Marine Biology

, 164:139 | Cite as

Allelopathic effects on the sun-coral invasion: facilitation, inhibition and patterns of local biodiversity

  • Damián MizrahiEmail author
  • Suelen F. Pereira
  • Sergio A. Navarrete
  • Augusto A. V. Flores
Original paper


In spite of growing concerns about the invasion of the sun-coral Tubastraea coccinea along the tropical Southwestern Atlantic, the biological interactions mediating this species’ establishment and spread are largely unknown. Here, we identified species associations with T. coccinea by comparing community structure between invaded and non-invaded areas at Búzios Island, SP, Brazil. We also investigated effects of chemical cues from representative benthic species on sun-coral larval performance in the laboratory and quantified the density of sun-coral recruits across different microhabitats in the field. Field surveys showed that the invasion of the sun-coral is more intense at reef areas of higher species richness and diversity, putting at risk a higher number of native species than anticipated and suggesting that local richness offers little resistance to invasion. Highest density of T. coccinea recruits observed on the least bioactive encrusting corallines suggests this taxonomic group may constitute doorways to the establishment of this coral. In contrast, field patterns of sun-coral colonies and recruits, as well as laboratory trials, suggest that cnidarian-dominated habitats represent obstacles to the sun-coral invasion. Thus, while areas dominated by the snowflake coral Carijoa riisei—which showed the greatest negative allelopathic effect on T. coccinea—likely provide resistance to the invader spreading, areas covered by encrusting coralline algae and ‘barren substrates’ probably facilitate its establishment. Because these latter, less-structured microhabitats often prevail after disturbance, damage assessment following human-mediated impacts should include detection and control of sun-coral populations.



We are grateful to the technical staff of the CEBIMar/USP, especially Alex Monteiro, Joseilto Medeiros de Oliveira and Elso Alves da Silva for their support in field surveys and laboratory experiments. Thanks are also due to Rafael Duarte, Fernando Freitas, Pedro Guerra, Fernando Hidalgo, Inês Leal, Karine Nascimento, Marcelo V. Kitahara, Alvaro E. Migotto, Gustavo M. Dias, Soledad Lopez, Carla Zilberberg and Samuel Faria for their comments and advice in all stages of this study. Two anonymous reviewers provided very helpful comments and criticism which greatly improved the paper. Financial support was provided by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, as a research grant to AAVF (CNPq 400614/2014-6), the International Collaboration Program PC-PEG (Programa de Estudante—Convênio de Pós-Graduação), promoted by CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), through a PhD fellowship to DM, and by the Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, through a visiting scientist grant conceded to SAN (FAPESP # 2012/0519-3). This is a contribution of the Research Centre for Marine Biodiversity of the University of São Paulo (NP-Biomar/USP).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

227_2017_3164_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (448 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 447 kb)
227_2017_3164_MOESM2_ESM.jpg (508 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (jpg 508 kb)
227_2017_3164_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (832 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 831 kb)


  1. Babcock RC, Davies P (1991) Effects of sedimentation on settlement of Acropora millepora. Coral Reefs 9:205–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Briand JC (2009) Marine antifouling laboratory bioassays: an overview of their diversity. Biofouling 25:297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruno JF, Witman JD (1996) Defense mechanisms of scleractinian cup corals against overgrowth by colonial invertebrates. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 207:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cairns SD (2000) A revision of the shallow-water azooxanthellate Scleractinia of the Western Atlantic. Stud Nat Hist Caribb 75:1–240Google Scholar
  5. Castro CB, Pires D (2001) Brazilian coral reefs: what we already know and what is still missing. Bull Mar Sci 69:357–371Google Scholar
  6. Concepcion GT, Kahng SE, Crepeau MW (2010) Resolving natural ranges and marine invasions in a globally distributed octocoral (genus Carijoa). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 401:113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornell HV, Lawton JH (1992) Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities—a theoretical perspective. J Anim Ecol 61:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Creed JC (2006) Two invasive alien azooxanthellate corals, Tubastraea coccinea and Tubastraea tagusensis, dominate the native zooxanthellate Mussismilia hispida in Brazil. Coral Reefs 25:350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Creed JC, Fenner F, Sammarco P, Cairns S, Capel K, Junqueira AOR, Cruz I, Miranda RJ, Carlos-Junior L, Mantelatto MC, Oigman-Pszczol S (2017) The invasion of the azooxanthellate coral Tubastraea (Scleractinia: Dendrophylliidae) throughout the world: history, pathways and vectors. Biol Invasions 19(1):283–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Da Gama BAP, Pereira RC, Soares AR, Teixeira VL, Yonheshigue-Valentin Y (2003) Is the mussel test a good indicator of antifouling activity? A comparison between laboratory and field assays. Biofouling 19:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies FK, Chesson P, Harrison S, Inouye BD, Melbourne BA, Rice JK (2005) Spatial heterogeneity explains the scale dependence of the native–exotic diversity relationship. Ecology 86(6):1602–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Nys R, Steinberg PD, Willemsen P, Dworjanyn SA, Gabalish CL, King RJ (1995) Broad spectrum effects of secondary metabolites from the red alga Delisea pulchra in antifouling assays. Biofouling 8:259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Paula A (2007) Biologia reprodutiva, crescimento e competição dos corais invasores Tubastraea coccínea e Tubastraea tagusensis (Scleractinia: Dendrophylliidae) com espécies nativas. PhD dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  14. Dethier MN (1994) The ecology of intertidal algal crusts: variation within a functional group. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 177:37–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dhivya P, Sachithanandam V, Mohan PM (2012) New record of Carijoa riisei at Wandoor-Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park [MGMNP], Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Indian. J Geo Mar Sci 41:212–214Google Scholar
  16. Doropoulos C, Ward S, Roff G, Gonzalez-Rivero M, Mumby PJ (2015) Linking demographic processes of juvenile corals to benthic recovery trajectories in two common reef habitats. PLoS One 10:e0128535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128535 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dworjanyn SA (2001) Chemically mediated antifouling and the cost of producing secondary metabolites in a marine alga. PhD dissertation, University of New South WalesGoogle Scholar
  18. Dworjanyn SA, De Nys R, Steinberg PD (1999) Localization and surface quantification of secondary metabolites in the red alga Delisea pulchra. Mar Biol 133:727–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edmunds PJ (2000) Recruitment of scleractinians onto the skeletons of corals killed by black band disease. Coral Reefs 19:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferreira CEL, Floeter SR, Gasparini JL, Ferreira BP, Joyeux JC (2012) Trophic structure patterns of Brazilian reef fishes: a latitudinal comparison. J Biogeogr 31:1093–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fridley JD, Stachowicz JJ, Naeem S, Sax DF, Seabloom EW, Smith MD, Stohlgren J, Tilman D, VonHolle B (2007) The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 88:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghilardi NP (2007) Utilização do método dos povoamentos na caracterização de comunidades bentônicas em trecho do infralitoral consolidado da Enseada das Palmas, Ilha Anchieta, Ubatuba (SP). PhD dissertation, Universidade de São PauloGoogle Scholar
  24. Glynn PW, Colley SB, Maté JL, Cortés J, Guzman HM, Bailey RL, Feingold JS, Enochs IC (2008) Reproductive ecology of the azooxanthellate coral Tubastraea coccinea in the Equatorial Eastern Pacific: Part V Dendrophylliidae. Mar Biol 153:529–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grigg RW (2003) Invasion of a deep black coral bed by an alien species, Carijoa riisei, off Maui, Hawaii. Coral Reefs 22:121–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hadfield MG, Paul VJ (2001) Natural chemical cues for settlement and metamorphosis of marine invertebrate larvae. In: McClintock JB, Baker BJ (eds) Marine chemical ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 431–461Google Scholar
  27. Hart SP, Burgin JR, Marshall DJ (2012) Revisiting competition in a classic model system using formal links between theory and data. Ecology 93:2015–2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hay ME, Piel J, Boland W, Schnitzler I (1998) Seaweed sex pheromones and their degradation products frequently suppress amphipod feeding but rarely suppress sea urchin feeding. Chemocology 8:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heyward A, Negri A (1999) Natural inducers for coral larval metamorphosis. Coral Reefs 18:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hodgson G (1990) Sediment and the settlement of larvae of the reef coral Pocillopora damicornis. Coral Reefs 9:41–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kohler KE, Gill SM (2006) Coral point count with excel extensions (CPCe): a Visual Basic program for the determination of coral and substrate coverage using random point count methodology. Comp Geosci 32:1259–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lages BG, Beatriz GF, Rezende CM, Pinto AC, Creed JC (2010) Chemical composition and release in situ due to injury of the invasive coral Tubastraea (Cnidaria, Scleractinia). Braz J Oceanogr 58:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lages BG, Fleury BG, Hovell AMC, Rezende CM, Pinto AC, Creed JC (2012) Proximity to competitors changes secondary metabolites of non-indigenous cup corals, Tubastraea sp., in the southwest Atlantic. Mar Biol 159:1551–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lapointe BE, Bedford BJ, Littler MM, Littler DS (2007) Shifts in coral overgrowth by sponges and algae. Coral Reefs 26:515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Linares C, Cebrian E, Coma R (2012) Effects of turf algae on recruitment and juvenile survival of gorgonian corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 452:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maia LF, Epifanio RD, Fenical W (2000) New cytotoxic sterol glycosides from the octocoral Carijoa (Telesto) riisei. J Nat Prod 63:1427–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mantelatto MC, Mourão GG, Migotto AE, Creed JC (2011) Range expansion of the invasive corals Tubastraea coccinea and Tubastraea tagusensis in the Southwest Atlantic. Coral Reefs 30:397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Melbourne BA, Cornell HV, Davies KF, Dugaw CJ, Elmendorf S, Freestone AL, Hall RJ, Harrison S, Hastings A, Holland M, Holyoak M, Lambrinos J, Moore K, Yokomizo H (2007) Invasion in a heterogeneous world: resistance, coexistence or hostile takeover? Ecol Lett 10:77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meurer BC, Lages NS, Pereira AO, Palhano S, Magalhães GM (2010) First record of native species of sponge overgrowing invasive corals Tubastraea coccinea and Tubastraea tagusensis in Brazil. Mar Biodivers Rec 3:e62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mizrahi D (2008) Influência da temperatura e luminosidade na distribuição da espécie invasora Tubastraea coccinea na região de ressurgência de Arraial do Cabo, RJ. Brasil. MSc dissertation, Universidade Federal do Estado de Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  41. Mizrahi D, Navarrete SA, Flores AAV (2014a) Groups travel further: pelagic metamorphosis and polyp clustering allow higher dispersal potential in sun-coral propagules. Coral Reefs 33:443–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mizrahi D, Navarrete AS, Flores AAV (2014b) Uneven abundance of the invasive sun-coral over habitat patches of different orientation: an outcome of larval or later benthic processes? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 452:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mizrahi D, Kitahara MV, Barbosa ACC, Flores AAV (2016) Possible interference competition involving established fish and a sun-coral incursion. Mar Biodiv. doi: 10.1007/s12526-016-0477-2 Google Scholar
  44. Moreira TSG, Creed JC (2012) Invasive, non-indigenous corals in a tropical rocky shore environment: no evidence for generalist predation. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 438:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morse ANC (1992) Role of algae in the recruitment of marine invertebrate larvae. In: John DM, Hawkins SJ, Price HH (eds) Plant-animal interactions in the marine benthos. Systematics Association Special Publication. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 385–403Google Scholar
  46. Morse ANC, Morse DE (1984) Recruitment and metamorphosis of Haliotis larvae induced by molecules uniquely available at the surfaces of crustose red algae. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 75:191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Munro MHG, Blunt JW, Barns G, Battershill CN, Lake RJ, Perry NB (1989) Biological activity in New Zealand marine organisms. Pure Appl Chem 61:529–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nylund GM, Gribben PE, de Nys R, Steinberg PD, Pavia H (2007) Surface chemistry versus whole-cell extracts: antifouling tests with seaweed metabolites. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 329:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Padilla DK (2001) Food and environmental cues trigger an inducible offence. Evol Ecol Res 3:15–25Google Scholar
  50. Padmakumar K, Chandran R, Kumar JSY (2011) Carijoa riisei (Cnidaria: Octocorallia: Clavulariidae), a newly observed threat to Gulf of Mannar coral biodiversity? Curr Sci India 100:35–37Google Scholar
  51. Paula A, Creed JC (2005) Spatial distribution and abundance of non-indigenous coral genus Tubastraea (Cnidaria, Scleractinia) around Ilha Grande, Brazil. Braz J Biol 65:661–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pineda J, Caswell H (1997) The dependence of settlement rate on substrate area. Mar Biol 129:541–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reimão JQ, Migotto AE, Kossuga Miriam H (2008) Antiprotozoan activity of Brazilian marine cnidarian extracts and of a modified steroid from the octocoral Carijoa riisei. Parasitol Res 103:1445–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Robles-Centeno PO, Ballantine DL, Gerwick WH (1996) Dynamics of antibacterial activity in three species of Caribbean marine algae as a function of habitat and life history. Hydrobiologia 326(327):457–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sampaio CLS, Miranda RJ, Maia-Nogueira R, de Anchieta CC, Nunes J (2012) New occurrences of the nonindigenous orange cup corals Tubastraea coccinea and T. tagusensis (Scleractinia: Dendrophylliidae) in Southwestern Atlantic. Check List 8:528–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanchez JA, Ballesteros D (2014) The invasive snowflake coral (Carijo ariisei) in the Tropical Eastern Pacific, Colombia. Rev Biol Trop 62:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stachowicz JJ, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW (1999) Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 286:1577–1579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Steinbeck JR, Schiel DR, Foster MS (2005) Detecting long-term change in complex communities: a case study from the rocky intertidal zone. Ecol Appl 15:1813–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Steneck RS (1997) Crustose corallines, other algal functional groups, herbivores and sediments: complex interactions along reef productivity gradients. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp. Panama 1:695–700Google Scholar
  61. Tamburri M, Finelli C, Wethey D, Zimmer-Faust R (1996) Chemical induction of larval settlement behavior in flow. Biol Bull 191(3):367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Terauds A, Chown SL, Bergstrom DM (2011) Spatial scale and species identity influence the indigenous-alien diversity relationship in springtails. Ecology 92:1436–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Uriz MJ, Martin D, Turon X, Ballesteros E, Hughes R, Acebal C (1991) An approach to the ecological significance of chemically mediated bioactivity in Mediterranean benthic communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 70:175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vermeij MJA, Fogarty ND, Miller MW (2006) Pelagic conditions affect larval behavior, survival, and settlement patterns in the Caribbean coral Montastraea faveolata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 310:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vermeij MJA, Dailer ML, Walsh SM, Donovan MK, Smith CM (2010) The effects of trophic interactions and spatial competition on algal community composition on Hawaiian coral reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 31:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vieira EA, Duarte LAF, Dias GM (2012) How the timing of predation affects composition and diversity of species in a marine sessile community? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 412:126–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wagner D, Kahng SE, Toonen RJ (2009) Observations on the life history and feeding ecology of a specialized nudibranch predator (Phyllodesmium poindimiei), with implications for biocontrol of an invasive octocoral (Carijoa riisei) in Hawaii. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 372:64–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. White LF, Shurin J (2007) Diversity effects on invasion vary with life history stage in marine macroalgae. Oikos 116:1193–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Whittaker RH, Feeny PP (1971) Allelochemics: Chemical interactions between species. Science 171:757–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Witman JD, Etter RJ, Smith F (2004) The relationship between regional and local species diversity in marine benthic communities: a global perspective. Proc Nat Acad Sci 101:15664–15669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zimmer-Faust RK, Tamburri MN (1994) Chemical identity and ecological implications of a water-borne, larval settlement cue. Limnol Oceanogr 39:1075–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Damián Mizrahi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Suelen F. Pereira
    • 2
  • Sergio A. Navarrete
    • 3
    • 4
  • Augusto A. V. Flores
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade de São Paulo, Centro de Biologia Marinha (CEBIMar/USP)São SebastiãoBrazil
  2. 2.Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências (IB/USP)São PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Estación Costera de Investigaciones Marinas, Las Cruces, Center for Marine Conservation, LincGlobalPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
  4. 4.Departamento de Ecología, Center for Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES)Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations