Advertisement

Differences in size distribution of marine phytoplankton in presence versus absence of jellyfish support theoretical predictions on top-down control patterns along alternative energy pathways

Abstract

While theoretical food web studies highlight the importance of alternative energy pathways in shaping community response to bottom-up and top-down forcing, empirical insight on the relevance of the predicted patterns is largely lacking. In marine plankton food webs differences in food size spectra between ciliates and copepods lead to alternative energy pathways, one expanding from small phytoplankton over ciliates to copepods, the other from large edible phytoplankton directly to copepods. Correspondingly, predation pressure by copepods leads to an increase of small phytoplankton through top-down control of copepods on ciliates, but to a decrease of large phytoplankton through direct predation by copepods. Hence, food web theory predicts a shift from the dominance of large to small algae along an enrichment gradient. This prediction clearly deviates from the general assumption of a shift from small fast growing to larger slow-growing phytoplankton taxa with increasing nutrient availability. However, if copepods themselves are under top-down control by strong predation through planktivores such as fish or jellyfish, dominance of large algae is expected throughout the enrichment gradient. We tested these predictions by analyzing the phytoplankton composition from numerous marine lakes and lagoon sites located on the archipelago of Palau covering a wide range of nutrient levels, comparing sites lacking large numbers of higher trophic levels with sites harboring high densities of jellyfish. The observed patterns strongly support that higher trophic levels influence the phytoplankton size distribution along a nutrient enrichment gradient, highlighting the importance of alternate energy pathways in food webs for community responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Data availability

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Arin L, Morán XAG, Estrada M (2002) Phytoplankton size distribution and growth rates in the Alboran Sea (SW Mediterranean): short term variability related to mesoscale hydrodynamics. J Plankton Res 24:1019–1033

  2. Armstrong RA (1994) Grazing limitation and nutrient limitation in marine ecosystems: steady state solutions of an ecosystem model with multiple food chains. Limnol Oceanogr 39:597–608

  3. Bezio N, Costello JH, Perry E, Colin SP (2018) Effects of capture surface morphology on feeding success of scyphomedusae: a comparative study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 596:83–93

  4. Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR (1985) Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. Bioscience 35:634–639

  5. Casini M, Lövgren J, Hjelm J, Cardinale M, Molinero J, Kornilovs G (2008) Multi-level trophic cascades in a heavily exploited open marine ecosystem. Proc R Soc B 275:1793–1801

  6. Chisholm SW (1992) Phytoplankton size. In: Falkowski PG, Woodhead AD (eds) Primary productivity and biogeochemical cycles in the sea. Plenum Press, New York, pp 213–237

  7. Colin PL (2009) Marine environments of Palau. Indo-Pacific Press, Taiwan

  8. Daskalov GM, Grishi AN, Rodionov S, Mihneva V (2007) Trophic cascades triggered by overfishing reveal possible mechanisms of ecosystem regime shifts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10518–10523

  9. Dawson MN (2005) Morphological variation and systematics in the Scyphozoa: mastigias (Rhizostomeae, Mastigiidae) a golden unstandard? Hydrobiologia 537:185–206

  10. Dawson MN, Hamner WM (2003) Geographic variation and behavioral evolution in marine plankton: the case of Mastigias (Scyphozoa, Rhizostomeae). Mar Biol 143:1161–1174

  11. Dawson MN, Hamner WM (2005) Rapid evolutionary radiation of marine zooplankton in peripheral environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:9235–9240

  12. Fretwell SD (1985) Food chain dynamics: the central theory of ecology? Oikos 50:291–301

  13. Fulton RS (1984) Effects of chaetognath predation and nutrient enrichment on enclosed estuarine copepod communities. Oecologia 62:97–101

  14. Garmendia M, Borja À, Franco J, Revilla M (2013) Phytoplankton composition indicators for the assessment of eutrophication in marine waters: present state and challenges within the European directives. Mar Pollut Bull 66:7–16

  15. Graham WM, Kroutil RM (2001) Size-based prey selectivity and dietary shifts in the jellyfish, Aurelia aurita. J Plankton Res 23:67–74

  16. Graham WM, Pagès F, Hamner W (2001) A physical context for gelatinous zooplankton aggregations: a review. Hydrobiologia 451:199–212

  17. Hairston NG, Smith FE, Slobodkin LB (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition. Am Nat 94:421–425

  18. Hamner WM, Hamner PP (1998) Stratified marine lakes of Palau (Western Caroline Islands). Phys Geogr 19:175–220

  19. Hessen DO, Kaartvedt S (2014) Top-down cascades in lakes and oceans: different perspectives but same story? J Plankton Res 36:914–924

  20. Holt RD, Grover J, Tilman D (1994) Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. Am Nat 144:741–771

  21. Hunter MD, Price PW (1992) Playing chutes and ladders: heterogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top-down forces in natural communities. Ecology 73:724–732

  22. Irwin AJ, Finkel ZV, Schofield OME, Falkowski PG (2006) Scaling-up from nutrient physiology to the size-structure of phytoplankton communities. J Plankton Res 28:459–471

  23. Kiørboe T (1993) Turbulence, phytoplankton cell size, and the structure of pelagic food webs. Adv Mar Biol 29:1–72

  24. Leibold MA (1996) A graphical model of keystone predators in food webs: trophic regulation of abundance, incidence, and diversity patterns in communities. Am Nat 147:784–812

  25. McCloskey LR, Muscatine L, Wilkerson FP (1994) Daily photosynthesis, respiration, and carbon budgets in a tropical marine jellyfish (Mastigias sp.). Mar Biol 119:13–22

  26. Myers RA, Baum JK, Shepherd TD, Powers SP, Peterson CH (2007) Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science 315:1846–1850

  27. Oksanen L, Fretwell SD, Arruda J, Niemela P (1981) Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Am Nat 118:240–261

  28. Øresland V (1987) Feeding of the chaetognaths Sagitta elegans and S. setosa at different seasons in Gullmarsfjorden, Sweden. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 39:69–79

  29. Pauly D, Christensen V, Dalsgaard J, Froese R, Torres F Jr (1998) Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279:860–863

  30. Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Díaz RJ, Justić D (2009) Global change and eutrophication of coastal waters. ICES J Mar Sci 66:1528–1537

  31. Raimbault P, Pouvesle W, Diaz F, Garcia N, Sempéré R (1999) Wet-oxidation and automated colorimetry for simultaneous determination of organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dissolved in seawater. Mar Chem 66:161–169

  32. Shin Y-J, Travers M, Maury O (2010) Coupling low and high trophic levels models: towards a pathways-orientated approach for end-to-end models. Prog Oceanogr 84:105–112

  33. Shurin JB, Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Anderson K, Blanchette CA, Broitman B, Cooper SD, Halpern BS (2002) A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades. Ecol Lett 5:785–791

  34. Sommer U, Sommer F (2006) Cladocerans versus copepods: the cause of contrasting top–down controls on freshwater and marine phytoplankton. Oecologia 147:183–194

  35. Stibor H, Vadstein O, Diehl S et al (2004) Copepods act as a switch between alternative trophic cascades in marine pelagic food webs. Ecol Lett 7:321–328

  36. R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

  37. Thingstad TF (1998) A theoretical approach to structuring mechanisms in the pelagic food web. Hydrobiologia 363:59–72

  38. Utermöhl H (1958) Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. Mitteilung Inernationale Vereinigung fuer Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 9:1–38

  39. West EJ, Pitt KA, Welsh DT, Koop K, Rissik D (2009) Top-down and bottom-up influences of jellyfish on primary productivity and planktonic assemblages. Limnol Oceanogr 54:2058–2071

  40. Wollrab S, Diehl S (2015) Bottom-up responses of the lower oceanic food web are sensitive to copepod mortality and feeding behavior. Limnol Oceanogr 60:641–656

  41. Wollrab S, Diehl S, De Roos AM (2012) Simple rules describe bottom-up and top-down control in food webs with alternative energy pathways. Ecol Lett 15:935–946

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Colin, L. Colin, S. Patris, G. Urcham, E. Basilis, M. Mesubed, M. Dawson, M. Le Goff, M. Stockenreiter for help in data collection, and S. Diehl, G. Singer, K. Pohlmann, U. Sommer and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We also thank the Coral Reef Research Foundation (CRRF) for their help with the logistic, and the Palau National Bureau of Marine Resources and Koror State Government for permitting our research in Palau. The project was funded by the European Commission MC CIG MICRODIVE. P.P. acknowledges the support of the Labex Mer (ANR-10-LABX-19).

Funding

This study was partly funded by the European Commission FP7 MC CIG MICRODIVE (322133).

Author information

Correspondence to Sabine Wollrab.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. Experiments were approved by the Republic of Palau and the State of Koror, research permit holders were Herwig Stibor & Philippe Pondaven. Jellyfish were released into their natural habitat after the experiments.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reviewed by Undisclosed experts.

Responsible Editor: N. Aberle-Malzahn.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wollrab, S., Pondaven, P., Behl, S. et al. Differences in size distribution of marine phytoplankton in presence versus absence of jellyfish support theoretical predictions on top-down control patterns along alternative energy pathways. Mar Biol 167, 9 (2020) doi:10.1007/s00227-019-3621-2

Download citation