Advertisement

European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

, Volume 59, Issue 3, pp 253–260 | Cite as

Pilot study on the feasibility and acceptability of academic detailing in general practice

  • Hilde Habraken
  • Isabelle Janssens
  • Kris Soenen
  • Mieke van Driel
  • Jaak Lannoy
  • Marc Bogaert
Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of academic detailing in general practice in the North-East-Flanders region of Belgium.

Methods

All local quality groups in the study region were randomly allocated to either (1) two academic detailing visits to the individual members or (2) two academic detailing visits during the meetings of the local quality group. During these visits, the results of a systematic review of the literature on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) were presented.

Results

Of 14 local quality groups, 12 allocated to the individual intervention agreed to participate. Of the 184 physicians invited to receive an academic detailer, 142 had two visits on NSAIDs. One hundred and five physicians gave their opinion on the visits by means of a questionnaire. The great majority of the responders (90%) wished to receive an academic detailer on other topics in the future, with a frequency of two visits per year. Of 13 local quality groups, 12 allocated to the group intervention, with a total number of 192 physicians who agreed to participate. Ten local quality groups with 166 members received the information on NSAIDs. The actual attendance rate per intervention session was approximately two out of three physicians. All 166 physicians of the participating local quality groups were offered an evaluation form, and 79 responded. Of the responders who received the full group intervention, 88% wished to have more academic detailing visits on other topics in their local quality group. A comparison between the evaluation forms of the individual and the group intervention revealed no major differences concerning the acceptability of the intervention.

Conclusion

The pilot study showed that academic detailing is feasible in the North-East-Flanders region of Belgium. Both the individual visits and the visits to the local quality groups were rated positively, and a majority of the general practitioners who returned the evaluation questionnaire wished to receive such visits in the future. The structure of the local quality groups implies limitations to the practical organisation of a visit, but requires less time investment than individual visits.

Keywords

Academic detailing General practice Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Belgian Ministry for Consumer Interests, Health and Environment, and was executed under the supervision of the Belgian Centre for Pharmacotherapeutic Information. Carl Goeminne, Isabelle Janssens, Sofie Leroy and Fréderic Proot were the academic detailers. Octaaf Verheyden took care of the communication training and the communication agency Imagine produced written materials. Special thanks to the physicians who assisted in the literature search and the development of written materials, or took part in the training of the academic detailers: Thierry Christiaens, Tom Declercq, Marc De Meyere, Geert Lammens, Luc Foucart, Jean-Pierre Sturtewagen, Koen Verhofstadt, Hans Warie. We also thank Dominique Begerem, Adelbert De Leeuw, Nathalie Denecker, Leo Halet, Francis Nagels, Herwig Proesmans, and Patrick Verdonck as members of the steering committee, and all physicians who agreed to participate in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Freemantle N, Eccles M, Wood J et al (1999) A randomized trial of evidence-based outreach (EBOR): rationale and design. Control Clin Trials 20:479–492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lexchin J (1998) Improving the appropriateness of physician prescribing. Int J Health Serv 28:253–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Avorn J, Soumerai SB (1983) Improving drug-therapy decisions through educational outreach. A randomized controlled trial of academically based 'detailing'. N Engl J Med 308:1457–1463PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Soumerai SB, Avorn J (1990) Principles of educational outreach ('academic detailing') to improve clinical decision making. JAMA 263:549–556PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Davis DA et al (2002) Outreach visits to improve health professional practice and health care outcomes. In: Bero L, Grilli R, Grimshaw J, Oxman A (eds) Collaboration on effective professional practice module of the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. The Cochrane collaboration, Issue 4 Update Software. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Eijk MEC, Avorn J, Porsius AJ, de Boer A (2001) Reducing prescribing of highly anticholinergic antidepressants for elderly people: randomised trial of group versus individual academic detailing. BMJ 322:654–657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Figueiras A, Sastre I, Tato F, Rodriguez C, Lado E, Caamano F, Gestal-Otero JJ (2001) One-to-one versus group sessions to improve prescription in primary care: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Med Care 39:158–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ray WA, Blaser DG et al (1986) Reducing long-term diazepam prescribing in office practice. A controlled trial of educational visits. JAMA 256:2536–2539PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yeo GT, de Burgh SPH, Letton T et al (1994) Educational visiting and hypnosedative prescribing in general practice. Fam Pract 11:57–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ilett KF, Johnson S, Greenhill G, Mullen L, Brockis J, Golledge CL, Reid DB (1999) Modification of general practitioner prescribing of antibiotics by use of a therapeutics adviser (academic detailer). Br J Clin Pharmacol 49:168–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wilkinson EK, Bosanquet A, Salisbury C, Hasler J, Bosanquet N (1999) Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of evidence-based medicine in general practice: a qualitative study. Eur J Gen Pract 5:66–70Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soumerai SB (1998) Principles and uses of academic detailing to improve the management of psychiatric disorders. Int J Psychiatry Med 28:81–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freemantle N, Nazareth I, Eccles M et al (2002) A randomised controlled trial of the effect of educational outreach by community pharmacists on prescribing in UK general practice. Br J Gen Pract 52:290–295PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hilde Habraken
    • 1
  • Isabelle Janssens
    • 1
  • Kris Soenen
    • 1
  • Mieke van Driel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jaak Lannoy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marc Bogaert
    • 3
  1. 1.Projekt FarmakaGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of General Practice and Primary Health CareGhent UniversityBelgium
  3. 3.Heymans Institute of PharmacologyGhent UniversityBelgium

Personalised recommendations