Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 218, Issue 1–3, pp 39–47 | Cite as

Organizational Principles of the Connexin-Related Brain Transcriptome

Article

Abstract

We have found that deletion of genes encoding the gap junction proteins Cx43, Cx32 and Cx36 alter the expression levels of large numbers of genes in mouse brain located on all chromosomes and encoding proteins from all major functional categories. Gene regulation in Cx32 and Cx43 null brains was more similar than that in the Cx36 null brain, suggesting the possibility of transcriptomic controls exerted by both genes on both astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. In order to explore the nature of expression linkage among the genes, we examined coordinated expression patterns in wild-type and connexin null brains. Coordination with Cx43 in wild-type brain predicted regulation in Cx43 nulls with considerable accuracy. Moreover, interlinkage within gene networks was greatly perturbed in the Cx43 null brain. These findings suggest several principles regarding regulatory transcriptomic networks involving gap junction genes and raise the issue of the underlying cause of connexin null phenotypes as well as mechanisms of regulation.

Keywords

Astrocyte Cx43 Cx32 Cx36 Gap junction Glia Gene expression Oligodendrocyte Panglial syncytium 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants MH65495 and NS41282. All data interpreted in this review were obtained through array hybridization and preparation of animals and cell cultures by Dr. Sanda Iacobas and Ms. Marcia Urban-Maldonaldo, and functional classification and consideration of biological relevance have relied on the additional efforts and input of Dr. Sanda Iacobas and Dr. Eliana Scemes.

References

  1. Ai Z, Fischer A, Spray DC, Brown AM, Fishman GI (2000) Wnt-1 regulation of connexin43 in cardiac myocytes. J Clin Invest 105:161–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcolea S, Jarry-Guichard T, de Bakker J, Gonzalez D, Lamers W, Coppen S, Barrio L, Jongsma H, Gros D, van Rijen H (2004) Replacement of connexin40 by connexin45 in the mouse: impact on cardiac electrical conduction. Circ Res 94:100–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brand-Schieber E, Werner P, Iacobas DA, Iacobas S, Beelitz M, Lowery SL, Spray DC, Scemes E (2005) Connexin43, the major gap junction protein of astrocytes, is down-regulated in inflamed white matter in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Res 80:798–808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dang X, Doble BW, Kardami E (2003) The carboxy-tail of connexin−43 localizes to the nucleus and inhibits cell growth. Mol Cell Biochem 242:35–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davy A, Bush JO, Soriano P (2006) Inhibition of gap junction communication at ectopic Eph/ephrin boundaries underlies craniofrontonasal syndrome. PLoS Biol 4:e315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Debeer P, Van Esch H, Huysmans C, Pijkels E, De Smet L, Van de Ven W, Devriendt K, Fryns JP (2005) Novel GJA1 mutations in patients with oculo-dento-digital dysplasia (ODDD). Eur J Med Genet 48:377–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duffy HS, Iacobas I, Hotchkiss K, Hirst-Jensen BJ, Bosco A, Dandachi N, Dermietzel R, Sorgen PL, Spray DC (2007) The gap junction protein connexin32 interacts with the Src homology 3/Hook domain of discs large homolog 1. J Biol Chem 282:9789–9796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu CT, Bechberger JF, Ozog MA, Perbal B, Naus CC (2004) CCN3 (NOV) interacts with connexin43 in C6 glioma cells: possible mechanism of connexin-mediated growth suppression. J Biol Chem 279:36943–36950PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ge H, Walhout AJ, Vidal M (2003) Integrating “omic” information: a bridge between genomics and systems biology. Trends Genet 19:551–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gellhaus A, Dong X, Propson S, Maass K, Klein-Hitpass L, Kibschull M, Traub O, Willecke K, Perbal B, Lye SJ, Winterhager E (2004) Connexin43 interacts with NOV: a possible mechanism for negative regulation of cell growth in choriocarcinoma cells. J Biol Chem 279:36931–36942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gong XQ, Shao Q, Langlois S, Laird DW, Bai D (2007) Differential potency of dominant negative connexin43 mutations in oculodentodigital dysplasia. J Biol Chem (in press)Google Scholar
  12. Iacobas DA, Fan C, Iacobas S, Spray DC, Haddad GG (2006) Transcriptomic changes in developing kidney exposed to chronic hypoxia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 349:329–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Iacobas DA, Iacobas S, Li WE, Zoidl G, Dermietzel R, Spray DC (2005a) Genes controlling multiple functional pathways are transcriptionally regulated in connexin43 null mouse heart. Physiol Genomics 20:211–223Google Scholar
  14. Iacobas DA, Iacobas S, Spray DC (2007a) Connexin43 and the brain transcriptome of newborn mice. Genomics 89:113–123Google Scholar
  15. Iacobas DA, Iacobas S, Spray DC (2007b) Connexin-dependent transcriptomic networks in mouse brain. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem 94:169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iacobas DA, Iacobas S, Urban-Maldonado M, Spray DC (2005b) Sensitivity of the brain transcriptome to connexin ablation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1711:183–196Google Scholar
  17. Iacobas DA, Scemes E, Spray DC (2004) Gene expression alterations in connexin null mice extend beyond the gap junction. Neurochem Int 45:243–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iacobas D, Suadicani SO, Iacobas S, Chrisman C, Cohen M, Spray DC, Scemes E (2007c) Gap junction and purinergic P2 receptor proteins as a functional unit: insights from transcriptomics. J Membr Biol (this issue)Google Scholar
  19. Iacobas DA, Urban-Maldonado M, Iacobas S, Scemes E, Spray DC (2003) Array analysis of gene expression in connexin−43 null astrocytes. Physiol Genomics 15:177–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Insel PA, Patel HH (2007) Do studies in caveolin-knockouts teach us about physiology and pharmacology or instead, the ways mice compensate for “lost proteins”? Br J Pharmacol 150:251–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kardami E, Dang X, Iacobas DA, Nickel BE, Jeyaraman M, Srisakuldee W, Makazan J, Tanguy S, Spray DC (2007) The role of connexins in controlling cell growth and gene expression. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 94:245–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lai A, Le DN, Paznekas WA, Gifford WD, Jabs EW, Charles AC (2006) Oculodentodigital dysplasia connexin43 mutations result in non-functional connexin hemichannels and gap junctions in C6 glioma cells. J Cell Sci 119(pt 3):532–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loddenkemper T, Grote K, Evers S, Oelerich M, Stogbauer F (2002) Neurological manifestations of the oculodentodigital dysplasia syndrome. J Neurol 249:584–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loewenstein WR (1999) The Touchstone of Life. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Loewenstein WR, Rose B (1992) The cell-cell channel in the control of growth. Semin Cell Biol 3:59–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Melloy PG, Kusnierczyk MK, Meyer RA, Lo CW, Desmond ME (2005) Overexpression of connexin43 alters the mutant phenotype of midgestational wnt-1 null mice resulting in recovery of the midbrain and cerebellum. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 283:224–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Penes MC, Li X, Nagy JI (2005) Expression of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and the transcription factor ZO-1-associated nucleic acid-binding protein (ZONAB)-MsY3 in glial cells and colocalization at oligodendrocyte and astrocyte gap junctions in mouse brain. Eur J Neurosci 22:404–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Plum A, Hallas G, Magin T, Dombrowski F, Hagendorff A, Schumacher B, Wolpert C, Kim J, Lamers WH, Evert M, Meda P, Traub O, Willecke K (2000) Unique and shared functions of different connexins in mice. Curr Biol 10:1083–1091PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rash JE, Duffy HS, Dudek FE, Bilhartz BL, Whalen LR, Yasumura T (1997) Grid-mapped freeze-fracture analysis of gap junctions in gray and white matter of adult rat central nervous system, with evidence for a “panglial syncytium” that is not coupled to neurons. J Comp Neurol 388:265–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shibayama J, Paznekas W, Seki A, Taffet S, Jabs EW, Delmar M, Musa H (2005) Functional characterization of connexin43 mutations found in patients with oculodentodigital dysplasia. Circ Res 96:e83–e91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spray DC, Duffy HS, Scemes E (1999) Gap junctions in glia. Types, roles, and plasticity. Adv Exp Med Biol 468:339–359Google Scholar
  32. Spray DC, Kojima T, Scemes E, Suadicani SO, Gao Y, Zhao S, Fort A (2000) “Negative” physiology: what connexin-deficient mice reveal about the functional roles of individual gap junctions. Curr Top Membr 49:509–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stains JP, Civitelli R (2005) Gap junctions regulate extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling to affect gene transcription. Mol Biol Cell 16:64–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Valiunas V, Polosina YY, Miller H, Potapova IA, Valiuniene L, Doronin S, Mathias RT, Robinson RB, Rosen MR, Cohen IS, Brink PR (2005) Connexin-specific cell-to-cell transfer of short interfering RNA by gap junctions. J Physiol 568(pt 2):459–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wiencken-Barger AE, Djukic B, Casper KB, McCarthy KD (2007) A role for connexin43 during neurodevelopment. Glia 55:675–686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Winterhager E, Pielensticker N, Freyer J, Ghanem A, Schrickel JW, Kim JS, Behr R, Grummer R, Maass K, Urschel S, Lewalter T, Tiemann K, Simoni M, Willecke K (2007) Replacement of connexin43 by connexin26 in transgenic mice leads to dysfunctional reproductive organs and slowed ventricular conduction in the heart. BMC Dev Biol 7:26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zheng-Fischhofer Q, Ghanem A, Kim JS, Kibschull M, Schwarz G, Schwab JO, Nagy J, Winterhager E, Tiemann K, Willecke K (2006) Connexin31 cannot functionally replace connexin43 during cardiac morphogenesis in mice. J Cell Sci 119(pt 4):693–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dominick P. Purpura Department of NeuroscienceAlbert Einstein College of MedicineBronxNY

Personalised recommendations