Advertisement

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of vancomycin in pediatric continuous renal replacement therapy

  • Brady S. MoffettEmail author
  • Jennifer Morris
  • Flor Munoz
  • Ayse Akcan Arikan
Pharmacokinetics and Disposition
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Background and objectives

Dosing of vancomycin in pediatric patients undergoing continuous venous–venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) is challenging. Characterization of vancomycin pharmacokinetics can assist with dosing and attainment of goal serum concentrations.

Design, setting, participants, and measurements

Patients less than 19 years of age who received vancomycin and had post-dose vancomycin concentrations while undergoing CVVHDF were identified. Data collection included the following: patient demographics, vancomycin dosing and serum concentrations, CVVHDF variables, serum creatinine (SCR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), albumin, hematocrit, and urine output. Fat-free mass was calculated. Data were summarized with descriptive statistical methods, and population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with NONMEM 7.2 and PDx-Pop 5.2. Simulation was performed to identify dosing regimens with the highest percentage of goal serum concentration < 20 mg/L and AUC0–24:MIC ≥ 400 attainment.

Results

A total of 138 patients met study criteria (45.6% male, median age 4.9 years (IQR (1.0, 14.5))). Mean vancomycin dose was 14.3 ± 1.6 mg/kg/dose (19.5 ± 3.0 mg/kg/dose by FFM). Patients had a median of six (IQR 2, 12) vancomycin serum concentrations sampled 13.6 ± 8.4 h after the dose, and the mean vancomycin serum concentration was 11.3 ± 3.4 mg/L. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics were characterized by a two-compartment model with allometric scaling on fat-free mass and significant covariates of SCR, BUN, dialysate flow rate, and ultrafiltration rate on clearance. Simulation identified doses of 40–50 mg/kg/day that divided every 8–12 h had the highest percentage of patients with a serum concentration < 20 mg/L and an AUC0–24:MIC ≥ 400.

Conclusions

Vancomycin pharmacokinetics are characterized by fat-free mass, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, dialysate flow rate, and ultrafiltration rate in the pediatric CVVHDF population. Dosing of 40–50 mg/kg/day on fat-free mass divided every 8–12 h with frequent vancomycin serum sampling is recommended.

Keywords

Vancomycin Dialysis Renal replacement therapy Population pharmacokinetics Pediatrics NONMEM 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Institutional review board approval from Baylor College of Medicine and affiliated institutions was obtained

Conflict of interest

The authors are currently receiving NIH funding for a prospective population pharmacokinetic trial of vancomycin in pediatrics.

References

  1. 1.
    Wilson FP, Berns JS (2012) Vancomycin levels are frequently subtherapeutic during continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). Clin Nephrol 77:329–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Omrani AS, Mously A, Cabaluna MP, Kawas J, Albarrak MM, Alfahad WA (2015) Vancomycin therapy in critically ill patients on continuous renal replacement therapy; are we doing enough? Saudi Pharm J 23:327–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jamal JA, Udy AA, Lipman J, Roberts JA (2014) The impact of variation in renal replacement therapy settings on piperacillin, meropenem, and vancomycin drug clearance in the critically ill: an analysis of published literature and dosing regimens. Crit Care Med 42:1640–1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joy MS, Matzke GR, Frye RF, Palevsky PM (1998) Determinants of vancomycin clearance by continuous venovenous hemofiltration and continuous venovenous hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 31:1019–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roberts DM, Roberts JA, Roberts MS, Liu X, Nair P, Cole L, Lipman J, Bellomo R, RENAL Replacement Therapy Study Investigators (2012) Variability of antibiotic concentrations in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: a multicentre pharmacokinetic study. Crit Care Med 40:1523–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trotman RL, Williamson JC, Shoemaker DM, Salzer WL (2005) Antibiotic dosing in critically ill adult patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Clin Infect Dis 41:1159–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Uchino S, Cole L, Morimatsu H, Goldsmith D, Bellomo R (2002) Clearance of vancomycin during high-volume haemofiltration: impact of pre-dilution. Intensive Care Med 28:1664–1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boereboom FT, Ververs FF, Blankestijn PJ, Savelkoul TJ, van Dijk A (1999) Vancomycin clearance during continuous venovenous haemofiltration in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 25:1100–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chaijamorn W, Jitsurong A, Wiwattanawongsa K, Wanakamanee U, Dandecha P (2011) Vancomycin clearance during continuous venovenous haemofiltration in critically ill patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents 38:152–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petejova N, Martinek A, Zahalkova J, Duricova J, Brozmannova H, Urbanek K, Grundmann M, Plasek J, Kacirova I (2014) Vancomycin pharmacokinetics during high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration in critically ill septic patients. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 158:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cies JJ, Moore WS 2nd, Conley SB et al (2016) Continuous infusion vancomycin through the addition of vancomycin to the continuous renal replacement therapy solution in the PICU: a case series. Pediatr Crit Care Med 17:e138–e145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anderson BJ, Holford NH (2008) Mechanism-based concepts of size and maturity in pharmacokinetics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 48:303–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anderson BJ, Holford NH (2009) Mechanistic basis of using body size and maturation to predict clearance in humans. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 24:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anderson BJ, Holford NH (2013) Understanding dosing: children are small adults, neonates are immature children. Arch Dis Child 98:737–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering R Jr, Craig W, Billeter M, Dalovisio JR, Levine DP (2009) Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm 66:82–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Al-Sallami HS, Goulding A, Grant A, Taylor R, Holford N, Duffull SB (2015) Prediction of fat-free mass in children. Clin Pharmacokinet 54:1169–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Lawman HG, Fryar CD, Kruszon-Moran D, Kit BK, Flegal KM (2016) Trends in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1988-1994 through 2013-2014. Jama 315:2292–2299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beumier M, Roberts JA, Kabtouri H, Hites M, Cotton F, Wolff F, Lipman J, Jacobs F, Vincent JL, Taccone FS (2013) A new regimen for continuous infusion of vancomycin during continuous renal replacement therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:2859–2865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    DelDot ME, Lipman J, Tett SE (2004) Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration. Br J Clin Pharmacol 58:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Escobar L, Andresen M, Downey P, Gai MN, Regueira T, Bórquez T, Lipman J, Roberts JA (2014) Population pharmacokinetics and dose simulation of vancomycin in critically ill patients during high-volume haemofiltration. Int J Antimicrob Agents 44:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beal SL (2002) Commentary on significance levels for covariate effects in NONMEM. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 29:403–410 discussion 11-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hooker AC, Staatz CE, Karlsson MO (2007) Conditional weighted residuals (CWRES): a model diagnostic for the FOCE method. Pharm Res 24:2187–2197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karlsson MO, Savic RM (2007) Diagnosing model diagnostics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 82:17–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Le J, Bradley JS, Murray W et al (2013) Improved vancomycin dosing in children using area under the curve exposure. Pediatr Infect Dis J 32:e155–e163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Udy AA, Covajes C, Taccone FS, Jacobs F, Vincent JL, Lipman J, Roberts JA (2013) Can population pharmacokinetic modelling guide vancomycin dosing during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients? Int J Antimicrob Agents 41:564–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roberts DM, Liu X, Roberts JA et al (2015) A multicenter study on the effect of continuous hemodiafiltration intensity on antibiotic pharmacokinetics. Crit Care (London, England) 19:84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marsot A, Boulamery A, Bruguerolle B, Simon N (2012) Vancomycin: a review of population pharmacokinetic analyses. Clin Pharmacokinet 51:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brady S. Moffett
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Jennifer Morris
    • 1
    • 2
  • Flor Munoz
    • 2
  • Ayse Akcan Arikan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PharmacyTexas Children’s HospitalHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Department of PharmacyTexas Children’s Hospital – The WoodlandsConroeUSA

Personalised recommendations