Checklist for standardized reporting of drug–drug interaction management guidelines
- First Online:
- 400 Downloads
Inconsistencies and omissions in drug–drug interaction (DDI) management guidelines may lead to harm and suboptimal therapy. The purpose of this study was to define a checklist for DDI management guidelines to help developers produce high-quality guidelines that will support healthcare providers in clinical practice.
We carried out a two-round Delphi process with an international panel of healthcare providers, most of whom are pharmacists involved in providing DDI information, in order to select those items that should be addressed in DDI management guidelines (including grading systems that could be used).
Twenty-three panellists reached consensus on 19 items in two main domains. These were consolidated into a checklist of 15 elements for standardized reporting in management guidelines. For each element a description is provided to specify what information should be documented in that specific element.
It was possible to reach a broad consensus on which relevant items should be included in a checklist for the development of DDI management guidelines.
KeywordsPractice guidelines Evidence-based medicine drug–drug interactions Checklist Assessment Management
- 10.Floor-Schreudering A, De Smet PA, Buurma H et al (2011) Clarity and applicability of drug–drug interaction management guidelines: a systematic appraisal by general practitioners and community pharmacists in the Netherlands. Drug Saf 34:683–690. doi:10.2165/11587270-000000000-00000 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Dalkey NC (1969) The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. RAND Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
- 23.National Guideline Clearinghouse (2012) NGC template of guideline attributes. Available at: http://guideline.gov/about/template-of-attributes.aspx. Accessed 11 June 2012
- 25.Brook R (1995) The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. RAND Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
- 27.Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD et al (2001) The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. RAND Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar