Advertisement

Marine Biology

, 166:162 | Cite as

Sound production and associated behaviours in the New Zealand paddle crab Ovalipes catharus

  • A. S. FloodEmail author
  • M. L. Goeritz
  • C. A. Radford
Original Paper

Abstract

Despite growing evidence that crustaceans produce and detect sounds, the behavioural and biological function of these sounds is still poorly understood. Here, we describe sounds produced by the New Zealand paddle crab, Ovalipes catharus, and provide evidence of intraspecific communication using underwater sound. Acoustic and video analyses of tank-based experiments show that O. catharus produce at least three distinct sounds: the rasp, zip and bass. Notably, two of these sounds, the zip and bass, were directly correlated with post-copulatory mate-guarding and courtship behaviour and produced only by competing adult male crabs in the presence of a receptive female. Rasp sounds were produced by both sexes; the occurrence significantly increased in the presence of food, and play-back experiments of these sounds initiated a foraging-like behaviour. Responses to rasps might have evolved as a result of acoustic spying. Further, we show that both the rasp and bass sounds were produced by an alternative mechanism than stridulation of the chela ridges. This refutes widespread assumptions that Ovalipes crabs use only stridulation of ridges along their chelae to produce rasp-like sounds. Our results suggest that sound production in decapod crustaceans may be more widespread than previously presumed.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff at the Leigh Marine Laboratory, in particular Errol Murray and Peter Browne for their help building the experimental setup and assistance collecting animals. We would also like to thank Katya Ruggiero for statistical advice and Colin McLay for his expertise. We also thank our two anonymous reviewers and editor Martin Thiel for their valuable input and helpful suggestions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for sampling, care and experimental use of organisms for the study have been followed and all necessary approvals have been obtained. All procedures involving animals were performed in accordance with the Ethical Standards of the University of Auckland and were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee (AEC), approval number 001721.

Data availability

The data sets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Supplementary material

227_2019_3598_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (301 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 301 kb)
227_2019_3598_MOESM2_ESM.wav (345 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (WAV 344 kb)
227_2019_3598_MOESM3_ESM.wav (3.9 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (WAV 3942 kb)
227_2019_3598_MOESM4_ESM.wav (174 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (WAV 174 kb)
227_2019_3598_MOESM5_ESM.mp4 (5.5 mb)
Supplementary material 5 (MP4 5620 kb)

References

  1. Akamatsu T, Okumura T, Novarini N, Yan HY (2002) Empirical refinements applicable to the recording of fish sounds in small tanks. J Acoust Soc Am 112(6):3073–3082.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1515799 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bilodeau AL, Felder DL, Neigel JE (2005) Multiple paternity in the thalassinidean ghost shrimp, Callichirus islagrande (Crustacea: Decapoda: Callianassidae). Mar Biol 146(2):381–385.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-004-1444-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breithaupt T, Tautz J (1990) The sensitivity of crayfish mechanoreceptors to hydrodynamic and acoustic stimuli. In: Wiese K, Krenz WD, Tautz J, Reichert H, Mulloney B (eds) Frontiers in crustacean neurobiology. Advances in life sciences. Birkhäuser, Basel. pp 114–120.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5689-8_12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brockerhoff A, McLay C (2005) Mating behaviour, female receptivity and male–male competition in the intertidal crab Hemigrapsus sexdentatus (Brachyura: Grapsidae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 290:179–191.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps290179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Budelmann BU (1992) Hearing in Crustacea. In: Webster DB, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) The evolutionary biology of hearing. Springer, New York, pp 131–139.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2784-7_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buscaino G, Gavio A, Galvan D, Filiciotto F, Maccarrone V, de Vincenzi G, Mazzola S, Orensanz JM (2015) Acoustic signals and behaviour of Ovalipes trimaculatus in the context of reproduction. Aquat Biol 24:61–73.  https://doi.org/10.3354/ab00636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Candolin U (2007) The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev 78(4):575–595.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793103006158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clayton D (2008) Singing and dancing in the ghost crab Ocypode platytarsus (Crustacea, Decapoda, Ocypodidae). J Nat Hist 42(3–4):141–155.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930701840530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crane J (1966) Combat, display and ritualization in fiddler crabs (Ocypodidae, genus Uca). Philos T R Soc B, Biol Sci 251(772):459–472.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1966.0035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duffy JE, Thiel M (2007) Sexual and Social Behavior of Crustacea—a Way Forward. In: Duffy JE, Thiel M (eds) Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems: crustaceans as model organisms. Oxford University Press on Demand, New York, pp 461–474.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179927.001.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elias DO, Mason AC, Maddison WP, Hoy RR (2003) Seismic signals in a courting male jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). J Exp Biol 206:4029–4039.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00634 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Favaro L, Tirelli T, Gamba M, Pessani D (2011) Sound production in the red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Decapoda: Cambaridae). Zoo Anz 250(2):143–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2011.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1–509Google Scholar
  14. Gleeson RA (1991) Intrinsic factors mediating pheromone communication in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. In: Bauer RT, Martin JW (eds) Crustacean sexual biology. Columbia, New York Chichester, West Sussex. pp 17–32.  https://doi.org/10.7312/baue90796-003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goeritz ML, Flood AS, Radford CA (2018) Sound production in decapod crustaceans: Behavioral contexts and a newly found role for the circuits of the stomatogastric nervous system. In: International congress of neuroethology 2018 Brisbane, Australia. International Society for Neuroethology, pp 31–32Google Scholar
  16. Guinot-Dumortier D, Dumortier B (1960) La stridulation chez les crabes. Crustaceana 1(2):117–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haddon M (1994) Size-fecundity relationships, mating behaviour, and larval release in the New Zealand paddle crab, Ovalipes catharus (White 1843) (Brachyura: Portunidae). New Zeal J Mar Fresh 28(4):329–334.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.1994.9516622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halfwerk W, Varkevisser J, Simon R, Mendoza M, Scharff C, Riebel K (2019) Toward testing for multimodal perception of mating signals. Front Ecol Evol 7:124.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hebets EA, Papaj DR (2005) Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57(3):197–214.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0865-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hebets EA, Rundus A (2010) Chemical communication in a multimodal context. In: Breithaupt T, Thiel M (eds) Chemical communication in crustaceans. Springer, New York, pp 335–354.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77101-4_17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hebets EA, Barron AB, Balakrishnan CN, Hauber ME, Mason PH, Hoke KL (2016) A systems approach to animal communication. Proc R Soc London, Ser 283(1826):20152889.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heinzel HG (1988) Gastric mill activity in the lobster. I. Spontaneous modes of chewing. J Neurophysiol 59(2):528–550.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1988.59.2.528 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Horch K (1971) An organ for hearing and vibration sense in the ghost crab Ocypode. Vergl Physiol 73(1):1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Horch K (1975) The acoustic behavior of the ghost crab Ocypode cordimana Latreille, 1818 (Decapoda, Brachyura). Crustaceana 29(2):193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jivoff P, Hines AH (1998a) Effect of female molt stage and sex ratio on courtship behavior of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. Mar Biol 131:533–542.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270050345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jivoff P, Hines AH (1998b) Female behaviour, sexual competition and mate guarding in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. Anim Behav 55(3):589–603.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0646 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson ML, Gaten E, Shelton PM (2002) Spectral sensitivities of five marine decapod crustaceans and a review of spectral sensitivity variation in relation to habitat. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 82(5):835–842.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315402006203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kalmijn AJ (1988) Hydrodynamic and acoustic field detection. In: Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN (eds) Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Springer, New York, pp 83–130.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3714-3_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kamio M, Reidenbach MA, Derby CD (2008) To paddle or not: context dependent courtship display by male blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus. J Exp Biol 211:1243–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.014977 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Madsen PT, Wahlberg M (2007) Recording and quantification of ultrasonic echolocation clicks from free-ranging toothed whales. Deep Sea Res Part I 54(8):1421–1444.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2007.04.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mazzoni D (2016) AUDACITY 2.1.2. Available from: https://www.audacityteam.org/download/
  32. McLay CL (1988) Crabs of New Zealand. Leigh Marine Laboratory Bulletin. University of Auckland, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  33. Mensinger AF (2013) Disruptive communication: stealth signaling in the toadfish. J Exp Biol 217(3):344–350.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.090316 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Myrberg AA (1997) Sound production by a coral reef fish (Pomacentrus partitus): evidence for a vocal, territorial “keep-out” signal. Bull Mar Sci 60:1017–1025Google Scholar
  35. Myrberg AA Jr, Mohler M, Catala JD (1986) Sound production by males of a coral reef fish (Pomacentrus partitus): its significance to females. Anim Behav 34(3):913–923.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80077-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Osborne TA (1987) Life history and population biology of the paddle crab, Ovalipes catharus. Dissertation, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  37. Parmentier E, Fine ML (2016) Fish sound production: insights. In: Suthers R, Fitch W, Fay R, Popper A (eds) Vertebrate sound production and acoustic communication@ Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol 53. Springer, Cham, pp 19–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27721-9_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Partan SR, Marler P (2005) Issues in the classification of multimodal communication signals. Am Nat 166(2):231–245.  https://doi.org/10.1086/431246 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Patek SN, Caldwell RL (2006) The stomatopod rumble: low frequency sound production in Hemisquilla californiensis. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 39(2):99–111.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10236240600563289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Patek SN, Shipp LE, Staaterman ER (2009) The acoustics and acoustic behavior of the California spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus). J Acoust Soc Am 125(5):3434–3443.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3097760 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Payne R, Webb D (1971) Orientation by means of long range acoustic signalling in baleen whales. Ann NY Acad Sci 188:110–141.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1971.tb13093.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Popper A, Salmon M, Horch K (2001) Acoustic detection and communication by decapod crustaceans. J Comp Physiol A 187:83–89.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590100184 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Radford CA, Tay K, Goeritz ML (2016) Hearing in the paddle crab, Ovalipes catharus. Proc Mtgs Acoust 27:010013.  https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rondeau A, Sainte-Marie B (2001) Variable mate-guarding time and sperm allocation by male snow crabs (Chionoecetes opilio) in response to sexual competition, and their impact on the mating success of females. Biol Bull 201(2):204–217.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1543335 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ryan MJ (1990) Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. In: Douglas F, Janis A (eds) Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, vol 7, pp 157–195Google Scholar
  46. Salmon M (1967) Coastal distribution, display and sound production by Florida fiddler crabs (genus Uca). Animal Behav 15(4):449–459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(67)90043-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Salmon M, Atsaides SP (1968) Visual and acoustical signalling during courtship by fiddler crabs (genus Uca). Am Zool 8:623–639.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/8.3.623 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Salmon M, Horch KW (1972) Acoustic signalling and detection by semiterrestrial crabs of the family Ocypodidae. In: Winn HE, Olla BL (eds) Behavior of marine animals. Springer, Boston, pp 60–96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0907-9_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Selverston A, Szücs A, Huerta R, Pinto RD, Reyes MB (2009) Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of the lobster gastric mill motor pattern. Front Neural Circuit 3:12.  https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.04.012.2009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sneddon LU, Huntingford FA, Taylor AC, Clare AS (2003) Female sex pheromone-mediated effects on behavior and consequences of male competition in the shore crab (Carcinus maenas). J Chem Ecol 29(1):55–70.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021972412694 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Sørensen PW, Scott AP (1994) The evolution of hormonal sex pheromones in teleost fish: poor correlation between the pattern of steroid release by goldfish and olfactory sensitivity suggests that these cues evolved as a result of chemical spying rather than signal specialization. Acta Physiol Scand 152(2):191–205.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1994.tb09799.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Staaterman E, Claverie T, Patek S (2010) Disentangling defense: the function of spiny lobster sounds. Behaviour 147(2):235–248.  https://doi.org/10.1163/000579509X12523919243428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Staaterman ER, Clark CW, Gallagher AJ, deVries MS, Claverie T, Patek SN (2011) Rumbling in the benthos: acoustic ecology of the California mantis shrimp Hemisquilla californiensis. Aquat Biol 13(2):97–105.  https://doi.org/10.3354/ab00361 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stephenson W (1969) The morphology of stridulatory structures in the genus Ovalipes Rathbun. Trans R Soc New Zealand, Bio Sci 11(4):43–71Google Scholar
  55. van Oosterom L, Montgomery JC, Jeffs AG, Radford CA (2016) Evidence for contact calls in fish: conspecific vocalisations and ambient soundscape influence group cohesion in a nocturnal species. Sci Rep 6:19098.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19098 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Wear RG, Haddon M (1987) Natural diet of the crab Ovalipes catharus (Crustacea, Portunidae) around central and northern New Zealand. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 35(1/2):39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wood DE, Derby CD (1995) Coordination and neuromuscular control of rhythmic behaviors in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. J Comp Physiol A 177(3):307–319.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192420 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wyatt TD (2010) Pheromones and Behavior. In: Breithaupt T, Thiel M (eds) Chemical communication in crustaceans. Springer, New York, pp 22–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77101-4_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leigh Marine Laboratory, Institute of Marine ScienceUniversity of AucklandWarkworthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations