Heat and Mass Transfer

, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 235–246 | Cite as

Temperature effects in deep-water gas hydrate foam

  • Alexander V. EgorovEmail author
  • Robert I. Nigmatulin
  • Aleksey N. Rozhkov


This study focuses on heat and mass exchange processes in hydrate foam. The foam was formed by methane bubble collection in Lake Baikal at a depth of 1400 m with a trap in the form of inverted beaker. The bubbles entering in the trap were transformed into solid hydrate foam due to low temperature and high pressure, i.e. thermobaric conditions preferable for hydrate formation. The boundary between forming hydrate foam and the water propagated slowly from top to bottom along the trap. As soon as the hydrate boundary crossed the location of temperature sensor, the temperature jump by ~ + 1.1 °C was recorded. After that during 3 h the temperature relaxes to an asymptotic magnitude which exceeded the temperature of ambient water by 0.3 °C. During the following ascent of the trap to the lake surface we recorded high amplitude oscillations of the temperature inside the foam. However the temperature was sharply stabilized on the constant level –0.25 °C once the trap left the hydrate stability zone located at a depth below 380 m. It was found that the temperature in the foam during the ascent is controlled by the performing of the work by foam gas against the forces of hydrostatic pressure and the absorption of heat by the decomposition of hydrate.



This work was supported by the Programs of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences I.3Π and 1.2.49, the Fund for the Protection of Lake Baikal, and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant Numbers 15-05-04229, 15-08-01365). The authors thank the pilot of the ‘Mir’ MS E.S. Chernyaev for useful participation in the deep-water measurements.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with third parties.


  1. 1.
    Judd AG, Hovland M, Dimitrov LI, Garcia-Gil S, Jukes V (2002) The geological methane budget at continental margins and its influence on climate change. Geofluids 2:109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    MacDonald IR, Leifer I, Sassen R, Stine P, Mitchell R, Guinasso N Jr (2002) Transfer of hydrocarbons from natural seeps to the water column and atmosphere. Geofluids 2:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ribeiro CP, Lage PLC (2008) Modelling of hydrate formation kinetics: state-of-the-art and future directions. Chem Eng Sci 63:2007–2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leifer I, Culling D (2010) Formation of seep bubble plumes in the coil oil point seep field. Geo-Mar Lett 30:339–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li C, Huang T (2016) Simulation of gas bubbles with gas hydrates rising in deep water. Ocean Eng 112:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luo Y-T, Zhu J-H, Fan S-S, Chen G-J (2007) Study on the kinetics of hydrate formation in a bubble column. Chem Eng Sci 62:1000–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Egorov AV, Nigmatulin RI, Rozhkov AN (2014) Transformation of deep-water methane bubbles into hydrate. Geofluids 14:430–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cyranoski D (2013) Japanese test coaxes fire from ice. Nature 496:409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hagerty CL, Ramseur JL (2010) Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: Selected Issues for Congress, CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Egorov AV, Nigmatulin RI, Rozhkov AN (2016) Heat and mass transfer effects during displacement of Deepwater methane hydrate to the surface of Lake Baikal. Geo-Mar Lett 36:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sagalevich AM, Rimskiy-Korsakov NA (2009) MIR submersibles explore the bottom of Russia's Lake Baikal. Seal Technol 50(12):15–19Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sagalevich AM (2011) Using manned submersibles to explore the oldest and deepest lake in the world. Seal Technol 52(12):10–12Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Egorov AV, Rimskii-Korsakov NA, Rozhkov AN, Chernyaev ES (2011) The first experience the transportation of deep-water methane hydrates in a container. Oceanology 51:359–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klapp SA, Enzmann F, Walz P, Huthwelker T, Tuckermann J, Schwarz JO, Pape T, Peltzer ET, Mokso R, Wangner D, Marone F, Kersten M, Bohrmann G, Kuhs WF, Stampanoni M, Brewer PG (2012) Microstructure characteristics during hydrate formation and dissociation revealed by X-ray tomographic microscopy. Geo-Mar Lett 32:555–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Egorov AV, Rozhkov AN (2010) Formation of gas hydrate reservoirs in submarine mud volcanos. Fluid Dynamics 45:769–778CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Katz DL, Cornell D, Kobayashi R, Roettmann FG, Vary JA, Elenbaas JR, Weinang CF (1959) Water-hydrocarbon-system. In: Katz (ed) Handbook of natural gas engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 189–221Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cuylaerts M, Naudts L, Casier R, Khabuev AV, Belousov OV, Kononov EE, Khlystov O, De Batist M (2012) Distribution and morphology of mud volcanoes and other fluid flow-related Lake-bed structures in lake Baikal, Russia. Geo-Mar Lett 32:383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khlystov O, De Batist M, Shoji H, Hachikubo A, Nishio S, Naudts L, Poort J, Khabuev A, Belousov O, Manakov A, Kalmychkov G (2013) Gas hydrate of Lake Baikal: discovery and varieties. J Asian Earth Sci 62(1):162–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kornev KG, Neimark AV, Rozhkov AN (1999) Foam in porous media: thermodynamic and hydrodynamic peculiarities. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 82:127–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bazilevsky AV, Rozhkov AN (2012) Motion of a foam lamella in a circular channel under a relaxing small pressure jump. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 414:457–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21. (2018). Accessed 26 September 2018
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Davidson DW, Garg SK, Gough SR, Handa YP, Ratcliffe CI, Ripmeester JA, Tse JS, Lawson WF (1986) Laboratory analysis of a naturally occurring gas hydrate from sediment of the Gulf of Mexico. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 50:619–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Istomin VA, Yakushev VS (1992) Gas-hydrates self-preservation phenomenon. In: Physics and chemistry of ice, Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo, pp 136–140Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Uchida T, Sakurai T, Hondoh T (2011) Ice-shielding models for self-preservation of gas hydrates. J Chem Chem Eng 5:691–705Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rehder G, Eckl R, Elfgen M, Falenty A, Hamann R, Kähler N, Kuhs WF, Osterkamp H, Windmeier C (2012) Methane hydrate pellet transport using the self-preservation effect: a techno-economic analysis. Energies 5:2499–2523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aragones JL, Conde MM, Noya EG, Vega C (2009) The phase diagram of water at high pressures as obtained by computer simulations of the TIP4P/2005 model: the appearance of a plastic crystal phase. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11:543–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kornfeld M (1952) Elasticity and strength of liquids. Verlag Technik, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Knapp RT, Daily JW, Hammitt FG (1970) Cavitation. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1951) Theory of elasticity, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill Book, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sedov LI (1997) Mechanics of continuous media, vol. 2. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Petrovic JJ (2003) Review mechanical properties of ice and snow. J Mater Sci 38(1):1–6MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander V. Egorov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert I. Nigmatulin
    • 1
  • Aleksey N. Rozhkov
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Ishlinsky Institute for Problems in Mechanics of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations