Marine Biology

, 164:63 | Cite as

Local tidal regime dictates plasticity of expression of locomotor activity rhythms of American horseshoe crabs, Limulus polyphemus

  • Rebecca L. Anderson
  • Winsor H. WatsonIII
  • Christopher C. Chabot
Original paper

Abstract

While horseshoe crabs Limulus polyphemus from regions with two daily tides express endogenous circatidal (~12.4 h) activity rhythms, much less is known about locomotor rhythm expression in horseshoe crabs from other tidal regimes. This study investigated whether horseshoe crabs (1) always express activity rhythms consistent with their natural tides and (2) can alter activity rhythm expression in response to novel tide cycles. Activity rhythms of L. polyphemus from environments with two daily tides (Gulf of Maine, 43°6′N/70°52′W, and Massachusetts, 41°32′N/70°40′W), one dominant daily tide (Apalachee Bay, Florida, 29°58′N/84°20′W), and microtides (Indian River Lagoon, Florida, 28°5′N/80°35′W) were recorded in 2011–2013 during three artificial tide conditions: no tides, a 12.4-h tidal cycle, and a 24.8-h tidal cycle. Interestingly, L. polyphemus from the microtidal site (n = 7) appeared “plastic” in their responses; they were able to express both bimodal and unimodal rhythms in response to different tide cycles. In contrast, the other two populations exhibited more fixed responses: regardless of the tides, they were exposed to, horseshoe crabs from areas with one dominant daily tide (n = 18) consistently expressed unimodal rhythms, while those from areas with two daily tides (n = 28) generally expressed bimodal rhythms. Rhythms expressed by L. polyphemus thus appear to be a function of endogenous clocks, the tidal cues to which individuals are exposed, and tidal cues that individuals experience throughout ontogeny.

Keywords

American horseshoe crabs Limulus polyphemus Circadian Circalunidian Circatidal Activity 

Abbreviations

IRL

Indian River Lagoon

GM

Gulf of Maine

MA

Mid-Atlantic

AF

Atlantic Florida

GF

Gulf Florida

Supplementary material

227_2017_3098_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (33 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 32 KB)

References

  1. Barlow RB, Powers MK, Howard H, Kass L (1986) Migration of Limulus for mating: Relation to lunar phase, tide height, and sunlight. Biol Bull 171:310–329. doi:10.2307/1541674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnwell FH (1968) The role of rhythmic systems in the adaptation of fiddler crabs to the intertidal zone. Am Zoologist 8:569–583. doi:10.1093/icb/8.3.569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brockmann HJ, Johnson SL (2011) A long-term study of horseshoe crabs in Florida. Estuaries Coasts 34: 1049–1069. doi:10.1007/s12237-011-9419-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CO-OPS (Center for Operational Oceanographic Services and Products) (2013) NOAA Tide Predictions. Retrieved from http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/tide_predictions.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2013
  5. Chabot CC, Watson WH III (2010) Circatidal rhythms of locomotion in the American horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus: Underlying mechanisms and cues that influence them. Curr Zool 56: 499–517Google Scholar
  6. Chabot CC, Kent J, Watson WH III (2004) Circatidal and circadian rhythms of activity in Limulus polyphemus. Biol Bull 207:72–75. doi:10.2307/1543630 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chabot CC, Betournay SH, Braley NR, Watson WH III (2007) Endogenous rhythms of locomotion in the American horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 345:79–89. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2007.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chabot CC, Skinner SJ, Watson WH III (2008) Rhythms of Locomotion Expressed by Limulus polyphemus, the American Horseshoe Crab: I. Synchronization by Artificial Tides. Biol Bull 215:34–45. doi:10.2307/25470681 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chabot CC, Yelle JF, O’Donnell CB, Watson WH III (2011) The effects of water pressure, temperature, and current cycles on circatidal rhythms expressed by the American horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 44: 43–60. doi:10.1080/10236244.2010.541992 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chabot CC, Ramberg-Pihl N, Watson WH III (2016) Circalunidian clocks control tidal rhythms of locomotion in the American horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus. Mar Fresh Behav Physiol 49: 75–91. doi:10.1080/10236244.2015.1127679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen JA, Brockmann JH (1983) Breeding activity and mate selection in the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus. Bull Mar Sci 33:274–281Google Scholar
  12. Cronin TW, Forward RB (1983) Vertical migration rhythms of newly hatched larvae of the estuarine crab, Rhithropanopeus harrisii. Biol Bull 165:139–153. doi:10.2307/1541360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darnell MZ, Rittschof D, Forward RB (2010) Endogenous swimming rhythms underlying the spawning migration of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus: ontogeny and variation with ambient tidal regime. Mar Biol 157:2415–2425. doi:10.1007/s00227-010-1506-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dugaw CJ, Honeyfield R, Taylor CM, Verzi DW (2009) Modeling activity rhythms in fiddler crabs. Chronobiol Int 26:1355–1368. doi:10.3109/07420520903421872 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehlinger GS, Tankersley RA (2006) Endogenous rhythms and entrainment cues of larval activity in the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 337:205–214. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2006.06.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehlinger GS, Tankersley RA (2009) Ecology of horseshoe crabs in microtidal lagoons. In: Tanacredi JT, Botton ML, Smith D (eds) Biology and Conservation of Horseshoe Crabs. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, New York, pp 149–162. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-89959-6_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehlinger GS, Tankersley RA, Bush MB (2003) Spatial and temporal patterns of spawning and larval hatching by the horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus, in a microtidal coastal lagoon. Estuaries 26:631–640. doi:10.1007/BF02711975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Enright JT (1976) Plasticity in an isopods clockworks: shaking shapes form and affects phase and frequency. J Comp Physiol 107:13–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris G, Morgan E (1986) Entrainment of the circatidal rhythm of the estuarine amphipod Corophium volutator (Pallas) to non-tidal cycles of inundation and exposure in the laboratory. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 80:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. King TL, Eackles MS, Spidle AP, Brockmann HJ (2005) Regional differentiation and sex-biased dispersal among populations of the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus. Trans Am Fish Soc 134:441–465. doi:10.1577/T04-023.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King T, Eackles M, Aunins AW, Brockmann HJ, Hallerman EM, Brown BB (2015) Conservation genetics of the horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus): allelic diversity, zones of genetic discontinuity, and regional differentiation. In: Carmichael RH, Botton ML, Shin PKS, Cheung SG (eds) Changing Global Perspectives on Biology, Conservation and Management of Horseshoe Crabs. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 65–96. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19542-1_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee WJ (2010) Intensive use of an intertidal mudflat by foraging adult American horseshoe crabs Limulus polyphemus in the Great Bay estuary, New Hampshire. Curr Zool 56: 611–617Google Scholar
  23. Lopez-Duarte PC, Tankersley RA (2007) Circatidal swimming behaviors of fiddler crab Uca pugilator larvae from different tidal regimes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 343:207–220. doi:10.3354/meps06926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moore S, Perrin S (2007) Seasonal movements and resource-use patterns of resident horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) populations in a Maine, USA estuary. Estuaries Coasts 30: 1016–1026. doi:10.1007/BF02841392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naylor E (1996) Crab clockwork: the case for interactive circatidal and circadian oscillators controlling rhythmic locomotor activity in Carcinus maenas. Cronobiol Int 13: 153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Queiroga H, Moksnes P, Meireles S (2002) Vertical migration behaviour in the larvae of the shore crab Carcinus maenas from a mictrotidal system (Gullmarsfjord, Sweden). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 237:195–207. doi:10.3354/meps237195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rudloe A (1979) Locomotor and light responses of larvae of the horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus. Biol Bull 157:494–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rudloe A (1980) The breeding behavior and patterns of movement of horseshoe crabs, Limulus polyphemus, in the vicinity of breeding beaches in Apalachee Bay, Florida. Estuaries 3:177–183. doi:10.2307/1352067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rudloe A (1985) Variation in the expression of lunar and tidal behavioral rhythms in the horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus. Bull Mar Sci 36:388–395Google Scholar
  30. Saigusa M (1986) The circa-tidal rhythm of larval release in the incubating crab Sesarma. J Comp Physiol 159:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saigusa M (1988) Entrainment of tidal and semilunar rhythms by artificial moonlight cycles. Biol Bull 174:126–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saunders NC, Kessler LG, Avis JC (1986) Genetic variation and geographic differentiation in mitochondrial DNA of the horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus. Genetics 112:613–627Google Scholar
  33. Stillman JH, Barnwell FH (2004) Relationship of daily and circatidal activity rhythms of the fiddler crab, Uca princeps, to the harmonic structure of semidiurnal and mixed tides. Mar Biol 144:143–482. doi:10.1007/s00227-003-1213-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Takekata H, Numata H, Shiga S, Goto SG (2014) Silencing the circadian clock gene Clock using RNAi reveals dissociation of the circatidal clock from the circadian clock in the mangrove cricket. J Insect Physiol 68:16–22. doi:10.1016/jinsphys.2014.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Watson WH III, Chabot CC (2010) High resolution tracking of adult horseshoe crabs Limulus polyphemus in a New Hampshire estuary using fixed array ultrasonic telemetry. Curr Zool 56: 599–610Google Scholar
  36. Watson WH, Bedford LB, Chabot CC (2008) Rhythms of locomotion expressed by Limulus polyphemus, the American horseshoe crab: II. Relationship to circadian rhythms of visual sensitivity. Biol Bull 215:46–56. doi:10.2307/25470682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams BG, Palmer JD (1986) Comparative study of tidal rhythms: the dual clock control of the locomotor rhythms of two decapod crustaceans. Mar Behav Physiol 12: 269–278. doi:10.1080/10236248609378653 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Marshall McCully and Associates, Inc., and Natural Systems Analysts, Inc (1994) Final technical report: Physical features of the Indian River Lagoon. Woodward-Clyde Consultants, TallahasseeGoogle Scholar
  39. Yannicelli B, Palacios R, Gimenez L (2001) Activity rhythms of two cirolanid isopods from an exposed microtidal sandy beach in Uruguay. Mar Biol 138:187–197. doi:10.1007/s002270000451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang L, Hastings MH, Green EW, Tauber E, Sladek M, Webster SG, Kyriacou CP, Wilcockson DC (2009) Dissociation of circadian and circatidal timekeeping in the marine crustacean Eurydice pulchra. Curr Biol 23:1863–1873. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biological Sciences Department, and Interdisciplinary Neurosciences ProgramUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesPlymouth State UniversityPlymouthUSA

Personalised recommendations