Safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of single ascending dose and continuous infusion of remimazolam besylate in healthy Chinese volunteers
- 89 Downloads
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of remimazolam besylate following single ascending dose (SAD) and continuous infusion in healthy Chinese volunteers.
This was a randomized phase I study conducted in two parts. Part I was a double-blind, placebo- and midazolam-controlled, SAD study among healthy Chinese participants with a remimazolam dose of 0.025–0.4 mg/kg. Part II was an open-label, midazolam-controlled, continuous infusion study. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring and Modified Observers Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (MOAA/S) score assessment were used to assess the PD properties.
The half-life range of remimazolam was from 34.1 ± 8.1 to 59.8 ± 20.5 min in the SAD study. The sedation function was initially observed at the dose of 0.05 mg/kg remimazolam. Doses of ≥ 0.075 mg/kg exerted a peak sedation effect within 1–2 min after injection, resulting in a deeper and more rapid sedation. In the 2 h continuous infusion, remimazolam showed a deeper sedation and more rapid recovery than midazolam. For general anesthesia, an induction dosage of 0.2 mg/kg/min and a maintenance dosage of 1 mg/kg/h can achieve a satisfactory efficacy effect.
Remimazolam was safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese participants. Based on the phase I clinical study, we suggest that remimazolam besylate demonstrates greater sedation and quicker recovery from sedation than midazolam.
KeywordsRemimazolam besylate Pharmacokinetics Pharmacodynamics Chinese subjects
This study was sponsored by Yichang Humanwell Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. We thank the contributions of WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd. for performing the concentration assays. We also thank the Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, for performing the statistical analysis.
Li-e Li, Xia Ye, Xue-yuan Yang, Xia Zhao, and Yi-min Cui designed the study. Xiao-yan Sheng, Yan Liang, Xue-yuan Yang, Xia Zhao, and Yi-min Cui conducted the clinical trial. Xue-yuan Yang is the anesthesiologist of the study, who assessed the pharmacodynamic parameters and safety of the subjects. Xiao-yan Sheng and Yan Liang analyzed the results and drafted the manuscript. Li-e Li, Xia Ye, Xia Zhao, and Yi-min Cui participated in the interpretation of results and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The authors confirm that the PI for this paper is Yi-min Cui.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Li-e Li and Xia Ye are employees of Yichang Humanwell Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., which sponsored the clinical trial. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.
- 5.Pastis NJ, Yarmus LB, Schippers F, Ostroff R, Chen A, Akulian J, Wahidi M, Shojaee S, Tanner NT, Callahan SP, Feldman G, Lorch DG Jr, Ndukwu I, Pritchett MA, Silvestri GA, Investigators PAION (2019) Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with placebo and midazolam for moderate sedation during bronchoscopy. Chest 155(1):137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Zhou Y, Hu P, Huang Y, Nuoer S, Song K, Wang H, Wen J, Jiang J, Chen X (2018) Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model-guided dosing optimization of a novel sedative HR7056 in Chinese healthy subjects. Front Pharmacol 9:1316. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01316 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Antonik LJ, Goldwater DR, Kilpatrick GJ, Tilbrook GS, Borkett KM (2012) A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): part I. safety, efficacy, and basic pharmacokinetics. Anesth Analg 115(2):274–283. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31823f0c28 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Wiltshire HR, Kilpatrick GJ, Tilbrook GS, Borkett KM (2012) A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): part II. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation. Anesth Analg 115(2):284–296. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e318241f68a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Worthington MT, Antonik LJ, Goldwater DR, Lees JP, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K, Borkett KM, Mitchell MC (2013) A phase Ib, dose-finding study of multiple doses of remimazolam (CNS 7056) in volunteers undergoing colonoscopy. Anesth Analg 117(5):1093–1100. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a705ae CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Borett KM, Riff DS, Schwartz HI, Winkle PJ, Pambianco DJ, Lees JP, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K (2015) A phase IIa, randomized, double-blind study of remimazolam (CNS 7056) versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Anesth Analg 120(4):771–780. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Pambianco DJ, Borkett KM, Riff DS, Winkle PJ, Schwartz HI, Melson TI, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K (2016) A phase IIb study comparing the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 83(5):984–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.062 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Rex DK, Bhandari R, Desta T, DeMicco MP, Schaeffer C, Etzkorn K, Barish CF, Pruitt R, Cash BD, Quirk D, Tiongco F, Sullivan S, Bernstein D (2018) A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 88(3):427–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2351 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Ericsson H, Bredberg U, Eriksson U, Jolin-Mellgård A, Nordlander M, Regårdh CG (2000) Pharmacokinetics and arteriovenous differences in clevidipine concentration following a short- and a long-term intravenous infusion in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 92(4):993–1001. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200004000-00016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Olofsen E, Mooren R, van Dorp E, Aarts L, Smith T, den Hartigh J, Dahan A, Sarton E (2010) Arterial and venous pharmacokinetics of morphine-6-glucuronide and impact of sample site on pharmacodynamic parameter estimates. Anesth Analg 111(3):626–632. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e5e8af CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar