Advertisement

Marine Biology

, 164:92 | Cite as

Influence of mesoscale oceanographic features on pelagic food webs in the Gulf of Mexico

  • R. J. David Wells
  • Jay R. Rooker
  • Antonietta Quigg
  • Björn Wissel
Original Paper

Abstract

This study examined the influence of mesoscale oceanographic features (anticyclonic; warm core and cyclonic; cold core) on offshore pelagic food webs in the Gulf of Mexico. Mean total biomass (wet weight) of all consumers was significantly higher in samples collected within cyclonic features (mean 3.78 g per 10 min tow) than anticyclonic features (mean 0.51 g per 10 min tow) during each survey date. Using stable isotope ratios of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N), we contrasted the two main primary producers in this ecosystem: phytoplankton (based on particulate organic matter, POM) and Sargassum spp. over a 2-year period. In addition, consumers (zooplankton, six invertebrate species, and eight fish species) collected in upper surface waters were analyzed for δ13C and δ15N. Both producers and ten of the fifteen consumer species had significantly enriched 15N in cyclonic relative to anticyclonic features in year one and each of the six selected ‘model taxa’ collected during both years showed this same pattern. Model taxa included POM, Sargassum spp., zooplankton, glass shrimp (Leander tenuicornis), Sargassum crab (Portunus sayi), and blackwing flyingfish (Hirundichthys rondeleti). δ13C values were more variable and dependent upon feature and survey date. Contributions for the two primary producers were estimated using a two-source Bayesian mixing model. Results support equal contributions of organic matter from phytoplankton and Sargassum spp. to consumers, but estimates were species and feature dependent and nitrogen-fixing Trichodesmium was likely important. For example, contribution estimates of Sargassum-derived organic matter to zooplankton in anticyclonic features ranged from 68 to 76%, in contrast to cyclonic features that varied from 29 to 83%. This study highlights the differences in δ13C and δ15N among producers and consumers collected within mesoscale oceanographic features in the Gulf of Mexico and demonstrates the need to obtain feature-dependent baseline estimates for calculating contribution estimates using stable isotope mixing models.

Keywords

Feeding ecology Pelagic food web δ13δ15Stable isotopes Eddies Loop current 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to staff and students at Texas A&M University at Galveston and the crew of the Lady Bride. In particular, A. Schultze, L. Wetmore, and S. Dorado for assistance in the field and laboratory. We also appreciate the valuable suggestions and feedback from the handling associate editor and two anonymous reviewers that improved the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

This project was funded by the McDaniel Charitable Foundation. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  1. Bakun A (2006) Fronts and eddies as key structures in the habitat of marine fish larvae: opportunity, adaptive response and competitive advantage. Sci Mar 70S2:105–122Google Scholar
  2. Biggs DC (1992) Nutrients, plankton, and productivity in a warm-core ring in the western Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 97:2143–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biggs DC, Vastano AC, Ossinger RA, Gil-Zurita A, Perez-Franco A (1988) Multidisciplinary study of warm and cold-core rings in the Gulf of Mexico. Mem Soc Cienc Nat La Salle, Venezuela. 48:12–31Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter EJ, Harvey HR, Fry B, Capone DG (1997) Biogeochemical tracers of the marine cyanobacterium Trichodesmium. Deep Sea Res Part I 44:27–38Google Scholar
  5. Chesney EJ, Baltz DM, Thomas RG (2000) Louisiana estuarine and coastal fisheries and habitats: perspectives from a fish’s eye view. Ecol Appl 10:350–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1978) Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 42:495–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Denman KL, Gargett AE (1983) Time and space scales of vertical mixing and advection of phytoplankton in the upper ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 28:801–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dorado S, Rooker JR, Wissel B, Quigg A (2012) Isotope baseline shifts in pelagic food webs of the Gulf of Mexico. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 464:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliott BA (1982) Anticyclonic rings in the Gulf of Mexico. J Phys Oceanogr 12:1292–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forristall GZ, Schaudt KJ, Cooper CK (1992) Evolution and kinematics of a Loop Current eddy in the Gulf of Mexico during 1985. J Geophys Res 97:2173–2184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fry B, Sherr EB (1984) δ13C measurements as indicators of carbon flow in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Contrib. Mar Sci 27:13–47Google Scholar
  12. Godo OR, Samuelsen A, Macaulay GJ, Patel R, Hjollo SS, Horne J, Kaartvedt S, Johannessen JA (2012) Mesoscale eddies are oases for higher trophic marine life. PLoS One 7(1):e30161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamilton P (1992) Lower continental slope cyclonic eddies in the central Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 97:2185–2200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holl CM, Villareal TA, Payne CD, Clayton TD, Hart CM, Montoya JP (2007) Trichodesmium in the western Gulf of Mexico: 15N2-fixation and natural abundance stable isotopic evidence. Limnol Oceanogr 52:2249–2259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hussey NE, MacNeil MA, McMeans BC, Olin JA, Dudley SFJ, Cliff G, Wintner SP, Fennessy ST, Fisk AT (2014) Rescaling the trophic structure of marine food webs. Ecol Lett 17:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leben RL, Born GH, Engebreth BR (2002) Operational altimeter data processing for mesoscale monitoring. Mar Geod 25(1–2):3–18Google Scholar
  17. Lima ID, Olson DB, Doney SC (2002) Biological response to frontal dynamics and mesoscale variability in oligotrophic environments: biological production and community structure. J Geophys Res 107(C8):3111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lindo-Atichati D, Bringas F, Goni G, Muhling B, Muller-Karger FE, Habtes S (2012) Varying mesoscale structures influence larval fish distribution in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 463:245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McGillicuddy DJ Jr, Johnson R, Siegel DA, Michaels AF, Bates NR, Knap AH (1999) Mescoscale variations of biogeochemical properties in the Sargasso Sea. J Geophys Res 104(C6):13381–13394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moncrieff CA, Sullivan MJ (2001) Trophic importance of epiphytic algae in subtropical seagrass beds: evidence from multiple stable isotope analyses. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 215:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morrison JM, Merrel WJ, Key RM, Key TC (1983) Property distributions and deep chemical measurements within the western Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 88:2601–2608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muhling BA, Beckley LE, Olivar MP (2007) Ichthyoplankton assemblage structure in two meso-scale Leeuwin Current eddies, eastern Indian Ocean. Deep Sea Res Part II 54:1113–1128Google Scholar
  23. Mulholland MR, Bernhardt PW, Heil CA, Bronk DA, O’Neil JM (2006) Nitrogen fixation and release of fixed nitrogen by Trichodesmium spp. in the Gulf of Mexico. Limnol Oceanogr 51:1762–1776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parnell A, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL (2010) Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too much variation. PLoS One 5(3):e9672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson BJ, Fry B (1987) Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:293–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Post DM, Layman CA, Arrington DA, Takimoto G, Quattrochi J, Montana CG (2007) Getting to the fat of the matter: models, methods and assumptions for dealing with lipids in stable isotope analyses. Oecologia 152:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richards WJ, McGowan MF, Leming T, Lamkin JT, Kelley S (1993) Larval fish assemblages at the Loop Current boundary in the Gulf of Mexico. Bull Mar Sci 53:475–537Google Scholar
  28. Rooker JR, Turner JP, Holt SA (2006) Trophic ecology of Sargassum-associated fishes in the Gulf of Mexico determined from stable isotopes and fatty acids. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 313:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rooker JR, Simms JR, Wells RJD, Holt SA, Holt GJ, Graves JE, Furey NB (2012) Distribution and habitat associations of billfish and swordfish larvae across mesoscale features in the Gulf of Mexico. PLoS One 7(4):e34180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seki MP, Polovina JJ, Brainard RE, Bidigare RR, Leonard CL, Foley DG (2001) Biological enhancement at cyclonic eddies tracked with GOES thermal imagery in Hawaiian waters. Geophys Res Lett 28:1583–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sturges W, Leben R (2000) Frequency of ring separations from the Loop Current in the Gulf of Mexico: a revised estimate. J Phys Oceanogr 30:1814–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Teo SLH, Boustany AM, Block BA (2007) Oceanographic preferences of Atlantic bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus, on their Gulf of Mexico breeding grounds. Mar Biol 152:1105–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vander Zanden MJ, Rasmussen JB (2001) Variation in δ15N and δ13C trophic fractionation: implications for aquatic food web studies. Limnol Oceanogr 46:2061–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vanderklift MA, Ponsard S (2003) Sources of variation in consumer-diet δ15N enrichment: a meta-analysis. Oecologia 136:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vonk JA, Middelburg JJ, Stapel J, Bouma TJ (2008) Dissolved organic nitrogen uptake by seagrasses. Limnol Oceanogr 53:542–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vukovich FM, Crissman BW (1986) Aspects of warm rings in the Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 91:2645–2660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waite AM, Muhling BA, Holl CM, Beckley LE, Montoya JP, Strzelecki J, Thompson PA, Pesant S (2007) Food web structure in two counter-rotating eddies based on δ15N and δ13C isotopic analyses. Deep Sea Res Part II 54:1055–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wells RJD, Rooker JR (2009) Feeding ecology of pelagic fish larvae and juveniles in slope waters of the Gulf of Mexico. J Fish Biol 75:1719–1732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams AK, McInnes AS, Rooker JR, Quigg A((2015) Changes in microbial plankton assemblages induced by mesoscale oceanographic features in the northern Gulf of Mexico. PLoS One 10(9):e0138230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wissel B, Gace A, Fry B (2005) Tracing river influences on phytoplankton dynamics in two Louisiana estuaries. Ecology 86:2751–2762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Woodland RJ, Holland DP, Beardall J, Smith J, Scicluna T, Cook PLM (2013) Assimilation of diazotrophic nitrogen into pelagic food webs. PLoS One 8(6):e67588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067588 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zimmerman RA, Biggs DC (1999) Patterns of distribution of sound scattering zooplankton in warm and cold-core eddies in the Gulf of Mexico, from a narrow acoustic Doppler current profile survey. J Geophys Res 104:5251–5262CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. J. David Wells
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jay R. Rooker
    • 1
    • 2
  • Antonietta Quigg
    • 1
    • 3
  • Björn Wissel
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Marine BiologyTexas A&M University at GalvestonGalvestonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Wildlife and Fisheries SciencesTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.Department of OceanographyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiologyUniversity of ReginaReginaCanada

Personalised recommendations