Self-ignition of diesel spray combustion
- 172 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
This work presents the development and implementation of auto-ignition modelling for DI diesel engines by using the probability density function-eddy break-up (PDF-EBU) model. The key concept of this approach is to combine the chemical reaction rate dealing with low-temperature mode, and the turbulence reaction rate governing the high-temperature part by a reaction progress variable coupling function which represents the level of reaction. The average reaction rate here is evaluated by a PDF averaging approach. In order to assess the potential of this developed model, the well-known Shell ignition model is chosen to compare in auto-ignition analysis. In comparison, the PDF-EBU ignition model yields the ignition delay time in good agreement with the Shell ignition model prediction. However, the ignition kernel location predicted by the Shell model is slightly nearer injector than that by the PDF-EBU model leading to shorter lift-off length. As a result, the PDF-EBU ignition model developed here are fairly satisfactory in predicting the auto-ignition of diesel engines with the Shell ignition model.
Keywords
Probability Density Function Diesel Engine Shell Model Mixture Fraction Diffusion FlameReferences
- 1.Aggarwal SK (1998) A review of spray ignition phenomena: present status and future research. Prog Energy Combust Sci 24:565–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Halstead MP, Kirsch A, Quinn CP (1977) The autoignition of hydrocarbon fuels at high temperature and pressure—fitting of a mathematical model. Combust Flame 30:45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Schapertons H, Lee W (1985) Multidimensional modelling of knocking combustion in S.I. engines. SAE Technical Paper Series No. 850502Google Scholar
- 4.Hamosfakidis V, Reitz RD (2003) Optimization of a hydrocarbon fuel ignition model for two single component surrogates of diesel fuel. Combust Flame 132:433–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Westbrook CK, Dryer FL (1984) Chemical kinetic modelling of hydrocarbon combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 10:1–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Magnussen BF, Hjertager BH (1976) On mathematical modelling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. In: The 16th international symposium on combustion, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
- 7.D’Errico G, Ettorre D, Lucchini T (2007) Comparison of combustion and pollutant emission models for DI diesel engines. SAE Technical Paper Series No. 07NAPLES-90Google Scholar
- 8.Pires da Cruz A, Baritaud TA, Poinsot TJ (2001) Self-ignition and combustion modeling of initially nonpremixed turbulent systems. Combust Flame 124:65–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Williams FA (1988) Combustion theory. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
- 10.Peters N (1984) Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 10:319–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Eswaran V, Pope SB (1988) Direct numerical simulations of turbulent mixing of a passive scalar. Phys Fluids 31:506–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kang SH, Baek SW, Choi JH (2001) Autoignition of sprays in a cylindrical combustor. Int J Heat Mass Transf 44:2413–2422MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Lutz AE, Kee RJ, Miller JA (1988) SENKIN: a Fortran program for predicting homogeneous gas phase chemical kinetics with sensitivity analysis. Sandia Report SAND 87-8248, UC-4Google Scholar
- 14.Rente T, Golovitchev VI, Denbratt I (2001) Numerical study of n-heptane spray auto-ignition at different levels of pre-ignition turbulence. In: The fifth international symposium on diagnostics and modelling of combustion in internal combustion engines (COMODIA 2001), NagoyaGoogle Scholar
- 15.Akiyama H, Nishimura H, Ibaraki Y, Iida N (1998) Study of diesel spray combustion and ignition using high-pressure fuel injection and a micro-hole nozzle with a rapid compression machine: improvement of combustion using low cetane number fuel. Soc Automot Eng Jpn 19:319–327Google Scholar