Advertisement

Marine Biology

, 166:127 | Cite as

Variation in flexural, morphological, and biochemical leaf properties of eelgrass (Zostera marina) along the European Atlantic climate regions

  • Maike PaulEmail author
  • Carmen B. de los Santos
Original Paper

Abstract

Seagrasses need to withstand hydrodynamic forces; therefore, mechanical properties such as flexibility or breaking resistance are beneficial for survival. The co-variation of leaf breaking properties with biochemical traits in seagrasses has been documented, but it is unknown if the same patterns apply to leaf flexural properties. To interpret changes in the ecological function of seagrass ecosystems based on acclimation responses to environmental changes, it is necessary to understand the factors that affect flexural leaf properties. Here, morphological and flexural leaf properties of the perennial type of Zostera marina across different environmental conditions along European Atlantic climate regions are presented together with C:N ratio and neutral detergent fibre content as descriptors of biochemical leaf composition. Eelgrass leaves from cold regions were ~ threefold more elastic and ~ tenfold more flexible, were also narrower (1.7-fold), and contained ~ 1.9-fold higher fibre content than from plants growing in warmer regions. Eelgrass also showed acclimation to local conditions such as seasonality, water depth, and hydrodynamic exposure. Leaves collected from exposed or shallower locations or during winter were more flexible, suggesting an avoidance strategy to hydrodynamic forcing, which is generally higher under those conditions. Flexural rigidity was almost equally controlled by bending modulus (35%) and leaf thickness (37%), indicating functional differences compared to leaf breaking described in the literature. Overall, the findings indicate that Zostera marina has a high flexural plasticity and high acclimation capacity to some climate change effects such as sea level rise and increase in storm frequency and intensity.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to C. Barañano and E. Fernández-Suárez from the University of Vigo (Spain) and to A. Silva, J. Silva and M. Costa, from the Center of Marine Sciences of Algarve (Portugal), for collecting samples and providing abiotic data. F. Kanzler and the SeaArt team is thanked for collecting the samples in Lübeck bay and E. Infantes assisted in sample collection at the Swedish locations and transport to the Centre of Marine Science of Algarve for further processing. R. Santos is thanked for his kindly financial contribution to the chemical analysis. MP acknowledges funding by the German Science Foundation (Grant No. PA 2547/1-1) and by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (KVA travel grant). This study received Portuguese national funds from FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology through project UID/Multi/04326/2019 and through fellowship SFRH/BPD/119344/2016 granted to CBS.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The collection of seagrass specimen for this study was conducted under permission from the respective authorities. All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the use of plants were followed.

References

  1. Beck HE, Zimmermann NE, McVicar TR, Vergopolan N, Berg A, Wood EF (2018) Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Scientific Data 5:180214 EPGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouma TJ, de Vries MB, Low E, Peralta G, Tánczos IC, van de Koppel J, Herman PMJ (2005) Trade-offs related to ecosystem engineering: a case study on stiffness of emerging macrophytes. Ecology 86(8):2187–2199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgert I, Fratzl P (2009) Plants control the properties and actuation of their organs through the orientation of cellulose fibrils in their cell walls. Integr Comp Biol 49(1):69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de los Santos CB, Brun FG, Onoda Y, Cambridge ML, Bouma TJ, Vergara JJ, Pérez-Lloréns JL (2012) Leaf-fracture properties correlated with nutritional traits in nine Australian seagrass species: Implications for susceptibility to herbivory. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 458:89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de los Santos CB, Brun FG, Vergara JJ, Pérez-Lloréns JL (2013) New aspect in seagrass acclimation: Leaf mechanical properties vary spatially and seasonally in the temperate species Cymodocea nodosa Ucria (Ascherson). Mar Biol 160(5):1083–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de los Santos CB, Onoda Y, Vergara JJ, Pérez-Lloréns JL, Bouma TJ, La Nafie YA, Cambridge ML, Brun FG, Bouma TJ, La Nafie YA, Cambridge ML, Brun FG (2016a) A comprehensive analysis of mechanical and morphological traits in temperate and tropical seagrass species. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 551:81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de los Santos CB, Vicencio-Rammsy B, Lepoint G, Remy F, Bouma TJ, Gobert S (2016b) Ontogenic variation and effect of collection procedure on leaf biomechanical properties of Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. Mar Ecol 37(4):750–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de los Santos CB, Godbold JA, Solan M (2017) Short-term growth and biomechanical responses of the temperate seagrass Cymodocea nodosa to CO2 enrichment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 572:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Den Hartog C (1970) The sea-grasses of the world. North Holland Publishing Company, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  10. Domke O (2014) Lichtwerte richtig umrechnen. Landwirtschaftskammer Nordrhein-Westfalen. https://www.landwirtschaftskammer.de/gartenbau/beratung/technik/artikel/lichtwerte-umrechnen.htm
  11. Etnier SA, Villani PJ (2007) Differences in mechanical and structural properties of surface and aerial petioles of the aquatic plant Nymphaea odorata subsp. tuberosa (Nymphaeaceae). Am J Bot 94(7):1067–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Henry P-YT (2014) Bending properties of a macroalga: Adaptation of Peirce’s cantilever test for in situ measurements of Laminaria digitata (Laminariaceae). Am J Bot 101(6):1050–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IPCC (2013) Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York Google Scholar
  14. Kopp BS (1999) Effects of nitrate fertilization and shading on physiological and biomechanical properties of eelgrass (Zostera marina L.). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rhode Island, pp 201Google Scholar
  15. Krause-Jensen D, Middelboe AL, Sand-Jensen K, Christensen PB (2000) Eelgrass, Zostera marina, growth along depth gradients: upper boundaries of the variation as a powerful predictive tool. Oikos 91(2):233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuo J, Den Hartog C (2006) Seagrass morphology, anatomy, and ultrastructure. In: Larkum AWD, Orth RJ, Duarte CM (eds) Seagrasses: biology, ecology and conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–87Google Scholar
  17. La Nafie YA, de los Santos v, Brun FG, van Katwijk MM, Bouma TJ (2012) Waves and high nutrient loads jointly decrease survival and separately affect morphological and biomechanical properties in the seagrass Zostera noltii. Limnol Oceangr 57(6):1664–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. La Nafie YA, de los Santos CB, Brun FG, Mashoreng S, van Katwijk MM, Bouma TJ (2013) Biomechanical response of two fast-growing tropical seagrass species subjected to in situ shading and sediment fertilization. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 446:186–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laugier T, Rigollet V, de Casabianca M-L (1999) Seasonal dynamics in mixed eelgrass beds, Zostera marina L. and Z. noltii Hornem., in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon (Thau lagoon, France). Aquat Bot 63(1):51–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meling-López AE, Ibarra-Obando SE (1999) Annual life cycles of two Zostera marina L. populations in the Gulf of California: contrasts in seasonality and reproductive effort. Aquat Bot 65(1–4):59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nienhuis PH, de Bree BHH (1980) Production and growth dynamics of eelgrass (Zostera marina) in brackish lake Grevelingen (the Netherlands). Neth J Sea Res 14(1):102–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Niklas KJ (1992) Plant biomechanics: an engineering approach to plant form and function. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. Orth RJ, Moore KA (1986) Seasonal and year-to-year variations in the growth of Zostera marina L. (eelgrass) in the lower Chesapeake Bay. Aquat Bot 24:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peralta G, Brun FG, Hernández I, Vergara JJ, Pérez-Lloréns JL (2005) Morphometric variations as acclimation mechanisms in Zostera noltii beds. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 64:347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peralta G, Brun FG, Pérez-Lloréns JL, Bouma TJ (2006) Direct effects of current velocity on the growth, morphometry and architecture of seagrasses: a case study on Zostera noltii. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 327:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Puijalon S, Bouma TJ, van Groenendael J, Bornette G (2008) Clonal plasticity of aquatic plant species submitted to mechanical stress: escape versus resistance strategy. Ann Bot 102(6):989–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Puijalon S, Bouma TJ, Douady CJ, van Groenendael J, Anten NPR, Martel E, Bornette G (2011) Plant resistance to mechanical stress: evidence of an avoidance-tolerance trade-off. New Phytol 191(4):1141–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Read J, Stokes A (2006) Plant biomechanics in an ecological context. Am J Bot 93(10):1546–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  30. Soissons LM, van Katwijk MM, Peralta G, Brun FG, Cardoso PG, Grilo TF, Ondiviela B, Recio M, Valle M, Garmendia JM, Ganthy F, Auby I, Rigouin L, Godet L, Fournier J, Desroy N, Barillé L, Kadel P, Asmus R, Herman PMJ, Bouma TJ (2017) Seasonal and latitudinal variation in seagrass mechanical traits across Europe: The influence of local nutrient status and morphometric plasticity. Limnol Oceanogr 35:269Google Scholar
  31. Troen I, Lundtang Petersen E (1990) Europäischer Windatals. Risø National Laboratory, RoskildeGoogle Scholar
  32. van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74(10):3583–3597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vogel S (1984) Drag and flexibility in sessile organisms. Am Zool 24(1):37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. WMO (2014) Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation. Geneva, Switzerland, World Meteorological Organization, 1128 pp. (WMO-No.8). http://hdl.handle.net/11329/365

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Landscape Ecology and Environmental Systems Analysis, Institute of GeoecologyTechnische Universität BraunschweigBrunswickGermany
  2. 2.Centre of Marine Sciences of AlgarveUniversity of AlgarveFaroPortugal
  3. 3.Ludwig-Franzius-InstitutLeibniz Universität HannoverHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations