Advertisement

Marine Biology

, 165:67 | Cite as

The trophic ecology of Caribbean reef sharks (Carcharhinus perezi) relative to other large teleost predators on an isolated coral atoll

  • Mark E. Bond
  • Jasmine Valentin-Albanese
  • Elizabeth A. Babcock
  • Nigel E. Hussey
  • Michael R. Heithaus
  • Demian D. Chapman
Original paper

Abstract

Bulk stable isotope analysis was used to assess the trophic level and foraging habitats of Caribbean reef sharks (Carcharhinus perezi) compared to three large sympatric predatory teleosts (the Nassau grouper Epinephelus striatus, black grouper Mycteroperca bonaci, and great barracuda Sphyraena barracuda) in an isolated Caribbean coral reef ecosystem. Models and empirical studies have suggested that the depletion of large-bodied sharks in coral reef ecosystems triggers a trophic cascade that could affect the benthic community, favoring algae over coral. The hypothesized cascade is based on the premise that sharks prey on large piscivorous teleost fish that in turn prey on key herbivorous fish. Analysis of nitrogen-stable isotopes (δ15N) from white muscle tissue revealed neither adult or juvenile Caribbean reef sharks were significantly enriched in 15N compared with sympatric predatory teleost species. Linear regression found no evidence of an ontogenetic increase in nitrogen with increasing body size for Caribbean reef sharks; however, there was a significant positive relationship between body size and carbon isotope (δ13C) values. These results suggest that Caribbean reef sharks in isolated systems do not act as the apex predator in coral reef ecosystems primarily feeding on large-bodied sympatric teleosts. Instead, Caribbean reef sharks form part of an upper trophic-level predator guild alongside large-bodied teleosts, which makes the predicted trophic cascade as a result of the removal of reef sharks unlikely. Moreover, the body size–δ13C relationship suggests Caribbean reef sharks exhibit ontogenetic and individual variation in where they feed. The ecological role of this species is, therefore, complex and contextual, similar to carcharhinid species in the Indo-Pacific, emphasizing the need to further elucidate the interactions between reef sharks and the overall coral reef ecosystem so as to best inform effective conservation and management of the species.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by grants from Earthwatch International (to DDC and EAB) and the Roe Foundation (to DDC). We would like to thank all the Earthwatch volunteers and Dr. Alex Tilley for their tireless efforts collecting the samples, and for providing additional samples, respectively. Captain Norlan Lamb, Ashbert Miranda, and the management and staff of Wildlife Conservation Society Belize and the Glover’s Reef Research Station provided outstanding logistical support. Furthermore, thanks to Anna Hussey and Aaron Fisk for assistance and mentorship in the lab and the Stony Brook students who helped prepare the samples.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from Earthwatch International (Grant number 7262541).

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of Stony Brook University and this work was carried out under the necessary research and animal care permits from the Government of Belize Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

227_2018_3322_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (713 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 712 kb)

References

  1. Bascompte J, Melian CJ, Sala E (2005) Interaction strength combinations and the overfishing of a marine food web. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5443–5447.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501562102 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bond ME, Babcock EA, Pikitch EK, Abercrombie DL, Lamb NF, Chapman DD (2012) Reef sharks exhibit site-fidelity and higher relative abundance in marine reserves on the mesoamerican barrier reef. PLoS One 7:e32983CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond ME, Valentin-Albanese J, Babcock EA, Abercrombie D, Lamb NF, Miranda A, Pikitch EK, Chapman DD (2017) Abundance and size structure of a reef shark population within a marine reserve has remained stable for more than a decade. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 576:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borer E, Seabloom E, Shurin J, Anderson K, Blanchette C, Broitman B, Cooper S, Halpern B (2005) What determines the strength of a trophic cascade? Ecology 86:528–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks EJ, Sims DW, Danylchuk AJ, Sloman KA (2013) Seasonal abundance, philopatry and demographic structure of Caribbean reef shark (Carcharhinus perezi) assemblages in the north-east Exuma Sound, The Bahamas. Mar Biol 160:2535–2546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkholder DA, Heithaus MR, Fourqurean JW, Wirsing A, Dill LM (2013) Patterns of top-down control in a seagrass ecosystem: could a roving apex predator induce a behaviour-mediated trophic cascade? J Anim Ecol 82:1192–1202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Casey JM, Baird AH, Brandl SJ, Hoogenboom MO, Rizzari JR, Frisch AJ, Mirbach CE, Connolly SR (2016) A test of trophic cascade theory: fish and benthic assemblages across a predator density gradient on coral reefs. Oecologia 183:161–175.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3753-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Castro J (1983) The sharks of North American waters. Texas A. & M. Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  9. Castro JI (2011) The sharks of North America. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Caut S, Angulo E, Courchamp F (2009) Variation in discrimination factors (Δ15N and Δ13C): the effect of diet isotopic values and applications for diet reconstruction. J Appl Ecol 46:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman MR, Kramer DL (2000) Movements of fishes within and among fringing coral reefs in Barbados. Environ Biol Fishes 57:11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapman DD, Pikitch EK, Babcock E, Shivji MS (2005) Marine reserve design and evaluation using automated acoustic telemetry: a case-study involving coral reef-associated sharks in the Mesoamerican Caribbean. Mar Technol Soc J 39:42–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapman DD, Pikitch EK, Babcock EA, Shivji MS (2007) Deep-diving and diel changes in vertical habitat use by Caribbean reef sharks Carcharhinus perezi. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 344:271–275.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps06941 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Compagno L (1999) Checklist of living elasmobranchs. Sharks, skates, and rays: the biology of elasmobranch fishes. The John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  15. Compagno LJV, Dando M, Fowler SL (2005) A field guide to the Sharks of the World. Harper Collins, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  16. Cordeiro C, Mendes T, Harborne A, Ferreira C (2015) Spatial distribution of nominally herbivorous fishes across environmental gradients on Brazilian rocky reefs. J Fish Biol 89:939–958CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cortés E (1999) Standardized diet compositions and trophic levels of sharks. ICES J Mar Sci Journal du Conseil 56:707–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Creel S, Christianson D (2008) Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. Trends Ecol Evol 23:194–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Creel S, Winnie JA, Christianson D (2013) Underestimating the frequency, strength and cost of antipredator responses with data from GPS collars: an example with wolves and elk. Ecol Evol 3:5189–5200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahlgren C (2014) Review of the benefits of no-take zones: a report to the Wildlife Conservation Society. Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NYGoogle Scholar
  21. Done TJ (1992) Phase shifts in coral reef communities and their ecological significance. In: Jaccarini V, Martens E (eds) The ecology of mangrove and related ecosystems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Estes JA, Duggins DO (1995) Sea otters and kelp forests in Alaska: generality and variation in a community ecological paradigm. Ecol Monogr 65:75–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Estes JA, Terborgh J, Brashares JS, Power ME, Berger J, Bond WJ, Carpenter SR, Essington TE, Holt RD, Jackson JB (2011) Trophic downgrading of planet earth. Science 333:301–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Estrada JA, Rice AN, Lutcavage ME, Skomal GB (2003) Predicting trophic position in sharks of the north-west Atlantic Ocean using stable isotope analysis. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 83:1347–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Estrada JA, Aaron NR, Natanson LJ, Skomal GB (2006) Use of isotopic analysis of vertebrae in reconstructing ontogenetic feeding ecology in white sharks. Ecology 87:829–834.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20069012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Finke DL, Denno RF (2004) Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature 429:407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Frisch A, Ireland M, Baker R (2014) Trophic ecology of large predatory reef fishes: energy pathways, trophic level, and implications for fisheries in a changing climate. Mar Biol 161:61–73.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-013-2315-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frisch AJ, Ireland M, Rizzari JR, Lönnstedt OM, Magnenat KA, Mirbach CE, Hobbs J-PA (2016) Reassessing the trophic role of reef sharks as apex predators on coral reefs. Coral Reefs 35:459–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Froese R, Pauly D (eds) (2018) FishBase: concepts designs and data sources. WorldFish, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  30. Fry B (2006) Stable isotope ecology. Springer, Boston, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gibson J (2003) Glover’s reef marine reserve & world heritage site management plan. Commissioned by the Coastal Zone Management Authority and Institute (CZMAI) on behalf of the Fisheries Department Belize City, Belize CZMAI, Belize CityGoogle Scholar
  32. Glazer RA, Delgado GA, Kidney JA (2003) Estimating queen conch (Strombus gigas) home ranges using acoustic telemetry: implications for the design of marine fishery reserves. Gulf Caribb Res 14:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heithaus M, Dill L, Marshall G, Buhleier B (2002) Habitat use and foraging behavior of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in a seagrass ecosystem. Mar Biol 140:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heithaus MR, Wirsing AJ, Frid A, Dill LM (2007) Behavioral indicators in marine conservation: lessons from a pristine seagrass ecosystem. Isr J Ecol Evol 53:355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heithaus MR, Frid A, Wirsing AJ, Worm B (2008) Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. Trends Ecol Evol 23:202–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Heithaus MR, Wirsing AJ, Burkholder D, Thomson J, Dill LM (2009) Towards a predictive framework for predator risk effects: the interaction of landscape features and prey escape tactics. J Animal Ecol 78(3):556–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heithaus MR, Wirsing A, Dill L (2012) The ecological importance of intact top-predator populations: a synthesis of 15 years of research in a seagrass ecosystem. Mar Freshw Res 63:1039–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Helfman GS (1986) Fish behaviour by day, night and twilight the behaviour of teleost fishes. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 366–387Google Scholar
  39. Heupel MR, Knip DM, Simpfendorfer CA, Dulvy NK (2014) Sizing up the ecological role of sharks as predators. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 495:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hobson KA (1999) Tracing origins and migration of wildlife using stable isotopes: a review. Oecologia 120:314–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hussey NE, Aaron MacNeil M, McMeans BC, Olin JA, Dudley SF, Cliff G, Wintner SP, Fennessy ST, Fisk AT (2014a) Corrigendum to Hussey et al. Ecol Lett 17:768CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Hussey NE, MacNeil MA, McMeans BC, Olin JA, Dudley SFJ, Cliff G, Wintner SP, Fennessy ST, Fisk AT (2014b) Rescaling the trophic structure of marine food webs. Ecol Lett 17:239–250.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12226 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Jackson AL, Inger R, Parnell AC, Bearhop S (2011) Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER - Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses in R. J Animal Ecol 80(3):595–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jud ZR, Layman CA (2012) Site fidelity and movement patterns of invasive lionfish, Pterois spp., in a Florida estuary. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 414:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kim SL, del Rio CM, Casper D, Koch PL (2012) Isotopic incorporation rates for shark tissues from a long-term captive feeding study. J Exp Biol 215:2495–2500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Layman CA, Winemiller KO, Arrington DA, Jepsen DB (2005) Body size and trophic position in a diverse tropical food web. Ecology 86:2530–2535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Layman CA, Arrington AD, Montan CG, Post DM (2007) Can stable isotope ratios provide for community-wide measures of trophic structure? Ecology 88:42–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Lepoint G, Michel L, Parmentier E, Frédérich B (2016) Trophic ecology of the seagrass-inhabiting footballer demoiselle Chrysiptera annulata (Peters, 1855); comparison with three other reef-associated damselfishes. Belg J Zool 146:21–32Google Scholar
  49. Lowe CG, Wetherbee BM, Crow GL, Tester AL (1996) Ontogenetic dietary shifts and feeding behavior of the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, in Hawaiian waters. Environ Biol Fishes 47:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maljković A, Côté IM (2011) Effects of tourism-related provisioning on the trophic signatures and movement patterns of an apex predator, the Caribbean reef shark. Biol Cons 144:859–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Matich P, Heithaus MR, Layman CA (2011) Contrasting patterns of individual specialization and trophic coupling in two marine apex predators. J Anim Ecol 80:294–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. McCann KS, Rasmussen J, Umbanhowar J (2005) The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs. Ecol Lett 8:513–523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. McCauley DJ, Young HS, Dunbar RB, Estes JA, Semmens BX, Micheli F (2012) Assessing the effects of large mobile predators on ecosystem connectivity. Ecol Appl 22:1711–1717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Morris J, Akins J, Barse A, Cerino D, Freshwater D, Green S, Muñoz R, Paris C, Whitfield P (2009) Biology and ecology of the invasive lionfishes, Pterois miles and Pterois volitans. In: Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, pp 409–414Google Scholar
  55. Motta F, Moura R, Francini-Filho R, Namora R (1999) Elasmobrânquios dos recifes Manoel Luıs—MA. Resumos do XIII Encontro Brasileiro de Ictiologia 1:267Google Scholar
  56. Mumby PJ, Dahlgren CP, Harborne AR, Kappel CV, Micheli F, Brumbaugh DR, Holmes KE, Mendes JM, Broad K, Sanchirico JN (2006) Fishing, trophic cascades, and the process of grazing on coral reefs. Science 311:98–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Munroe S, Simpfendorfer C, Heupel M (2014) Defining shark ecological specialisation: concepts, context, and examples. Rev Fish Biol Fish 24:317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. O’Farrell S, Bearhop S, McGill RA, Dahlgren CP, Brumbaugh DR, Mumby PJ (2014) Habitat and body size effects on the isotopic niche space of invasive lionfish and endangered Nassau grouper. Ecosphere 5:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Olin JA, Hussey NE, Fritts M, Heupel MR, Simpfendorfer CA, Poulakis GR, Fisk AT (2011) Maternal meddling in neonatal sharks: implications for interpreting stable isotopes in young animals. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 25:1008–1016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Opitz S (1996) Trophic interactions in Caribbean coral reefs. WorldFish, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  61. Pace ML, Cole JJ, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1999) Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 14:483–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Papastamatiou YP, Friedlander AM, Caselle JE, Lowe CG (2010) Long-term movement patterns and trophic ecology of blacktip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus) at Palmyra Atoll. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 386:94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Parker R, Mays R (1998) Southeastern US deepwater reef fish assemblages, habitat characteristics, catches, and life history summaries. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Scientific Publications OfficeGoogle Scholar
  64. Peterson BJ, Fry B (1987) Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:293–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pikitch EK, Chapman DD, Babcock EA, Shivji MS (2005) Habitat use and demographic population structure of elasmobranchs at a Caribbean atoll (Glover’s Reef, Belize). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 302:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Plass-Johnson J, McQuaid C, Hill J (2015) The effects of tissue type and body size on δ13C and δ15N values in parrotfish (Labridae) from Zanzibar, Tanzania. J Appl Ichthyol 31:633–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Polis GA, Sears AL, Huxel GR, Strong DR, Maron J (2000) When is a trophic cascade a trophic cascade? Trends Ecol Evol 15:473–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Post DM (2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83:703–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Prugh LR, Stoner CJ, Epps CW, Bean WT, Ripple WJ, Laliberte AS, Brashares JS (2009) The rise of the mesopredator. Bioscience 59:779–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Randall JE (1964) Contributions to the biology of the queen conch, Strombus gigas. Bull Mar Sci 14:246–295Google Scholar
  71. Randall JE (1967) Food habits of reef fishes of the West Indies. Inst Mar Biol 1967:665–673Google Scholar
  72. R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
  73. Ritchie EG, Johnson CN (2009) Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation. Ecol Lett 12:982–998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Rizzari JR, Frisch AJ, Hoey AS, McCormick MI (2014) Not worth the risk: apex predators suppress herbivory on coral reefs. Oikos 123:829–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Roff G, Doropoulos C, Rogers A, Bozec Y-M, Krueck NC, Aurellado E, Priest M, Birrell C, Mumby PJ (2016a) The ecological role of sharks on coral reefs. Trends Ecol Evol 31:395–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Roff G, Doropoulos C, Rogers A, Bozec Y-M, Krueck NC, Aurellado E, Priest M, Birrell C, Mumby PJ (2016b) Reassessing shark-driven trophic cascades on coral reefs: a reply to Ruppert et al. Trends Ecol Evol 31:587–589CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Romanuk TN, Hayward A, Hutchings JA (2011) Trophic level scales positively with body size in fishes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rosa RS, Mancini P, Caldas JP, Graham RT (2006) Carcharhinus perezi. The IUCN red list of threatened species. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 20143Google Scholar
  79. Rubenstein DR, Hobson KA (2004) From birds to butterflies: animal movement patterns and stable isotopes. Trends Ecol Evol 19:256–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Ruppert JL, Fortin M-J, Meekan MG (2016) The ecological role of sharks on coral reefs: response to Roff et al. Trends Ecol Evol 31:586–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Speed CW, Meekan MG, Field IC, McMahon CR, Abrantes K, Bradshaw CJA (2011) Trophic ecology of reef sharks determined using stable isotopes and telemetry. Coral Reefs 31:357–367.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-011-0850-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stevenson C, Katz LS, Micheli F, Block B, Heiman KW, Perle C, Weng K, Dunbar R, Witting J (2007) High apex predator biomass on remote Pacific islands. Coral Reefs 26:47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tavares RAT (2009) Fishery biology of the Caribbean reef sharks, Carcharhinus perezi (Poey, 1876), in a Caribbean insular platform: Los Roques Archipelago National Park, Venezuela. Pan Am J Aquatic Sci 4:500–512Google Scholar
  84. Terborgh J, Estes J, Paquet P, Ralls K, Boyd-Heger D, Miller B, Noss R (1999) The role of top carnivores in regulating terrestrial ecosystems. Wild Earth 9:42–56Google Scholar
  85. Tilley A, Strindberg S (2012) Population density estimation of southern stingrays Dasyatis americana on a Caribbean atoll using distance sampling. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 23(2):202–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tilley A, López-Angarita J, Turner JR (2013a) Diet reconstruction and resource partitioning of a caribbean marine mesopredator using stable isotope bayesian modelling. PLoS One 8:e79560CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. Tilley A, López-Angarita J, Turner JR (2013b) Effects of scale and habitat distribution on the movement of the southern stingray Dasyatis americana on a Caribbean atoll. MEPS 482:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vander Zanden MJ, Cabana G, Rasmussen JB (1997) Comparing trophic position of freshwater fish calculated using stable nitrogen isotope ratios (δ15N) and literature dietary data. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1142–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ward-Paige CA, Mora C, Lotze HK, Pattengill-Semmens C, McClenachan L, Arias-Castro E, Myers RA (2010) Large-scale absence of sharks on reefs in the greater-Caribbean: a footprint of human pressures. PLoS One 5:e11968CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Wetherbee BM, Cortés E, Bizzarro JJ (2004) Food consumption and feeding habits. In: Biology of sharks and their relatives. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 225–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wirsing AJ, Ripple WJ (2010) A comparison of shark and wolf research reveals similar behavioral responses by prey. Front Ecol Environ 9:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wirsing AJ, Heithaus MR, Dill LM (2007) Fear factor: do dugongs (Dugong dugon) trade food for safety from tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier)? Oecologia 153:1031–1040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark E. Bond
    • 1
    • 4
  • Jasmine Valentin-Albanese
    • 1
  • Elizabeth A. Babcock
    • 2
  • Nigel E. Hussey
    • 3
  • Michael R. Heithaus
    • 4
  • Demian D. Chapman
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Marine and Atmospheric SciencesStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA
  2. 2.Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA
  3. 3.University of Windsor-Biological SciencesWindsorCanada
  4. 4.Department of Biological SciencesFlorida International UniversityNorth MiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations