Various process parameters influence the melting and solidification phase change process. Studies on the influence of shape of cavity, thermo-physical properties of the phase change material and the boundary conditions, on the phase change process, has been carried out by various researchers worldwide. The effect of the thermal properties of the cavity material on the process is yet to be investigated thoroughly. In this work, melting process of paraffin wax is simulated in a spherical cavity for various cavity materials having different thermal properties and for different boundary conditions. The simulations results are obtained using enthalpy-porosity model for free surface melting process, solved using Ansys-fluent 16.2. Experimental studies were carried out for one type of cavity material. The experimental investigation included visualization of shape of solid fraction which is used to validate the numerical approach of this computational study. The results showed that the materials having higher thermal diffusivity has enhanced melting rate because of increased bouncy effect and convection. It has been found that the higher Stefan number shows the effect of higher natural convection and maximum velocity profile, resulting in enhanced melting process. These simulations are significant for selection of cavity material for different processes like energy storage, melting-solidification of metal in casting and others.
Phase volume fraction of nth fluid
Velocity component in ith direction (m/s)
Density of PCM (kg/m3)
Viscosity of PCM (kg.m/s)
Specific heat of liquid pcm (J/kg.K)
Gravitational force (m/s2)
Momentum source (kg/m2.s2)
Thermal conductivity (W/m.K)
Wall temperature of the cavity (K)
Mean melting temperature of PCM (K)
Mushy zone constant
Solidus temperature (K)
Thermal diffusivity (m2/s)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
There are no potential conflicts of interest with regard to publication of this paper.
Human participants and/or animals
Research did not involve Human Participants and/or Animals.
Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors.
Haillot DFE, Gibout S, Bédécarrats J-P (2013) Optimization of solar DHW system including PCM media. Appl Energy 109:470–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibáñez MCL, Solé C, Roca J, Nogués M (2006) Modelization of a water tank including a PCM module. Appl Therm Eng 26:1328–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zondag HKB, Smeding S, de Boer R, Bakker M (2013) Prototype thermo chemical heat storage with open reactor system. Appl Energy 109:360–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agyenim FHN, Eames P, Smyth M (2010) A review of materials, heat transfer and phase change problem formulation for latent heat thermal energy storage systems (LHTESS). Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:615–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail JRHq KAR (2000) Solidification of pcm inside a spherical capsule. Energy Conv Manag 41:173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assis E, LK GZ, Letan R (2007) Numerical and experimental study of melting in a spherical Shell. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:1790–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan FL (2008) Constrained and unconstrained melting inside a sphere. Int Commun Heat Mass Trans 35:466–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan FL, Hosseinizadeh SF, Khodadadi JM, Fan L (2009) Experimental and computational study of constrained melting of phase change materials (PCM) inside a spherical capsule. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:3464–3472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosseinizadeh SF, AARD FLT (2012) Numerical investigations of unconstrained melting of nano-enhanced phase change material (NEPCM) inside a spherical container. Int J Therm Sci 51:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao W, AFE AO, Neti S (2013) Heat transfer analysis of encapsulated phase change material for thermal energy storage. Int J Heat Mass Transf 63:323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekaran P, MC VK, Velraj R (2014) Enhanced heat transfer characteristics of water based copper oxide nanofluid PCM in a spherical capsule during solidification for energy efficient cool thermal storage system. Energy 72:636–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saitoh TS, HK HH (1996) Theoretical analysis for combined closecontact and natural convection melting in ice storage spherical capsule. Proc Energy Conv Eng Conf 3IEEE:2104–2108Google Scholar
Saitoh TS, HH KY (1997) Theoretical analysis and experiment on combined close-contact and natural convection melting in thermal energy storage spherical capsule. Proc Energy Conv Eng Conf 3 IEEE:1656–1661Google Scholar
Assis E, GZ RL (2009) Numerical and experimental study of solidification in a spherical shell. J Heat Transf 131:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizan MZM, FLT CPT (2012) An experimental study of n-octadecane melting inside a sphere subjected to constant heat rate at surface. Int Commun Heat Mass Trans 39:1624–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosseinizadeh SF, AARD FLT, Khodadadi JM (2013) Unconstrained melting inside a sphere. Int J Therm Sci 63:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arasu AV, Mujumdar AS (2012) Numerical study on melting of paraffin wax with Al2O3 in a square enclosure. Int Commun Heat Mass Trans 39:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babak Kamkaria HJA (2017) Numerical simulation and experimental verification of constrained melting of phase change material in inclined rectangular enclosures. Int Commun Heat Mass Trans 88:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kund NK, Dutta P (2010) Numerical simulation of solidification of liquid aluminum alloy flowing on cooling slope. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc Chin 20:898–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar