Advertisement

Marine Biology

, 166:5 | Cite as

Oceanic nomad or coastal resident? Behavioural switching in the shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus)

  • Malcolm P. Francis
  • Mahmood S. Shivji
  • Clinton A. J. Duffy
  • Paul J. Rogers
  • Michael E. Byrne
  • Bradley M. Wetherbee
  • Scott C. Tindale
  • Warrick S. Lyon
  • Megan M. Meyers
Original paper

Abstract

Pelagic sharks are vulnerable to overfishing because of their low reproductive rates, generally low growth rates, and high catch rates in tuna and billfish fisheries worldwide. Pelagic sharks often migrate long distances, but they may also occur close to shore, making it difficult to classify their behaviour on the continuum from oceanic nomad to coastal resident. This has important implications for fishery management, which must be targeted at an appropriate spatial scale. Conventional tagging indicates that shortfin mako sharks move widely around the southwest Pacific Ocean, but there is little information on their habitat use or mobility in the region. This study deployed electronic tags on 14 mostly juvenile New Zealand mako sharks to investigate their habitat use, and the spatial and temporal scale of their movements. Movement behaviour was classified as Resident or Travel, with the former focused in New Zealand coastal waters, and the latter in oceanic waters around New Zealand and along oceanic ridges running north towards the tropical islands of Fiji, Vanuatu and New Caledonia. Sharks regularly switched between Resident and Travel behavioural states, but their residency periods sometimes lasted for several months. Sharks spent most of their time in the New Zealand Exclusive Economic Zone (median 77%, five sharks > 90%), presumably because of the high coastal productivity and access to abundant prey. These results challenge the conventional view that mako sharks are nomadic wanderers, and suggest that fishing mortality should be managed at a local as well as a regional scale.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank our NIWA colleagues, Mike Bhana (Wild Film), and recreational fishers for assistance with the capture and tagging of sharks. Special thanks to Sue Tindale for her support in the field. We are grateful to Blanca García (Instituto Español de Oceanografía), for providing information on the recapture of Shark 3, and to Shelley Clarke (WCPFC) for providing unpublished data on the mako shark post-release mortality study. John Annala (MPI) provided invaluable support for this study over many years.

Funding

The New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries,  Guy Harvey Ocean Fund, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Department of Conservation, New Zealand Oil and Gas, South Australia Research and Development Institute, University of Rhode Island, Tindale Marine Research Charitable Trust, and Wild Film Ltd, funded the tags and tagging programme. Preparation of the journal paper was supported through Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment Strategic Science Investment Funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards and fish tagging protocols of the New Zealand National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research.

Data availability

The datasets produced by this study are not publicly available because of multiple ownership, but may be requested from the senior author.

Supplementary material

227_2018_3453_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.9 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1990 kb)

References

  1. Abascal FJ, Quintans M, Ramos-Cartelle A, Mejuto J (2011) Movements and environmental preferences of the shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus, in the southeastern Pacific Ocean. Mar Biol 158:1175–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams GD, Flores D, Galindo Flores O, Aarestrup K, Svendsen JC (2016) Spatial ecology of blue shark and shortfin mako in southern Peru: local abundance, habitat preferences and implications for conservation. Endang Species Res 31:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey H, Shillinger G, Palacios D, Bograd S, Spotila J, Paladino F, Block B (2008) Identifying and comparing phases of movement by leatherback turtles using state-space models. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 356:128–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Block BA, Jonsen ID, Jorgensen SJ et al (2011) Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean. Nature 475:86–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyd JD, Brightsmith DJ (2013) Error properties of Argos satellite telemetry locations using least squares and Kalman filtering. PLoS One 8(5):63051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bustamante C, Bennett MB (2013) Insights into the reproductive biology and fisheries of two commercially exploited species, shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) and blue shark (Prionace glauca), in the south-east Pacific Ocean. Fish Res 143:174–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne ME, Cortés E, Vaudo JJ, Harvey GCM, Sampson M, Wetherbee BM, Shivji M (2017) Satellite telemetry reveals higher fishing mortality rates than previously estimated, suggesting overfishing of an apex marine predator. Proc Roy Soc B 284:20170658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calenge C (2006) The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Mod 197:516–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campana SE, Joyce W, Fowler M, Showell M (2016) Discards, hooking, and post-release mortality of porbeagle (Lamna nasus), shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus), and blue shark (Prionace glauca) in the Canadian pelagic longline fishery. ICES J Mar Sci 73:520–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell R (2014) Analysis of Commonwealth logbook and observer data—eastern Australia. In: Bruce B (ed) Shark futures: a synthesis of available data on mako and porbeagle sharks in Australasian waters. Current status and future directions, FRDC project 2011/045. CSIRO, Hobart, pp 39–68Google Scholar
  11. Carey FG, Teal JM, Kanwisher JW (1981) The visceral temperatures of mackerel sharks (Lamnidae). Physiol Zool 54:334–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casey JG, Kohler NE (1992) Tagging studies on the shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) in the western North Atlantic. Aust J Mar Freshwater Res 43:45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke S, Harley S, Hoyle S, Rice J (2011) An indicator-based analysis of key shark species based on data held by SPC-OFP. WCPFC Seventh Reg Sess, WCPFC-SC7-EB-WP-01. 88 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke SC, Harley SJ, Hoyle SD, Rice JS (2012) Population trends in Pacific oceanic sharks and the utility of regulations on shark finning. Conserv Biol 27:197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clarke S, Sato M, Small C, Sullivan B, Inoue Y, Ochi D (2014) Bycatch in longline fisheries for tuna and tuna-like species: a global review of status and mitigation measures. FAO Fish Aqua Tech Pap 588Google Scholar
  16. Corrigan S, Lowther AD, Beheregaray LB et al (2018) Population connectivity of the highly migratory shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus Rafinesque 1810) and implications for management in the Southern Hemisphere. Front Ecol Evol 6:187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cortés E, Arocha F, Beerkircher L et al (2010) Ecological risk assessment of pelagic sharks caught in Atlantic pelagic longline fisheries. Aquat Liv Res 23:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cortés E, Domingo A, Miller P et al (2015) Expanded ecological risk assessment of pelagic sharks caught in Atlantic pelagic longline fisheries. Coll Vol Sci Pap ICCAT 71:2637–2688Google Scholar
  19. Doherty PD, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Hodgson DJ, Mangel JC, Witt MJ, Godley BJ (2014) Big catch, little sharks: insight into Peruvian small-scale longline fisheries. Ecol Evol 4:2375–2383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duffy C, Francis MP (2001) Evidence of summer parturition in shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) sharks from New Zealand waters. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res 35:319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dulvy NK, Baum JK, Clarke S et al (2008) You can swim but you can’t hide: the global status and conservation of oceanic pelagic sharks and rays. Aquat Cons Mar Freshwater Ecosyst 18:459–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ebert DA, Fowler S, Compagno L (2013) Sharks of the world. A fully illustrated guide. Wild Nature Press, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  23. Francis MP (1998) New Zealand shark fisheries: development, size and management. Mar Freshwater Res 49:579–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Francis MP (2006) Morphometric minefields—towards a measurement standard for chondrichthyan fishes. Environ Biol Fish 77:407–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Francis MP (2013) Commercial catch composition of highly migratory elasmobranchs. N Z Fish Assess Rep, 2013/68Google Scholar
  26. Francis MP (2016) Size, maturity and age composition of mako sharks observed in New Zealand tuna longline fisheries. N Z Fish Assess Rep, 2016/22Google Scholar
  27. Francis MP, Duffy C (2005) Length at maturity in three pelagic sharks (Lamna nasus, Isurus oxyrinchus, and Prionace glauca) from New Zealand. Fish Bull 103:489–500Google Scholar
  28. Francis M, Large K (2017) Updated abundance indicators for New Zealand blue, porbeagle and shortfin mako sharks. CCSBT Ecologically Related Species Working Group 12th meeting CCSBT-ERS/1703/14 WCPFC Scientific Committee Thirteenth Reg Sess WCPFC-SC13-2017/SA-IP-13Google Scholar
  29. Francis MP, Duffy CAJ, Bonfil R, Manning MJ (2012) The third dimension. Vertical habitat use by white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias, in New Zealand and in oceanic and tropical waters of the southwest Pacific Ocean. In: Domeier ML (ed) Global perspectives on the biology and life history of the white shark. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 319–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Francis MP, Clarke SC, Griggs LH, Hoyle SD (2014) Indicator based analysis of the status of New Zealand blue, mako and porbeagle sharks. N Z Fish Assess Rep, 2014/69Google Scholar
  31. Francis MP, Holdsworth JC, Block BA (2015) Life in the open ocean: seasonal migration and diel diving behaviour of Southern Hemisphere porbeagle sharks (Lamna nasus). Mar Biol 162:2305–2323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freitas C, Lydersen C, Fedak MA, Kovacs KM (2008) A simple new algorithm to filter marine mammal Argos locations. Mar Mam Sci 24:315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. French RP, Lyle J, Tracey S, Currie S, Semmens JM (2015) High survivorship after catch-and-release fishing suggests physiological resilience in the endothermic shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus). Cons Phys 3:44Google Scholar
  34. Giorli G, Drazen JC, Neuheimer AB, Copeland A, Au WWL (2018) Deep sea animal density and size estimated using a dual-frequency identification sonar (DIDSON) offshore the island of Hawaii. Prog Oceanogr 160:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Griggs LH, Baird SJ (2013) Fish bycatch in New Zealand tuna longline fisheries 2006-07 to 2009-10. N Z Fish Assess Rep, 2013/13Google Scholar
  36. Griggs LH, Baird SJ, Francis MP (2007) Fish bycatch in New Zealand tuna longline fisheries 2002-03 to 2004-05. N Z Fish Assess Rep, 2007/18Google Scholar
  37. Groeneveld JC, Cliff G, Dudley SFJ, Foulis AJ, Santos J, Wintner SP (2014) Population structure and biology of shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus, in the south-west Indian Ocean. Mar Freshwater Res 65:1045–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hays GC, Sequeira CFL et al (2016) Key questions in marine megafauna movement ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 31:463–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holdsworth J, Saul P (2014) New Zealand billfish and gamefish tagging, 2012-13. N Z Fish Assess Rep, 2014/11Google Scholar
  40. Holdsworth J, Saul P (2017) New Zealand billfish and gamefish tagging, 2013–14 to 2015–16. N Z Fish Assess Rep, 2017/14Google Scholar
  41. Hoolihan JP, Luo J, Abascal FJ et al (2011) Evaluating post-release behaviour modification in large pelagic fish deployed with pop-up satellite archival tags. ICES J Mar Sci 68:880–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Horn PL, Ballara SL, Sutton PJH, Griggs LH (2013) Evaluation of the diets of highly migratory species in New Zealand waters. N Z Aquat Environ Biodiv Rep 116Google Scholar
  43. Howey LA, Tolentino ER, Papastamatiou YP et al (2016) Into the deep: the functionality of mesopelagic excursions by an oceanic apex predator. Ecol Evol 6:5290–5304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Humphries NE, Queiroz N, Dyer JRM et al (2010) Environmental context explains Lévy and Brownian movement patterns of marine predators. Nat Lett 465:1066–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jonsen ID (2016) Joint estimation over multiple individuals improves behavioural state inference from animal movement data. Nat Sci Rep 6:20625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jonsen ID, Flemming JM, Myers RA (2005) Robust state-space modeling of animal movement data. Ecol 86:2874–2880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jonsen ID, Myers RA, James MC (2007) Identifying leatherback turtle foraging behaviour from satellite telemetry using a switching state-space model. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 337:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Josse E, Bach P, Dagorn L (1998) Simultaneous observations of tuna movements and their prey by sonic tracking and acoustic surveys. Hydrobiol 371(372):61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kai M, Shiozaki K, Ohshimo S, Yokawa K (2015) Growth and spatiotemporal distribution of juvenile shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) in the western and central North Pacific. Mar Freshwater Res 66:1176–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Last PR, Stevens JD (2009) Sharks and rays of Australia, 2nd edn. CSIRO, HobartGoogle Scholar
  51. Loefer JK, Sedberry GR, McGovern JC (2005) Vertical movements of a shortfin mako in the western North Atlantic as determined by pop-up satellite tagging. Southeast Nat 4:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maia A, Queiroz N, Cabral HN, Santos AM, Correia JP (2007) Reproductive biology and population dynamics of the shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus Rafinesque, 1810, off the southwest Portuguese coast, eastern North Atlantic. J Appl Ichth 23:246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Michaud A, Hyde JR, Kohin S, Vetter R (2011) Mitochondrial DNA sequence data reveals barriers to dispersal in the highly migratory shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus). Working document submitted to the ISC Shark Working Group Workshop, ISC/11/SHARKWG-2/03Google Scholar
  54. Ministry for Primary Industries (2017) Fisheries Assessment Plenary November 2017. Stock assessments and stock status, Compiled by the Fisheries Science Group. Ministry for Primary Industries, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  55. Musyl MK, Brill RW, Curran DS, Fragoso NM, McNaughton LM, Nielsen A, Kikkawa BS, Moyes CD (2011) Postrelease survival, vertical and horizontal movements, and thermal habitats of five species of pelagic sharks in the central Pacific Ocean. Fish Bull 109:341–368Google Scholar
  56. Ohshimo S, Fujinami Y, Shiozaki K et al (2016) Distribution, body length, and abundance of blue shark and shortfin mako offshore of northeastern Japan, as determined from observed pelagic longline data, 2000–2014. Fish Oceanogr 25:259–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pante E, Simon-Bouhet B (2013) Marmap: a package for importing, plotting and analyzing bathymetric and topographic data in R. PLoS One 8(9):73051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Papastamatiou YP, Iosilevskii G, Leos-Barajas V, Brooks EJ, Howey LA, Chapman DD, Watanabe YY (2018) Optimal swimming strategies and behavioral plasticity of oceanic whitetip sharks. Nat Sci Rep 8:551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pebesma EJ, Bivand RS (2005) Classes and methods for spatial data in R. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=sp/vignettes/intro_sp.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2018
  60. Porsmoguer SB, Bănaru D, Boudouresque CF, Dekeyser I, Viricel A, Merchán M (2015) DNA evidence of the consumption of short-beaked common dolphin Delphinus delphis by the shortfin mako shark Isurus oxyrinchus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 532:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Preti A, Soykan CU, Dewar H, Wells RJD, Spear N, Kohin S (2012) Comparative feeding ecology of shortfin mako, blue and thresher sharks in the California Current. Env Biol Fish 95:127–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Queiroz N, Humphries NE, Mucientes G et al (2016) Ocean-wide tracking of pelagic sharks reveals extent of overlap with longline fishing hotspots. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 113:1582–1587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. R Development Core Team (2017) The R project for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 19 Feb 2018
  64. Reynolds AM (2012) Fitness-maximizing foragers can use information about patch quality to decide how to search for and within patches: optimal Lévy walk searching patterns from optimal foraging theory. J Roy Soc 9:1568–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rice J, Tremblay-Boyer L, Scott R, Hare S, Tidd A (2015) Analysis of stock status and related indicators for key shark species of the Western Central Pacific Fisheries Commission. Western Central Pacific Fisheries Commission Scientific Committee Eleventh Reg Sess, WCPFC-SC11-2015/EB-WP-04-Rev 1Google Scholar
  66. Rogers PJ (2011) Habitat use, movement and dietary dynamics of pelagic sharks in coastal and shelf ecosystems off southern Australia. PhD thesis, Flinders University, Adelaide, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  67. Rogers PJ, Huveneers C, Page B, Hamer DJ, Goldsworthy SD, Mitchell JG, Seuront L (2012) A quantitative comparison of the diets of sympatric pelagic sharks in gulf and shelf ecosystems off southern Australia. ICES J Mar Sci 69:1382–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rogers PJ, Corrigan S, Lowther A (2015a) Using satellite tagging and molecular techniques to improve the ecologically sustainable fisheries management of shortfin makos (Isurus oxyrinchus) in the Australasian region. FRDC Project 2011/077Google Scholar
  69. Rogers PJ, Huveneers C, Page B, Goldsworthy SD, Coyne M, Lowther AD, Mitchell JG, Seuront L (2015b) Living on the continental shelf edge: habitat use of juvenile shortfin makos Isurus oxyrinchus in the Great Australian Bight, southern Australia. Fish Oceanogr 24:205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Runcie R, Holts D, Wraith J, Xuc Y, Ramon D, Rasmussen R, Kohin S (2016) A fishery-independent survey of juvenile shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) and blue (Prionace glauca) sharks in the Southern California Bight, 1994–2013. Fish Res 183:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schnute JT, Boers N, Haigh R (2018) PBSmapping: mapping fisheries data and spatial analysis tools. R package version 2.70.4. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PBSmapping. Accessed 18 Nov 2018
  72. Sippel T, Wraith J, Kohin S, Taylor V, Holdsworth J, Taguchi M, Matsunaga H, Yokawa K (2011) A summary of blue shark (Prionace glauca) and shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) tagging data available from the North and Southwest Pacific Ocean. Working document submitted to the ISC Shark Working Group Workshop, ISC/11/SHARKWG-2/04Google Scholar
  73. Sippel T, Ohshimo S, Yokawa K, Kai M, Carvalho F, Liu K-M, Castillo-Géniz JL, Kohin S (2015) Spatial and temporal patterns of shortfin mako shark size and sex in the North Pacific Ocean. Working document submitted to the ISC Shark Working Group Workshop, ISC/15/SHARKWG-1/04Google Scholar
  74. Smith SE, Au DW, Show C (2008) Intrinsic rates of increase in pelagic elasmobranchs. In: Camhi MD, Pikitch EK, Babcock EA (eds) Sharks of the open ocean: biology, fisheries and conservation. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 288–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stevens JD (1984) Biological observations on sharks caught by sport fishermen off New South Wales. Aust J Mar Freshwater Res 35:573–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stevens JD (1992) Blue and mako shark by-catch in the Japanese longline fishery off South-eastern Australia. Aust J Mar Freshwater Res 43:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stevens JD, Bradford RW, West GJ (2010) Satellite tagging of blue sharks (Prionace glauca) and other pelagic sharks off eastern Australia: depth behaviour, temperature experience and movements. Mar Biol 157:575–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sutton TT (2013) Vertical ecology of the pelagic ocean: classical patterns and new perspectives. J Fish Biol 83:1508–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Taguchi M, Ohshimo S, Yokawa K (2015) Genetic stock structure of shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) in the Pacific Ocean. Working document submitted to the ISC Shark Working Group Workshop, ISC/15/SHARKWG-1/05Google Scholar
  80. Vaudo JJ, Wetherbee BM, Wood AD, Weng K, Howey-Jordan LA, Harvey GM, Shivji MS (2016) Vertical movements of shortfin mako sharks Isurus oxyrinchus in the western North Atlantic Ocean are strongly influenced by temperature. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 547:163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vaudo JJ, Byrne ME, Wetherbee BM, Harvey GM, Shivji MS (2017) Long-term satellite tracking reveals region-specific movements of a large pelagic predator, the shortfin mako shark, in the western North Atlantic Ocean. J App Ecol 54:1765–1775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Worton BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70:164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yatsu A (1995) Zoogeography of the epipelagic fishes in the South Pacific Ocean and the Pacific sector of the Subantarctic, with special reference to the ecological role of slender tuna, Allothunnus fallai. Bull Nat Res Inst Far Seas Fish 32Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Malcolm P. Francis
    • 1
  • Mahmood S. Shivji
    • 2
  • Clinton A. J. Duffy
    • 3
  • Paul J. Rogers
    • 4
  • Michael E. Byrne
    • 5
  • Bradley M. Wetherbee
    • 2
    • 6
  • Scott C. Tindale
    • 7
  • Warrick S. Lyon
    • 1
  • Megan M. Meyers
    • 8
  1. 1.National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA)WellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.The Guy Harvey Research InstituteNova Southeastern UniversityDania BeachUSA
  3. 3.Department of ConservationAucklandNew Zealand
  4. 4.South Australia Research and Development InstituteHenley BeachAustralia
  5. 5.School of Natural Resources, University of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  6. 6.University of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA
  7. 7.Tindale Marine Research Charitable TrustAucklandNew Zealand
  8. 8.The University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations