Comparison of meiofaunal diversity by combined morphological and molecular approaches in a shallow Mediterranean sediment
- 499 Downloads
Fast, accurate and thorough assessments of meiofaunal communities are crucial requirements for ecological studies and routine monitoring of ecosystem status. This study scrutinizes the reliability of the molecular approach through a comparison of morphological and molecular inventories of meiofaunal diversity, with a special focus on nematodes. Sediment samples were collected from a reference coastal Mediterranean site. Metabarcoding analysis was performed using a nuclear marker (small subunit 18S ribosomal RNA) and compared to a morphological analysis performed on the same sample-cores. The results from morphological and molecular inventories differed but were complementary. The molecular analysis revealed a remarkable level of diversity (16 phyla) that exceeded the traditional morphological analysis (10 phyla), showing that meiofaunal diversity can greatly exceed current perceptions. The molecular method proved powerful in detecting the presence of soft-bodied predators, such as Platyhelminthes, possibly reflecting preservation bias in morphological approaches. Even if the molecular inventory identified 57.5% of the sampled diversity, surprisingly, it has not revealed the presence of some nematode genera identified through morphological assessment. While the technique is promising, some further developments are required. As the dominant genus Sabatieria was undetected by the molecular approach, despite being present in the Silva database, improving the knowledge of specific primers should be a priority. Additionally, with 77% of nematode OTUs remaining unassigned at genera level, remedy this lower efficiency requires further investigations to provide DNA-sequences of all morphologically identified species.
KeywordsMeiofauna Morphological Method Morphological Approach Meiofaunal Community Molecular Dataset
This research received support from CNRS as the APEGE programme (incentive funds from the Institute of Ecology and Environment - InEE). Additional support was obtained from the chair of biodiversity, extreme marine environments and global change supported by Foundation TOTAL. We acknowledge Hervé Moreau for his support and stimulating discussions, Nigel Grimsley and Wiley Edition Services for English correction. We thank Jean-Claude Roca and Bruno Hesse, the scuba divers, and the R/V crew Nereis II of the Observatoire Océanologique in Banyuls-sur-Mer. We thank anonymous reviewers for improvement of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was partly funded by the chair of biodiversity supported by Foundation TOTAL (J091I006).
Conflict of interest
All authors declared they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
- Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
- Fauvel P (1923) Polychaetes errantes. Fauna de France, Fédération Française des Sociétés de Sciences NaturellesGoogle Scholar
- Giere O (2009) Meiobenthology: the microscopic motile fauna of aquatic sediments. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Guille A (1970) Bionomie benthique du plateau continental de la côte catalane française. II- Les communautés de la macrofaune. Vie & Milieu 21:149–280Google Scholar
- Guille A (1971) Bionomie benthique du plateau continental de la côte catalane française IV-Densités, biomasses et variations saisonnières de la macrofaune. Vie & Milieu 22:93–158Google Scholar
- Guille A, Soyer J (1968) La faune benthique des substrats meubles de Banyuls-sur-Mer. Premières données qualitatives et quantitatives. Vie & Milieu 19:323–360Google Scholar
- Guille A, Soyer J (1974) Bionomie benthique du plateau continental de la côte catalane française. Macrofaune et méiofaune, rapports quantitatifs et biocénotiques. Vie & Milieu 24:301–320Google Scholar
- Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1): 9Google Scholar
- Heip C, Vincx M, Vranken G (1985) The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanogr Mar Biol 23:399–489Google Scholar
- Higgins RP, Thiel H (1988) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Huys R, Gee JM, Moore CG, Hamond R (1996) Marine and brackish water Harpacticoid Copepods part 1. Synopses of the British fauna (new series), no. 51. The Linnean Society of London and The Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association, Field Studies Council Shrewsbury, UKGoogle Scholar
- Lallias D, Hiddink JG, Fonseca VG et al. (2015) Environmental metabarcoding reveals heterogeneous drivers of microbial eukaryote diversity in contrasting estuarine ecosystems. Intl Soc Microbial Ecol 9:1208–1221Google Scholar
- Lang K (1975a) Monographie der Harpacticiden, 1. Otto Koeltz, KoenigsteinGoogle Scholar
- Lang K (1975b) Monographie der Harpacticiden, 2. Otto Koeltz, KoenigsteinGoogle Scholar
- Platt HM, Warwick RM (1983) Free living marine nematodes. Part I. British Enoplids. Synopses of the British fauna (new series), no. 28. The Linnean Society of London and The Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Platt HM, Warwick RM (1988) Free living marine nematodes. Part II. British Chromadorids. Synopses of the British fauna (new series), no. 38. The Linnean Society of London and The Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association, E.J. Brill/Dr W. Backhuys, Leiden, New York, Kobenhavn, KölnGoogle Scholar
- Platt HM, Warwick RM, Somerfiels PJ (1988) Free living marine nematodes. Part III. Monhysterids. Synopses of the British fauna (new series), no. 53. The Linnean Society of London and The Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association, Field Studies Council Shrewsbury, UKGoogle Scholar
- Soyer J (1970) Bionomie benthique du plateau continental de la côte catalane française. III. Les peuplements de Copepodes harpacticoides (Crustacea). Vie milieu 21:337–511Google Scholar
- Soyer J (1971) Bionomie benthique du plateau continental de la cote catalane Frangaise. V. Densites et biomasses du meiobenthos. Vie Milieu 22:351–424Google Scholar
- Soyer J (1974) Contribution à l’étude des Copépodes Harpacticoïdes de Méditerranée occidentale. Vie Milieu 24:379–408Google Scholar
- Westheide W (1990) Polychaetes : Interstitial families. Synopses of the British fauna (new series), no. 44. The Linnean Society of London and The Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association, Universl Book Services/Dr W. Backhuys, OegstgeestGoogle Scholar