Marine Biology

, 164:76 | Cite as

Articulated coralline algae provide a spatial refuge to juvenile sea urchins from predatory crabs

  • Dara S. Yiu
  • Colette J. FeehanEmail author


Coralline algae provide settlement cues, food, and biotic structure for benthic marine invertebrates in intertidal and subtidal habitats. Here, we present evidence from laboratory experiments that juvenile sea urchins Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (1.0–3.0 mm test diameter) are chemically attracted to articulated coralline algae Corallina vancouveriensis in the San Juan Archipelago (Washington, USA), resulting in movement of sea urchins into the algae. This behavior significantly reduced sea urchin mortality in the presence of predatory crabs Pagurus spp. and Cancer oregonensis as compared to treatments with no algae. In addition, we tested predation rates of various benthic predators from intertidal and subtidal habitats, and found that crabs were the most voracious predators of juvenile sea urchins. Our results indicate that C. vancouveriensis provides a spatial refuge to juvenile sea urchins from predatory crabs, and may facilitate recruitment into sea urchin populations by enhancing juvenile survival.


Hermit Crab Coralline Alga Test Diameter Benthic Marine Invertebrate Spatial Refuge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank K. Dobkowski, M. Dethier, and T. Mumford for assistance with the collection of experimental organisms, A. Summers for providing laboratory facilities for experiments with O. maculatus, M. Van de Brooke and J. Huie for laboratory assistance, and Friday Harbor Laboratories for facilities access and logistical support. J. Ching provided the illustration in Fig. 1b. T. Carrier, K. Filbee-Dexter and 2 anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on the manuscript. DSY received funding from the Mary Gates Endowment. CJF was supported by a Friday Harbor Laboratories Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest, that all animals have been sampled and treated according to national legislation, and that all required permissions have been obtained.


  1. Andrew NL (1991) Changes in subtidal habitat following mass mortality of sea urchins in Botany Bay, New South Wales. Aust J Ecol 16:353–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balch T, Scheibling RE (2001) Larval supply, settlement and recruitment in echinoderms. In: Jangoux M, Lawrence JM (eds) Echinoderm studies 6, pp 1–83Google Scholar
  3. Bouma JV, Rothaus DP, Straus KM, Vadopalas B, Friedman CS (2012) Low juvenile Pinto abalone Haliotis kamtschatkana kamtschatkana abundance in the San Juan Archipelago, Washington State. T Am Fish Soc 141:76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clemente S, Hernández JC, Montano-Moctezuma C, Russell MP, Ebert TA (2013) Predators of juvenile sea urchins and the effect of habitat refuges. Mar Biol 160:579–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duggins DO (1983) Starfish predation and the creation of mosaic patterns in a kelp-dominated community. Ecology 64:1610–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dumont C, Himmelman JH, Russell MP (2004) Size-specific movement of green sea urchins Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis on urchin barrens in eastern Canada. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 276:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisenlord ME, Groner ML, Yoshioka RM, Elliott J, Maynard J, Fradkin S, Turner M, Pyne K, Rivlin N, van Hooidonk R, Harvell CD (2016) Ochre star mortality during the 2014 wasting disease epizootic: role of population size structure and temperature. Phil Trans R Soc B 371:20150212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Estes JA, Peterson CH, Steneck RS (2010) Some effects of apex predators in higher-latitude coastal oceans. In: Terborgh J, Estes JA (eds) Trophic cascades: predators, prey, and the changing dynamics of nature. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 37–53Google Scholar
  9. Fagerli CW, Norderhaug KM, Christie HC, Pedersen MF, Fredriksen S (2014) Predators of the destructive sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis on the Norwegian coast. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 502:207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feehan CJ, Scheibling RE (2014) Effects of sea urchin disease on coastal marine ecosystems. Mar Biol 161:1467–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feehan CJ, Francis FT, Scheibling RE (2014) Harbouring the enemy: kelp holdfasts protect juvenile sea urchins from predatory crabs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 514:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Filbee-Dexter K, Scheibling RE (2014) Sea urchin barrens as alternative stable states of collapsed kelp ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 495:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hereu B, Zabala M, Linares C, Sala E (2005) The effects of predator abundance and habitat structural complexity on survival of juvenile urchins. Mar Biol 146:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hereu B, Linares C, Sala E, Garrabou J, Garcia-Rubies A, Diaz D, Zabala M (2012) Multiple processes regulate long-term population dynamics of sea urchins on Mediterranean rocky reefs. PLoS One 7:e36901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hewson I et al (2014) Densovirus associated with sea-star wasting disease and mass mortality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:17278–17283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Himmelman JH (1986) Population biology of green sea urchins on rocky barrens. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 33:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Himmelman JH, Steele DH (1971) Foods and predators of the green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in Newfoundland waters. Mar Biol 9:315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keats DW, South GR, Steele DH (1985) Ecology of juvenile green sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) at an urchin dominated sublittoral site in eastern Newfoundland. Proc 5th Int Echinoderm Conf, Galway, 24–29 September 1984. Balkema Press, Rotterdam, pp 295–302Google Scholar
  19. Lawrence JM (2013) Edible sea urchins: biology and ecology. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  20. McNaught DC (1999) The indirect effects of macroalgae and micropredation on the post- settlement success of the green sea urchin in Maine. PhD dissertation, University of Maine, OronoGoogle Scholar
  21. Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paine RT (1980) Food webs: Linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure. J Anim Ecol 49:666–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pearce CM, Scheibling RE (1990) Induction of metamorphosis of larvae of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, by coralline red algae. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 179:304–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sala E (1997) Fish predators and scavengers of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in protected areas of the north-west Mediterranean Sea. Mar Biol 129:531–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scheibling RE (1996) The role of predation in regulating sea urchin populations in eastern Canada. Oceanol Acta 19:421–430Google Scholar
  26. Scheibling RE, Hamm J (1991) Interactions between sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) and their predators in field and laboratory experiments. Mar Biol 110:105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scheibling RE, Raymond BG (1990) Community dynamics on a subtidal cobble bed following mass mortalities of sea urchins. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 63:127–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scheibling RE, Robinson MC (2008) Settlement behaviour and early post-settlement predation of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 365:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schultz JA, Cloutier RN, Côté IM (2016) Evidence for a trophic cascade on rocky reefs following sea star mass mortality in British Columbia. PeerJ 4:e1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Steneck RS, Graham MH, Bourque BJ, Corbett D, Erlandson JM, Estes JA, Tegner MJ (2002) Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future. Environ Conserv 29:436–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steneck RS, Vavrinec J, Leland AV (2004) Accelerating trophic level dysfunction in kelp forest ecosystems of the western North Atlantic. Ecosystems 7:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steneck RS, Leland A, McNaught DC, Vavrinec J (2013) Ecosystem flips, locks and feedbacks: the lasting effects of fisheries on Maine’s kelp forest ecosystem. Bull Mar Sci 89:31–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Strathmann MF (1987) Reproduction and development of marine invertebrates of the northern Pacific Coast: Data and methods for the study of eggs, embryos, and larvae. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  34. Yamada SB, Boulding EG (1998) Claw morphology, prey size, selection, and foraging efficiency in generalist and specialist shell-breaking crabs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 220:191–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Friday Harbor LaboratoriesUniversity of WashingtonFriday HarborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Marine and Coastal SciencesRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations