Publication bias in complementary and conventional medicine
- 79 Downloads
Ernst and Schmidt  recently conducted an interesting and complete review, the first of its kind, aimed at critically evaluating the evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of homotoxicology, a form of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) quite popular in Central Europe. Despite mostly positive findings and high ratings on the Jadad score, the authors concluded that the review failed to demonstrate the efficacy of homotoxicology, in that most of the positive results were not based on proper analysis of the data.
The authors particularly emphasized the high level of sponsor bias: in three of the seven RCTs included in the review, at least one author was an employee of the manufacturer; in most articles, no conflicts of interest were declared and many articles were published in a journal closely linked to the manufacturer .
Indeed, sponsor bias is one of the most controversial factors that limits the interpretation of RCTs both in CAM and in conventional medicine....
KeywordsHomotoxicology Clinical trials Evidence-based medicine
- 2.Cosci F, Faravelli C (2004) Clinical trials. In: Griez E, Faravelli C, Nutt D, Zohar J (eds) Depressive disorders. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 3.Fava GA (1998) All our dreams are sold. Psychother Psychosom 67:191–193Google Scholar
- 4.Faravelli C, Cosci F, Ciampelli M, Scarpato MA, Spiti R, Ricca V (2003) A self-controlled, naturalistic study of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants. Psychother Psychosom 72:95–101Google Scholar
- 5.Fava GA (2002) Long-term treatment with antidepressant drugs: the spectacular achievement of propaganda. Psychother Psychosom 71:127–132Google Scholar
- 6.Ernst E (2004) Equivalence and non-inferiority trials of CAM. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 1:9–10Google Scholar
- 7.Barbui C, Violante A, Garattini S (2000) Does placebo help establish equivalence in trials of new antidepressants?. Eur Psychiatry 15:268–273Google Scholar