Patterns of psychotropic medicine use and related diseases across educational groups: national cross-sectional survey
- 98 Downloads
To analyse whether the use of different groups of psychotropic medicines among educational groups in a general population was congruent with the occurrence of related diseases.
Data from The Danish Health and Morbidity Survey 2000 were analysed. The survey was conducted by face-to-face interviews with a representative sample of the Danish population aged 16 years and above (n=16,690). The prevalence of four different types of psychotropic medicine use and related diseases in educational groups was analysed by indirect standardisation. Age and gender standardised prevalence ratios (SPRs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated based on the total study population.
In general, respondents in the two least-educated groups used psychotropic medicines more often and had a higher proportion reporting the related disease than could be expected according to indirect standardisation. The opposite picture appeared for respondents in the two highest educated groups (SPR<100). The overall patterns were similar for all four groups of psychotropic medicine users, although some of the SPRs were not significant.
The results documented an uneven distribution of health problems in the general population. Psychotropic medicine use was congruent with the distribution of related health problems, which means that the least-educated groups in most need of treatment also had the most-frequent medicine use. Expenses incurred by the individual user did not seem to be a barrier to access to medicines, not even for specific groups of medicine ineligible for reimbursement in Denmark.
KeywordsPsychotropic medicine Education General population
The authors would like to thank Ola Ekholm, National Institute of Public Health, for statistical support during the analyses. Data collection was funded by a grant from The Danish Ministry of Health and data analysis by a PhD fellowship from The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
- 1.The Danish Medicines Agency (2003) Surveillance (in Danish).http://www.laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/statistik/overvaagning/udgifter/2003–3.asp
- 2.Hansen EH (1997) Hypnotics and tranquillisers. Use, dependence, interventions (in Danish). The Danish Medicines Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- 3.Ohayon MM, Caulet M, Priest RG, Guilleminault C (1998) Psychotropic medication consumption patterns in the UK general population. J Clin Epidemiol 51:273–283Google Scholar
- 7.Magrini N, Vaccheri A, Parma E, D’Alessandro R, Bottoni A, Occhionero M, Montanaro N (1996) Use of benzodiazepines in the Italian general population: prevalence, pattern of use and risk factors for use. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 50:19–25Google Scholar
- 11.Lynch J, Kaplan G (2000) Socioeconomic position. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I (eds) Social epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 13–35Google Scholar
- 12.Kjøller M, Rasmussen NK (2002) Danish health and morbidity survey 2000....and trends since 1987 (in Danish). Statens Institut for Folkesundhed, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- 13.Vallgårda S, Krasnik A, Vrangbaek K (2001) Health care systems in transition—Denmark 2001. European Observatory on Health Care Systems, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- 14.The Danish Medicines Agency (2003) Letter about medicines eligible for reimbursement (in Danish).http://www.laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/tilskud/generelt/tilskud/fortegnelse.doc.
- 15.World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (2003) Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment, 6th edn. World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, OsloGoogle Scholar
- 16.UNESCO (1997) International standard classification of education ISCED 1997. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)Google Scholar
- 20.Knudsen P, Hansen EH, Traulsen JM (2002) Perceptions of young women using SSRI antidepressants—a reclassification of stigma. Int J Pharm Pract 10:243–252Google Scholar
- 21.Klungel OH, de Boer A, Paes AHP, Herings RMC, Seidell JC, Bakker A (2000) Influence of question structure on the recall of self-reported drug use. J Clin Epidemiol 53:273–277Google Scholar