Marine Biology

, Volume 160, Issue 4, pp 1001–1013 | Cite as

Spatial and temporal patterns in the feeding behavior of a fiddler crab

Original Paper

Abstract

Fiddler crabs consume the surficial microphytobenthos around their burrows during low tide. We studied the spatial and temporal feeding patterns in the species Uca uruguayensis by using sequences of digital pictures of feeding pellets accumulation. Data from 61 crabs, feeding without the interference of neighbors, were fitted to different models using Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian approaches. Initial feeding location was independent from the emergence location, and then, crabs continued holding a main feeding direction (clockwise or counterclockwise), suggesting a systematic mechanism that may avoid feeding over already processed sediment. Crabs used at least half of their potential feeding area, but these areas were heterogeneous. Both sexes developed similar feeding areas; however, females were faster and needed less time to feed than males, suggesting that males are time restricted. Our work also highlights the importance of incorporating other underlying mechanisms of the behavior of species into the study of feeding strategies.

References

  1. Anderson ARA, Young IM, Sleeman BD, Griffiths BS, Robertson WM (1997) Nematode movement along a chemical gradient in a structurally heterogeneous environment, 1. Experiment. Fundam Appl Nematol 20:157–164Google Scholar
  2. Andersson M (1978) Optimal foraging area: size and allocation of search effort. Theor Popul Biol 13:397–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bildstein KL, McDowell SG, Brisbin IL (1989) Consequences of sexual dimorphism in sand fiddler crabs, Uca pugilator: differential vulnerability to avian predation. Anim Behav 37:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boaden P (1968) Water movement—a dominant factor in interstitial ecology. Sarsia 34:125–136Google Scholar
  5. Bogazzi E, Iribarne O, Guerrero R, Spivak E (2001) Wind pattern may explain the southern limit of distribution of a southwestern Atlantic fiddler crab. [Un patrón de vientos puede explicar el límite sur de distribución del cangrejo violinista del Atlántico sudoccidental]. J Shellfish Res 20:353–360Google Scholar
  6. Bolker BM (2011) Ecological models and data in R. University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  7. Botton ML, Loveland RE (1987) Orientation of the horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus, on a sandy beach. Biol Bull 173:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caravello HE, Cameron GN (1987) The effects of sexual selection on the foraging behaviour of the Gulf Coast fiddler crab, Uca panacea. Anim Behav 35:1864–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christy JH (1980) The mating system of the sand fiddler crab, Uca pugilator. Ph.D thesis, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
  11. Christy JH, Salmon M (1984) Ecology and evolution of mating systems of fiddler crabs (genus Uca). Biol Rev 59:483–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colpo K, Negreiros-Fransozo M (2011) Sediment particle selection during feeding by four species of Uca (Brachyura, Ocypodidae). Crustaceana 84:5–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook SB (1971) A study of homing behavior in the limpet Siphonaria alternata. Biol Bull 141:449–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Covich AP (1976) Analyzing shapes of foraging areas: some ecological and economic theories. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7:235–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crane J (1975) Fiddler crabs of the world: Ocypodidae: genus Uca. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Dade WB, Jumars PA, Penry DL (1990) Supply-side optimization: maximizing absorptive rates. In: RN H (ed) Behavioural mechanisms in food selection. Springer, Berlin, pp 531–555Google Scholar
  17. de la Iglesia HO, Rodríguez EM, Dezi RE (1994) Burrow plugging in the crab Uca uruguayensis and its synchronization with photoperiod and tides. Physiol Behav 55:913–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dye A (1978) Diurnal vertical migrations of meiofauna in an estuarine sand flat. Zool Afr 13:201–205Google Scholar
  19. Dye A, Lasiak T (1986) Microbenthos, meiobenthos and fiddler crabs: trophic interactions in a tropical mangrove sediment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 32:9–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edwards A (1992) Likelihood. Johns Hopkins Ed. University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliott PF (1988) Foraging behavior of a central-place forager: field tests of theoretical predictions. Am Nat 131:159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fielder D (1970) The feeding behaviour of the sand crab Scopimera inflata (Decapoda, Ocypodidae). J Zool 160:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Galván K, Fleeger JW, Fry B (2008) Stable isotope addition reveals dietary importance of phytoplankton and microphytobenthos to saltmarsh infauna. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 359:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Genoni GP (1985) Food limitation in salt marsh fiddler crabs Uca rapax (Smith) (Decapoda: Ocypodidae). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 87:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giraldeau LA, Kramer DL, Deslandes I, Lair H (1994) The effect of competitors and distance on central place foraging eastern chipmunks, Tamias striatus. Anim Behav 47:621–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grant P (1968) Polyhedral territories of animal. Am Nat 102:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gray D, Hodgson A (1997) Temporal variation in foraging behaviour of Patella granularis (Patellogastropoda) and Siphonaria concinna (Basommatophora) on a South African shore. J Mollus Stud 63:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grimes BH, Huish MT, Kerby JH, Moran D (1989) Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (mid-Atlantic): summer and winter flounder, vol 82. U.S. Fish Wildlife Service Biological Report, USGoogle Scholar
  29. Hamner W, Smyth M, Mulford E (1968) Orientation of the sand-beach isopod Tylos punctatus. Anim Behav 16:405–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harris RP (1972) Seasonal changes in population density and vertical distribution of harpacticoid copepods on an intertidal sand beach. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 52:493–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herrnkind WF (1968) Adaptive visually-directed orientation in Uca pugilator. Am Zool 8:585–598Google Scholar
  32. Herrnkind WF (1983) Movement patterns and orientation. In: Vernberg Va (ed) The biology of Crustacea, vol 7. Academic Press, New York, pp 41–105Google Scholar
  33. Hilborn R, Mangel M (1997) The ecological detective: confronting models with data, vol 28. University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  34. Hixon MA (1980) Food production and competitor density as the determinants of feeding territory size. Am Nat 115:510–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hixon MA (1982) Energy maximizers and time minimizers: theory and reality. Am Nat 119:596–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hixon MA, Carpenter FL (1988) Distinguishing energy maximizers from time minimizers: a comparative study of two hummingbird species. Am Zool 28:913–925Google Scholar
  37. Horch K, Salmon M (1972) Responses of the ghost crab, Ocypode, to acoustic stimuli. Z Tierpsychol 30:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Houston D, Shine R (1993) Sexual dimorphism and niche divergence: feeding habits of the Arafura filesnake. J Anim Ecol 62:737–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hughes RN (1980) Optimal foraging theory in the marine context. Oceanogr Mar Biol 18:423–481Google Scholar
  40. Hulings N (1991) Activity patterns and homing of Acanthopleura gemmata (Blainville, 1825) (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) in the rocky intertidal of the Jordan Gulf of Aqaba. Nautilus 105:16–25Google Scholar
  41. Hyatt GW (1974) Behavioural evidence for light intensity discrimination by the fiddler crab, Uca pugilator (brachyura, ocypodidae). Anim Behav 22:796–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Iribarne O, Martinetto P, Schwindt E, Botto F, Bortolus A, Borboroglu PG (2003) Evidences of habitat displacement between two common soft-bottom SW Atlantic intertidal crabs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 296:167–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (1996) Residency and size affect fight duration and outcome in the fiddler crab Uca annulipes. Biol J Linn Soc 57:293–306Google Scholar
  44. Jumars P, Self R (1986) Gut-marker and gut-fullness methods for estimating field and laboratory effects of sediment transport on ingestion rates of deposit-feeders. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 98:293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Karrh RR, Miller DC (1994) Functional response of a surface-deposit feeder, Saccoglossus kowalevskii. Limnol Oceanogr 39:1455–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kihslinger RL, Woodin SA (2000) Food patches and a surface deposit feeding spionid polychaete. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 201:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Koga T, Backwell PRY, Jennions MD, Christy JH (1998) Elevated predation risk changes mating behaviour and courtship in a fiddler crab. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol 265:1385–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Koga T, Backwell PRY, Christy JH, Murai M, Kasuya E (2001) Male-biased predation of a fiddler crab. Anim Behav 62:201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Krebs JR (1978) Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. In: Krebs J, Davies N (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 23–63Google Scholar
  50. Kristensen JH (1972) Carbohydrases of some marine invertebrates with notes on their food and on the natural occurrence of the carbohydrates studied. Mar Biol 14:130–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lair H, Kramer DL, Giraldeau LA (1994) Interference competition in central place foragers: the effect of imposed waiting on patch-use decisions of eastern chipmunks, Tamias striatus. Behav Ecol 5:237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Langdon JW, Herrnkind W (1985) Visual shape discrimination in the fiddler crab, Uca pugilator. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 11:315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Layne JE, Barnes WJP, Duncan LMJ (2003a) Mechanisms of homing in the fiddler crab Uca rapax 1. Spatial and temporal characteristics of a system of small-scale navigation. J Exp Biol 206:4413–4423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Layne JE, Barnes WJP, Duncan LMJ (2003b) Mechanisms of homing in the fiddler crab Uca rapax 2. Information sources and frame of reference for a path integration system. J Exp Biol 206:4425–4442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lohmann KJ (1985) Geomagnetic field detection by the western Atlantic spiny lobster, Panulirus argus. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 12:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lopez GR, Levinton JS (1987) Ecology of deposit-feeding animals in marine sediments. Q Rev Biol 62:235–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Luschi P, Seppia CD, Crosio E (1997) Orientation during short-range feeding in the crab Dotilla wichmanni. J Comp Physiol A 181:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mangel M, Ludwig D (1992) Definition and evaluation of the fitness of behavioral and developmental programs. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:507–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Martinetto P, Valiñas M, Palomo G, Iribarne O (2007) Negative interactions between two SW Atlantic intertidal crabs in soft-bottom habitats. Mar Biol 151:1479–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Matthiopoulos J (2011) How to be a quantitative ecologist: the ‘A to R’ of green mathematics and statistics. Wiley, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McIntyre A, Eleftheriou A (1968) The bottom fauna of a flatfish nursery ground. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 48:113–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McLachlan A, Winter P, Botha L (1977) Vertical and horizontal distribution of sub-littoral meiofauna in Algoa Bay, South Africa. Mar Biol 40:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McNamara JM, Houston AI (1986) The common currency for behavioral decisions. Am Nat 127:358–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McNamara JM, Houston AI (1994) The effect of a change in foraging options on intake rate and predation rate. Am Nat 144:978–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Miller RS (1967) Pattern and process in competition. Adv Ecol Res 4:1–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Murai M, Goshima S, Nakasone Y (1983) Adaptive droving behavior observed in the fiddler crab Uca vocans vocans. Mar Biol 76:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1985) Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs, 4th edn. Richard D. Irwin, Inc, HomewoodGoogle Scholar
  70. Park T (1957) Experimental studies of interspecies competition. III Relation of initial species proportion to competitive outcome in populations of Tribolium. Physiol Zool 30:22–40Google Scholar
  71. Perillo GME, Piccolo MC, Pino-Quivira M, Quiviria P (1999) Estuaries of South America: their geomorphology and dynamics. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pomeroy AC (2006) Tradeoffs between food abundance and predation danger in spatial usage of a stopover site by western sandpipers, Calidris mauri. Oikos 112:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Popper AN, Salmon M, Horch KW (2001) Acoustic detection and communication by decapod crustaceans. J Comp Physiol A 187:83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pratt AE, McLain DK, Berry AS (2005) Variation in the boldness of courting sand fiddler crabs (Uca pugilator). Ethology 111:63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Reinsel KA, Rittschof D (1995) Environmental regulation of foraging in the sand fiddler crab Uca pugilator (Bosc 1802). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 187:269–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ribeiro PD, Iribarne OO (2011) Coupling between microphytobenthic biomass and fiddler crab feeding. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 407:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ribeiro PD, Iribarne OO, Jaureguy L, Navarro D, Bogazzi E (2003) Variable sex-specific mortality due to shorebird predation on a fiddler crab. Can J Zool 81:1209–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ribeiro PD, Iribarne OO, Daleo P (2005) The relative importance of substratum characteristics and recruitment in determining the spatial distribution of the fiddler crab Uca uruguayensis Nobili. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 314:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ribeiro PD, Christy JH, Rissanen RJ, Kim TW (2006) Males are attracted by their own courtship signals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rice DL (1982) The detritus nitrogen problem: new observations and perspectives from organic geochemistry. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 9:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Robertson JR, Newell S (1982a) Experimental studies of particle ingestion by the sand fiddler crab Uca pugilator (Bosc). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 59:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Robertson JR, Newell S (1982b) A study of particle ingestion by three fiddler crab species foraging on sandy sediments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 65:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Round F (1979) Occurrence and rhythmic behaviour of Tropidoneis lepidoptera in the epipelon of Barnstable Harbor, Massachusetts, USA. Mar Biol 54:215–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Salmon M (1965) Waving display and sound production in the courtship behavior of Uca pugilator with comparison to Uca minax and Uca pugnax. Zoologica 50:123–150Google Scholar
  87. Salmon M, Atsaides SP (1968) Visual and acoustical signalling during courtship by fiddler crabs (genus Uca). Am Zool 8:623–639Google Scholar
  88. Salmon M, Hyatt G, McCarthy K, Costlow JD Jr (1978) Display specificity and reproductive isolation in the fiddler crabs, Uca panacea and U. pugilator. Z Tierpsychol 48:251–276Google Scholar
  89. Schoener TW (1983) Simple models of optimal feeding-territory size: a reconciliation. Am Nat 121:608–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schoener TW (1987) Time budgets and territory size: some simultaneous optimization models for energy maximizers. Am Zool 27:259–291Google Scholar
  91. Self RFL, Jumars PA (1988) Cross-phyletic patterns of particle selection by deposit feeders. J Mar Res 46:119–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sih A (1982) Foraging strategies and the avoidance of predation by an aquatic insect, Notonecta hoffmanni. Ecology 63:786–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Simpson SJ, Sibly RM, Lee KP, Behmer ST, Raubenheimer D (2004) Optimal foraging when regulating intake of multiple nutrients. Anim Behav 68:1299–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Smith CC (1968) The adaptive nature of social organization in the genus of three squirrels Tamiasciurus. Ecol Monogr 38:31–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N, Gilks W (1996) BUGS 0.5: Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling manual (version ii). MRC Biostatistics Unit Institute of Public Health, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  96. Spivak ED, Gavio MA, Navarro CE (1991) Life history and structure of the world’s southernmost Uca population: Uca uruguayensis (Crustacea, Brachyura) in Mar Chiquita lagoon (Argentina). Bull Mar Sci 48:679–688Google Scholar
  97. Stanton ML (1982) Searching in a patchy environment: foodplant selection by Colis philodice eriphyle butterflies. Ecology 63:839–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Stephens DW, Charnov EL (1982) Optimal foraging: some simple stochastic models. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Taghon GL, Greene RR (1990) Effects of sediment-protein concentration on feeding and growth rates of Abarenicola pacifica Healy et Wells (Polychaeta: Arenicolidae). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 136:197–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Taghon GL, Jumars PA (1984) Variable ingestion rate and its role in optimal foraging behavior of marine deposit feeders. Ecology 65:549–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Thurman CL (1998) Evaporative water loss, corporal temperature and the distribution of sympatric fiddler crabs (Uca) from South Texas. Comp Biochem Phys A 119:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Valiela I, Teal JM (1979) The nitrogen budget of a salt marsh ecosystem. Nature 280:652–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Valiela I, Babiec DF, Atherton W, Seitzinger S, Krebs C (1974) Some consequences of sexual dimorphism: feeding in male and female fiddler crabs, Uca pugnax (Smith). Biol Bull 147:652–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wada K (1993) Territorial behavior, and sizes of home range and territory, in relation to sex and body size in Ilyoplax pusilla (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae). Mar Biol 115:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Weissburg M (1992) Functional analysis of fiddler crab foraging: sex-specific mechanics and constraints in Uca pugnax (Smith). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 156:105–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Weissburg M (1993) Sex and the single forager: gender-specific energy maximization strategies in fiddler crabs. Ecology 74:280–291Google Scholar
  107. Weissburg M, Derby C (1995) Regulation of sex-specific feeding behavior in fiddler crabs: physiological properties of chemoreceptor neurons in claws and legs of males and females. J Comp Physiol A 176:513–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Werner EE, Gilliam JF (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:393–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Ydenberg R, Giraldeau L, Kramer D (1986) Interference competition, payoff asymmetries, and the social relationships of central place foragers. Theor Popul Biol 30:26–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Young DY, Ambrose HW (1978) Underwater orientation in the sand fiddler crab, Uca pugilator. Biol Bull 155:246–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zeil J (1998) Homing in fiddler crabs (Uca lactea annulipes and Uca vomeris: Ocypodidae). J Comp Physiol A 183:367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Zimmer-Faust RK (1987) Substrate selection and use by a deposit-feeding crab. Ecology 4:955–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratorio Ecotono, INIBIOMA-CONICETUniversidad Nacional del ComahueSan Carlos de BarilocheArgentina
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC)CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Mar del PlataMar del PlataArgentina
  3. 3.Grupo de Investigación y Educación en Temas Ambientales (GrIETA)Mar del PlataArgentina

Personalised recommendations