Marine Biology

, Volume 159, Issue 10, pp 2117–2126 | Cite as

Natal site and offshore swimming influence fitness and long-distance ocean transport in young sea turtles

  • Nathan F. Putman
  • Rebecca Scott
  • Philippe Verley
  • Robert Marsh
  • Graeme C. Hays
Original Paper


Although long-distance transport of marine organisms is constrained by numerous oceanic and biological factors, some species have evolved life-histories reliant on such movements. We examine the factors that promote long-distance transport in a transoceanic migrant, young loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta), from the southeastern U.S. Empirical data from near-surface buoys and simulations in two ocean circulation models indicated that passive drifters are often retained for long periods shoreward of oceanic fronts that delineate coastal and offshore waters. Further simulations revealed that offshore swimming aided newly hatched turtles in moving past fronts and increased turtles’ probability of survival, reaching distant foraging grounds, and encountering favorable temperatures. Swimming was most beneficial in regions that were more favorable under scenarios assuming passive drift. These results have broad implications for understanding the movement processes of many marine species, highlighting likely retention of more planktonic species and potential for dispersal in more nektonic species.



NFP, GCH, and RS conceived the project. PV developed ICHTHYOP software, NFP ran the HYCOM simulations, and RS and RM calculated the NEMO trajectories. NFP and RS analyzed the data, NFP wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors. NFP was supported by NCSU’s Initiative for Biological Complexity and a Journal of Experimental Biology travel fellowship. RS was funded through a PhD studentship awarded to GCH from the Natural Environment Research Council. GCH was supported by grants from the Natural Environmental Research Council, The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and the Climate Change Consortium for Wales (C3W).


  1. Aretxabaleta A, Nelson JR, Blanton JO, Seim HE, Werner FE, Bane JM, Weisberg R (2006) Cold event in the South Atlantic Bight during summer of 2003: anomalous hydrographic and atmospheric conditions. Marine Sci Fac Publ Paper 133:17Google Scholar
  2. Azumaya T, Ishida Y (2004) An evaluation of the potential influences of SST and currents on the oceanic migration of juvenile and immature chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) by a simulation model. Fish Oceanogr 13:10–23Google Scholar
  3. Bane JM, Dewar WK (1988) Gulf Stream bimodality and variability downstream of the Charleston Bump. J Geophys Res 93:6695–6710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belkin IM, Cornillon PC, Sherman K (2009) Fronts in large marine ecosystems. Prog Oceanogr 81:223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleck R (2002) An oceanic general circulation model framed in hybrid isopycnic cartesian coordinates. Ocean Model 4:55–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumenthal JM, Abreu-Grobois FA, Austin TJ, Broderick AC, Bruford MW, Coyne MS, Ebanks-Petrie G, Formia A, Meylan PA, Meylan AB, Godley BJ (2009) Turtle groups or turtle soup: dispersal patterns of hawksbill turtles in the Caribbean. Mol Ecol 18:4841–4853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowen BW, Abreu-Grobois FA, Balazs GH, Kamezaki N, Limpus CJ, Ferl RJ (1995) Trans-Pacific migrations of the loggerhead sea turtle demonstrated with mitochondrial DNA markers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:3731–3734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyle MC, FitzSimmons NN, Limpus CJ, Kelez S, Velez-Zuazo X, Waycott M (2009) Evidence for transoceanic migrations by loggerhead sea turtles in the southern Pacific Ocean. Proc Royal Soc B 276:1993–1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr AF (1987) New perspectives on the pelagic stage of sea turtle development. Conserv Biol 1:103–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chassignet EP, Hurlburt HE, Smedstad OM, Halliwell GR, Hogan PJ, Wallcraft AJ, Baraille R, Bleck R (2007) The HYCOM (HYbrind Coordinate Ocean Model) data assimilative system. J Mar Syst 65:60–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke J, Kerry K, Fowler C, Lawless R, Eberhard S, Murphy R (2003) Post-fledgling and winter migration of Adélie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae in the Mawson region of East Antarctica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 248:267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collard SB, Ogren LH (1990) Dispersal scenarios for pelagic post-hatchling sea turtles. Bull Mar Sci 47:233–243Google Scholar
  13. Cowen RK, Sponaugle S (2009) Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. Ann Rev Marine Sci 1:443–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowen RK, Paris CB, Srinivasan A (2006) Scales of connectivity in marine populations. Science 311:522–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davenport J (1997) Temperature and the life-history strategies of sea turtles. J Therm Biol 22:479–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards KP, Hare JA, Werner FE, Blanton BO (2006) Lagrangian circulation on the southeast US Continental Shelf: implications for larval dispersal and retention. Cont Shelf Res 26:1375–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hare JA, Walsh HJ (2007) Planktonic linkages among marine protected areas on the south Florida and southeast United States continental shelves. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:1234–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hare JA, Churchill JH, Cowen RK, Berger TJ, Cornillon PC, Dragos P, Glenn SM, Govoni JJ, Lee TN (2002) Routes and rates of larval fish transport from the southeast to the northeast United States continental shelf. Limnol Oceanogr 47:1774–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hays GC, Fossette S, Kastelidis KA, Mariani P, Schofield G (2010) Ontogenetic development of migration: lagrangian drift trajectories suggest a new paradigm for sea turtles. J R Soc Interface 7:1319–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. He R, Weisberg RH (2002) Tides on the west Florida shelf. J Phys Oceanogr 32:3455–3473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. He R, Weisberg RH (2003) A Loop Current intrusion case study on the west Florida Shelf. J Phys Oceanogr 33:465–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill AE (1991) A mechanism for horizontal zooplankton transport by vertical migration in tidal currents. Mar Biol 111:485–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hyun KH, He R (2010) Coastal upwelling in the South Atlantic Bight: a revisit of the 2003 cold event using long term observations and model hindcast solutions. J Mar Syst 83:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kraemer JE, Bennett SH (1981) Utilization of posthatchling yolk in loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta). Copeia 1981:406–411Google Scholar
  25. Largier J (2003) Considerations in estimating larval dispersal distances from oceanographic data. Ecol Appl 13:S71–S89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lett C, Verley P, Mullon P, Parada C, Brochier T, Penven P, Blanke B (2008) A Lagrangian tool for modelling ichthyoplankton dynamics. Environ Model Softw 23:1210–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lohmann KJ, Lohmann CMF (2003) Orientation mechanisms in hatchling sea turtles. In: Bolten AB, Witherington BE (eds) Loggerhead sea turtles. Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  28. Luiz OJ, Madin JS, Robertson DR, Rocha LA, Wirtz P, Floeter SR (2011) Ecological traits influencing range expansion across large oceanic dispersal barriers: insights from tropical Atlantic reef fishes. Proc Royal Soc B 279:1033–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Madec G (2008) “NEMO ocean engine”. Note du Pole de modélisation, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL), France, No 27 ISSN No 1288–1619Google Scholar
  30. Mansfield KL, Saba VS, Keinath J, Musick JA (2009) Satellite telemetry reveals a dichotomy in migration strategies among juvenile loggerhead sea turtles in the northwest Atlantic. Mar Biol 156:2555–2570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nathan R, Getz WM, Revilla E, Holyoak M, Kadmon R, Saltz D, Smouse PE (2008) A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19052–19059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Hara J (1980) Thermal influences on the swimming speed of loggerhead turtle hatchlings. Copeia 1980:773–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ohlmann JC, Niiler PP (2005) Circulation over the continental shelf in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Prog Oceanogr 64:45–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Putman NF, Bane JM, Lohmann KJ (2010a) Sea turtle nesting distributions and oceanographic constraints on hatchling migration. Proc Royal Soc B 277:3631–3637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Putman NF, Shay TJ, Lohmann KJ (2010b) Is the geographic distribution of nesting in the Kemp’s ridley turtle shaped by the migratory needs of offspring? Integr Comp Biol 50:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Putman NF, Verley P, Shay TJ, Lohmann KJ (2012) Simulating transoceanic migrations of young loggerhead sea turtles: merging magnetic navigation behavior with an ocean circulation model. J Exp Biol 215:1863–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Salmon M, Wyneken J (1987) Orientation and swimming behavior of hatchling loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta L. during their offshore migration. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 109:137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Savidge DK, Bane JM (2001) Wind and Gulf Stream influences on along-shelf transport and off-shelf export at Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. J Geophys Res 106:505–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scott R, Marsh R, Hays GC (2012) A little movement orientated to the geomagnetic field makes a big difference in strong flows. Mar Biol 59:481–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shillinger GL, Di Lorenzo E, Luo H, Bograd SJ, Hazen EL, Bailey H, Spotilla JR (2012) On the dispersal of leatherback turtle hatchlings from Mesoamerican nesting beaches. Proc Royal Soc B 279:2391–2395Google Scholar
  41. Sponaugle S, Lee T, Kourafalou V, Pinkard D (2005) Florida current frontal eddies and the settlement of coral reef fishes. Limnol Oceanogr 50:1033–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Staaterman E, Paris CB, Helgers J (2012) Orientation behavior in fish larvae: a missing piece to Hjort’s critical period hypothesis. J Theor Biol 304:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tester PA, Steidinger KA (1997) Gymnodinum breve red tide blooms: initiation, transport and consequences of surface circulation. Limnol Oceanogr 42:1039–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Whelan CI, Wyneken J (2007) Estimating predation levels and site-specific survival of hatchling loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) from south Florida beaches. Copeia 2007:745–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Witherington BE (1991) Orientation of hatchling loggerhead turtles at sea off artificially lighted and dark beaches. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 149:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Witherington BE (2002) Ecology of neonate loggerhead turtles inhabiting lines of downwelling near a Gulf Stream front. Mar Biol 140:843–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wyneken J, Salmo M (1992) Frenzy and postfrenzy activity in loggerhead, green, and leatherback hatchling sea turtles. Copeia 1992:478–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wyneken J, Madrak SV, Salmon M, Foote J (2008) Migratory activity by hatchling loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta L.): evidence for divergence between nesting groups. Mar Biol 156:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang H, Weisberg RH, Niiler PP, Sturges W, Johnson W (1999) Lagrangian circulation and forbidden zone on the West Florida Shelf. Cont Shelf Res 19:1221–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathan F. Putman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rebecca Scott
    • 3
  • Philippe Verley
    • 4
    • 5
  • Robert Marsh
    • 6
  • Graeme C. Hays
    • 3
  1. 1.Initiative for Biological ComplexityNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biosciences, College of ScienceSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
  4. 4.Laboratoire de Physique des Océans, UMR 6523 CNRS-Ifremer-IRD-UBOUFR Sciences et Techniques CS 93837Brest Cedex 3France
  5. 5.Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMR 212 EMECentre de Recherche Halieutique Méditerranéenne et TropicaleSète cedexFrance
  6. 6.Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, SouthamptonUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations