Advertisement

Marine Biology

, 166:67 | Cite as

Multiple spatially distinct introductions and not range expansion may explain colonization history in a non-native marine shrimp

  • Eleanor K. BorsEmail author
  • James T. Carlton
  • Timothy M. ShankEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Biological invasions are often characterized by a phase of post-establishment expansion in which the invading species increases its range through colonization of new geographic areas. These expansions are predicted to result in specific genetic signatures, most notably decreased genetic diversity with distance from the point of introduction. The Asian caridean shrimp Palaemon macrodactylus is an introduced species in many regions of the globe. It has most recently invaded the U.S. Atlantic coast, with the first reported sighting in New York in 2001. This study used mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I sequence data and data for 1598 single-nucleotide polymorphisms generated through restriction enzyme-associated DNA sequencing to evaluate two potential invasion mechanisms describing the spread of P. macrodactylus north of New York: the first based on a single introduction followed by range expansion facilitated by ocean currents, coastal transport, and physical environment; the second based on multiple introductions from overseas into different ports along the coast. We compare population genetic results to predictions of genetic patterns for each of these potential invasion pathways. Results do not support range expansion in which diversity decreases with distance from the point of first detection. Rather, the data suggest that multiple introductions may have taken place with population genomic diversity increasing with distance from New York, and peaks of mitochondrial diversity in populations collected from New York and the Boston–Plymouth coastline. These results indicate that multiple human-mediated dispersal events may be as important as oceanographic and life history considerations during the colonization phases of a marine invasion.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the exuberant field assistance provided by the many members of the “ShrimpEX2014” research team, based out of the Williams College-Mystic Seaport Maritime Studies Program in Mystic, Connecticut. Support was provided for the ShrimpEX2014 research program by the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management and the Northeast Sea Grant Consortium. This research is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 1122374. Funding for the RAD-sequencing was provided in part by the Woods Hole Sea Grant Program, and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Biology Department. Additional support was provided by the National Science Foundation (OCE-1131620 to TMS) and the James Education Fund for Ocean Exploration within the Ocean Exploration Institute of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. We would like to thank the editors and reviewers for Marine Biology who contributed insight and perspective to this manuscript.

Author contributions

Eleanor K. Bors (EKB) conceived of the project with substantial input from James T. Carlton (JTC) and Timothy M. Shank (TMS). JTC and EKB planned and undertook sample collection. EKB undertook the laboratory work and data analysis for the genetic and genomic data. EKB, JTC, and TMS discussed interpretation of the data. JTC and TMS both provided support for the project from assistance in the field to laboratory materials.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All funding is listed in the acknowledgements section. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical guidelines

All guidelines for the sampling of organisms were followed. Collecting permits were obtained for New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New York, copies of which are available upon request.

Data availability statement

Data have been made available online on GenBank (BioProject ID PRJNA521400). As noted in the text, some accession numbers are already available online for mitochondrial data. Scripts used in analysis are available on the author’s GitHub page accessible via the following link: https://github.com/ekbors/p_macrodactylus-.

Supplementary material

227_2019_3514_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (896 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 895 kb)

References

  1. Ashelby CW, Johnson ML, De Grave S (2013) The global invader Palaemon macrodactylus (Decapoda, Palaemonidae): an interrogation of records and a synthesis of data. Crustaceana 86:594–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baeza JA, Fuentes MS (2013) Phylogeography of the shrimp Palaemon floridanus (Crustacea: Caridea: Palaemonidae): a partial test of meta-population genetic structure in the wider Caribbean. Mar Ecol 34:381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett SCH (2015) Foundations of invasion genetics: the Baker and Stebbins legacy. Mol Ecol 24:1927–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bax N, Williamson A, Aguero M, Gonzalez E, Geeves W (2003) Marine invasive alien species: a threat to global biodiversity. Mar Policy 27:313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Béguer M, Bergé J, Martin J, Martinet J, Pauliac G, Girardin M, Philippe Boët P (2011) Presence of Palaemon macrodactylus in a European estuary: evidence for a successful invasion of the Gironde (SW France). Aquat Invasions 6:301–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blakeslee AMH, Kamakukra Y, Onufrey J, Makino W, Urabe J, Park S, Keogh CL, Miller AW, Minton MS, Carlton JT, Miura O (2017) Reconstructing the invasion history of the Asian shorecrab, Hemigrapsus sanguineus (De Haan 1835) in the Western Atlantic. Mar Biol 164:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bock DG, Zhan A, Lejeusne C, MacIsaac HJ, Cristescu ME (2010) Looking at both sides of the invasion: patterns of colonization in the violet tunicate Botrylloides violaceus. Mol Ecol 20:503–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlton JT (2009) Deep invasion ecology and the assembly of communities in historical time. In: Rilov G, Crooks JA (eds) Biological invasions in marine ecosystems. Springer, Berlin, pp 13–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlton JT, Cohen AN (2003) Episodic global dispersal in shallow water marine organisms: the case history of the European shore crabs Carcinus maenas and C. aestuarii. J Biogeogr 30:1809–1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Catchen J, Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Amores A, Cresko WA (2013) Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Mol Ecol 22:3124–3140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowen RK, Gawarkiewic G, Pineda J, Thorrold SR, Werner FE (2007) Population connectivity in marine systems an overview. Oceanography 20:14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cristescu ME (2015) Genetic reconstructions of invasion history. Mol Ecol 24:2212–2225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darling JA, Bagley MJ, Roman J, Tepolt CK, Geller JB (2008) Genetic patterns across multiple introductions of the globally invasive crab genus Carcinus. Mol Ecol 17:4992–5007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darling JA, Herborg L-M, Davidson IC (2012) Intracoastal shipping drives patterns of regional population expansion by an invasive marine invertebrate. Ecol Evol 2:2557–2566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darling JA, Tsai YHE, Blakeslee AMH, Roman J (2014) Are genes faster than crabs? Mitochondrial introgression exceeds larval dispersal during population expansion of the invasive crab Carcinus maenas. R Soc Open Sci 1:140202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edmonds CA, Lillie AS, Cavalli-Sforza LL (2004) Mutations arising in the wave front of an expanding population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:975–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Epifanio CE (2013) Invasion biology of the Asian shore crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus: a review. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 441:33–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Estoup A, Lombaert E, Marin JM, Guillemaud T, Pudlo P, Robert CP, Cornuet JM (2012) Estimation of demo-genetic model probabilities with Approximate Bayesian Computation using linear discriminant analysis on summary statistics. Mol Ecol Resour 12:846–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Estoup A, Ravigné V, Hufbauer R, Vitalis R, Gautier M, Facon B (2016) Is there a genetic paradox of biological invasion? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Styst 47:51–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Excoffier L, Foll M, Petit RJ (2009) Genetic consequences of range expansions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:481–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fofonoff PW, Ruiz GM, Steves B, Simkanin C, Carlton JT. (2018) Palaemon macrodactylus, in California. National Exotic Marine and Estuarine Species Information System. http://invasions.si.edu/nemesis/. Accessed 30 Mar 2018
  23. Fraimout A, Debat V, Fellous S, Hufbauer RA, Foucaud J, Pudlo P, Marin JM, Price DK, Cattel J, Chen X, Depra M, Francois Duyck P, Guedot C, Kenis M, Kimura MT, Loeb G, Loiseau A, Martinez-Sanudo I, Pascual M, Polihronakis Richmond M, Shearer P, Singh N, Tamura K, Xuereb A, Zhang J, Estoup A (2017) Deciphering the Routes of invasion of Drosophila suzukii by Means of ABC Random Forest. Mol Biol Evol 34:980–996PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Funk JL, Matzek V, Bernhardt M, Johnson D (2014) Broadening the case for invasive species management to include impacts on ecosystem services. Bioscience 64:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. González-Ortegón E, Cuesta JA (2006) An illustrated key to species of Palaemon and Palaemonetes (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea) from European waters, including the alien species Palaemon macrodactylus. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 86:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hallatschek O, Nelson DR (2008) Gene surfing in expanding populations. Theor Popul Biol 73:158–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hartl DL, Clark AG (2007) Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Associates Incorporated, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  28. Herrera S, Watanabe H, Shank TM (2015) Evolutionary and biogeographical patterns of barnacles from deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Mol Ecol 24:673–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1322–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jennings RM, Shank TM, Mullineaux LS, Halanych KM (2008) Assessment of the Cape Cod phylogeographic break using the bamboo worm Clymenella torquata reveals the role of regional water masses in dispersal. J Hered 100:86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jiang M, Brown MW, Turner JT, Kenney RD, Mayo CA, Zhang Z, Zhou M (2007) Springtime transport and retention of Calanus finmarchicus in Massachusetts and Cape Cod Bays, USA, and implications for right whale foraging. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 349:183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson C, Woollacott R (2015) Analyses with newly developed microsatellite markers elucidate the spread dynamics of Tricellaria inopinata d’Hondt and Occhipinti-Ambrogi, 1985—a recently established bryozoan along the New England seashore. Aquat Invasions 10:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17:386–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lejeusne C, Saunier A, Petit N, Béguer M, Otani M, Carlton JT, Rico C, Green AJ (2014) High genetic diversity and absence of founder effects in a worldwide aquatic invader. Sci Rep 4:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lord JP, Williams LM (2016) Increase in density of genetically diverse invasive Asian shore crab (Hemigrapsus sanguineus) populations in the Gulf of Maine. Biol Invasions 19(4):1153–1168.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1304-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lowry E, Rollinson EJ, Laybourn AJ, Scott TE, Aiello-Lammens ME, Gray SM, Mickley J, Gurevitch J (2013) Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature. Ecol Evol 3:182–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Omori M, Chida Y (1988) Life history of a caridean shrimp Palaemon macrodactylus with special reference to the difference in reproductive features among ages. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 54:365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peter BM, Slatkin M (2013) Detecting range expansions from genetic data. Evolution 67:3274–3289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D (2006) Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 38:904–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Raj A, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2013) fastSTRUCTURE: variational inference of population structure in large SNP datasets. Genetics 197:573–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reitzel AM, Herrera S, Layden MJ, Martindale MQ, Shank TM (2013) Going where traditional markers have not gone before: utility of and promise for RAD sequencing in marine invertebrate phylogeography and population genomics. Mol Ecol 22:2953–2970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reuschel S, Cuesta JA, Schubart CD (2010) Marine biogeographic boundaries and human introduction along the European coast revealed by phylogeography of the prawn Palaemon elegans. Mol Phylogenet Evol 55:765–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Richardson MF, Sherman CDH, Lee RS, Bott NJ, Hirst AJ (2016) Multiple dispersal vectors drive range expansion in an invasive marine species. Mol Ecol 25:5001–5014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rius M, Turon X, Bernardi G, Volckaert FAM, Viard F (2015) Marine invasion genetics: from spatio-temporal patterns to evolutionary outcomes. Biol Invasions 17:869–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roman J (2006) Diluting the founder effect: cryptic invasions expand a marine invader’s range. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 273:2453–2459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Selkoe KA, D’Aloia CC, Crandall ED, Iacchei M, Liggins L, Puritz JB, von der Heyden S, Toonen RJ (2016) A decade of seascape genetics: contributions to basic and applied marine connectivity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 554:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 28 June 2016
  50. Thomaz SM, Kovalenko KE, Havel JE, Kats LB (2014) Aquatic invasive species: general trends in the literature and introduction to the special issue. Hydrobiologia 746:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Torres AP, Dos Santos A, Cuesta JA, Carbonell A, Massuti E, Alemany F, Reglero P (2012) First record of Palaemon macrodactylus Rathbun, 1902 (Decapoda, Palaemonidae) in the western Mediterranean. Mediterr Mar Sci 13:278–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Travis JM, Munkemuller T, Burton OJ, Best A, Dytham C, Johst K (2007) Deleterious mutations can surf to high densities on the wave front of an expanding population. Mol Biol Evol 24:2334–2343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ (2000) Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5948–5953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van Etten J (2015) gdistance: Distances and Routes on Geographical Grids. R package version 1.1-9. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gdistance. Accessed 28 June 2016
  55. Vázquez MG, Bas CC, Kittlein M, Spivak ED (2015) Effects of temperature and salinity on larval survival and development in the invasive shrimp Palaemon macrodactylus (Caridea: Palaemonidae) along the reproductive season. J Sea Res 99:56–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walsh JR, Carpenter SR, Vander Zanden MJ (2016) Invasive species triggers a massive loss of ecosystem services through a trophic cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:4081–4085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Warkentine BE, Rachlin JW (2010) The first record of Palaemon macrodactylus (Oriental Shrimp) from the eastern coast of North America. Northeast Nat 17:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. White C, Selkoe KA, Watson J, Siegel DA, Zacherl DC, Toonen RJ (2010) Ocean currents help explain population genetic structure. Proc R Soc Lond Biol 277:1685–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Whitney MM, Ullman DS, Codiga DL (2016) Subtidal exchange in eastern Long Island Sound. J Phys Oceanogr 46:2351–2371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams ST, Knowlton N (2001) Mitochondrial pseudogenes are pervasive and often insidious in the snapping shrimp genus Alpheus. Mol Biol Evol 18:1484–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yoon M, Hong S-E, Kwon Nam Y, Kim DS (2011) Genetic diversity of the Asian shore crab, Hemigrapsus sanguineus, in Korea and Japan inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome coxidase subunit I gene. Anim Cells and Syst 15:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Hatfield Marine Science CenterOregon State UniversityNewportUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA
  3. 3.Williams College-Mystic Seaport Maritime Studies ProgramMysticUSA

Personalised recommendations