Advertisement

European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

, Volume 74, Issue 12, pp 1575–1584 | Cite as

The role of solute carrier (SLC) transporters in actinomycin D pharmacokinetics in paediatric cancer patients

  • Hannah Yejin Kim
  • Gareth J Veal
  • Fanfan Zhou
  • Alan V Boddy
Pharmacogenetics
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Actinomycin D is used for treatment of paediatric cancers; however, a large inter-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability and hepatotoxicity are significant limitations to its use and warrant further investigation. Elimination of actinomycin D may be mediated by transporters, as the drug does not seem to undergo significant metabolism. We investigated the role of solute carrier (SLC) transporters in actinomycin D PK.

Methods

Fourteen key SLCs were screened through probe substrate uptake inhibition by actinomycin D in HEK293 cells. Uptake of actinomycin D was further studied in candidate SLCs by measuring intracellular actinomycin D using a validated LCMS assay. Pharmacogenetic analysis was conducted for 60 patients (Clinical trial: NCT00900354), who were genotyped for SNPs for OAT4 and PEPT2.

Results

OAT4, OCT2, OCT3 and PEPT2 showed significantly lower probe substrate uptake (mean ± SD 75.0 ± 3.5% (p < 0.0001), 74.8 ± 11.2% (p = 0.001), 81.2 ± 14.0% (p = 0.0083) and 70.7 ± 5.7% (p = 0.0188)) compared to that of control. Intracellular accumulation of actinomycin D was greater compared to vector control in OAT4-transfected cells by 1.5- and 1.4-fold at 10 min (p = 0.01) and 20 min (p = 0.03), and in PEPT2-transfected cells by 1.5- and 1.7-fold at 10 min (p = 0.047) and 20 min (p = 0.043), respectively. Subsequent clinical study did not find a significant association between OAT4 rs11231809 and PEPT2 rs2257212 genotypes, and actinomycin D PK parameters such as clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd).

Conclusion

Transport of actinomycin D was mediated by OAT4 and PEPT2 in vitro. There was a lack of clinical significance of OAT4 and PEPT2 genotypes as predictors of actinomycin D disposition in paediatric cancer patients.

Keywords

Actinomycin D SLC transporters Pharmacokinetics Pharmacogenetics Cancer 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the University of Sydney, Australia, Cancer Research UK and the Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre Network.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Fernandez CV, Mullen EA, Chi YY, Ehrlich PF, Perlman EJ, Kalapurakal JA, Khanna G, Paulino AC, Hamilton TE, Gow KW, Tochner Z, Hoffer FA, Withycombe JS, Shamberger RC, Kim Y, Geller JI, Anderson JR, Grundy PE, Dome JS (2018) Outcome and prognostic factors in stage III favorable-histology Wilms tumor: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group Study AREN0532. J Clin Oncol 36(3):254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gosiengfiao Y, Reichek J, Walterhouse D (2012) What is new in rhabdomyosarcoma management in children? Paediatr Drugs 14(6):389–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gaspar N, Hawkins DS, Dirksen U, Lewis IJ, Ferrari S, le Deley MC, Kovar H, Grimer R, Whelan J, Claude L, Delattre O, Paulussen M, Picci P, Sundby Hall K, van den Berg H, Ladenstein R, Michon J, Hjorth L, Judson I, Luksch R, Bernstein ML, Marec-Bérard P, Brennan B, Craft AW, Womer RB, Juergens H, Oberlin O (2015) Ewing sarcoma: current management and future approaches through collaboration. J Clin Oncol 33(27):3036–3046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldberg IH, Rabinowitz M, Reich E (1962) Basis of actinomycin action. I. DNA binding and inhibition of RNA-polymerase synthetic reactions by actinomycin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 48:2094–2101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldberg IH, Rabinowitz M, Reich E (1963) Basis of actinomycin action. II. Effect of actinomycin on the nucleoside triphosphate-inorganic pyrophosphate exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 49:226–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Green DM, Norkool P, Breslow NE, Finklestein JZ, D'Angio GJ (1990) Severe hepatic toxicity after treatment with vincristine and dactinomycin using single-dose or divided-dose schedules: a report from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study. J Clin Oncol 8(9):1525–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arndt C, Hawkins D, Anderson JR, Breitfeld P, Womer R, Meyer W (2004) Age is a risk factor for chemotherapy-induced hepatopathy with vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide. J Clin Oncol 22(10):1894–1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D'Antiga L, Baker A, Pritchard J, Pryor D, Mieli-Vergani G (2001) Veno-occlusive disease with multi-organ involvement following actinomycin-D. Eur J Cancer 37(9):1141–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bisogno G, Kraker J, Weirich A, Masiero L, Ludwig R, Tournade MF, Carli M (1997) Veno-occlusive disease of the liver in children treated for Wilms tumor. Med Pediatr Oncol 29(4):245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Veal GJ, Cole M, Errington J, Parry A, Hale J, Pearson AD, Howe K, Chisholm JC, Beane C, Brennan B, Waters F, Glaser A, Hemsworth S, McDowell H, Wright Y, Pritchard-Jones K, Pinkerton R, Jenner G, Nicholson J, Elsworth AM, Boddy AV, Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Pharmacology Working Group (2005) Pharmacokinetics of dactinomycin in a pediatric patient population: a United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group Study. Clin Cancer Res 11(16):5893–5899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hill CR, Cole M, Errington J, Malik G, Boddy AV, Veal GJ (2014) Characterisation of the clinical pharmacokinetics of actinomycin D and the influence of ABCB1 pharmacogenetic variation on actinomycin D disposition in children with cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet 53(8):741–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Skolnik JM, Herman JL, Adamson PC (2008) Identification of metabolites of actinomycin-D in vivo and in vitro. in 37th Annual Meeting, American College of Clinical Pharmacology. J Clin Pharmacol Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 48:1128Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tattersall MH et al (1975) Pharmacokinetics of actinoymcin D in patients with malignant melanoma. Clin Pharmacol Ther 17(6):701–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin X, Skolnik S, Chen X, Wang J (2011) Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model. Drug Metab Dispos 39(2):265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Polli JW, Wring SA, Humphreys JE, Huang L, Morgan JB, Webster LO, Serabjit-Singh CS (2001) Rational use of in vitro P-glycoprotein assays in drug discovery. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 299(2):620–628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hill CR, Jamieson D, Thomas HD, Brown CDA, Boddy AV, Veal GJ (2013) Characterisation of the roles of ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2 and ABCG2 in the transport and pharmacokinetics of actinomycin D in vitro and in vivo. Biochem Pharmacol 85(1):29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nigam SK (2015) What do drug transporters really do? Nat Rev Drug Discov 14(1):29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roth M, Obaidat A, Hagenbuch B (2012) OATPs, OATs and OCTs: the organic anion and cation transporters of the SLCO and SLC22A gene superfamilies. Br J Pharmacol 165(5):1260–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    He L, Vasiliou K, Nebert DW (2009) Analysis and update of the human solute carrier (SLC) gene superfamily. Hum Genomics 3(2):195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koepsell H (2013) The SLC22 family with transporters of organic cations, anions and zwitterions. Mol Asp Med 34(2–3):413–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou F, You G (2007) Molecular insights into the structure-function relationship of organic anion transporters OATs. Pharm Res 24(1):28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhou F, Zhu L, Wang K, Murray M (2017) Recent advance in the pharmacogenomics of human Solute Carrier Transporters. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 116:21–36Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    UniProt (2017) the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 45(D1):D158–d169Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu F, Li Z, Zheng J, Cheung FSG, Chan T, Zhu L, Zhuge H, Zhou F (2013) The inhibitory effects of the bioactive components isolated from Scutellaria baicalensis on the cellular uptake mediated by the essential solute carrier transporters. J Pharm Sci 102(11):4205–4211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li Z, Cheung FSG, Zheng J, Chan T, Zhu L, Zhou F (2014) Interaction of the bioactive flavonol, icariin, with the essential human solute carrier transporters. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 28(2):91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johnston RA, Rawling T, Chan T, Zhou F, Murray M (2014) Selective inhibition of human solute carrier transporters by multikinase inhibitors. Drug Metab Dispos 42(11):1851–1857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lu X, Chan T, Zhu L, Bao X, Velkov T, Zhou QT, Li J, Chan HK, Zhou F (2018) The inhibitory effects of eighteen front-line antibiotics on the substrate uptake mediated by human organic anion/cation transporters, organic anion transporting polypeptides and oligopeptide transporters in in vitro models. Eur J Pharm Sci 115:132–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhou F, Zhu L, Cui PH, Church WB, Murray M (2010) Functional characterization of nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in the human organic anion transporter 4 (hOAT4). Br J Pharmacol 159(2):419–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lu X, Chan T, Xu C, Zhu L, Zhou QT, Roberts KD, Chan HK, Li J, Zhou F (2016) Human oligopeptide transporter 2 (PEPT2) mediates cellular uptake of polymyxins. J Antimicrob Chemother 71(2):403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Poirier A, Belli S, Funk C, Otteneder MB, Portmann R, Heinig K, Prinssen E, Lazic SE, Rayner CR, Hoffmann G, Singer T, Smith DE, Schuler F (2012) Role of the intestinal peptide transporter PEPT1 in oseltamivir absorption: in vitro and in vivo studies. Drug Metab Dispos 40(8):1556–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhou F, Zheng J, Zhu L, Jodal A, Cui PH, Wong M, Gurney H, Church WB, Murray M (2013) Functional analysis of novel polymorphisms in the human SLCO1A2 gene that encodes the transporter OATP1A2. AAPS J 15(4):1099–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cervera L, Gutiérrez S, Gòdia F, Segura MM (2011) Optimization of HEK 293 cell growth by addition of non-animal derived components using design of experiments. BMC Proc 5(Suppl 8):P126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schwartz A, Sugg H, Ritter TW, Fernandez-Repollet E (1983) Direct determination of cell diameter, surface area, and volume with an electronic volume sensing flow cytometer. Cytometry 3(6):456–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Boss D, Kühn J, Jourdain P, Depeursinge C, Magistretti PJ, Marquet P (2013) Measurement of absolute cell volume, osmotic membrane water permeability, and refractive index of transmembrane water and solute flux by digital holographic microscopy. J Biomed Opt 18(3):036007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Milo R, Jorgensen P, Moran U, Weber G, Springer M (2010) BioNumbers—the database of key numbers in molecular and cell biology. Nucleic Acids Res 38(Database issue):D750–D753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Koley D, Bard AJ (2010) Triton X-100 concentration effects on membrane permeability of a single HeLa cell by scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(39):16783–16787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Whirl-Carrillo M, McDonagh EM, Hebert JM, Gong L, Sangkuhl K, Thorn CF, Altman RB, Klein TE (2012) Pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 92(4):414–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Langholz B, Skolnik JM, Barrett JS, Renbarger J, Seibel NL, Zajicek A, Arndt CAS (2011) Dactinomycin and vincristine toxicity in the treatment of childhood cancer: a retrospective study from the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 57(2):252–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Corn BW, Goldwein JW, Evans I, D'Angio GJ (1992) Outcomes in low-risk babies treated with half-dose chemotherapy according to the Third National Wilms’ Tumor Study. J Clin Oncol 10(8):1305–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ortega JA, Donaldson SS, Ivy SP, Pappo A, Maurer HM (1997) Venoocclusive disease of the liver after chemotherapy with vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide for the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma. A report of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group. Childrens Cancer Group, the Pediatric Oncology Group, and the Pediatric Intergroup Statistical Center. Cancer 79(12):2435–2439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Green DM, Breslow NE, Beckwith JB, Finklestein JZ, Grundy PE, Thomas PR, Kim T, Shochat SJ, Haase GM, Ritchey ML, Kelalis PP, D'Angio GJ (1998) Comparison between single-dose and divided-dose administration of dactinomycin and doxorubicin for patients with Wilms’ tumor: a report from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study Group. J Clin Oncol 16(1):237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Green DM, Breslow NE, Beckwith JB, Finklestein JZ, Grundy P, Thomas PR, Kim T, Shochat S, Haase G, Ritchey M, Kelalis P, D'Angio GJ (1998) Effect of duration of treatment on treatment outcome and cost of treatment for Wilms’ tumor: a report from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study Group. J Clin Oncol 16(12):3744–3751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Crist WM, Anderson JR, Meza JL, Fryer C, Raney RB, Ruymann FB, Breneman J, Qualman SJ, Wiener E, Wharam M, Lobe T, Webber B, Maurer HM, Donaldson SS (2001) Intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study-IV: results for patients with nonmetastatic disease. J Clin Oncol 19(12):3091–3102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tournade MF, Com-Nougué C, de Kraker J, Ludwig R, Rey A, Burgers JM, Sandstedt B, Godzinski J, Carli M, Potter R, Zucker JM, International Society of Pediatric Oncology Nephroblastoma Trial and Study Committee (2001) Optimal duration of preoperative therapy in unilateral and nonmetastatic Wilms’ tumor in children older than 6 months: results of the Ninth International Society of Pediatric Oncology Wilms’ Tumor Trial and Study. J Clin Oncol 19(2):488–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Arndt CA et al (2009) Vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide compared with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide for intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: children’s oncology group study D9803. J Clin Oncol 27(31):5182–5188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Graf N, van Tinteren H, Bergeron C, Pein F, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Sandstedt B, Schenk JP, Godzinski J, Oldenburger F, Furtwängler R, de Kraker J (2012) Characteristics and outcome of stage II and III non-anaplastic Wilms’ tumour treated according to the SIOP trial and study 93-01. Eur J Cancer 48(17):3240–3248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pritchard-Jones K, Bergeron C, de Camargo B, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Acha T, Godzinski J, Oldenburger F, Boccon-Gibod L, Leuschner I, Vujanic G, Sandstedt B, de Kraker J, van Tinteren H, Graf N (2015) Omission of doxorubicin from the treatment of stage II-III, intermediate-risk Wilms’ tumour (SIOP WT 2001): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(9999):1156–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Skolnik JM, Herman JL, Adamson PC (2008) Identification of metabolites of actinomycin-D in vivo and in vitro. J Clin Pharmacol 48(9):1128Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ekaratanawong S, Anzai N, Jutabha P, Miyazaki H, Noshiro R, Takeda M, Kanai Y, Sophasan S, Endou H (2004) Human organic anion transporter 4 is a renal apical organic anion/dicarboxylate exchanger in the proximal tubules. J Pharmacol Sci 94(3):297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Motohashi H, Sakurai Y, Saito H, Masuda S, Urakami Y, Goto M, Fukatsu A, Ogawa O, Inui K (2002) Gene expression levels and immunolocalization of organic ion transporters in the human kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 13(4):866–874PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wu X, Huang W, Ganapathy ME, Wang H, Kekuda R, Conway SJ, Leibach FH, Ganapathy V (2000) Structure, function, and regional distribution of the organic cation transporter OCT3 in the kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 279(3):F449–F458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nies AT, Koepsell H, Winter S, Burk O, Klein K, Kerb R, Zanger UM, Keppler D, Schwab M, Schaeffeler E (2009) Expression of organic cation transporters OCT1 (SLC22A1) and OCT3 (SLC22A3) is affected by genetic factors and cholestasis in human liver. Hepatology 50(4):1227–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Luckner P, Brandsch M (2005) Interaction of 31 beta-lactam antibiotics with the H+/peptide symporter PEPT2: analysis of affinity constants and comparison with PEPT1. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 59(1):17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Babu E, Takeda M, Narikawa S, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto T, Cha SH, Sekine T, Sakthisekaran D, Endou H (2002) Human organic anion transporters mediate the transport of tetracycline. Jpn J Pharmacol 88(1):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kimura H, Takeda M, Narikawa S, Enomoto A, Ichida K, Endou H (2002) Human organic anion transporters and human organic cation transporters mediate renal transport of prostaglandins. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 301(1):293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hagos Y, Stein D, Ugele B, Burckhardt G, Bahn A (2007) Human renal organic anion transporter 4 operates as an asymmetric urate transporter. J Am Soc Nephrol 18(2):430–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Takeda M, Khamdang S, Narikawa S, Kimura H, Hosoyamada M, Cha SH, Sekine T, Endou H (2002) Characterization of methotrexate transport and its drug interactions with human organic anion transporters. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302(2):666–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Liu R, Tang AMY, Tan YL, Limenta LMG, Lee EJD (2009) Interethnic differences of PEPT2 (SLC15A2) polymorphism distribution and associations with cephalexin pharmacokinetics in healthy Asian subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 65(1):65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Takahashi K, Nakamura N, Terada T, Okano T, Futami T, Saito H, Inui KI (1998) Interaction of beta-lactam antibiotics with H+/peptide cotransporters in rat renal brush-border membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 286(2):1037–1042PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ganapathy ME, Huang W, Wang H, Ganapathy V, Leibach FH (1998) Valacyclovir: a substrate for the intestinal and renal peptide transporters PEPT1 and PEPT2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 246(2):470–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Shu C, Shen H, Hopfer U, Smith DE (2001) Mechanism of intestinal absorption and renal reabsorption of an orally active ace inhibitor: uptake and transport of fosinopril in cell cultures. Drug Metab Dispos 29(10):1307–1315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lima A, Bernardes M, Azevedo R, Medeiros R, Seabra V (2015) Pharmacogenomics of methotrexate membrane transport pathway: can clinical response to methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis be predicted? Int J Mol Sci 16(6):13760–13780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Vormfelde SV, Schirmer M, Hagos Y, Toliat MR, Engelhardt S, Meineke I, Burckhardt G, Nurnberg P, Brockmoller J (2006) Torsemide renal clearance and genetic variation in luminal and basolateral organic anion transporters. Br J Clin Pharmacol 62(3):323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Lee YS, Kim BH, Kim BC, Shin A, Kim JS, Hong SH, Hwang JA, Lee JA, Nam S, Lee SH, Bhak J, Park JW (2015) SLC15A2 genomic variation is associated with the extraordinary response of sorafenib treatment: whole-genome analysis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 6(18):16449–16460PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Lal S, Wong ZW, Sandanaraj E, Xiang X, Ang PCS, Lee EJD, Chowbay B (2008) Influence of ABCB1 and ABCG2 polymorphisms on doxorubicin disposition in Asian breast cancer patients. Cancer Sci 99(4):816–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Yao S, Sucheston LE, Zhao H, Barlow WE, Zirpoli G, Liu S, Moore HCF, Thomas Budd G, Hershman DL, Davis W, Ciupak GL, Stewart JA, Isaacs C, Hobday TJ, Salim M, Hortobagyi GN, Gralow JR, Livingston RB, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Ambrosone CB (2014) Germline genetic variants in ABCB1, ABCC1 and ALDH1A1, and risk of hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities in a SWOG phase III trial S0221 for breast cancer. Pharmacogenomics J 14(3):241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Campa D, Müller P, Edler L, Knoefel L, Barale R, Heussel CP, Thomas M, Canzian F, Risch A (2012) A comprehensive study of polymorphisms in ABCB1, ABCC2 and ABCG2 and lung cancer chemotherapy response and prognosis. Int J Cancer 131(12):2920–2928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sprowl JA, Sparreboom A (2014) Uptake carriers and oncology drug safety. Drug Metab Dispos 42(4):611–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Li Q, Shu Y (2014) Role of solute carriers in response to anticancer drugs. Mol Cell Ther 2:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    de Graan AJ et al (2012) Influence of polymorphic OATP1B-type carriers on the disposition of docetaxel. Clin Cancer Res 18(16):4433–4440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Mori S, Ohtsuki S, Takanaga H, Kikkawa T, Kang YS, Terasaki T (2004) Organic anion transporter 3 is involved in the brain-to-blood efflux transport of thiopurine nucleobase analogs. J Neurochem 90(4):931–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Martinez D et al (2017) Endogenous metabolites-mediated communication between OAT1/OAT3 and OATP1B1 may explain the association between SLCO1B1 SNPs and methotrexate toxicity. Clin Pharmacol Ther  https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Moscow JA, Gong M, He R, Sgagias MK, Dixon KH, Anzick SL, Meltzer PS, Cowan KH (1995) Isolation of a gene encoding a human reduced folate carrier (RFC1) and analysis of its expression in transport-deficient, methotrexate-resistant human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 55(17):3790–3794PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lopez-Lopez E, Ballesteros J, Piñan MA, Sanchez de Toledo J, Garcia de Andoin N, Garcia-Miguel P, Navajas A, Garcia-Orad A (2013) Polymorphisms in the methotrexate transport pathway: a new tool for MTX plasma level prediction in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pharmacogenet Genomics 23(2):53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Trevino LR et al (2009) Germline genetic variation in an organic anion transporter polypeptide associated with methotrexate pharmacokinetics and clinical effects. J Clin Oncol 27(35):5972–5978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Xu G et al (2005) Analyses of coding region polymorphisms in apical and basolateral human organic anion transporter (OAT) genes [OAT1 (NKT), OAT2, OAT3, OAT4, URAT (RST)]. Kidney Int 68(4):1491–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Pinsonneault J, Nielsen CU, Sadee W (2004) Genetic variants of the human H+/dipeptide transporter PEPT2: analysis of haplotype functions. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 311(3):1088–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Low SK, Takahashi A, Mushiroda T, Kubo M (2014) Genome-wide association study: a useful tool to identify common genetic variants associated with drug toxicity and efficacy in cancer pharmacogenomics. Clin Cancer Res 20(10):2541–2552CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Northern Institute of Cancer ResearchNewcastle UniversityNewcastleUK

Personalised recommendations