Advertisement

Marine Biology

, 166:123 | Cite as

Role of thermal photosynthetic plasticity in the dispersal and settlement of two global green tide formers: Ulva pertusa and U. ohnoi

  • Marianela ZanollaEmail author
  • Raquel Carmona
  • Hiroshi Kawai
  • Dagmar B. Stengel
  • María Altamirano
Original Paper

Abstract

The green invasive macroalgae Ulva ohnoi and U. pertusa are known for their capacity to form green tides across many geographic regions. Given their global ecological and economic impact, photosynthetic responses of both Ulva spp. were tested in laboratory experiments using short-term (3 h, and 5 h) exposure to different temperatures (27–36 °C) and light regimes, simulating light deprivation during ballast water transport conditions. Heat treatment of ship’s ballast water has been widely advocated as a possible treatment to prevent biological contamination. In addition, the physiological performance of U. ohnoi was assessed in long-term experiments (14 days). We examined several photosynthetic parameters and physiological variables such as growth and pigment content as a measure of physiological fitness. Both species maintained stable values of Fv/Fm over several hours across temperatures, although Ulva ohnoi presented higher values of Fv/Fm, photosynthetic efficiency and NPQmax than U. pertusa, and activated dissipative protective mechanisms earlier. In the long-term experiment, U. ohnoi died by the 4th day at 36 °C. In surviving samples, Fv/Fm increased by day 7, regardless of temperature and decreased by day 14; lower values pertained to 34 °C. Photosynthetic efficiency of U. ohnoi decreased after 1 week at 27 and 29 °C, but at 31 and 34 °C, an increase was recorded after 7 days. The highest rETRmax was recorded at 29 °C, while growth optimum occurred at 27–31℃. We postulate that short-term thermal stress affects dispersal risk, which may also explain the seasonal replacement of the two Ulva spp. in Japan; and that U. ohnoi has a higher thermal tolerance that allows its settlement in new areas, resulting in a wide distributional range. Its physiological performance under the temperatures tested suggests that U. ohnoi may pose a greater risk of dispersal and settlement than U. pertusa.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the projects CGL2008/01549/BOS (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain), P09-RNM-5187 (Consejería de Innovación, Ciencia y Empresa, Junta de Andalucía, Spain) and the Plan Propio of the University of Malaga (Spain). M. Zanolla would like to thank Ms. Tomoko Kotani for her help during experiments.

Funding

This project was funded by the projects CGL2008/01549/BOS (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain), P09-RNM-5187 (Consejería de Innovación, Ciencia y Empresa, Junta de Andalucía, Spain) and the Plan Propio of the University of Malaga (Spain).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author Marianela Zanolla declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Raquel Carmona declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Hiroshi Kawai declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Dagmar Stengel declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Maria Altamirano declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

227_2019_3578_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (359 kb)
Supp Fig. 1 Relative electron transport rate (rETR)-irradiance curves in U. ohnoi at experimental temperatures at the beginning (t = 0), after 1 week (t = 7) and at the end (t = 14) of the long-term (14 d) exposure experiment. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 7) (PDF 359 kb)
227_2019_3578_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (300 kb)
Supp Fig. 2 Saturation parameter of photosynthesis (Ik) calculated for U. ohnoi and U. pertusa after 3 and 5 h of thermal and light/dark treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 5) (PDF 299 kb)
227_2019_3578_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (629 kb)
Supp Table 1 Univariate ANOVA tests derived from the different MANOVA tests shown in Table 1. Significant values (p < 0.0083) are highlighted in bold (see M & M) (PDF 629 kb)
227_2019_3578_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (477 kb)
Supp Table 2 Effect of temperature (27, 29, 31, 34 and 36º C) on the maximum non-photochemical quenching NPQmax (relative units) calculated from NPQ versus EPAR curves from short-term (3 h, 5 h, light and dark conditions) and long-term (14 days) experiments for Ulva ohnoi (a) and U. pertusa (b). qP model fit data (relative units) derived from the model fit of qP versus EPAR curves (see Materials and methods section) are displayed for all experiments conducted in U. ohnoi (c) and U. pertusa (d). Data are mean values (± SD) (n = 5-7) (PDF 477 kb)

References

  1. Andreakis N, Procaccini G, Maggs C, Kooistra WH (2007) Phylogeography of the invasive seaweed Asparagopsis (Bonnemaisoniales, Rhodophyta) reveals cryptic diversity. Mol Ecol 16(11):2285–2299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Breeman AM (1988) Relative importance of temperature and other factors in determining geographic boundaries of seaweeds: experimental and phenological evidence. Helgol Mar Res 42(2):199–241Google Scholar
  3. Carlton JT (2001) Introduced species in U.S. coastal waters: environmental impacts and management priorities. Pew Oceans Commission, Virginia, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaloub RM, Reinert F, Nassar CAG, Fleury BG, Mantuano DG, Larkum AWD (2010) Photosynthetic properties of three Brazilian seaweeds. Braz J Bot 33(2):371–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi TS, Kim JH, Kim KY (2001) Seasonal changes in the abundance of Ulva mats on a rocky intertidal zone of the southern coast of Korea. Algae 16:337–341Google Scholar
  6. Colautti RI, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2006) Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol Invasion 8(5):1023–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crooks JA, Rilov G (2009) The establishment of invasive species. In: Rilov G, Crooks JA (eds) Biological invasions in marine ecosystems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 173–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. da Oliveira VP, Martins NT, Yoneshigue-Valentin Y, Enrich-Prast A (2013) Chlorophyll-a fluorescence in ecology: theoretical considerations and examples around marine macroalgae. J Environ Sci Eng A2:1165–1172Google Scholar
  9. Davidson AM, Jennions M, Nicotra AB (2011) Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 14(4):419–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davison IR (1991) Environmental effects on algal photosynthesis: temperature. J Phycol 27(1):2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dijoux L, Viard F, Payri C (2014) The more we search, the more we find: discovery of a new lineage and a new species complex in the genus Asparagopsis. PLoS One 9(7):e103826CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards G, Walker D (1983) C3, C4: mechanisms, and cellular and environmental regulation, of photosynthesis. University of California Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Eggert A (2012) Seaweed responses to temperature. In: Wiencke C, Bischof K (eds) Seaweed biology. Springer, Berlin, pp 47–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flagella MM, Andreakis N, Hiraoka M, Verlaque M, Buia MC (2010) Identification of cryptic Ulva species (Chlorophyta, Ulvales) transported by ballast water. J Biol Res 13:47–57Google Scholar
  15. Fletcher RL (1996) The occurrence of “Green Tides”—a review. In: Schramm W, Nienhuis H (eds) Marine benthic vegetation, recent changes and the effects of eutrophication, ecological studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 7–43Google Scholar
  16. Fracheboud Y, Leipner J (2003) The application of chlorophyll fluorescence to study light, temperature, and drought stress. In: DeEll JR, Toivonen PMA (eds) Practical applications of chlorophyll fluorescence in plant biology. Springer, Boston, pp 125–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao G, Clare AS, Rose C, Caldwell GS (2017) Eutrophication and warming-driven Green Tides (Ulva rigida) are predicted to increase under future climate change scenarios. Mar Pollut Bull 114(1):439–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8(9):993–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanyuda T, Kawai H (2018) Genetic examination of the type specimen of Ulva australis suggests that it was introduced to Australia. Phycol Res 66(3):238–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henley WJ (1993) Measurement and interpretation of photosynthetic light-response curves in algae in the context of photoinhibition and diel changes. J Phycol 29:729–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hewitt CL, Hayes KR (2002) Risk assessment of marine biological invasions. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (eds) Invasive aquatic species of Europe. Distribution, impacts and management. Springer, Netherlands, pp 456–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hewitt CL, Campbell ML, Thresher RE et al (2004) Introduced and cryptogenic species in Port Philip Bay, Victoria, Australia. Mar Biol 144:183–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hiraoka M, Shimada S, Uenosono M, Masuda M (2004) A new green-tide-forming alga, Ulva ohnoi Hiraoka et Shimada sp. nov. (Ulvales, Ulvophyceae) from Japan. Phycol Res 52(1):17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Japan Meteorological Agency. www.data.jma.go.jp. Accessed 15 Dec 2018
  25. Kakinuma M, Coury DA, Kuno Y, Itoh S, Kozawa Y, Inagaki E, Yoshiura Y, Amano H (2006) Physiological and biochemical responses to thermal and salinity stresses in a sterile mutant of Ulva pertusa (Ulvales, Chlorophyta). Mar Biol 149(1):97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kawai H, Shimada S, Hanyuda T, Suzuki T (2007) Species diversity and seasonal changes of dominant Ulva species (Ulvales, Ulvophyceae) in Mikawa Bay, Japan, deduced from ITS2 rDNA region sequences. Algae 22(3):221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lüning K, Yarish C, Kirkman H (1990) Seaweeds: their environment, biogeography, and ecophysiology. Wiley Interscience, Ney York, p 268Google Scholar
  28. Macdonald EM, Davidson RD (1997) Ballast water project. Report No. 3/97. Marine Laboratory, Fisheries Research Services (FRS), Aberdeen, UK, pp 83Google Scholar
  29. Mata L, Magnusson M, Paul NA, de Nys R (2016) The intensive land-based production of the green seaweeds Derbesia tenuissima and Ulva ohnoi: biomass and bioproducts. J App Phycol 28(1):365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51(345):659–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McCollin TA, Hamer JP, Lucas IAN (1999) Marine organisms transported in ships’ ballast. Final Report to MAFF. Project Code AE1114. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Aberdeen, UK, pp 20Google Scholar
  32. Meusnier I, Valero M, Olsen JL, Stam WT (2004) Analysis of rDNA ITS1 indels in Caulerpa taxifolia (Chlorophyta) supports a derived, incipient species status for the invasive strain. Eur J Phycol 39(1):83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nelson TA, Haberlin K, Nelson AV et al (2008) Ecological and physiological controls of species composition in green macroalgal blooms. Ecology 89(5):1287–1298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nitschke U, Connan S, Stengel DB (2012) Chlorophyll a fluorescence responses of temperate Phaeophyceae under submersion and emersion regimes: a comparison of rapid and steady-state light curves. Photosynth Res 114(1):29–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Niyogi KK (1999) Photoprotection revisited: genetic and molecular approaches. Ann Rev Plant Biol 50(1):333–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Notoya M (1999) Characteristics of each species and growth (in Japanese). In: Notoya M (ed) Utilization of Ulva spp and environmental restoration. Seizan-do, Tokyo, pp 16–25Google Scholar
  37. Ohno M (1999) Ulva and excessive growth. In: Notoya M (ed) The utilization and environmental remediation in Ulva. Seizandou, Tokyo, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  38. Provan J, Murphy S, Maggs CA (2005) Tracking the invasive history of the green alga Codium fragile ssp tomentosoides. Mol Ecol 14:189–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Provasoli L (1968) Media and prospects for the cultivation of marine algae. In: Watanabe A, Hattori A (eds) Cultures and collections of algae (Proc Jpn Conf Hakone). Japanese Society of Plant Physiology, Tokyo, pp 63–75Google Scholar
  40. Raffaelli DG, Raven JA, Poole LJ (1998) Ecological impact of green macroalgal blooms. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 36:97–125Google Scholar
  41. Raniello R, Lorenti M, Brunet C, Buia MC (2004) Photosynthetic plasticity of an invasive variety of Caulerpa racemosa in a coastal Mediterranean area: light harvesting capacity and seasonal acclimation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 271:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ribera-Siguan MA (2003) Pathways of biological invasions of marine plants. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton J (eds) Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, London, pp 183–227Google Scholar
  43. Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Carlton JT, Wonham MJ, Hines AH (2000) Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:481–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS et al (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32(1):305–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schreiber U, Schliwa U, Bilger W (1986) Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photosynth Res 10:51–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Serôdio J, Lavaud J (2011) A model for describing the light response of the nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Photosynth Res 108(1):61–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Smetacek V, Zingone A (2013) Green and golden seaweed tides on the rise. Nature 504(7478):84–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith LD (2009) The role of phenotypic plasticity in marine biological invasions. In: Rilov G, Crooks JA (eds) Biological invasions in marine ecosystems. Springer, Berlin, pp 177–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Steffensen DA (1976) The effect of nutrient enrichment and temperature on the growth in culture of Ulva lactuca L. Aquat Bot 2:337–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sutherland TF, Levings CD, Elliott CC, Hesse WW (2001) Effect of a ballast water treatment system on survivorship of natural populations of marine plankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 210:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tait LW, Hawes I, Schiel DR (2017) Integration of chlorophyll a fluorescence and photorespirometry techniques to understand production dynamics in macroalgal communities. J Phycol 53(3):476–485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Taylor R, Fletcher RL, Raven JA (2001) Preliminary studies on the growth of selected ‘green tide’ algae in laboratory culture: effects of irradiance, temperature, salinity and nutrients on growth rate. Bot Mar 44(4):327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor A, Rigby G, Gollasch S, Voigt M, Hallegraeff G, McCollin T, Jelmert A (2002) Preventive treatment and control techniques for ballast water. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (eds) Invasive aquatic species of Europe: distribution, impacts and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 583Google Scholar
  54. Teo LW, Wee YC (1983) Seaweeds of Singapore. Singapore University Press, Singapore, p vi+ 123Google Scholar
  55. Terumoto J (1960) Frost-resistance in a marine alga Ulva pertusa Kjellman. Low Temp Sci Ser B 18:35–38Google Scholar
  56. Tokida J (1954) The marine algae of Southern Saghalien. Mem Fac Fish, Hokkaido Univ 2:1–264Google Scholar
  57. Trowbridge CD (1996) Introduced versus native subspecies of Codium fragile: how distinctive is the invasive subspecies tomentosoides? Mar Biol 126:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Uchimura M, Yoshida G, Hiraoka M, Komatsu T, Arai S, Terawaki T (2004) Ecological studies of green tide, Ulva spp. (Chlorophyta) in Hiroshima Bay, the Seto Inland Sea. Jpn J Phycol 52(Suppl):17–22Google Scholar
  59. Varela-Alvarez E, Garreta AG, Lluch JR, Soler NS, Serrao EA, Siguán MAR (2012) Mediterranean species of Caulerpa are polyploid with smaller genomes in the invasive ones. PLoS One 7(10):e47728CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Wellburn AR (1994) The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J Plant Physiol 144(3):307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Werschkun B, Sommer Y, Banerji S (2012) Disinfection by-products in ballast water treatment: an evaluation of regulatory data. Water Res 46(16):4884–4901CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Yabe T, Ishii Y, Amano Y, Koga T, Hayashi S, Nohara S, Tatsumoto H (2009) Green tide formed by free-floating Ulva spp. at Yatsu tidal flat, Japan. Limnology 10:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ye NH, Zhang XW, Mao YZ et al (2011) ‘Green Tides’ are overwhelming the coastline of our blue planet: taking the world’s largest example. Ecol Res 26(3):477–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zanolla M, Carmona R, De la Rosa J et al (2014) Morphological differentiation of cryptic lineages within the invasive genus Asparagopsis (Bonnemaisoniales, Rhodophyta). Phycologia 53(3):233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zanolla M, Altamirano M, Carmona R et al (2015) Photosynthetic plasticity of the genus Asparagopsis (Bonnemaisoniales, Rhodophyta) in response to temperature: implications for invasiveness. Biol Invasions 17(5):1341–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zanolla M, Altamirano M, Carmona R et al (2018) Assessing global range expansion in a cryptic species complex: insights from the red seaweed genus Asparagopsis (Florideophyceae). J Phycol 54(1):12–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Zenetos A, Cinar ME, Pancucci-Papadopoulou MA et al (2005) Annotated list of marine alien species in the Mediterranean with records of the worst invasive species. Med Mar Sci 6:62–118Google Scholar
  68. Zhang J, Huo Y, Yu K et al (2013) Growth characteristics and reproductive capability of green tide algae in Rudong coast, China. J Appl Phycol 25(3):795–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Botany and Plant Science, School of Natural SciencesNational University of Ireland GalwayGalwayIreland
  2. 2.Departamento de Ecología y Geología, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de MálagaMálagaSpain
  3. 3.Kobe University Research Center for Inland SeasKobeJapan
  4. 4.Departamento de Botánica y Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de MálagaMálagaSpain

Personalised recommendations