Advertisement

European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

, Volume 73, Issue 10, pp 1237–1245 | Cite as

Reduction in targeted potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly inpatients: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

  • Benoit CossetteEmail author
  • Jean-François Éthier
  • Thomas Joly-Mischlich
  • Josée Bergeron
  • Geneviève Ricard
  • Serge Brazeau
  • Mathieu Caron
  • Olivier Germain
  • Hélène Payette
  • Janusz Kaczorowski
  • Mitchell Levine
Clinical Trial

Abstract

Purpose

The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in hospitalized older adults is a complex problem, but the use of computerized alert systems (CAS) has shown some potential. The study’s objective is to assess the change in PIM use with a CAS-based pharmacist-physician intervention model compared to usual clinical care.

Methods

Pragmatic single-site randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Hospitalizations identified with selected Beers or STOPP criteria were randomized to usual clinical care or to the CAS-based pharmacist-physician intervention. The primary outcome was PIM drug cessation or dosage decrease. Clinical relevance of the CAS alerts was assessed.

Results

Analyses included 231 patients who had 128 and 126 hospitalizations in the control and intervention groups, respectively. Patients had a mean age of 81, and 60% were female. In the intervention compared to the control group, drug cessation or dosage decrease were more frequent at 48 h post-alert (45.8 vs 15.9%; absolute difference 30.0%; 95%CI 13.8 to 46.1%) and at discharge from the hospital (48.1 vs 27.3%; absolute difference 20.8%; 95%CI 4.6 to 37.0%). In a post hoc analysis of all alerts, regardless of their clinical relevance, the absolute difference in drug cessation or dosage decrease between the intervention and control groups was 16.2% (95%CI 2.9 to 29.6%) at 48 h and 8.0% (95%CI −4.0 to 20.0%) at discharge from the hospital.

Conclusions

In hospitalized older adults, a CAS-based pharmacist-physician intervention, compared to usual clinical care, resulted in significant higher number of drug cessation and dosage reductions for targeted PIMs.

Keywords

Older adults Computerized alert system Potentially inappropriate medications Hospital Knowledge translation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Guillaume Joly for his help in developing and structuring the CAS, and to Jean-Michel Gagnon, Philippe Nault, and Philip-André Fillion for their informatics support. The interventions were conducted by four pharmacists: Sabrina Bergeron-Wolff, Nora Bernier-Fillion, Martine Grondin, and Claudia Pelletier-Mayette.

Authors’ contributions

Benoit Cossette, Jean-François Éthier, Thomas Joly-Mischlich, Josée Bergeron, Geneviève Ricard, Serge Brazeau, Janusz Kaczorowski, and Mitchell Levine designed the study; Benoit Cossette, Jean-François Éthier, Thomas Joly-Mischlich, Mathieu Caron, and Olivier Germain acquired and analyzed the data; Benoit Cossette, Jean-François Éthier, Thomas Joly-Mischlich, Josée Bergeron, Geneviève Ricard, Serge Brazeau, Mathieu Caron, Hélène Payette, Janusz Kaczorowski, and Mitchell Levine interpreted the data; Benoit Cossette drafted the manuscript; Jean-François Éthier, Thomas Joly-Mischlich, Josée Bergeron, Geneviève Ricard, Serge Brazeau, Mathieu Caron, Olivier Germain, Hélène Payette, Janusz Kaczorowski, and Mitchell Levine critically revised the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the CHUS ethics committee. The committee did not request patient consent before randomization but required that each patient be contacted after the hospitalization to determine if their relevant hospitalization information could be included in the analysis.

Funding

This study was funded through a grant received from the Merck funds of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences of the University of Sherbrooke. The funding source had no involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the report for publication.

Supplementary material

228_2017_2293_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (181 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 181 kb)
228_2017_2293_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (144 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 144 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Lehnert T, Heider D, Leicht H, Heinrich S, Corrieri S, Luppa M, Riedel-Heller S, Konig HH (2011) Review: health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev 68(4):387–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beijer HJ, de Blaey CJ (2002) Hospitalisations caused by adverse drug reactions (ADR): a meta-analysis of observational studies. Pharm World Sci 24(2):46–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bressler R, Bahl JJ (2003) Principles of drug therapy for the elderly patient. Mayo Clin Proc 78(12):1564–1577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davies EC, Green CF, Taylor S, Williamson PR, Mottram DR, Pirmohamed M (2009) Adverse drug reactions in hospital in-patients: a prospective analysis of 3695 patient-episodes. PLoS One 4(2):e4439CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Merle L, Laroche ML, Dantoine T, Charmes JP (2005) Predicting and preventing adverse drug reactions in the very old. Drugs Aging 22(5):375–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alhawassi TM, Krass I, Bajorek BV, Pont LG (2014) A systematic review of the prevalence and risk factors for adverse drug reactions in the elderly in the acute care setting. Clin Interv Aging 9:2079–2086PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O'Sullivan D, O'Mahony D, O'Connor MN, Gallagher P, Gallagher J, Cullinan S, O'Sullivan R, Eustace J, Byrne S (2016) Prevention of adverse Drug reactions in hospitalised older patients using a software-supported structured pharmacist intervention: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Drugs Aging 33(1):63–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klopotowska JE, Wierenga PC, Stuijt CC, Arisz L, Dijkgraaf MG, Kuks PF, Asscheman H, de Rooij SE, Lie AHL, Smorenburg SM (2013) Adverse drug events in older hospitalized patients: results and reliability of a comprehensive and structured identification strategy. PLoS One 8(8):e71045CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tangiisuran B, Davies JG, Wright JE, Rajkumar C (2012) Adverse drug reactions in a population of hospitalized very elderly patients. Drugs Aging 29(8):669–679PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jano E, Aparasu RR (2007) Healthcare outcomes associated with Beers’ criteria: a systematic review. Ann Pharmacother 41(3):438–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Page RL 2nd, Linnebur SA, Bryant LL, Ruscin JM (2010) Inappropriate prescribing in the hospitalized elderly patient: defining the problem, evaluation tools, and possible solutions. Clin Interv Aging 5:75–87CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spinewine A, Schmader KE, Barber N, Hughes C, Lapane KL, Swine C, Hanlon JT (2007) Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimised? Lancet 370(9582):173–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hill-Taylor B, Sketris I, Hayden J, Byrne S, O'Sullivan D, Christie R (2013) Application of the STOPP/START criteria: a systematic review of the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults, and evidence of clinical, humanistic and economic impact. J Clin Pharm Ther 38(5):360–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tosato M, Landi F, Martone AM, Cherubini A, Corsonello A, Volpato S, Bernabei R, Onder G (2014) Potentially inappropriate drug use among hospitalised older adults: results from the CRIME study. Age Ageing 43(6):767–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(11):2227–46.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O'Mahony D, O'Sullivan D, Byrne S, O'Connor MN, Ryan C, Gallagher P (2015) STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age Ageing 44(2):213–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Duran CE, Azermai M, Vander Stichele RH (2013) Systematic review of anticholinergic risk scales in older adults. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 69(7):1485–1496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hilmer SN, Mager DE, Simonsick EM, Cao Y, Ling SM, Windham BG, Harris TB, Hanlon JT, Rubin SM, Shorr RI, Bauer DC, Abernethy DR (2007) A drug burden index to define the functional burden of medications in older people. Arch Intern Med 167(8):781–787CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Page RL 2nd, Ruscin JM (2006) The risk of adverse drug events and hospital-related morbidity and mortality among older adults with potentially inappropriate medication use. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 4(4):297–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Onder G, Landi F, Cesari M, Gambassi G, Carbonin P, Bernabei R (2003) Inappropriate medication use among hospitalized older adults in Italy: results from the Italian Group of Pharmacoepidemiology in the Elderly. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 59(2):157–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laroche ML, Charmes JP, Nouaille Y, Fourrier A, Merle L (2006) Impact of hospitalisation in an acute medical geriatric unit on potentially inappropriate medication use. Drugs Aging 23(1):49–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu CL, Peng LN, Chen YT, Lin MH, Liu LK, Chen LK (2012) Potentially inappropriate prescribing (IP) for elderly medical inpatients in Taiwan: a hospital-based study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 55(1):148–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wahab MS, Nyfort-Hansen K, Kowalski SR (2012) Inappropriate prescribing in hospitalised Australian elderly as determined by the STOPP criteria. Int J Clin Pharm 34(6):855–862CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cossette B, Bergeron J, Ricard G, Ethier JF, Joly-Mischlich T, Levine M, Sene M, Mallet L, Lanthier L, Payette H, Rodrigue MC, Brazeau S (2016) Knowledge Translation Strategy to Reduce the Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Hospitalized Elderly Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Approche adaptée à la personne âgée, cadre de référence. MSSS. 2011. http://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/acrobat/f/documentation/2010/10-830-03.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2016.
  26. 26.
    Arvisais K, Bergeron-Wolff S, Bouffard C, Michaud AS, Bergeron J, Mallet L, Brazeau S, Joly-Mischlich T, Bernier-Filion N, Lanthier L, Ricard G, Rodrigue MC, Cossette B (2015) A pharmacist-physician intervention model using a computerized alert system to reduce high-risk medication use in elderly inpatients. Drugs Aging 32(8):663–670CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    American Geriatrics Society updated Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(4):616–31.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ghibelli S, Marengoni A, Djade CD, Nobili A, Tettamanti M, Franchi C, Caccia S, Giovarruscio F, Remuzzi A, Pasina L (2013) Prevention of inappropriate prescribing in hospitalized older patients using a computerized prescription support system (INTERcheckR). Drugs Aging 30(10):821–828CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peterson JF, Kripalani S, Danciu I, Harrell D, Marvanova M, Mixon AS, Rodriguez C, Powers JS (2014) Electronic surveillance and pharmacist intervention for vulnerable older inpatients on high-risk medication regimens. J Am Geriatr Soc 62(11):2148–2152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    O'Sullivan D, O'Mahony D, O'Connor MN, Gallagher P, Cullinan S, O'Sullivan R, Gallagher J, Eustace J, Byrne S (2014) The impact of a structured pharmacist intervention on the appropriateness of prescribing in older hospitalized patients. Drugs Aging 31(6):471–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grion AM, Gallo U, Tinjala DD, Daragjati J, Loreggian M, Cardaci G, Mangoni A, Pilotto A (2016) A new computer-based tool to reduce potentially inappropriate prescriptions in hospitalized geriatric patients. Drugs Aging 33(4):267–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cockcroft DW, Gault MH (1976) Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16(1):31–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, Januel JM, Sundararajan V (2011) Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 173(6):676–682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Canadian Institute for Health Informartion. Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio (HSMR). www.cihi.ca/CIHI-ext-portal/pdf/internet/HSMR_TECH_NOTES_EN. Accessed November 7, 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benoit Cossette
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Jean-François Éthier
    • 1
    • 5
    • 6
  • Thomas Joly-Mischlich
    • 1
    • 3
  • Josée Bergeron
    • 3
  • Geneviève Ricard
    • 1
    • 5
  • Serge Brazeau
    • 5
  • Mathieu Caron
    • 7
  • Olivier Germain
    • 8
  • Hélène Payette
    • 1
    • 2
  • Janusz Kaczorowski
    • 9
    • 10
  • Mitchell Levine
    • 4
    • 11
  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversité de SherbrookeQCCanada
  2. 2.Research Centre on AgingCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l’Estrie – Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeQCCanada
  3. 3.Department of PharmacyCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l’Estrie – Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeQCCanada
  4. 4.Department of Clinical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  5. 5.Department of MedicineCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l’Estrie – Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeQCCanada
  6. 6.Research Center of the Centre hospitalier universitaire de SherbrookeCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l’Estrie – Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeQCCanada
  7. 7.Department of Information TechnologyCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l’Estrie – Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeQCCanada
  8. 8.Department of MathematicsUniversité de SherbrookeQCCanada
  9. 9.Department of Family and Emergency MedicineUniversité de MontréalQCCanada
  10. 10.Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM)QCCanada
  11. 11.Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH)Research Institute of St. Joseph’s HamiltonHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations