Advertisement

European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

, Volume 72, Issue 1, pp 93–107 | Cite as

Risk factors for potentially inappropriate prescribing to older patients in primary care

  • Ivana Projovic
  • Dubravka Vukadinovic
  • Olivera Milovanovic
  • Milena Jurisevic
  • Radisa Pavlovic
  • Sasa Jacovic
  • Slobodan Jankovic
  • Srdjan StefanovicEmail author
Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to determine modifiable risk factors contributing to potentially inappropriate prescribing in older primary care outpatients (≥65 years).

Methods

Two separate, age- and sex-matched case-control studies were carried out simultaneously at the Primary Health Care Center Kragujevac, Serbia, during the period September 2013–September 2014. The cases were defined as patients with at least one prescription for potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) according to Screening Tool of Older Persons potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria (n = 122), and patients who had at least one potential prescribing omission (PPO) listed in Screening Tool to Alert doctors to the Right Treatment (START) criteria (n = 108), while the control groups consisted of patients without such outcomes (n = 244 and n = 216, respectively).

Results

A total of 138 PIM and 161 PPO events were identified using 26 (41.3 %) of STOPP criteria and 17 (77.3 %) of START indicators, respectively. The unhealthy behaviors including at least two of the following: sedentary lifestyle, improper nutrition, active smoking or heavy alcohol consumption (adjusted OR 2.57, 95 % CI 1.28–5.20), use of multiple drugs (five to eight drugs, adjusted OR 3.05, 95 % CI 1.59–5.85; ≥9 of drugs adjusted OR 7.17, 95 % CI 3.07–16.74) and frequent contacts between patients chosen general practitioners (GPs) and pharmaceutical sales representatives (adjusted OR 2.28, 95 % CI 1.10–4.75), were identified as major risk factors for PIM use. Patients who were handled by GPs from smaller practices (adjusted OR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.29–0.93), those with more organ systems affected by the extremely severe disorders and those who often visited the outpatient specialist services (adjusted OR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.81–0.95), had a significantly reduced risk of PPO.

Conclusions

This study suggests that avoidance of major polypharmacy, use of nonpharmacological measures to improve lifestyle habits and decreasing the exposure of physicians to drug promotional material may reduce the risk of PIM use in older primary care outpatients. The only modifiable protective factors for PPOs were working environment of the patients chosen GPs and more frequent ambulatory visits to specialists.

Keywords

Inappropriate prescribing Elderly STOPP/START Risk factors Primary care 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was partially financed by grant no. 175007, given by Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technical Development.

Compliance with ethical standard

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Spinewine A, Schmader KE, Barber N, Hughes C, Lapane KL, Swine C, Hanlon JT (2007) Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimized? Lancet 370(9582):173–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fjalová D, Topinková E, Gambassi G et al (2005) Potentially inappropriate medication use among elderly home care patients in Europe. JAMA 293(11):1348–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gallagher P, Lang PO, Cherubini A et al (2011) Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in an acutely ill population of older patients admitted to six European hospitals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 67(11):1175–1188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradley MC, Motterlini N, Padmanabhan S, Cahir C, Williams T, Fahey T, Hughes CM (2014) Potentially inappropriate prescribing among older people in the United Kingdom. BMC Geriatr 14:72PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Galvin R, Moriarty F, Cousins G et al (2014) Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing and prescribing omissions in older Irish adults: findings from The Irish LongituDinal Study on Ageing study (TILDA). Eur J Clin Pharmacol 70(5):599–606PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ryan C, O’Mahony D, Kennedy J, Weedle P, Byrne S (2009) Potentially inappropriate prescribing in an Irish elderly population in primary care. Br J Clin Pharmacol 68(6):936–947PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ryan C, O’Mahony D, Kennedy J et al (2013) Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older residents in Irish nursing homes. Age Ageing 42(1):116–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O’Sullivan DP, O’Mahony D, Parsons C, Hughes C, Murphy K, Patterson S, Byrne S (2013) A prevalence study of potentially inappropriate prescribing in Irish long-term care residents. Drugs Aging 30(1):39–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu CL, Peng LN, Chen YT, Lin MH, Liu LK, Chen LK (2012) Potentially inappropriate prescribing (IP) for elderly medical inpatients in Taiwan: a hospital-based study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 55(1):148–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lai HY, Hwang SJ, Chen YC, Chen TJ, Lin MH, Chen LK (2009) Prevalence of the prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications at ambulatory care visits by elderly patients covered by the Taiwanese National Health Insurance program. Clin Ther 31(8):1859–1870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vezmar Kovačević S, Simišić M, Stojkov Rudinski S, Ćulafić M, Vučićević K, Prostran M, Miljković B (2014) Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older primary care patients. PLoS One 9(4):e95536PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuijpers MAJ, van Marum RJ, Egberts ACG, Jansen PA, The Oldy Study Group (Old People Drugs & Dysregulations) (2008) Relationship between polypharmacy and underprescribing. Br J Clin Pharmacol 65(1):130–133PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wright RM, Sloane R, Pieper CF, Ruby-Scelsi C, Twersky J, Schmader KE, Hanlon J (2009) Underuse of indicated medications among physically frail older US veterans at the time of hospital discharge: results of a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Geriatric Evaluation and Management Drug Study. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 7(5):271–280PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hamilton H, Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, O’Mahony D (2011) Potentially inappropriate medications defined by STOPP criteria and the risk of adverse drug events in older hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med 171(11):1013–1019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reich O, Rosemann T, Rapold R, Blozik E, Senn O (2014) Potentially inappropriate medication use in older patients in Swiss managed care plans: prevalence, determinants and association with hospitalization. PLoS One 9(8):e105425PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tosato M, Landi F, Martone AM et al (2014) Potentially inappropriate drug use among hospitalised older adults: results from the CRIME study. Age Ageing 43(6):767–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ruggiero C, Dell’Aquila G, Gasperini B et al (2010) Potentially inappropriate drug prescriptions and risk of hospitalization among older, Italian, nursing home residents: the ULISSE project. Drugs Aging 27(9):747–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dalleur O, Spinewine A, Henrard S, Losseau C, Speybroeck N, Boland B (2012) Inappropriate prescribing and related hospital admissions in frail older persons according to the STOPP and START criteria. Drugs Aging 29(10):829–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bradley MC, Fahey T, Cahir C, Bennett K, O’Reilly D, Parsons C, Hughes CM (2012) Potentially inappropriate prescribing and cost outcomes for older people: a cross-sectional study using the Northern Ireland Enhanced Prescribing Database. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 68(10):1425–1433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cahir C, Fahey T, Teeling M, Teljeur C, Feely J, Bennett K (2010) Potentially inappropriate prescribing and cost outcomes for older people: a national population study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 69(5):543–552PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lau DT, Kasper JD, Potter DE, Lyles A, Bennett RG (2005) Hospitalization and death associated with potentially inappropriate medication prescriptions among elderly nursing home residents. Arch Intern Med 165(1):68–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lund BC, Carnahan RM, Egge JA, Chrischilles EA, Kaboli PJ (2010) Inappropriate prescribing predicts adverse drug events in older adults. Ann Pharmacother 44:957–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stockl KM, Le L, Zhang S, Harada AS (2010) Clinical and economic outcomes associated with potentially inappropriate prescribing in the elderly. Am J Manag Care 16(1):e1–e10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Passarelli MC, Jacob-Filho W, Figueras A (2005) Adverse drug reactions in an elderly hospitalised population: inappropriate prescription is a leading cause. Drugs Aging 22(9):767–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Laroche ML, Charmes JP, Nouaille Y, Picard N, Merle L (2007) Is inappropriate medication use a major cause of adverse drug reactions in the elderly? Br J Clin Pharmacol 63:177–186PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hill-Taylor B, Sketris I, Hayden J, Byrne S, O’Sullivan D, Christie R (2013) Application of the STOPP/START criteria: a systematic review of the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults, and evidence of clinical, humanistic and economic impact. J Clin Pharm Ther 38(5):360–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ryan C, O’Mahony D, O’Donovan DÓ, O’Grady E, Weedle P, Kennedy J, Byrne S (2013) A comparison of the application of STOPP/START to patients’ drug lists with and without clinical information. Int J Clin Pharm 35(2):230–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miller MD, Towers A (1991) A Manual of Guidelines for Scoring the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G). Pittsburg, Pa: University of Pittsburgh. http://catalogue.iugm.qc.ca/GEIDEFile/CIRSG.PDF?Archive=102955792013&File=CIRSG_PDF. Accessed 5 April 2015.
  30. 30.
    Miller MD, Paradis CF, Houck PR, Mazumdar S et al (1992) Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Psychiatry Res 41(3):237–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hall SF (2006) A user’s guide to selecting a comorbidity index for clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol 59(8):849–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brett T, Arnold-Reed DE, Popescu A et al (2013) Multimorbidity in patients attending 2 Australian primary care practices. Ann Fam Med 11(6):535–542PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Artaud F, Dugravot A, Sabia S, Singh-Manoux A, Tzourio C, Elbaz A (2013) Unhealthy behaviours and disability in older adults: three-City Dijon cohort study. BMJ 347:f4240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stefanovic SM, Jankovic SM (2011) Knowledge of the pharmacological profile of a patient improves the quality of prescribing, the outcomes of treatment, and the utilization of health services in primary health care. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 67(11):1091–1101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Maher RL, Hanlon J, Hajjar ER (2014) Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf 13(1):57–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gallagher PF, O’Connor MN, O’Mahony D (2011) Prevention of potentially inappropriate prescribing for elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial using STOPP/START criteria. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89(6):845–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haveman-Nies A, de Groot LC, van Staveren WA (2003) Dietary quality, lifestyle factors and healthy ageing in Europe: the SENECA study. Age Ageing 32(4):427–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Watkins C, Moore L, Harvey I, Carthy P, Robinson E, Brawn R (2003) Characteristics of general practitioners who frequently see drug industry representatives: national cross sectional study. BMJ 326(7400):1178–1179PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Spurling GK, Mansfield PR, Montgomery BD, Lexchin J, Doust J, Othman N, Vitry A (2010) Information from pharmaceutical companies and the quality, quantity, and cost of physicians’ prescribing: a systematic review. PLoS Med 7(10):e1000352PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lexchin J (1997) What information do physicians receive from pharmaceutical representatives? Can Fam Physician 43:941–945PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mali SN, Dudhgaonkar S, Bachewar NP (2010) Evaluation of rationality of promotional drug literature using World Health Organization guidelines. Indian J Pharmacol 42(5):267–272PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hemminki E, Karttunen T, Hovi SL, Karro H (2004) The drug industry and medical practice—the case of menopausal hormone therapy in Estonia. Soc Sci Med 58(1):89–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jankovic SM, Radonjic V, Cupara S, Stefanovic S (2008) Preventing exposure of hospital staff to incorrect drug information. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 46(12):652–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Republic of Serbia, Ministry of Health (2010) Rulebook on the method of advertising and marketing of medicines and medical devices (Article in Serbian). The Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 79/2010. http://www.zdravlje.gov.rs/downloads/Zakoni/Pravilnici/PravilnikONacinuOglasavanjaLekaOdnosnoMedicinskogSredstva.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2015.
  45. 45.
    Huntley AL, Johnson R, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Salisbury C (2012) Measures of multimorbidity and morbidity burden for use in primary care and community settings: a systematic review and guide. Ann Fam Med 10(2):134–141PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    O’Mahony D, O’Sullivan D, Byrne S, O’Connor MN, Ryan C, Gallagher P (2015) STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age Ageing 44(2):213–218PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivana Projovic
    • 1
  • Dubravka Vukadinovic
    • 1
  • Olivera Milovanovic
    • 1
  • Milena Jurisevic
    • 1
  • Radisa Pavlovic
    • 1
  • Sasa Jacovic
    • 1
  • Slobodan Jankovic
    • 1
    • 2
  • Srdjan Stefanovic
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department for Clinical PharmacyUniversity of Kragujevac, Faculty of Medical SciencesKragujevacSerbia
  2. 2.Department of Clinical PharmacologyClinical Center of KragujevacKragujevacSerbia

Personalised recommendations