Marine Biology

, Volume 160, Issue 9, pp 2531–2533 | Cite as

Worrisome trends in global stock status continue unabated: a response to a comment by R.M. Cook on “What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries”

  • Rainer FroeseEmail author
  • Dirk Zeller
  • Kristin Kleisner
  • Daniel Pauly
Comment and Reply

In a previous contribution to this journal (Froese et al. 2012), we refuted criticism of a simple method (Froese and Kesner-Reyes 2002) that derives information about the status of global stocks from global catch data. This method assumes that, for a given stock, the ratio of current catches to previous maximum catches (Cmax) is indicative of the likely current exploitation status of the stock. For example, the method considers a stock as “collapsed” if current catch is <10 % of the previous maximum catch.

The method also assumes that current catches in the range of 0.5–1.0 Cmax are indicative of fully exploited stocks, implying that the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) would also fall into that range. This assumption was supported by the observation (Froese et al. 2012) that the median MSY/Cmax ratio in 50 fully assessed stocks of the Northeast Atlantic was 0.62 (95 % confidence limits 0.56–0.70). Also, a plot of log(Cmax) over log(MSY) for these stocks showed a high correlation with...


Random Data Maximum Sustainable Yield Stock Size Catch Data Stock Status 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank Josephine R. Barile for help with the analysis of the latest FAO data. This is FIN contribution number 140.


  1. Cook RM (2013) A comment on “What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries” (Froese et al. 2012). (2013) Marine BiologyGoogle Scholar
  2. Costello C, Ovando D, Hilborn R, Gaines SD, Deschenes O, Lester SE (2012) Status and solutions for the World’s unassessed fisheries. Science 338:517–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daan N, Gislason H, Pope JG, Rice JC (2011) Apocalypse in world fisheries? The reports of their death are greatly exaggerated. ICES J Marine Sci 68:1375–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. FAO (2012) State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2012. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  5. Froese R, Kesner-Reyes K (2002) Impact of fishing on the abundance of marine species. ICES Document CM 2002/L:12, 15 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Froese R, Zeller D, Kleisner K, Pauly D (2012) What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries. Mar Biol 159:1283–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Halpern BS, Longo C, Hardy D, McLeod KL, Samhouri JF, Katona SK, Kleisner K, Lester SE, O’Leary J, Ranelletti M, Rosenberg AA, Scarborough C, Selig ER, Best BD, Brumbaugh DR, Chapin FS, Crowder LB, Daly KL, Doney SC, Elfes C, Fogarty MJ, Gaines SD, Jacobsen KI, Karrer LB, Leslie HM, Neeley E, Pauly D, Polasky S, Ris B, Martin KS, Stone GS, Sumaila UR, Zeller D (2012) An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature 488:615–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kleisner K, Zeller D, Froese R, Pauly D (2012) Using global catch data for inferences on the world’s marine fisheries. Fish Fish. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00469.x Google Scholar
  9. Pikitch EK (2012) The risks of overfishing. Science 338:474–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Srinivasan UT, Cheung WWL, Watson R, Sumaila UR (2010) Food security implications of global marine catch losses due to overfishing. J Bioecon 12(3):183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rainer Froese
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dirk Zeller
    • 2
  • Kristin Kleisner
    • 2
  • Daniel Pauly
    • 2
  1. 1.GEOMARKielGermany
  2. 2.Fisheries CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations