Advertisement

Heat and Mass Transfer

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 35–53 | Cite as

Influence of the variable thermophysical properties on the turbulent buoyancy-driven airflow inside open square cavities

  • Blas ZamoraEmail author
  • Antonio S. Kaiser
Original

Abstract

The effects of the air variable properties (density, viscosity and thermal conductivity) on the buoyancy-driven flows established in open square cavities are investigated, as well as the influence of the stated boundary conditions at open edges and the employed differencing scheme. Two-dimensional, laminar, transitional and turbulent simulations are obtained, considering both uniform wall temperature and uniform heat flux heating conditions. In transitional and turbulent cases, the low-Reynolds k − ω turbulence model is employed. The average Nusselt number and the dimensionless mass-flow rate have been obtained for a wide and not yet covered range of the Rayleigh number varying from 103 to 1016. The results obtained taking into account variable properties effects are compared with those calculated assuming constant properties and the Boussinesq approximation. For uniform heat flux heating, a correlation for the critical heating parameter above which the burnout phenomenon can be obtained is presented, not reported in previous works. The effects of variable properties on the flow patterns are analyzed.

Keywords

Mass Flow Rate Rayleigh Number Average Nusselt Number Critical Heat Flux Boussinesq Approximation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

List of symbols

b

Width of the vent, m (Fig. 1)

C1,C2

Correlation factors

cp

Specific heat at constant pressure, J kg−1 K−1

g

Gravitational acceleration, m s−2

GrH

Grashof number for isothermal cases, gβ(T w  − T )H 3 2

GrH

Grashof number for heat flux cases, gβq H 4 2 κ

hx

Local heat transfer coefficient, −κ(∂T/∂n) w /(T w  − T ), W m−2 K−1

I

Turbulence intensity, Eq. 18

k

Turbulent kinetic energy, Eq. 17, m2 s−2

H

Height of the cavity (and the heated wall) (Fig. 1), m

L

Length of the cavity (Fig. 1), m

Lc

Typical length, m

M

Dimensionless mass-flow rate, mα

m

Two-dimensional mass-flow rate, kg m−1s−1

n

Coordinate perpendicular to wall, m

NuH

Average Nusselt number based on H, isothermal cases, Eq. 6

NuH

Average Nusselt number based on H, heat flux cases, Eq. 7

Nux

Local Nusselt number, h x H

P

Average reduced pressure, N m−2

PT

Total-average reduced pressure, N m−2

p

Pressure, N m−2

Pr

Prandtl number, μc p

q

Wall heat flux, W m−2

R

Constant of the gas, J kg−1 K−1

RaH

Rayleigh number based on H, (Gr H )(Pr)

Sij

Mean-strain tensor, s−1

TT

Average and turbulent temperatures, respectively, K

\(-\overline{T'u_{j}}\)

Average turbulent heat flux, K m s−1

Ujuj

Average and turbulent components of velocity, respectively, m s−1

\(-\overline{u_{i}u_{j}}\)

Turbulent stress, m2 s−2

uτ

Friction velocity, u τ = (τ w /ρ)1/2, m s−1

xy

Cartesian coordinates in the vertical and horizontal directions, m

y+

ρ y 1 u τ/μ, with y 1 the distance between the wall and the first grid point

Greek symbols

α

Thermal diffusivity, κ/ρ c p , m2 s−1

β

Coefficient of thermal expansion, 1/T , K−1

δij

Krönecker delta

δT

Thickness of the thermal boundary layer, m

ϕ

Dependent variable

φ

Correlation factor, Eq. 28

κ

Thermal conductivity, W m−1 K−1

\(\Uplambda\)

Heating parameter, Eqs. 2 and 4 for UWT and UHF heating, respectively

μ

Viscosity, kg m−1 s−1

ν

Kinematic viscosity, μ/ρ, m2 s−1

θ

Dimensionless temperature difference, θ = (T − T )/(T w  − T )

ρ

Density, kg m−3

τw

Wall shear stress, N m−2

ω

Specific dissipation rate of k (or turbulent frequency), s−1

Subscripts

B

Constant properties and Boussinesq approximation

c

Critical value

l

Laminar

max

Maximum value

ref

Reference mesh

t

Turbulent

w

Wall

Ambient or reference conditions

Superscript

Averaged value

Abbreviations

DNS

Direct numerical simulation

UHF

Uniform heat flux

UWT

Uniform wall temperature

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge to Prof. J. Hernández (UNED, Spain), for his great teachings.

References

  1. 1.
    Ostrach S (1972) Natural convection in enclosures. In: Hartnett JP, Irvine TF (eds) Adv Heat Transfer 8:161–227Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bejan A (1993) Heat transfer. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chan YL, Tien CL (1985) A numerical study of two-dimensional laminar natural convection in shallow open cavities. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 28:603–612CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mohamad AA, Viskanta R (1989) An evaluation of different discretizacion schemes for natural convection of low-Prandtl number fluids in cavities. Num Heat Transfer B 16:179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bilgen E, Oztop H (2005) Natural convection heat transfer in partially open inclined square cavities. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 48:1470–1479CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bilgen E, Balkaya A (2008) Natural convection on discrete heaters in a square enclosure with ventilation ports. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 29:1182–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bilgen E, Muftuoglu A (2008) Natural convection in an open square cavity with slots. Int Comm Heat Mass Transfer 35:896–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muftuoglu A, Bilgen E (2008) Natural convection in an open square cavity with discrete heaters at their optimized positions. Int J Thermal Sci 47:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khanafer K, Vafai K (2002) Effective boundary conditions for buoyancy-driven flows and heat transfer in fully open-ended two-dimensional enclosures. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 45:2527–2538CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anil Lal S, Reji C (2009) Numerical prediction of natural convection in vented cavities using restricted domain approach. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 52:724–734CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ben Yedder R, Bilgen E (1995) Turbulent natural convection and conduction in enclosures bounded by a massive wall. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 38:1879–1891CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henkes RAWM, Hoogendorn CJ (1995) Comparison exercise for computations of turbulent natural convection in enclosures. Num Heat Transfer 28:59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bessaih R, Kadja M (2000) Turbulent natural convection of electronic components mounted on a vertical channel. Appl Therm Eng 20:141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xamán J, Tun J, Álvarex G, Chávez Y, Noh F (2009) Optimum ventilation based on the overall ventilation effectiveness for temperature distribution in ventilated cavities. Int J Therm Sci 48:1574–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    La Pica A, Rodonò G, Volpes R (1993) An experimental investigation on natural convection of air in a vertical channel. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 36:611–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Warrington RO, Ameel TA (1995) Experimental studies of natural convection in partitioned enclosures with a Trombe Wall geometry. J Solar Energy Eng 117:16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Radhakrishnan TV, Balaji C, Venkateshan SP (2010) Optimization of multiple heaters in a vented enclosure—a combined numerical and experimental study. Int J Therm Sci 49:721–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gray DD, Giorgini A (1976) The validity of the Boussinesq approximation for liquids and gases. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 19:545–551CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhong ZY, Yang KT, Lloyd JR (1985) Variable property effects in laminar natural convection in a square enclosure. J Heat Transfer 107:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Emery AF, Lee JW (1999) The effects of property variations on natural convection in a square enclosure. J Heat Transfer 121:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chenoweth DR, Paolucci S (1986) Natural convection in an enclosed vertical air layer. J Fluid Mech 169:173–210CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hernández J, Zamora B (2005) Effects of variable properties and non-uniform heating on natural convection flows in vertical channel. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 48:793–807CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guo ZY, Wu XB (1993) Thermal drag and critical heat flux for natural convection of air in vertical parallel plates. J Heat Transfer 115:124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guo ZY, Song YZ, Li ZX (1995) Lase spleckle photography in heat transfer studies. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 10:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abu-Nada E, Masoud Z, Oztop HF, Campo A (2010) Effect of nanofluid variable properties on natural convection in enclosures. Int J Therm Sci 49:479–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morrone B, Campo A (2010) Influence of intense symmetric heating and variable physical properties on the thermo-buoyant airflow inside vertical parallel-plate channels. J Heat Transfer 132. doi: 10.1115/1.4001932
  27. 27.
    Zamora B, Kaiser AS, Viedma A (2008) On the effects of Rayleigh number and inlet turbulence intensity upon the buoyancy-induced mass flow rate in sloping and convergent channels. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 51:4985–5000CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zamora B, Kaiser AS (2009) Thermal and dynamic optimization of the convective flow in Trombe Wall shaped channels by numerical investigation. Heat Mass Transfer 45:1393–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sparrow EM, Gregg JL (1958) The variable fluid property problem in free convection. J Heat Transfer 80:879–886Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kolmogorov AN (1942) Equations of turbulent motion of an incompressible fluid. Izvestia Acad Sci USSR Phys 6:56–58Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wilcox DC (2003) Turbulence modeling for CFD. 2nd edn. DCW Industries, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Van Leer B (1979) Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second order sequel to Gadunov’s method. J Comput Phys 32:101–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Leonard BP (1979) A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 19:59–98CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Versteegh TA, Nieuwstadt FT (1999) A direct numerical simulation of natural convection between two infinite vertical differentially heated walls scaling laws and wall functions. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 42:3673–3693CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zamora B, Hernández J (1997) Influence of variable property effects on natural convection flows in asymmetrically-heated vertical channels. Int Comm Heat Mass Transfer 24:1153–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dpto. Ingeniería Térmica y de FluidosUniversidad Politécnica de CartagenaCartagenaSpain

Personalised recommendations