New axial dispersion model for heat exchanger design
- 232 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
The special case of unity dispersive Mach number of the hyperbolic axial dispersion model is investigated as the more realistic and simpler alternative to the parabolic model with zero Mach number. Simple corrections to the mean temperature difference or to the heat transfer coefficients are derived as functions of the dispersive Peclet numbers. As an example the model is applied to a cascade of stirred tanks in overall counterflow arrangement.
Keywords
Heat Transfer Coefficient Heat Exchanger Dispersion Model Peclet Number Parallel FlowList of symbols
- A
Area for heat transfer (m2)
- Ac
Cross-sectional area (m2)
- B
n × n matrix
- bij
Elements of matrix B
- C
Propagation velocity (m s−1)
- cp
Specific isobaric heat capacity (J kg−1 K−1)
- H
Operator
- k
Overall heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)
- k*
Overall heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1), Eq. 24a
- L
Length of heat exchanger (m)
- l
Space coordinate (m)
- M
Dispersive Mach number, M = |w|/C
- NTU
Number of transfer units, NTU = k A/(A c wρc p )
- NTU*
Number of transfer units, Eq. 24
- NTUα
Number of transfer units, NTUα = αA/(A c wρc p )
- \( {\text{NTU}}_{\alpha }^{*} \)
Number of transfer units, Eq. 27a
- n
Number of stirred tanks in series or number of fluid streams
- P
Dimensionless temperature change, \( P_{1} = {{\left( {T_{1}^{\prime } - T_{1}^{\prime \prime } } \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {T_{1}^{\prime } - T_{1}^{\prime \prime } } \right)} {\left( {T_{1}^{\prime } - T_{2}^{\prime } } \right)}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\left( {T_{1}^{\prime } - T_{2}^{\prime } } \right)}} \) and \( P_{2} = {{\left( {T_{2}^{\prime \prime } - T_{2}^{\prime } } \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {T_{2}^{\prime \prime } - T_{2}^{\prime } } \right)} {\left( {T_{1}^{\prime } - T_{2}^{\prime } } \right)}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\left( {T_{1}^{\prime } - T_{2}^{\prime } } \right)}} \)
- Pe
Dispersive Peclet number, Pe = w L ρ c p /λ *
- \( \dot{Q} \)
Heat transfer rate (W)
- \( \dot{q}_{l} \)
Heat flux (W m−2)
- Rw
Wall resistance including fouling resistances (K W−1)
- T
Hypothetic temperature inside the heat exchanger and true fluid temperature outside the heat exchanger (K)
- T
Vector of fluid temperatures (K)
- ΔTM
Non-dispersive mean temperature difference (K)
- t
True fluid temperature inside the exchanger (K)
- t
Vector of temperatures (K)
- ΔtM
Dispersive mean temperature difference (K)
- W1
Capacity of residing fluid in the core of the heat exchanger (J K−1)
- W2
Capacity of the core of the heat exchanger (J K−1)
- \( \dot{W} \)
Heat capacity rate (W K−1)
- w
Flow velocity (m s−1)
- x
Dimensionless space coordinate (x = l/L)
- y
Dimensionless space coordinate, perpendicular to x (cross-flow)
- z
Dimensionless time coordinate (z = τ w/L)
Greek symbols
- α
Heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)
- α*
Heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1), Eq. 27
- λ*
Dispersive thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1)
- φ
Reduced axial dispersive heat flux (K)
- ρ
Density (kg m−3)
- τ
Time (s)
- Θ
Dimensionless mean temperature difference, \( \Uptheta_{\text{dispersive}} = {{\Updelta t_{\text{M}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\Updelta t_{\text{M}} } {\left( {T_{1}^{\prime } - T_{2}^{\prime } } \right)}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\left( {T_{1}^{\prime } - T_{2}^{\prime } } \right)}} \) and \( \Uptheta_{\text{plug}} = {{\Updelta T_{\text{M}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\Updelta T_{\text{M}} } {\left( {T_{1}^{\prime } - T_{2}^{\prime } } \right)}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\left( {T_{1}^{\prime } - T_{2}^{\prime } } \right)}} \)
Super- and subscripts
- c
Cascade of stirred tanks
- i
Stirred tank
- i, j
Fluid stream i, j
- plug
Plug flow
- w
Wall
- 1
Fluid 1
- 2
Fluid 2
- ′
Inlet
- ″
Outlet
- -
Mean value
- τ
Transposition
References
- 1.(2006) VDI-Wärmeatlas, 10. Auflage. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 2.(2010) Heat Atlas, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 3.Hewitt GF, Shires GL, Bott TR (1994) Process heat transfer. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- 4.Das SK, Roetzel W (2004) The axial dispersion model for heat transfer equipment—a review. Int J Transp Phenom 6:23–49Google Scholar
- 5.Spang B (1991) Über das thermische Verhalten von Rohr-bündelwärmeübertragern mit Segmentumlenkblechen. VDI-Fortschrittsberichte, Reihe 19, Nr. 48, VDI-Verlag, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
- 6.Xuan Y (1991) Thermische Modellierung mehrgängiger Rohrbündelwärmeübertrager mit Umlenkblechen und geteiltem Mantelstrom. VDI-Fortschrittsberichte, Reihe 19, Nr. 52, VDI-Verlag, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
- 7.Luo X (1998) Das axiale Dispersionsmodell für Kreuzstrom-wärmeübertrager. VDI-Fortschrittsberichte, Reihe 19, Nr. 109, VDI-Verlag, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
- 8.Roetzel W, Das SK (1995) Hyperbolic axial dispersion model: concept and its application to a plate heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transf 38:3065–3076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Roetzel W, Na Ranong C (2000) Axial dispersion models for heat exchangers. Int J Heat Technol 18:7–17MATHGoogle Scholar
- 10.Sahoo RK, Roetzel W (2002) Hyperbolic axial dispersion model for heat exchangers. Int J Heat Mass Transf 45:1261–1270MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Na Ranong C, Höhne M, Franzen J, Hapke J, Fieg G, Dornheim M, Bellosta von Colbe M, Eigen N, Metz O (2009) Concept, design and manufacture of a prototype hydrogen storage tank based on sodium alanate. Chem Eng Technol 32(8):1154–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Chester M (1963) Second sound in solids. Phys Rev 131:2013–2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Roetzel W, Spang B, Luo X, Das SK (1998) Propagation of the third sound wave in fluid: hypothesis and theoretical foundation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 41:2769–2780MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Roetzel W, Luo X (2010) Thermal design of multi-fluid mixed–mixed cross-flow heat exchangers. Heat Mass Transf 46(10):1077–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Roetzel W, Na Ranong C (2003) On the application of the Wilson plot technique. Int J Heat Technol 21:125–130Google Scholar