Multidisciplinary perspectives on medication-related decision-making for people with advanced dementia living in long-term care: a critical incident analysis
This study aimed to explore medication-related decision-making by health professionals from different disciplines and specialties caring for people with advanced dementia living in long-term care facilities, focusing on dilemmas associated with starting, continuing or deprescribing medications commonly regarded as potentially inappropriate.
Four focus groups were undertaken, each on a different medication type (antibiotics, lipid-lowering agents, opioids and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors). Transcripts underwent qualitative analysis using line by line inductive coding and then a person-centred framework to highlight themes across medication types.
Sixteen participants participated in focus groups. Regardless of medication type or dilemma, results suggested decision-making for residents with advanced dementia should begin with discussing goals of care and engaging with families, and be viewed as an iterative process involving regular monitoring and adjustment. Decision-making was seen as requiring a dialectical approach involving multiple perspectives, with an emphasis on establishing communication between health professionals, family and the person with dementia to better understand goals/preferences for care.
Inter-professional collaboration enables sharing of clinical experience/expertise, differing disciplinary perspectives and knowledge about the resident. Continuing a medication should be considered an active decision that carries as much responsibility as starting or deprescribing.
KeywordsDecision-making Potentially inappropriate prescribing Long-term care Deprescribing Dementia Interdisciplinary collaboration
The authors would like to thank all participants who participated in the focus groups as part of this study.
DD contributed to the development of the research questions, conducted the search, analysed the articles and drafted the manuscript. TL and MA contributed to the development of research questions and analysis of data and helped to draft the manuscript. AB and PD contributed to the analysis of data. All authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript.
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. DD was supported by a UTS Doctoral Scholarship.
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethics approval was from the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval Reference No. ETH16-0291). All participants gave written informed consent to participate.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Prince M, Comas-Herrera A, Knapp M, Guerchet M, Karagiannidou M (2016) World Alzheimer report 2016: improving healthcare for people living with dementia: coverage, quality and costs now and in the futureGoogle Scholar
- 9.NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, University of Sydney, in collaboration with the Australian Deprescribing Network and NPS MedicineWise. Quality Use of Medicines to Optimise Ageing in Older Australians: recommendations for a national strategic action plan to reduce inappropriate polypharmacy. Sydney, NSW, Australia; 2018Google Scholar
- 18.Nielsen J, Clemmensen T, Yssing C (2002) Getting access to what goes on in people’s heads?: reflections on the think-aloud technique. Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction :101–100 ACMGoogle Scholar
- 23.Gheewala P, Peterson G, Curtain C, Nishtala P, Hannan P, Castelino R (2014) Impact of the pharmacist medication review services on drug-related problems and potentially inappropriate prescribing of renally cleared medications in residents of aged care facilities. Drugs Aging 31(11):825–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Reeve E, Farrell B, Thompson W, Herrmann N, Sketris I, Magin P et al (2018) Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for deprescribing cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in people with dementia. The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, RecommendationsGoogle Scholar