Marine Biology

, 165:12 | Cite as

Seen or heard? A comparison of visual and acoustic autonomous monitoring methods for investigating temporal variation in occurrence of southern right whales

  • William Rayment
  • Trudi Webster
  • Tom Brough
  • Tim Jowett
  • Steve Dawson
Original paper
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

Passive acoustic detectors are widely used for monitoring distribution of cetaceans. Autonomous visual methods are less frequently employed; they are limited to detections during daylight and good weather, but offer potential advantages due to certainty of species’ identification and longevity of deployment. To compare performance of acoustic and visual methods, temporal changes in distribution of southern right whales, Eubalaena australis, were monitored in the remote sub-Antarctic Auckland Islands (50°31′S, 166°16′E). A time-lapse camera was deployed for 2 years from August 2010, taking an image every 70 min. The presence of whales was scored for each image taken during daylight (n = 8295). A passive acoustic recorder was deployed in August 2011, recording for 3.75 min every hour until battery life expired after 10 months. Each recording (n = 6978) was aurally reviewed. Both methods revealed a similar seasonal distribution; maximum detection rates were in the austral winter and no whales were detected in January or February. However, at the peak of right whale occurrence, the proportion of samples with whales detected was much higher for the acoustic recorder (93.9% in August) than the time-lapse camera (14.8%). A generalised additive model fitted to the visual data revealed significant effects of sea state and visibility. Acoustic detection rates were higher, probably because detection range is greater, and less affected by weather. The solar-powered time-lapse camera system, however, functioned effectively for much longer. We discuss the relative merits of visual and acoustic detectors and attempt to draw conclusions about their efficacy for different focal species and monitoring locations.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Foundation for Research Science and Technology (FRST), the New Zealand Whale and Dolphin Trust, and the Marine Science Department at the University of Otago for funding this work. Sincere thanks also to the crew of RV Polaris II, Phil Heseltine, Anthony Davidson, Tim Cole for assistance in the field, Marta Guerra for assistance with image analysis, and New Zealand’s Department of Conservation for permitting. WR was supported by a FRST post-doctoral fellowship, and TW by a University of Otago Ph.D. scholarship. The manuscript was improved thanks to comments from two anonymous reviewers and the assistance of the editors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Research was carried out under Marine Mammal Research Permit Per/NO/2010/05 issued by the Department of Conservation to Will Rayment and Steve Dawson. The time-lapse camera was deployed on Enderby Island in compliance with High Impact, Research and Collection Permit SO-28239-RES issued by the Department of Conservation to Will Rayment. The acoustic recorder was deployed in Port Ross in compliance with Permit to Undertake Specified Study within a Marine Reserve SO-31108-MAR issued by the Department of Conservation to Trudi Webster. No ethical approvals were required.

Supplementary material

227_2017_3264_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (322 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 321 kb)
227_2017_3264_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (340 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 339 kb)
227_2017_3264_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (309 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 309 kb)
227_2017_3264_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (148 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 148 kb)

References

  1. Akamatsu T, Wang D, Wang K, Naio Y (2005) Biosonar behaviour of free-ranging porpoises. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:797–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barendse J, Best PB (2014) Shore-based observations of seasonality, movements, and group behaviour of southern right whales in a non-nursery area on the South African west coast. Mar Mamm Sci 30:1358–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow J, Taylor BL (2005) Estimates of sperm whale abundance in the northeastern temperate Pacific from a combined acoustic and visual survey. Mar Mamm Sci 21:429–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bence JR (1995) Analysis of short time series: correcting for autocorrelation. Ecology 76:628–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Best PB, Payne R, Rowntree V, Palazzo JT, Both MDC (1993) Long range movements of South Atlantic right whales Eubalaena australis. Mar Mamm Sci 9:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bridges AS, Dorcas ME (2000) Temporal variation in anuran calling behaviour: implications for surveys and monitoring programs. Copeia 2000:587–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnell SR, Bryden MM (1997) Coastal residence and reproductive timing in southern right whales, Eubalaena australis. J Zool Lond 241:613–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll EL, Patenaude NJ, Childerhouse SJ, Kraus SD, Fewster RM, Baker CS (2011) Abundance of the New Zealand subantarctic southern right whale population estimated from photo-identification and genotype mark-recapture. Mar Biol 158:2565–2575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll EL, Rayment WJ, Alexander AM, Baker CS, Patenaude NJ, Steel D, Constantine R, Cole R, Boren LJ, Childerhouse S (2014) Reestablishment of former wintering grounds by New Zealand southern right whales. Mar Mamm Sci 30:206–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cato DH, Tavener S (1997) Ambient sea noise dependence on local, regional and geostrophic wind speeds: implications for forecasting noise. Appl Acoust 51:317–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark CW (1982) The acoustic repertoire of the southern right whale, a quantitative analysis. Anim Behav 30:1060–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark CW (1983) Acoustic communication and behaviour of the southern right whale. In: Payne RS (ed) Behaviour and communication of whales. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark CW, Brown MW, Corkeron P (2010) Visual and acoustic surveys for North Atlantic right whales, Eubalaena glacialis, in Cape Cod Bay, Massachussets, 2001–2005: management implications. Mar Mamm Sci 26:837–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawbin W (1986) Right whales caught in waters around south eastern Australia and NZ during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Rep Int Whal Comm 10:261–268 (special issue) Google Scholar
  16. Dawson SM, Fletcher D, Slooten E (2013) Habitat use and conservation of an endangered dolphin. Endang Spec Res 21:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Digby A, Bell BD, Teal PD (2013) Vocal cooperation between the sexes in little spotted kiwi Apteryx owenii. Ibis 155:229–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Douglas LA, Dawson SM, Jaquet N (2005) Click rates and silences of sperm whales at Kaikoura, New Zealand. J Acoust Soc Am 118:523–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferguson MC, Barlow J, Fiedler P, Reilly SB, Gerrodette T (2006) Spatial models of delphinid (family Delphinidae) encounter rate and group size in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. Ecol Modell 193:645–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fretwell PT, Staniland IJ, Forcada J (2014) Whales from space: counting southern right whales by satellite. PLoS One 9:e88655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaskin DE (1964) Return of the southern right whale (Eubalaena australis Desm.) to New Zealand waters, 1963. Tuatara 12:115–118Google Scholar
  22. Griffin DR, Webster FA, Michael CR (1960) The echolocation of flying insects by bats. Anim Behav 8:141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman & Hall, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  24. Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kenney RD (2009) Right whales: Eubalaena glacialis, E. japonica and E. australis. In: Perrin WF, Würsig B, Thewissen JGM (eds) Encyclopedia of marine mammals. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (1982) Acoustic communication in birds. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Lammers MO, Brainard RE, Au WWL, Mooney TA, Wong KB (2008) An ecological acoustic recorder (EAR) for long-term monitoring of biological and anthropogenic sounds on coral reefs and other marine habitats. J Acoust Soc Am 123:1720–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landwehr JM, Pregibon D, Shoemaker AC (1984) Graphical methods for assessing logistic regression models. J Am Stat Assoc 79:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marques TA, Munger L, Thomas L, Wiggins S, Hildebrand JA (2011) Estimating North Pacific right whale Eubalaena japonica density using passive acoustic cue counting. Endang Species Res 13:163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matthews LP, McCordic JA, Parks SE (2014) Remote acoustic monitoring of North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) reveals seasonal and diel variations in acoustic behaviour. PLoS One 9:e91367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mellinger DK, Stafford KM, Moore SE, Dziak RP, Matsumoto H (2007a) Fixed passive acoustic observation methods for cetaceans. Oceanography 20:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mellinger DK, Nieukirk SL, Matsumotu H, Heimlich SL, Dziak RP, Haxel J, Fowler M, Meinig C, Miller HV (2007b) Seasonal occurrence of North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) vocalisations at two sites on the Scotian shelf. Mar Mamm Sci 23:856–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mills CA, Godley BJ, Hodgson DJ (2016) Take only photographs, leave only footprints: novel applications of non-invasive survey methods for rapid detection of small, arboreal animals. PLoS One 11:e0146142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morruzzi TL, Fuller TK, deGraaf RM, Brooks RT, Li W (2002) Assessing remotely triggered cameras for surveying carnivore distribution. Wildl Soc Bull 30:380–386Google Scholar
  35. Munger LM, Wiggins SM, Moore SE, Hildebrand JA (2008) North Pacific right whale (Eubalaena japonica) seasonal and diel calling patterns from long-term acoustic recordings in the southeastern Bering Sea, 2000–2006. Mar Mamm Sci 24:795–814Google Scholar
  36. Mussoline SE, Risch D, Hatch LT, Weinrich MT, Wiley DN, Thompson MA, Corkeron PJ, Van Parijs SM (2012) Seasonal and diel variation in North Atlantic right whale up-calls: implications for management and conservation in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean. Endang Species Res 17:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nieukirk SL, Stafford KM, Mellinger DK, Dziak RP, Fox CG (2004) Low-frequency whale and seismic airgun sounds recorded in the mid-Atlantic Ocean. J Acoust Soc Am 115:1832–1843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nuuttila HK, Courtene-Jones W, Baulch S, Simon M, Evans PGH (2017) Don’t forget the porpoise: acoustic monitoring reveals fine scale temporal variation between bottlenose dolphin and harbour porpoise in Cardigan Bay SAC. Mar Biol 164:50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oleson EM, Calambokidis J, Barlow J, Hildebrand JA (2007) Blue whale visual and acoustic encounter rates in the southern California Bight. Mar Mamm Sci 23:574–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paiva EG, Salgado-Kent C, Gagnon MM, Parnum I, McCauley R (2015) An assessment of the effectiveness of high definition cameras as remote monitoring tools for dolphin ecology studies. PLoS One 10:e0126165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parks SE, Tyack PL (2005) Sound production by North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) in surface active groups. J Acoust Soc Am 117:3297–3306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parks SE, Hamilton PK, Kraus SD, Tyack PL (2005) The gunshot sound produced by male North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) and its potential function in reproductive advertisement. Mar Mamm Sci 21:458–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Patenaude NJ (2000) Southern right whales wintering in the Auckland Islands. Conservation advisory science notes no. 321, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  44. Patenaude NJ, Baker CS (2001) Population status and habitat use of southern right whales in the Subantarctic Auckland Islands of New Zealand. J Cetacean Res Manag Spec Issue 10:111–116Google Scholar
  45. Payne R (1986) Long term behavioural studies of the southern right whale (Eubalaena australis). Rep Int Whal Commn 10:161–167 (special issue) Google Scholar
  46. Pirotta E, Matthiopoulos J, MacKenzie M, Scott-Hayward L, Rendell L (2011) Modelling sperm whale habitat preference: a novel approach combining transect and follow data. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 436:257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rayment W, Dawson S, Slooten L (2010) Use of T-PODs for acoustic monitoring of Cephalorhynchus dolphins: a case study with Hector’s dolphins in a marine protected area. Endang Species Res 10:333–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rayment W, Dawson S, Scali S, Slooten L (2011) Listening for a needle in a haystack: passive acoustic detection of dolphins at very low densities. Endang Species Res 14:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rayment W, Davidson A, Dawson S, Slooten E, Webster T (2012) Distribution of southern right whales on the Auckland Islands calving grounds. NZ J Mar Fresh Res 46:431–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rayment W, Dawson S, Webster T (2015) Breeding status affects fine-scale habitat selection of southern right whales on their wintering grounds. J Biogeog 42:463–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Richards R (2002) Southern right whales: a reassessment of their former distribution and migration routes in New Zealand waters, including on the Kermadec grounds. J Roy Soc NZ 32:355–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Riede K (1993) Monitoring biodiversity: analysis of Amazonian rainforest sounds. Ambio 2:546–548Google Scholar
  53. Širović A, Hildebrand JA, Wiggins SM, McDonald MA, Moore SE, Thiele D (2004) Seasonality of blue and fin whale calls and the influence of sea ice in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Deep Sea Res II 51:2327–2344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Širović A, Hildebrand JA, Wiggins SM (2007) Blue and fin whale call source levels and propagation range in the Southern Ocean. J Acoust Soc Am 122:1208–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Soldevilla MS, Henderson EE, Campbell GS, Wiggins SM, Hildebrand JA, Roch MA (2008) Classification of Risso’s and Pacific white-sided dolphins using spectral properties of echolocation clicks. J Acoust Soc Am 124:609–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Soldevilla MS, Rice AN, Clark CW, Garrison LP (2014) Passive acoustic monitoring on the North Atlantic right whale calving ground. Endang Species Res 25:115–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stafford KM, Nieukirk SL, Fox CG (1999) Low-frequency whale sounds recorded on hydrophones moored in the eastern tropical Pacific. J Acoust Soc Am 106:3687–3698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Swiston KA, Mennill DJ (2009) Comparison of manual and automated methods for identifying target sounds in audio recordings of pileated, pale-billed, and putative ivory-billed woodpeckers. J Field Ornithol 80:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2.15.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 18 May 2015
  60. Torres L, Read A, Halpin P (2008) Fine scale habitat modelling of a top predator: do prey data improve predictive capacity? Ecol Appl 18:1702–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Urick RJ (1967) Principles of underwater sound for engineers. Tata McGraw-Hill EducationGoogle Scholar
  62. Van Opzeeland I, Kindermann L, Boebel O, Van Parijs SM (2008) Insights into the acoustic behaviour of polar pinnipeds: current knowledge and emerging techniques of study. In: Weber EA, Krause LH (eds) Animal Behaviour: new research. Nova Science Publishers, HauppageGoogle Scholar
  63. Van Parijs SM, Clark CW, Sousa-Lima RS, Parks SE, Rankin S, Risch D, Van Opzeeland IC (2009) Management and research applications of real-time and archival passive acoustic sensors over varying temporal and spatial scales. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 395:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Verfuß UK, Honnef CG, Medding A, Dahne M, Mundry R, Benke H (2007) Geographical and seasonal variation of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) presence in the German Baltic Sea revealed by passive acoustic monitoring. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 87:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Waddle JH, Thigpen TF, Glorioso BM (2009) Efficacy of automatic vocalization recognition software for anuran monitoring. Herpetol Conserv Biol 4:384–388Google Scholar
  66. Webster T (2014) Southern right whales (Eubalaena australis): acoustic behaviour and ambient noise. Ph.D. thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  67. Webster TA, Dawson SM, Rayment WJ, Parks SE, Van Parijs SM (2016) Quantitative analysis of the acoustic repertoire of southern right whales in New Zealand. J Acoust Soc Am 140:322–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wells KD (1977) The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25:666–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wood SN (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J Roy Stat Soc B 73:3–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wood S, Wood MS (2017) Package ‘mgcv’. R package version, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  71. Yee TW, Mitchell ND (1991) Generalized additive models in plant ecology. J Veg Sci 2:587–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zoidis AM, Smultea MA, Frankel AS, Hopkins JL, Day A, McFarland AS, Whitt AD, Fertl D (2008) Vocalisations produced by humpback whale calves recorded in Hawaii. J Acoust Soc Am 123:1737–1746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marine ScienceUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Otago MuseumDunedinNew Zealand
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations