Advertisement

Marine Biology

, 165:150 | Cite as

Trophic ecology of the neustonic cnidarian Velella velella in the northern California Current during an extensive bloom year: insights from gut contents and stable isotope analysis

  • Samantha M. Zeman
  • Marco Corrales-Ugalde
  • Richard D. Brodeur
  • Kelly R. Sutherland
Original paper

Abstract

Aggregations of the neustonic hydrozoan Velella velella occur periodically in the northern California Current. Despite the regular occurrence of notable bloom events in this productive upwelling zone, little is known about their trophic ecology. We used gut content and stable isotope analyses (SIA) to elucidate V. velella prey selectivity and trophic niche to address their potential impacts on the marine ecosystem. The dominant prey items ingested by V. velella colonies were non-motile prey including cladocerans and northern anchovy (Engraulis mordax) eggs, though copepods were also common in gut contents. Removal rates of northern anchovy eggs could be magnified in bloom years and in areas of high spawning biomass. Stable isotope analysis revealed differences in isotopic niche width and overlap among V. velella based on latitudinal gradients and to a lesser extent on V. velella size and demonstrates the need for continued work to fully understand the trophic ecology of this unique neustonic organism.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Curtis Roegner for providing the neuston samples and Toby Auth for assistance in identifying fish eggs and larvae, along with members of the Weis lab at Oregon State University, especially Jack Koch, for guidance and laboratory work with V. velella symbionts. For stable isotope direction, we would like to thank Jennifer McKay at the Oregon State University Stable Isotope Facility for her expertise. We thank Curtis Roegner, Elizabeth Daly, Rich Zabel, Jennifer Purcell and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge the support of Oregon Sea Grant (R/ECO-33-Sutherland). We also appreciate the NOAA Fisheries Northwest Fisheries Science Center for providing ship, logistic, and salary support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All national and institutional guidelines for the use of animals were followed.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

227_2018_3404_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. Anderson MJ (2001) Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:626–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arai MN (2005) Predation on pelagic coelenterates: a review. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 85:523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auth TD, Daly EA, Brodeur RD, Fisher JL (2018) Phenological and distributional shifts in ichthyoplankton associated with recent warming in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Glob Change Biol 24:259–272.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13872 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banaszak AT, Iglestas-Prieto R, Trench RK (1993) Scrippsiella velellae sp. nov. (Perinidiales) and Glokeodinium viscum sp. nov. (Phytodiniales) dinoflagellate symbionts of two hydrozoans (Cnidaria). J Phycol 29(4):517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barth JA, Pierce SD, Smith RL (2000) A separating coastal upwelling jet at Cape Blanco, Oregon and its connection to the California Current System. Deep Sea Res II 47:783–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bearhop S, Adams CE, Waldron S, Fuller RA, Macleod H (2004) Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis. J Anim Ecol 73:1007–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergschneider HP, Muller-Parker G (2008) Nutritional role of two algal symbionts in the temperate sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima Brandt. Biol Bull 215(1):73–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bieri R (1961) Post-larval food of the pelagic Coelenterate, Velella lata. Pac Sci 15:553–556Google Scholar
  9. Bieri R (1966) Feeding preferences and rates of the snail, Janthina prolongata, the barnacle, Lepas anserifera, the nudibranchs, Glaucus atlanticus and Fiona pinnata, and the food web in the marine neuston. Publ Seto Mar Biol Lab 14(2):161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bieri R (1970) The food of Porpita and niche separation in the neuston coelenterates. Publ Seto Mar Biol Lab 17(5):305–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bieri R (1977) The ecological significance of seasonal occurrence and growth rate of Velella (Hydrozoa). Publ Seto Mar Biol Lab 24(1):63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bond NA, Cronin MF, Freeland H, Mantua N (2015) Causes and impacts of the 2014 warm anomaly in the NE Pacific. Geophys Res Lett 42:3414–3420.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bouillon J, Gravili C, Pagès F, Gili JM, Boero F (2006) An introduction to hydrozoa. Mémoires du Muséum National D’Histoire Naturelle. Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  14. Brodeur RD, Morgan CA (2016) Influence of a coastal riverine plume on the cross-shelf variability in hydrography, zooplankton and juvenile salmon diets. Estuaries Coasts 39:1183–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brodeur RD, Peterson WT, Auth TD, Soulen HL, Parnel MM, Emerson AA (2008) Abundance and diversity of coastal fish larvae as indicators of recent changes in ocean and climate conditions in the Oregon upwelling zone. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 366:187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheng L (1975) Marine pleuston—animals at the sea-air interface. Oceanogr Mar Biol 13:181–212Google Scholar
  17. Coombs SH, Boyra G, Rueda LD, Halliday NC (2004) Buoyancy measurements and vertical distribution of eggs of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) and anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus). Mar Biol 145:959–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costello JH, Colin SP, Dabiri JO (2008) Medusan morphospace: phylogenetic constraints, biomechanical solutions, and ecological consequences. Invertebr Biol 127(3):265–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. D’Ambra I, Carmichael R, Graham W (2014) Determination of δC and δN and trophic fractionation in jellyfish: implications for food web ecology. Mar Biol 161(2):473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans F (1986) Velella velella (L.), the “by-the-wind-sailor”, in the North Pacific Ocean in 1985. Mar Obs 56:196–200Google Scholar
  21. Fancett MS (1988) Diet and prey selectivity of scyphomedusae from Port Phillip Bay, Australia. Mar Biol 98:503–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferrier-Pagès C, Peirano A, Abbate M, Cocito S, Negri A, Rottier C, Riera P, Rodolfo-Metalpa R, Reynaud S (2011) Summer autotrophy and winter heterotrophy in the temperate symbiotic coral. Limnol Oceanogr 56:1429–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fleming NE, Houghton JD, Magill CL, Harrod C (2011) Preservation methods alter stable isotope values in gelatinous zooplankton: implications for interpreting trophic ecology. Mar Biol 158:2141–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fleming NE, Harrod C, Newton J, Houghton JD (2015) Not all jellyfish are equal: isotopic evidence for inter- and intraspecific variation in jellyfish trophic ecology. PeerJ 3:e1110CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Flux JEC (2009) First mass stranding of Velella velella in New Zealand. Mar Biodivers Rec 1(e84):1–2Google Scholar
  26. Gardner GA, Szabo I (1982) British Columbia pelagic marine Copepoda: an identification manual and annotated bibliography. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 62:1–536Google Scholar
  27. Graham WM, Kroutil RM (2001) Size-based prey selectivity and dietary shifts in the jellyfish, Aurelia aurita. J Plankton Res 23(1):67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hill JK, Wheeler PA (2002) Organic carbon and nitrogen in the northern California Current System: comparison of offshore, river plume, and coastally upwelled waters. Prog Ocean 53:369–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson AL, Inger R, Parnell AC, Bearhop S (2011) Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER—stable isotope bayesian ellipses in R. J Anim Ecol 80(3):595–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kemp PF (1986) Deposition of organic matter on a high-energy sand beach by a mass stranding of the cnidarian Velella velella (L.). Estaurine Coast Shelf Sci 23:575–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kiørboe T (2008) A mechanistic approach to plankton ecology. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  32. Kirkpatrick PA, Pugh PR (1984) Siphonophores and velellids. In: Kermack DM, Barnes RSK (eds) Synopsis of the British Fauna, vol 29. Pitman Press, Great Britain, pp 1–155Google Scholar
  33. Kogovšek T, Tinta T, Klun K, Malej A (2014) Jellyfish biochemical composition: importance of standardised sample processing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 510:275–288.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10959 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lepoint G, Bernard L, Gobert S, Michel LN (2016) Trophic interactions between two neustonic organisms: insights from Bayesian stable isotope data analysis tools. Belg J Zool 146:123–133Google Scholar
  35. Lopes AR, Baptista M, Rosa IC, Dionisio G, Gomes-Pereira J, Paula JR, Figueiredo C, Bandarra N, Calado R, Rosa R (2016) “Gone with the wind”: fatty acid biomarkers and chemotaxonomy of stranded pleustonic hydrozoans (Velella velella and Physalia physalis). Biochem Sys Ecol 66:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacKenzie KM, Trueman CN, Lucas CH, Bortoluzzi J (2017) The preparation of jellyfish for stable isotope analysis. Mar Biol 164:219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mackie GO (1962) Factors affecting the distribution of Velella (Chondrophora). Int Rev Gesamten Hydrobiol Hydrogr 47:26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Madin LP (1988) Feeding behavior of tentaculate predators: in situ observations and a conceptual model. Bull Mar Sci 43(3):413–429Google Scholar
  39. Martinussen MB, Båmstedt U (2001) Digestion rate in relation to temperature of two gelatinous planktonic predators. Sarsia 86:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller TW, Brodeur RD, Rau HG (2008) Carbon stable isotopes reveal relative contribution of shelf-slope production to the Northern California Current pelagic community. Limnol Oceanogr 53:1493–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Minagawa M, Wada E (1984) Stepwise enrichment of 15N along food chains: further evidence and the relation between δ15N and animal age. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48:1135–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Newsome SD, Martinez del Rio C, Bearhop S, Phillips DL (2007) A niche for isotopic ecology. Front Ecol Environ 5(8):429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parnel MM, Emmett RL, Brodeur RD (2008) Ichthyoplankton community in the Columbia River plume off Oregon: effects of fluctuating oceanographic conditions. Fish Bull 106:161–173Google Scholar
  44. Pearre S (1982) Estimating prey preference by predators: uses of various indices, and a proposal of another based on i2. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39:914–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peterson BJ, Fry B (1987) Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18:293–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Phillips N, Eagling L, Harrod C, Reid N, Cappanera V, Houghton J (2017) Quacks snack on smacks: mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) observed feeding on hydrozoans (Velella velella). Plankton Benthos Res 12(2):143–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pires RFT, Cordeiro N, Dubert J, Marraccini A, Relvas P, dos Santos A (2018) Untangling Velella velella (Cnidaria: Anthoathecatae) transport: a citizen science and oceanographic approach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 591:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Postel L, Fock H, Hagen W (2000) Biomass and abundance. In: Harris R, Wiebe P, Lenz J, Rune Skojdal H, Huntley M (eds) ICES zooplankton methodology manual. Elsiever Academic Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  49. Purcell JE, Clarkin E, Doyle TK (2012) Foods of Velella velella (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) in algal rafts and its distribution in Irish seas. Hydrobiologia 690:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Purcell JE, Tilves U, Fuentes VL, Milisenda G, Olariaga A, Sabatés A (2014) Digestion times and predation potentials of Pelagia noctiluca eating fish larvae and copepods in the NW Mediterranean Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 510:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Purcell JE, Milisenda G, Rizzo A, Carrion SA, Zampardi S, Airoldi S, Zagami G, Guglielmo L, Boero R, Doyle TK, Piraino S (2015) Digestion and predation rates of zooplankton by the pleustonic hydrozoan Velella velella and widespread blooms in 2013 and 2014. J Plankton Res 37:1056–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
  53. Reynaud S, Martinez P, Houlbrèque F, Billy I, Allemand D, Ferrier-Pagès C (2009) Effect of light and feeding on the nitrogen isotopic composition of a zooxanthellate coral: role of nitrogen recycling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 392:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shanks A (2002) An Identification guide to the larval marine invertebrates of the Pacific Northwest. Oregon State University Press, OregonGoogle Scholar
  55. Sullivan BK, Suchman CL, Costello JH (1997) Mechanics of prey selection by ephyrae of the scyphomedusa Aurelia aurita. Mar Biol 130:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yellowlees D, Rees TAV, Leggat W (2008) Metabolic interactions between algal symbionts and invertebrate hosts. Plant Cell Environ 31(5):679–694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zeman SM, Brodeur RD, Daly EA, Sutherland KR (2016) Prey selection patterns of Chrysaora fuscescens in the northern California Current. J Plankton Res 38:1433–1443Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samantha M. Zeman
    • 1
  • Marco Corrales-Ugalde
    • 2
  • Richard D. Brodeur
    • 3
  • Kelly R. Sutherland
    • 2
  1. 1.Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources StudiesOregon State UniversityNewportUSA
  2. 2.Oregon Institute of Marine BiologyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA
  3. 3.Fish Ecology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries ServiceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNewportUSA

Personalised recommendations