Marine Biology

, Volume 161, Issue 8, pp 1943–1948 | Cite as

Limits to local adaptation: some impacts of temperature on Nucella emarginata differ among populations, while others do not

Short note

Abstract

Predicting future impacts of temperature change require consideration of multiple impacts of temperature on organisms from different populations. We explored the impacts of temperature on feeding, growth, and mortality of emarginated dogwhelks, Nucella emarginata, from three populations (34.459, −120.473; 34.435, −119.930; 34.355, −119.441) that are separated by a total distance of <100 km. Collections and experiments took place September–December 2012. Populations differed both in the number of mussels consumed at 16 and 20 °C and in the difference in feeding at these temperatures. Despite differences in feeding, increases in whelk mortality with temperature did not differ among populations, and in the 16 °C treatment changes in whelk mass did not differ among populations. These results indicate population-specific responses may differ even among geographically close populations. However, some traits may be more adaptable than others and impacts of a given change may be limited by various constraints (e.g., changes in feeding may accompany changes in metabolic needs). Improving our predictions of climate change impacts will require considering these issues, which may be especially important for marine communities where species differ widely in developmental mode, population connectivity, and other traits which may affect responses to changing temperatures.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Maps were made with data provided via Natural Earth, and sea surface temperature data was compiled and made available by the Scripps Photobiology Group.

References

  1. Anderson MT, Kiesecker JM, Chivers DP, Blaustein AR (2001) The direct and indirect effects of temperature on a predator–prey relationship. Can J Zool-Rev Can Zool 79:1834–1841Google Scholar
  2. Barton BT, Schmitz OJ (2009) Experimental warming transforms multiple predator effects in a grassland food web. Ecol Lett 12:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2012) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
  4. Blanchette CA, Broitman BR, Gaines SD (2006) Intertidal community structure and oceanographic patterns around Santa Cruz Island, CA, USA. Mar Biol 149:689–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchette CA, Helmuth B, Gaines SD (2007) Spatial patterns of growth in the mussel, Mytilus californianus, across a major oceanographic and biogeographic boundary at point conception, California, USA. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 340:126–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchette CA, Melissa Miner C, Raimondi PT et al (2008) Biogeographical patterns of rocky intertidal communities along the Pacific coast of North America. J Biogeogr 35:1593–1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Broitman BR, Szathmary PL, Mislan KAS et al (2009) Predator–prey interactions under climate change: the importance of habitat versus body temperature. Oikos 118:219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP et al (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burrows MT, Hughes RN (1989) Natural foraging of the dogwhelk, Nucella lapillus (Linnaeus); the weather and whether to feed. J Molluscan Stud 55(2):285–295Google Scholar
  10. Denny MW, Dowd WW, Bilir L, Mach KJ (2011) Spreading the risk: small-scale body temperature variation among intertidal organisms and its implications for species persistence. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 400:175–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deschaseaux E, Taylor A, Maher W (2011) Measure of stress response induced by temperature and salinity changes on hatched larvae of three marine gastropod species. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 397:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaylord B, Gaines SD (2000) Temperature or transport? Range limits in marine species mediated solely by flow. Am Nat 155:769–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gleason LU, Burton RS (2013) Phenotypic evidence for local adaptation to heat stress in the marine snail Chlorostoma (formerly Tegula) funebralis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 448:360–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gosnell JS, Macfarlan RJ, Shears NT, Caselle JE (2014) A dynamic oceanographic front drives biogeographical structure in invertebrate settlement along Santa Cruz Island, California. Mar Ecol Prog Ser . doi:10.3354/meps10802
  15. Harley CDG (2011) Climate change, keystone predation, and biodiversity loss. Science 334:1124–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hellberg ME, Burton RS, Neigel JE, Palumbi SR (2002) Genetic assessment of connectivity among marine populations. Bull Mar Sci 70:273–290Google Scholar
  17. Helmuth BST (1998) Intertidal mussel microclimates: predicting the body temperature of a sessile invertebrate. Ecol Monogr 68:51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6(2):65–70Google Scholar
  19. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kearney M, Shine R, Porter WP (2009) The potential for behavioral thermoregulation to buffer “cold-blooded” animals against climate warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:3835–3840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelly MW, Sanford E, Grosberg RK (2011) Limited potential for adaptation to climate change in a broadly distributed marine crustacean. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279(1727):349–356. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0542
  22. Kordas RL, Harley CDG, O’Connor MI (2011) Community ecology in a warming world: the influence of temperature on interspecific interactions in marine systems. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 400:218–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuo E, Sanford E (2009) Geographic variation in the upper thermal limits of an intertidal snail: implications for climate envelope models. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 388:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lemoine NP, Burkepile DE (2012) Temperature-induced mismatches between consumption and metabolism reduce consumer fitness. Ecology 93:2483–2489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marcel EV, Adriaensen F, van Balen JH et al (2003) Variable responses to large-scale climate change in European Parus populations. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marshall DJ, McQuaid CD, Williams GA (2010) Non-climatic thermal adaptation: implications for species’ responses to climate warming. Biol Lett 6:669–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McMillan DM, Fearnley SL, Rank NE, Dahlhoff EP (2005) Natural temperature variation affects larval survival, development and Hsp70 expression in a leaf beetle. Funct Ecol 19:844–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller LP (2013) The effect of water temperature on drilling and ingestion rates of the dogwhelk Nucella lapillus feeding on Mytilus edulis mussels in the laboratory. Mar Biol 160:1489–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Navarrete SA, Menge BA (1996) Keystone predation and interaction strength: interactive effects of predators on their main prey. Ecol Monogr 66:409–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Connor MI, Bruno JF, Gaines SD et al (2007) Temperature control of larval dispersal and the implications for marine ecology, evolution, and conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:1266–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paine RT (1969) A note on trophic complexity and community stability. Am Nat 103:91–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Phillips NE (2005) Growth of filter-feeding benthic invertebrates from a region with variable upwelling intensity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 295:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pincebourde S, Sanford E, Helmuth B (2009) An intertidal sea star adjusts thermal inertia to avoid extreme body temperatures. Am Nat 174:890–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  36. Russell BD, Harley CDG, Wernberg T et al (2012) Predicting ecosystem shifts requires new approaches that integrate the effects of climate change across entire systems. Biol Lett 8:164–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sanford E (2002) The feeding, growth, and energetics of two rocky intertidal predators (Pisaster ochraceus and Nucella canaliculata) under water temperatures simulating episodic upwelling. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 273:199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanford E, Worth DJ (2009) Genetic differences among populations of a marine snail drive geographic variation in predation. Ecology 90:3108–3118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Selkoe KA, Gaines SD, Caselle JE, Warner RR (2006) Current shifts and kin aggregation explain genetic patchiness in fish recruits. Ecology 87:3082–3094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sorte CJB, Jones SJ, Miller LP (2011) Geographic variation in temperature tolerance as an indicator of potential population responses to climate change. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 400:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tewksbury JJ, Huey RB, Deutsch CA (2008) Putting the heat on tropical animals. Science 320:1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trussell GC (2002) Evidence of countergradient variation in the growth of an intertidal snail in response to water velocity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 243:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Woodson CB, McManus MA, Tyburczy JA et al (2012) Coastal fronts set recruitment and connectivity patterns across multiple taxa. Limnol Oceanogr 57:582–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zuur AF (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine BiologyUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Golden Gate UniversitySan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Florida State University Coastal and Marine LaboratorySt. TeresaUSA

Personalised recommendations