Marine Biology

, Volume 160, Issue 2, pp 327–341 | Cite as

Substrate-dependent bacterivory by intertidal benthic copepods

  • Clio Cnudde
  • Tom Moens
  • Anne Willems
  • Marleen De Troch
Original Paper


The trophic importance of bacteria to harpacticoid copepods in intertidal areas remains poorly understood, and so do the mechanisms of bacterial feeding. It is, for instance, unclear whether harpacticoids directly target bacterial cells or merely co-ingest them with substrates to which bacterial cells may be attached. Here, we investigate bacterial uptake and substrate requirement for four mud intertidal species (Microarthridion littorale, Platychelipus littoralis, Delavalia palustris and Nannopus palustris) by means of 13C-labeled bacteria and biomarker fatty acids (FA). Bacterial uptake strongly depended on grazing on a primary food source but bacterial ingestion rates were low, and no clear indication of copepods directly targeting bacteria was found. Delavalia was the only species that accumulated bacteria-derived FA and gained in polyunsaturated FA (PUFA) probably through bioconversion of bacteria-derived FA. In general, however, our results suggest that bacteria represent a relatively minor and low-quality food for intertidal harpacticoid copepods.


Copepod Species Harpacticoid Copepod Total Fatty Acid Content Harpacticoids Bacterial Uptake 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The first author acknowledges a PhD grant of IWT (Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders). MDT is a postdoctoral researcher financed by the Special Research Fund at the Ghent University (GOA project 01GA1911 W). Financial support was obtained from the Flemish Science Foundation through project 3G019209 W and from the research council of Ghent University through project BOF09/24 J/148. Special thanks go to Ir. Dirk Van Gansbeke (Marine Biology, UGent) for analyzing the fatty acids and Annick Vankenhove for her help with sorting the copepods. The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive remarks that contributed to the improvement of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

227_2012_2091_MOESM1_ESM.docx (35 kb)
Supplementary Table 1 (DOCX 34.8 kb)


  1. Abdulkadir S, Tsuchiya M (2008) One-step method for quantitative and qualitative analysis of fatty acids in marine animal samples. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 354:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azam F, Fenchel T, Field JG, Gray JS, Meyerreil LA, Thingstad F (1983) The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 10:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berggreen U, Hansen B, Kiørboe T (1988) Food size spectra, ingestion and growth of the copepod Acartia tonsa during development—implications for determination of copepod production. Mar Biol 99:341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boecklen WJ, Yarnes CT, Cook BA, James AC (2011) On the use of stable isotopes in trophic ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 42:411–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brett MT, Muller-Navarra DC (1997) The role of highly unsaturated fatty acids in aquatic food web processes. Freshw Biol 38:483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carman KR (1990) Mechanisms of uptake of radioactive labels by meiobenthic copepods during grazing experiments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 68:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carman KR, Thistle D (1985) Microbial food partitioning by 3 species of benthic copepods. Mar Biol 88:143–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen M, Lui H, Chen B (2012) Effects of dietary essential fatty acids on reproduction rates of a subtropical calanoid copepod, Acartia erythraea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 455:95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chepurnov VA, Mann DG, Vyverman W, Sabbe K, Danielidis DB (2002) Sexual reproduction, mating system, and protoplast dynamics of Seminavis (Bacillariophyta). J Phycol 38:1004–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cnudde C, Willems A, Van Hoorde K, Vyverman W, Moens T, De Troch M (2011) Effect of food preservation on the grazing behavior and on the gut flora of the harpacticoid copepod Paramphiascella fulvofasciata. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 407:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coull BC, Grant J (1981) Encystment discovered in a marine copepod. Science 212:342–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahms H-U, Harder T, Qian P-Y (2007) Selective attraction and reproductive performance of a harpacticoid copepod in a response to biofilms. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 341:228–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Troch M, Chepurnov V, Gheerardyn H, Vanreusel A, Olafsson E (2006a) Is diatom size selection by harpacticoid copepods related to grazer body size? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 332:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Troch M, Houthoofd L, Chepurnov VA, Vanreusel A (2006b) Does sediment grain size affect diatom grazing by harpacticoid copepods? Mar Environ Res 61:265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Troch M, Chepurnov VA, Vincx M, Olafsson E (2008) The effect of Fucus vesiculosus on the grazing of harpacticoid copepods on diatom biofilms. J Sea Res 60:139–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Troch M, Cnudde C, Vyverman W, Vanreusel A (2009) Increased production of faecal pellets by the benthic harpacticoid Paramphiascella fulvofasciata: importance of the food source. Mar Biol 156:469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Troch M, Cnudde C, Willems A, Moens T, Vanreusel A (2010) Bacterial colonization on fecal pellets of harpacticoid copepods and on their diatom food. Microb Ecol 60:581–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Troch M, Boeckx P, Cnudde C, Van Gansbeke D, Vanreusel A, Vincx M, Caramujo MJ (2012) Bioconversion of fatty acids at the basis of marine food webs: insights from a compound-specific stable isotope analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 465:53–67Google Scholar
  19. Decho AW (1986) Water-cover influences on diatom ingestion rates by meiobenthic copepods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 33:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Decho AW, Castenholz RW (1986) Spatial patterns and feeding of meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods in relation to resident microbial-flora. Hydrobiologia 131:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Desvilettes C, Bourdier G, Breton JC (1997) On the occurrence of a possible bioconversion of linolenic acid into docosahexaenoic acid by the copepod Eucyclops serrulatus fed on microalgae. J Plankton Res 19:273–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eder K (1995) Gas-chromatographic analysis of fatty-acid methyl-esters. J Chromatogr B-Biomed Appl 671:113–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Epstein SS (1997) Microbial food webs in marine sediments.I. Trophic interactions and grazing rates in two tidal flat communities. Microb Ecol 34:188–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Epstein SS, Shiaris MP (1992) Rates of microbenthic and meiobenthic bacterivory in a temperate muddy tidal flat community. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:2426–2431Google Scholar
  25. Fujiwara M, Highsmith RC (1997) Harpacticoid copepods: potential link between inbound adult salmon and outbound juvenile salmon. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 158:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Galvan K, Fleeger JW, Fry B (2008) Stable isotope addition reveals dietary importance of phytoplankton and microphytobenthos to saltmarsh infauna. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 359:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Griebler C, Mindl B, Slezak D (2001) Combining DAPI and SYBR Green II for the enumeration of total bacterial numbers in aquatic sediments. Int Rev Hydrobiol 86:453–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guckert JB, Antworth CP, Nichols PD, White DC (1985) Phospholipid, ester-linked fatty-acid profiles as reproducible assays for changes in prokaryotic community structure of estuarine sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 31:147–158Google Scholar
  29. Guillard RL (1975) Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In: Smith WL, Chandley MH (eds) Culture of marine invertebrate animals. Plenum Press, New York, pp 26–60Google Scholar
  30. Hicks GRF (1977) Observations on substrate preference of marine phytal harpacticoids (Copepoda). Hydrobiologia 56:7–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hicks GFR, Coull BC (1983) The ecology of marine meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 21:67–175Google Scholar
  32. Hicks GRF, Grahame J (1979) Mucus production and its role in the feeding-behavior of Diarthrodes nobilis (Copepoda, Harpacticoida). J Mar Biol Assoc U K 59:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hondeveld BJM, Bak RPM, Vanduyl FC (1992) Bacterivory by heterotrophic nanoflagellates in marine sediments measured by uptake of fluorescently labeled bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 89:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huys R, Gee JM, Moore GC, Hamond R (1996) Marine and brackish water harpacticoid copepods. Part 1 Keys and notes for identification of the species. In: Barnes RSK and Crothers JH (eds.) Synopses of the Britain Fauna (New Series) no. 51. Field Studies Council, ShrewsburyGoogle Scholar
  35. Kelly JR, Scheibling RE (2012) Fatty acids as dietary tracers in benthic food webs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 446:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kemp PF (1988) Bacterivory by benthic ciliates—significance as a carbon source and impact on sediment bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 49:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lang K (1948) Monographie der Harpacticiden. Håkan Ohlssons Boktryckeri, LundGoogle Scholar
  38. Leduc D, Probert PK, Duncan A (2009) A multi-method approach for identifying meiofaunal trophic connections. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 383:95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leroy F, Riera P, Jeanthon C, Edmond F, Leroux C, Comtet T (2012) Importance of bacterivory and preferential selection toward diatoms in larvae of Crepidula fornicata (L.) assessed by a dual stable isotope (13C, 15N) labeling approach. J Sea Res 70:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ling SC, Alldredge AL (2003) Does the marine copepod Calanus pacificus consume transparent exopolymer particles (TEP)? J Plankton Res 25:507–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marcotte BM (1977) An introduction to the architecture and kinematics of harpacticoid (Copepoda) feeding: Tisbe furcata (Baird, 1837). Mikrofauna des Meeresbodens 61:183–196Google Scholar
  42. McCall JN (1992) Source of harpacticoid copepods in the diet of juvenile starry flounder. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 86:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Michels J, Schnack-Schiel SB (2005) Feeding in dominant antarctic copepods—does the morphology of the mandibular gnathobases relate to diet? Mar Biol 146:483–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Middelburg JJ, Barranguet C, Boschker HTS, Herman PMJ, Moens T, Heip CHR (2000) The fate of intertidal microphytobenthos carbon: an in situ 13C-labeling study. Limnol Oceanogr 45:1224–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moens T, Verbeeck L, de Maeyer A, Swings J, Vincx M (1999a) Selective attraction of marine bacterivorous nematodes to their bacterial food. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 176:165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moens T, Verbeeck L, Vincx M (1999b) Preservation and incubation time-induced bias in tracer-aided grazing studies on meiofauna. Mar Biol 133:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moens T, Luyten C, Middelburg JJ, Herman PMJ, Vincx M (2002) Tracing organic matter sources of estuarine tidal flat nematodes with stable carbon isotopes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 234:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moens T, Bouillon S, Gallucci F (2005a) Dual stable isotope abundances unravel trophic position of estuarine nematodes. J Mar Biol Assoc U K 85:1401–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moens T, dos Santos GAP, Thompson F, Swings J, Fonseca-Genevois V, Vincx M, De Mesel I (2005b) Do nematode mucus secretions affect bacterial growth? Aquat Microb Ecol 40:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Montagna PA, Blanchard GF, Dinet A (1995) Effect of production and biomass of intertidal microphytobenthos on meiofaunal grazing rates. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 185:149–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nehring S (1993) Tube-dwelling meiofauna in marine-sediments. Int Rev Gesamten Hydrobiol 78:521–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pascal PY, Dupuy C, Richard P, Mallet C, Armynot du Chatelet E, Niquil N (2009) Seasonal variation in consumption of benthic bacteria by meio- and macrofauna in an intertidal mudflat. Limnol Oceanogr 54:1048–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pasternak A, Hagen W, Kattner G, Michels J, Graeve M, Schnack-Schiel SB (2009) Lipid dynamics and feeding of dominant antarctic calanoid copepods in the eastern Weddell Sea in December. Polar Biol 32:1597–1606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Perlmutter DG, Meyer JL (1991) The impact of a stream-dwelling harpacticoid copepod upon detritally associated bacteria. Ecology 72:2170–2180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pinckney JL, Carman KR, Lumsden SE, Hymel SN (2003) Microalgal-meiofaunal trophic relationships in muddy intertidal estuarine sediments. Aquat Microb Ecol 31:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Porter KG, Feig YS (1980) The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora. Limnol Oceanogr 25:943–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL
  58. Rajkumar M, Vasagam KPK (2006) Suitability of the copepod, Acartia clausi as a live feed for seabass larvae (Lates calcarifer Bloch):compared to traditional live-food organisms with special emphasis on the nutritional value. Aquaculture 261:649–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Riemann F, Helmke E (2002) Symbiotic relations of sediment-agglutinating nematodes and bacteria in detrital habitats: the enzyme-sharing concept. Mar Ecol 23:93–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rieper M (1978) Bacteria as food for marine harpacticoid copepods. Mar Biol 45:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rieper M (1982) Feeding preferences of marine harpacticoid copepods for various species of bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 7:303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Roff JC, Turner JT, Webber MK, Hopcroft RR (1995) Bacterivory by tropical copepod nauplii—extent and possible significance. Aquat Microb Ecol 9:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Santos PJP, Castel J, Souza-Santos LP (1995) Microphytobenthic patches and their influence on meiofaunal distribution. Cah Biol Mar 36:133–139Google Scholar
  64. Santos PJP, Souza-Santos LP, Castel J (2003) Population dynamics of Nannopus palustris (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) in the oligo-mesohaline area of the Gironde estuary (France). Cah Biol Mar 44:329–338Google Scholar
  65. Sapp M, Gerdts G, Wellinger M, Wichels A (2008) Consuming algal products: trophic interactions of bacteria and a diatom species determined by RNA stable isotope probing. Helgol Mar Res 62:283–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schmidt JL, Deming JW, Jumars PA, Keil RG (1998) Constancy of bacterial abundance in surficial marine sediments. Limnol Oceanogr 43:976–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Seifried S, Durbaum J (2000) First clear case of carnivory in marine Copepoda Harpacticoida. J Nat Hist 34:1595–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Souza-Santos LP, Castel J, Santos PJP (1996) The role of phototrophic sulfur bacteria as food for meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods inhabiting eutrophic coastal lagoons. Hydrobiologia 329:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Souza-Santos LP, Santos PJP, Castel J (1999) Development and population dynamics of Amonardia normani Brady reared on axenic and non-axenic diatoms. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 235:167–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tang KW, Hutalle KML, Grossart H-P (2006) Microbial abundance, composition and enzymatic activity during decomposition of copepod carcasses. Aquat Microb Ecol 45:219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Turner JT, Tester PA (1992) Zooplankton feeding ecology—bacterivory by metazoan microzooplankton. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 160:149–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van Oevelen D, Middelburg JJ, Soetaert K, Moodley L (2006) The fate of bacterial carbon in sediments: modeling an in situ isotope tracer experiment. Limnol Oceanogr 51:1302–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vandenberghe W, Bergmans M (1981) Differential food preferences in 3 co-occurring species of Tisbe (Copepoda, Harpacticoida). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 4:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Veloza AJ, Fu-Lin E, Tang KW (2006) Trophic modification of essential fatty acids by heterotrophic protists and its effect on the fatty acid composition of the copepod Acartia tonsa. Mar Biol 148:779–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Williams JL, Biesiot PM (2004) Lipids and fatty acids of the benthic marine harpacticoid copepod Heteropsyllus nunni Coull during diapause: a contrast to pelagic copepods. Mar Biol 144:335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Williams-Howze J, Fleeger JW (1987) Pore pattern: a possible indicator of tube-building in Stenhelia and Pseudostenhelia (Copepoda: Harpacticoida). J Crustac Biol 7:148–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clio Cnudde
    • 1
  • Tom Moens
    • 1
  • Anne Willems
    • 2
  • Marleen De Troch
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology Department, Marine BiologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Laboratory for MicrobiologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations