize the mouse gap junction protein connexin45 against degradation. J Membr Biol 162:247–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu X, Ma M, Dahl G (2006) Conductance of connexin hemichannels segregates with the first transmembrane segment. Biophys J 90:140–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lai A, Le D-N, Paznekas WA, Gifford WD, Wang Jabs E, Charles AC (2006) Oculodentodigital dysplasia connexin43 mutations result in non-functional connexin hemichannels and gap junctions in C6 glioma cells. J Cell Sci 119: 532–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laird DW, Castillo M, Kasprzak L (1995) Gap junction turnover, intracellular trafficking, and phosphorylation of connexin43 in brefeldin A-treated rat mammary tumor cells. J Cell Biol 131:1193–1203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lampe PD, Cooper CD, King TJ, Burt JM (2006) Analysis of connexin43 phosphorylated at S325, S328 and S330 in normoxic and ischemic heart. J Cell Sci 119:3435–3442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin Liang SG, de Miguel M, Gomez-Hernandez JM, Glass JD, Scherer SS, Mintz M, Barrio LC, Fischbeck KH (2005) Severe neuropathy with leaky connexin32 hemichannels. Ann Neurol 57:749–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin PE, Blundell G, Ahmad S, Errington RJ, Evans WH (2001) Multiple pathways in the trafficking and assembly of connexin 26, 32 and 43 into gap junction intercellular communication channels. J Cell Sci 114:3845–3855PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Oh SY, Dupont E, Madhukar BV, Briand JP, Chang CC, Beyer E, Trosko JE (1993) Characterization of gap junctional communication-deficient mutants of a rat liver epithalial cell line. Eur J Cell Biol 60:250–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Paznekas WA, Boyadjiev SA, Shapiro RE, et al. (2003) Connexin 43 (GJA1) mutations cause the pleiotropic phenotype of oculodentodigital dysplasia. Am J Hum Genet 72:408–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saez JC, Retamal MA, Basilio D, Bukauskas FF, Bennett MV (2005) Connexin-based gap junction hemichannels: gating mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta 1711:215–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Soehl G, Willecke K (2003) An update on connexin genes and their nomenclature in mouse and man. Cell Commun Adhes 10:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Spray DC, Ye ZC, Ransom BR (2006) Functional connexin “hemichannels”: a critical appraisal. Glia 547:758–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stong BC, Chang Q, Ahmad S, Lin X (2006) A novel mechanism for connexin 26 mutation linked deafness: cell death caused by leaky gap junction hemichannels. Laryngoscope 116:2205–2210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stout CE, Costantin JL, Naus CCG, Charles AC (2002) Intercellular calcium signaling in astrocytes via ATP release through connexin hemichannels. J Biol Chem 12:10482–10488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilgenbus KK, Kirkpatrick CJ, Knuechel R, Willecke K, Traub O (1992) Expression of Cx26, Cx32 and Cx43 gap junction proteins in normal and neoplastic human tissues. Int J Cancer 51:522–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yotsumoto S, Hashiguchi T, Chen X, Ohtake N, Tomitaka A, Akamatsu H, Matsunaga K, Shiraishi S, Miura H, Adachi J, Kanzaki T (2003) Novel mutations in GJB2 encoding connexin-26 in Japanese patients with keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. Br J Dermatol 148:649–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Radoslaw Dobrowolski
    • 1
  • Annette Sommershof
    • 1
    • 2
  • Klaus Willecke
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of GeneticsUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Department of Biology/ImmunologyUniversity of KonstanzKonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations